In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance &ndash\; Series III
\nA series of interviews with contributors to The Philosophy of Money and Finance (Hardcover\, OUP 2024\; Paperback\, fall 2025)
\nSchedule
\n"Bitcoins Left and Right: A Normative Assessment of a Digital Currency"
Authors: Lars Lindblom and Joakim Sandberg
Interviewer: Violet Victoria
Date and Time: October 6\, 2026\, 12 pm EST (18:00 CET)
[Thi is the final interview in the series. Recordings of prior interviews can be found on Phinance.]
ORGANIZER;CN=Lisa Warenski;CN=Emiliano Ippoliti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20251028T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Bucharest:20260930T170000 SUMMARY:DFT-CELFIS research seminar\, University of Bucharest UID:20260918T174030Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Bucharest LOCATION:Splaiul Independenţei nr. 204\, Bucharest\, Romania\, 060024 DESCRIPTION:We're delighted to invite you to the research seminar of the Department of Theoretical Philosophy at the University of Bucharest. These are organized in partnership with CELFIS\, the Center for Logic\, Philosophy and History of Science at UB. Here are talks scheduled so far:
\nFall 2025:
\nOctober 28\, 5pm: Alexandru Dragomir &\; Andrei Mărăşoiu (University of Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, "The Inconstant Moral Expert: the case of LLMs"
\nNovember 25\, 4pm: Nicholas Rimell (Chinese University of Hong Kong\, hybrid via Zoom)\, "A Metaphysics of Despair"
\nNovember 28\, 2pm: Micah Thomas Pimaro\, Jr. (University of Calabar\, \;f2f)\, "Placide Tempels&rsquo\;s Metaphysics: A challenge or a trap for African philosophy?"
\nDecember 2\, 3pm: Nora Grigore (Romanian Academy\, Institute of Philosophy and Psychology\, f2f)\, "Worthiness and Expediency: a Distinction without a Difference?"
\nDecember 19\, 2pm: Alin Olteanu (Shanghai International Studies University\, ICUB\, \;f2f)\, "Iconic Imagination in Modeling: A Semiotic Approach to Scientific Inquiry"
\nJanuary 16\, 2pm: Marco Facchin (University of Antwerp\, hybrid via Zoom)\, \;"Is mental content an illusion?" \;
\nJanuary 22\, 12pm: Sandra Brâ\;nzaru (University of Bucharest\, CELFIS\, FPSE\, \;f2f)\, "Conceptualising Empathy"
\nFebruary 10\, 4pm: Marian Călborean (OPTI Software &\; University of Bucharest\, f2f)\, "The minimal ontology of time" \;
\nSpring 2026:
\nMarch 27\, 2pm: Erik Myin (University of Antwerp\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, &ldquo\;Of a Different Mind&rdquo\;
\nMarch 30: \;Mariona Eiren Miyata-Sturm (University of Oxford\, f2f)\, &ldquo\;The metacognitive account of aesthetics in science&rdquo\;
\nApril 3: \;René\; \;van Woudenberg (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, "Are LLMs Authors?"
\nMay 11\, 12pm: Gheorge Ştefanov (U. Bucharest\, f2f)\; "Ce nu pot vedea neuroștiințele? &mdash\; \;Gramatica \;libertății: Wittgenstein\, Anscombe și critica determinismului tare"
\nMay 13\, 3pm: Andrei Moldovan (U. Salamanca\, f2f)\, \;&ldquo\;Between Independence and Guidance: A Dilemma for Intellectual Autonomy&rdquo\;
\nMay 19\, 10am: Daian Bica (Heinrich Heine University\, \;hybrid \;via Zoom)\, \;''How to Tame &lsquo\;Abundance&rsquo\;? Roman Frigg&rsquo\;s User Manual''
\nJune 5\, 2pm: Paula Tomi (National University of Science and Technology 'Politehnica' Bucharest\, \;f2f)\, &ldquo\;LLMs and truth pluralism&rdquo\;
\nJune 15\, 6.45pm: Ioan Muntean (UT Rio Grande Valley\, UI Urbana\, \;f2f)\, "Reflective equilibrium and scientific progress"
\nPrevious events \;in the series are available at: \;
\n2021-22: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/93365 \;
\n2022-23: \;https://philevents.org/event/show/105249 \;
\nhttps://filosofie.unibuc.ro/category/seminar-cercetare-dft/ \;
\nhttps://icub.unibuc.ro/2022/06/14/workshop-semantic-cognition-and-truth/ \;
\nFor those of you who would like to join some of the meetings but have overlapping commitments\, we will do our best to record the meetings whenever everyone in attendance consents to it\, and to then upload the recordings on the Department's YouTube channel. Previous talks are available here:
\nhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOgUq3dN8CXI4L6DhZT1f_Q
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrei Mărăşoiu": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260218T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T170000 SUMMARY:Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series 2026 UID:20260918T174031Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:I am excited to share that the \;Reconstructing Carnap Webinar Series \;will resume in \;February 2026! Please find the official flyer attached. All talks will take place from \;4:30 PM to 6:30 PM CET \;(10:30 AM&ndash\;12:30 PM EST).
The webinar can be accessed via the following link: https://meet.google.com/uaq-jqpf-mwr
Schedule of speakers:
The series is organized in collaboration with \;Carnap in Context IV \;(Ö\;AW\, FWF Grant PAT7905424) and \;Rudolf Carnap Digital \;(MCMP\, LMU Munich). \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Caterina Del Sordo;CN=Luca Oliva;CN=Silvano Zipoli Caiani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261117T170000 SUMMARY:Wittgenstein's Lecture on Ethics: Online Lecture Series UID:20260918T174032Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:&Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Alpha\;&lambda\;έ&xi\;&eta\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;έ&alpha\; &theta\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &rho\;&iota\;&zeta\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &nu\;&omicron\;ή&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;. &Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &pi\;&upsilon\;&rho\;ή&nu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&omicron\;&pi\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &beta\;&rho\;ί&sigma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; έ&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;-&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&omicron\;ύ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &chi\;&omega\;&rho\;ί&sigmaf\; &nu\;&alpha\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;ώ&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omicron\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&omicron\;&mu\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &Mu\;&eta\;-&Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; έ&nu\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&rho\;&omicron\;&phi\;ά &tau\;&omicron\; ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &omicron\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&alpha\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&tau\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&chi\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &chi\;&rho\;ό&nu\;&omicron\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;ύ&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&psi\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &Sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&Gamma\;έ&nu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ώ&nu\; &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&epsilon\;&omega\;&nu\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ά&theta\;&epsilon\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&eta\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&pi\;ί&delta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&beta\;&alpha\;ί&alpha\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&pi\;ό&rho\;&epsilon\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&lambda\;&omega\;&tau\;ί&nu\;&omicron\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Sigma\;&pi\;&iota\;&nu\;ό&zeta\;&alpha\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;έ&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;-&alpha\;&nu\;ή&kappa\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;ώ&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Chi\;ά&iota\;&nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&epsilon\;&rho\;\, &tau\;&eta\; «\;&sigma\;ά&rho\;&kappa\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;»\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Merleau-Ponty &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Whitehead.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&pi\;&tau\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &Mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&phi\;&omega\;&nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;ά&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&chi\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ώ&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &omega\;&sigmaf\; &eta\; ί&delta\;&iota\;&alpha\; &eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&rho\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &pi\;&eta\;&gamma\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&chi\;έ&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;ύ&sigma\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Pi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ό&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&eta\;&delta\;έ&nu\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&tau\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, έ&nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &beta\;ά&theta\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&omicron\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&omicron\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &Pi\;ά&nu\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&chi\;ή&sigmaf\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;έ&rho\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &epsilon\;&nu\;ώ &tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ή &alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&xi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;ί&omicron\; &Delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &Alpha\;&beta\;&epsilon\;&beta\;&alpha\;&iota\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &eta\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &mu\;ή&tau\;&rho\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;\, &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Tau\;ά&xi\;&eta\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omega\;&rho\;&iota\;&nu\;ή &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &gamma\;&iota\;&alpha\; &nu\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&psi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;ά&lambda\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&upsilon\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &kappa\;ύ&kappa\;&lambda\;&omicron\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;ά &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &eta\;&rho\;&alpha\;&kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&rho\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\;\, &tau\;&omicron\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &chi\;ά&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;ί&tau\;&sigma\;&epsilon\;\, &tau\;&eta\; &zeta\;&omega\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &omicron\;&rho\;&mu\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&sigma\;ό&nu\;\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Nu\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;έ&zeta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&gamma\;&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&omicron\;&rho\;&gamma\;ά&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Pi\;&rho\;ί&gamma\;&kappa\;&omicron\;&zeta\;&iota\;&nu\;.
\n&Mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ή &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, &omicron\; &Kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&eta\;&chi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;-&pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &zeta\;&omega\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&nu\;ή &rho\;&omicron\;ή ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\; &gamma\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&phi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;&omicron\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\; &eta\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\; &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&epsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&omicron\;&pi\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; &kappa\;έ&nu\;&tau\;&rho\;&omicron\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\; &Beta\;&iota\;&omega\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ώ&sigmaf\; &epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &epsilon\;&mu\;&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&mu\;&mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &rho\;&upsilon\;&theta\;&mu\;ό &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &kappa\;ό&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &epsilon\;&mu\;&phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;ί&zeta\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &eta\; &Upsilon\;&pi\;έ&rho\;&beta\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &Gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;ώ&sigmaf\; &eta\; &alpha\;&lambda\;ή&theta\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &mu\;&pi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&epsilon\;ί &nu\;&alpha\; &pi\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&epsilon\; &omicron\;&rho\;&iota\;&sigma\;&mu\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &delta\;ό&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; ά&mu\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&alpha\;ί&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Sigma\;&omega\;&kappa\;&rho\;ά&tau\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &Sigma\;&tau\;&omega\;&iota\;&kappa\;&omicron\;ύ&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &tau\;έ&chi\;&nu\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &beta\;ί&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Zeta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &mu\;&eta\;-&epsilon\;&nu\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Wittgenstein &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Heidegger ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &pi\;&lambda\;&eta\;&sigma\;&iota\;ά&zeta\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;. &Eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &epsilon\;&pi\;&omicron\;&mu\;έ&nu\;&omega\;&sigmaf\;\, &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&gamma\;&kappa\;&rho\;&omicron\;&tau\;&epsilon\;ί &kappa\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&sigma\;&tau\;ό &sigma\;ύ&sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&mu\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ό &Omicron\;&rho\;ί&zeta\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&rho\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&omicron\; Ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&omicron\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &Kappa\;&alpha\;&theta\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &Epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;/&Pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&delta\;ή &mu\;&iota\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &epsilon\;&kappa\;&delta\;&eta\;&lambda\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &alpha\;&pi\;ό &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&phi\;&omicron\;&rho\;&omicron\;&pi\;&omicron\;ί&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &gamma\;&epsilon\;&gamma\;&omicron\;&nu\;ό&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&delta\;έ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;&epsilon\; &tau\;&eta\; &sigma\;ύ&mu\;&pi\;&tau\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\;&theta\;έ&tau\;&omega\;&nu\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; &Nu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&lambda\;&alpha\;&omicron\; &Kappa\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&zeta\;&alpha\;&nu\;ό\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&xi\;&epsilon\;&lambda\;&iota\;&kappa\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Teilhard de \;Chardin\, &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;ύ&pi\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&kappa\;&eta\; &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Morin\, &tau\;&eta\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &theta\;έ&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Castoriadis &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Deleuze.
\n&Sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &beta\;&alpha\;&theta\;ύ&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&omicron\; &epsilon\;&pi\;ί&pi\;&epsilon\;&delta\;&omicron\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &omicron\;&delta\;&eta\;&gamma\;&epsilon\;ί &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\; &Sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;&eta\;&lambda\;ή &Epsilon\;&pi\;ί&gamma\;&nu\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;&epsilon\;&nu\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&lambda\;έ&omicron\;&nu\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&upsilon\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &alpha\;&lambda\;&lambda\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&chi\;&alpha\;&sigma\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; &Mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &epsilon\;&delta\;ώ &eta\; &phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&tau\;&rho\;έ&pi\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&tau\;ά&sigma\;&eta\; &delta\;έ&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&pi\;έ&nu\;&alpha\;&nu\;&tau\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&rho\;&rho\;&eta\;&tau\;&omicron\;\, ό&pi\;&omega\;&sigmaf\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Pascal &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &lambda\;ό&gamma\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&sigmaf\;\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Meister Eckhart &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &epsilon\;&sigma\;&omega\;&tau\;&epsilon\;&rho\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&iota\;&omega\;&pi\;ή\, &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Levinas &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; Ά&lambda\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\;&nu\; Blanchot &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&omicron\; ό&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &gamma\;&lambda\;ώ&sigma\;&sigma\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\;. Έ&tau\;&sigma\;&iota\;\, &eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;-&phi\;&iota\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &sigma\;&kappa\;έ&psi\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Kappa\;&alpha\;&rho\;&pi\;&omicron\;ύ&zeta\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &alpha\;&nu\;&alpha\;&delta\;ύ&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&omicron\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή&sigmaf\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;ό&rho\;&phi\;&omega\;&sigma\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &tau\;&alpha\;&upsilon\;&tau\;ό&chi\;&rho\;&omicron\;&nu\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &upsilon\;&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ό&sigmaf\; &tau\;&rho\;ό&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &zeta\;&omega\;ή&sigmaf\;\, ό&pi\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &eta\; &pi\;&rho\;&alpha\;&gamma\;&mu\;&alpha\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή\, &sigma\;&chi\;&epsilon\;&sigma\;&iota\;&alpha\;&kappa\;ή &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &pi\;&omicron\;&iota\;&eta\;&tau\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή\, &eta\; &gamma\;&nu\;ώ&sigma\;&eta\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&mu\;&omicron\;&rho\;&phi\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &sigma\;&epsilon\; &sigma\;&omicron\;&phi\;ί&alpha\;\, &eta\; &epsilon\;&nu\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &phi\;&alpha\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&rho\;ώ&nu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &pi\;&omicron\;&lambda\;&lambda\;&alpha\;&pi\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\;\, &kappa\;&alpha\;&iota\; &omicron\; ά&nu\;&theta\;&rho\;&omega\;&pi\;&omicron\;&sigmaf\; &kappa\;&alpha\;&lambda\;&epsilon\;ί&tau\;&alpha\;&iota\; &nu\;&alpha\; &mu\;&epsilon\;&tau\;έ&chi\;&epsilon\;&iota\; &sigma\;&upsilon\;&nu\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&delta\;&eta\;&tau\;ά &sigma\;&tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &kappa\;&omicron\;&sigma\;&mu\;&iota\;&kappa\;ή &delta\;&iota\;&alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;&kappa\;&alpha\;&sigma\;ί&alpha\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; &delta\;&eta\;&mu\;&iota\;&omicron\;&upsilon\;&rho\;&gamma\;ί&alpha\;&sigmaf\;\, &beta\;&iota\;ώ&nu\;&omicron\;&nu\;&tau\;&alpha\;&sigmaf\; &tau\;&eta\;&nu\; &Alpha\;&nu\;&omicron\;&iota\;&chi\;&tau\;ή &Omicron\;&lambda\;ό&tau\;&eta\;&tau\;&alpha\; &omega\;&sigmaf\; &alpha\;&delta\;&iota\;ά&kappa\;&omicron\;&pi\;&eta\; &kappa\;ί&nu\;&eta\;&sigma\;&eta\; &tau\;&omicron\;&upsilon\; &Epsilon\;ί&nu\;&alpha\;&iota\; &mu\;έ&sigma\;&alpha\; &sigma\;&tau\;&omicron\; ά&pi\;&epsilon\;&iota\;&rho\;&omicron\; &mu\;&upsilon\;&sigma\;&tau\;ή&rho\;&iota\;&omicron\; &tau\;&eta\;&sigmaf\; ύ&pi\;&alpha\;&rho\;&xi\;&eta\;&sigmaf\;.
ORGANIZER;CN=Abhijith Jose: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260429T210000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261126T170000 SUMMARY:Séminaire Arendt 2026 UID:20260918T174034Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Le Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone\, cré\;é\; en 2024\, vise à\; favoriser une synergie entre celles et ceux qui\, des amateurs aux chercheuses\, fré\;quentent la pensé\;e de Hannah Arendt. Dans cette optique\, nous cherchons à\; mettre en place un rendez-vous ré\;gulier pour en discuter les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects.
\nDu fait de l&rsquo\;é\;tendue de la francophonie\, ces sé\;minaires auront lieu en ligne. Leur principe sera le suivant : les participant-e-s auront tous et toutes pré\;alablement lu un article ou un chapitre ré\;cent\, lequel sera pré\;senté\; trè\;s rapidement par souci de prioriser les é\;changes (10 minutes) par son autrice ou auteur. À\; partir de celui-ci\, un-e membre du ré\;seau ouvrira (5 min) à\; un dé\;bat plus large afin de discuter\, outre l&rsquo\;article\, les diffé\;rents interpré\;tations et aspects de l&rsquo\;&oelig\;uvre d&rsquo\;Arendt (1h30).
\nProgramme 2026\nEn 2026\, nous proposons quatre sé\;ances ordinaires du sé\;minaire et une sé\;ance spé\;ciale : «\; Arendt et la science é\;conomique »\;\, «\; Arendt et le travail »\;\, «\; Liberté\;\, volonté\;\, politique »\;\, «\; Arendt et la violence »\;\, «\; Philosophie\, é\;ducation et politique »\;.
\nLe sé\;minaire est ouvert à\; toutes et tous sans inscription pré\;alable \; n&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas à\; venir y assister et y participer. Les articles et textes discuté\;s sont disponibles sur le site du RAF. N&rsquo\;hé\;sitez pas non plus à\; nous contacter pour toute demande d&rsquo\;information complé\;mentaire.
\nLe RAF ?\nLe Ré\;seau Arendtien Francophone (RAF) se veut un espace divers et pluriel\, rassemblant une communauté\; de doctorant-e-s\, enseignant-e-s\, chercheurs/ses\, intellectuel-le-s et toute personne inté\;ressé\;e ou engagé\;e dans l'é\;tude et la diffusion de la pensé\;e d'Hannah Arendt en France et le monde francophone. À\; travers cette plateforme\, nous souhaitons favoriser les é\;changes intellectuels\, offrir une visibilité\; accrue aux travaux de recherche et cré\;er des liens solides entre francophones s'inté\;ressant à\; et puisant dans l'&oelig\;uvre de cette autrice majeure du XXe siè\;cle.
\nOutre l&rsquo\;organisation de ce sé\;minaire et d'é\;vè\;nements acadé\;miques lié\;s à\; la pensé\;e d'Arendt\, le ré\;seau actualise continuellement un site web qui met à\; disposition : une bibliographie des textes de langue franç\;aise consacré\;s à\; Arendt ou la mobilisant\, un annuaire des membres du ré\;seau\, un agenda des activité\;s francophones qui lui sont dé\;dié\;es et une lettre d'information mensuelle.
\nN'hé\;sitez pas à\; rejoindre le ré\;seau ou à\; nous contacter pour rejoindre l&rsquo\;é\;quipe d&rsquo\;animation !
\n ORGANIZER;CN="Rémi Zanni": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260528T163000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260924T170000 SUMMARY:Inner Speech Colloquium UID:20260918T174035Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are happy to announce another season of the online Inner Speech colloquium starting next month\, with a new list of speakers: \;
\n- May 28th - Gary Lupyan (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
\n- June 25th - \;Kasia Jaszczolt (University of Cambridge)
\n- July 16th - \;Romain Bourdoncle (Collè\;ge de France) &\; Axel Baptista (Institut Jean Nicod)
\n- August 20th - Aleksandr Fadeev (University of Leuven)
\n- September 24th - Keith Frankish (University of Sheffield) \;
\nTimes are all 16:30 CEST
\nMore info about the first talk coming soon. We hope to see many of you there next month! For more information or to subscribe to the mailing list\, contact: jonida.kodra@uni-osnabrueck.de
\nBest regards\,
\nJonida Kodra\, Daniel Mü\;ller and Mathijs Geurts (University of Osnabrü\;ck and \;University of Salzburg)
ORGANIZER;CN=Jonida Kodra;CN=Mathijs Geurts;CN="Daniel Lennart Müller": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260604T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20261024T170000 SUMMARY:Stanley Cavell at 100. An International Centennial Conference UID:20260918T174036Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:Roma\; Paris\; Boston\, Italy DESCRIPTION:Stanley Cavell at 100 \; An International Centennial Conference \; \;
Paris: \;4-5 June 2026 \;| Organized by Sandra Laugier\, Université\; Paris 1 Panthé\;on Sorbonne \; Rome: 8-9 June 2026 \;| Organized by Piergiorgio Donatelli\, Sapienza Università\; di Roma \; Boston: 23-24 October 2026 \;| Organized by Juliet Floyd\, Boston University \; \; \;
In 2026\, we mark the centenary of \;Stanley Cavell (1926&ndash\;2026)\, one of the \;most original and wide-ranging American philosophers of the twentieth century. Cavell&rsquo\;s work traversed traditional disciplinary boundaries&mdash\;engaging deeply with philosophy\, literature\, film\, opera\, psychoanalysis\, politics\, and both American and European traditions of thought. In the spirit of his intellectual breadth and transnational sensibility\, we are organizing a three-part international conference to celebrate his life\, work\, and legacy in Paris\, Rome\, and Boston.
\nWhy This Conference Matters
\nStanley Cavell transformed philosophy into an act of acknowledgment&mdash\;of self\, of others\, and of the everyday. His writings on skepticism\, language\, film\, and the ordinary remain vital at a time when trust in both language and human connection faces renewed challenges. From \;Must We Mean What We Say? \;to \;The Claim of Reason\, from \;The World Viewed \;to \;Pursuits of Happiness\, and through his readings of Emerson and Thoreau\, Cavell helped redefine the scope and style of philosophical writing and teaching.
\nHis engagement with Wittgenstein and Austin reinvigorated the ordinary language tradition\, while his interests in modernism\, cinema\, and American transcendentalism forged a philosophical voice that responded to&mdash\;and often transcended&mdash\;the academic context.
\nThis centennial conference will bring together philosophers\, literary scholars\, and critics to reflect on Cavell&rsquo\;s legacy and extend the conversations he began.
\nThis call for papers concerns all three installments&mdash\;Paris\, Rome\, and Boston&mdash\;of the Cavell at 100 conference.
\nSuggested Themes:
\nWe welcome proposals that engage with the following themes or propose new directions for exploring Cavell&rsquo\;s thought.
\nConference Foci:
\nParis will focus especially on Ordinary Language Philosophy\, Film\, and Popular Culture.
\nRome will center mainly on Ethics\, Politics\, and Forms of Life.
\nBoston will treat primarily Philosophy and Literature\, Tragedy\, Music\, and the Idea of America.
\nSome themes&mdash\;such as skepticism\, modernism\, the ordinary&mdash\;cut across all three conferences.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260817T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261204T170000 SUMMARY:Fall 2026 Tulane German Philosophy Workshop Series UID:20260918T174037Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:New Orleans\, United States DESCRIPTION:The Tulane German Philosophy Workshop is based out of Tulane University&rsquo\;s Philosophy department. It is aimed at promoting the discussion of scholarship about the German philosophical tradition and the establishment of relations between philosophers and departments that focus on the German philosophical tradition. It welcomes scholars interested in the many ways to engage with this rich tradition and the specific projects and concerns of its many representatives&mdash\;from Leibniz to Wittgenstein\, Kant to Gadamer\, Hegel to Habermas&mdash\;as well as the reception of this tradition.
ORGANIZER;CN=Jeffrey Patrick Colgan;CN=Nicolas Day: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260901T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261215T170000 SUMMARY:Inquiry Network WIP Talks UID:20260918T174038Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Inquiry Network WIP Talks feature presentations of work in progress related to inquiry\, broadly understood. For example\, presentations might discuss (but are not limited to): the epistemology of inquiry\, the metaphysics of inquiry\, ethical norms of inquiry\, historical perspectives on inquiry\, or the structure of scientific inquiry.
We aim to foster the sharing of ideas in an inclusive\, welcoming and low-pressure environment. Papers that are already accepted for publication will not be accepted. We aim to be sensitive to the needs of early-career scholars.
The group meets biweekly on Zoom during each of the Fall and Spring semesters. Meeting times are determined shortly before the beginning of each semester with the goal of finding a time that works for as many members as possible. Special consideration is given to finding a meeting time that works for presenters of accepted papers.
Applications are open for Foundations and Frontiers of Analytical Sociology\, a doctoral-level course hosted by Institute for Analytical Sociology\, Linkö\;ping University. The course is organized around an international lecture series featuring many of the scholars who have shaped analytical sociology and continue to define its contemporary development.
\nConfirmed speakers include:
\nPeter Bearman\, Delia Baldassarri\, Elizabeth Bruch\, Damon Centola\, Diego Gambetta\, Peter Hedströ\;m\, Gianluca Manzo\, Michael Macy\, Arnout van de Rijt\, Duncan Watts\, and Petri Ylikoski.
\nThe course explores central questions concerning social mechanisms\, explanation\, social interaction\, networks\, diffusion\, collective action\, computational social science\, and the relationship between theory and empirical research. Particular attention is devoted to the role of mechanism-based explanations in the social sciences and to philosophical questions concerning explanation\, causation\, and social scientific inquiry.
\nThe lecture series is accompanied by readings and highly participatory seminars in which participants critically discuss the lectures\, the assigned literature\, and connections to their own research. The course culminates in an individual paper in which participants develop an independent analysis of a research question using the theories\, concepts\, and explanatory models discussed throughout the course. Participants are encouraged to connect this assignment directly to their doctoral projects.
\nThe course is open to doctoral students and researchers from sociology\, philosophy\, political science\, economics\, computational social science\, and related disciplines.
\nFor more information\, contact the course organizer and seminar leader \;Josef Ginnerskov at josef.ginnerskov(at)liu.se
\nSyllabus:
https://forskarstudier.liu.se/en/kurs/7FIEI26/2026V/1624499#syllabus
Registration:
https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/eFsbLUXnfk
SEMINAR DESCRIPTION
Anaximander&rsquo\;s fragment has been interpreted in various different ways. The young Nietzsche reads in it a &ldquo\;pessimism&rdquo\; comparable to that of Schopenhauer\, whereas Heidegger\, in his 1946 lecture series &ldquo\;The Anaximander Fragment\,&rdquo\; criticizes Nietzsche for projecting a moralistic sentiment onto the early Pre-Socratic. Anaximander&rsquo\;s fragment\, argues Heidegger\, is &ldquo\;neither pessimistic nor nihilistic\; nor is it optimistic. It is tragic.&rdquo\;
Although Heidegger&rsquo\;s critique is probably correct\, it is symptomatic of a more general critique against Nietzsche. In the chapter &ldquo\;The Concept of &lsquo\;Chaos&rsquo\;&rdquo\; in his great book on Nietzsche\, Heidegger asserts that Nietzsche&rsquo\;s conception of chaos is far off from the &ldquo\;original Greek meaning&rdquo\; of a yawning abyss as found in Hesiod. Nietzsche\, however\, seems way more interested in the pluralistic &ldquo\;Anaxagorian chaos\,&rdquo\; which he contrasts with the apeiron of Anaximander. Not to mention their shared interest in Heraclitus&mdash\;could not Heidegger&rsquo\;s defense of Anaximander in the first place be a hint at his perennial critique of Nietzsche&rsquo\;s &ldquo\;modern&rdquo\; thinking? And could not Nietzsche&rsquo\;s preference for Anaxagoras point at a wholly different picture\, where chaos can be freed of its &ldquo\;original Greek meaning&rdquo\;&mdash\;quite ironically\, already in the Pre-Socratics?
In this seminar\, we turn to the Greek origins of the term &lsquo\;chaos\,&rsquo\; contrasting an &ldquo\;abyssal&rdquo\; with a more creative reading. No prior knowledge is required. All key texts will be provided on registration.
TIME
5 SATURDAYS\, weekly\, beginning September 12\, 2026.
1-3 PM Eastern US Time.
SESSIONS
1) The Concept of Chaos: Heidegger contra Nietzsche
2) Nietzsche and the early Pre-Socratics
3) Anaximander&rsquo\;s Fragment
4) Anaxagoras&rsquo\; Fragments
5) Anaxagorian Chaos: Nietzsche contra Heidegger
FACILITATOR
Having lived and studied all around the world\, Hannes Schumacher works at the threshold between philosophy and art. He has carried out intensive research on Hegel and Deleuze\, and he has also published widely on Nishida\, Nāgārjuna\, chaos theory\, global mysticism\, and contemporary art. Hannes is the founder of the Berlin-based publisher Freigeist Verlag\, co-founder of the grassroots art space Chaosmos &infin\; in Athens\, Greece\, and he collaborates extensively with the literary translator Peter Constantine and World Poetry Books\, New York. He has facilitated the following courses and groups at Incite Seminars: &ldquo\;Nishida Kitarō: The Logic of Place and the Religious Worldview&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Who&rsquo\;s Afraid of Hegel: Introduction to G. W. F. Hegel&rsquo\;s Science of Logic&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Chaos Research Group&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Reading After Finitude by Quentin Meillassoux&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Deleuze &\; Guattari: What is Philosophy?&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Plato&rsquo\;s chô\;ra through the lens of Derrida&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;Anarchia and Archai: Reimagining the Pre-Socratics&rdquo\; (with Carlos A. Segovia)\; &ldquo\;Reading Nietzsche&rsquo\;s Zarathustra&rdquo\; (current)\; &ldquo\;Liana of the Resurrected&rdquo\;\; &ldquo\;The Body without Organs&rdquo\;\; and &ldquo\;Introduction to Chaos Theory.&rdquo\;
INCITE SEMINARS
We are a mix of rogue scholars\, disgruntled academics\, disenchanted buddhists\, enchantment-hungry anarchists\, radical therapists\, and general weirdos looking to create autonomous and accessible forms of &ldquo\;higher education.&rdquo\;
We offer online seminars and reading groups to incite personal exploration and inspire community action. Incite Seminars offers an educational experience. We do so by gathering an engaged group of participants for a dynamic exchange of ideas\, led by skilled facilitators. All of our facilitators have a deep relationship to a subject or topic through intensive study or practice.
Incite Seminars is a 100% member-supported learning community. We depend on member contributions to continue holding space for radical study and practice groups\, putting on rigorous seminars and courses\, and providing our facilitators and organizers with fair compensation. If you are unable to pay the full amount for a session or membership at this time\, we invite you to join us at reduced or no cost with our Solidarity option.
Program: \;
\nThursday (September 17)
\n10.00 Opening of the conference &ndash\; Anna Brożek\, Dariusz Łukasiewicz
\n10.15-11.00 Jan Woleński &ndash\; Concept of Analyticity in the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle (on-line)
\n11.00-11. 45 Peter Simons &ndash\; Logic in Metaphysics
\n11.45-12.15 Coffee break
\n12.15-13.00 Anna Brożek &ndash\; The Scope and Limitations of Formal Methods in Philosophy
\n13.00-13.45 Krzysztof Brzechczyn &ndash\; The Methodology of History of Philosophy in the Reflections of the Founders of the Lvov-Warsaw School
\n13.45-15.00 Lunch break
\n15.15-16.00 Marcin Tkaczyk &ndash\; Stoic Logic: A New Reconstruction
\n16.00-16.45 Aleksandra Horecka &\; Piotr Kamela &ndash\; The Reception of Frege and Wittgenstein in Lvov-Warsaw School
\n16.45-17.15 Coffee break
\n17.15-18.00 Janusz Maciaszek &ndash\; Notions of Rationality in Donald Davidson
\n18.00-18.45 Wojciech Rechlewicz &ndash\; G. E. Moore&rsquo\;s and K. Twardowski&rsquo\;s Theories of Judgment
\nFriday (September 18)
\n10.00-10.45 Tadeusz Szubka &\; Marcin Iwanicki &ndash\; Kazimierz Twardowski on Alethic Relativism: A Reappraisal
\n10.45-11.30 Kordula Świętorzecka &ndash\; On Some Connections Between Philosophy and Infinitary Logics
\n11.30-12.00 Coffee break
\n12.00-12.45 Joe Ulatowski &ndash\; truth\, Truth\, and &lsquo\;Truth&rsquo\;: On the Concept-Property Distinction in Dambska\, Kokoszyńska\, and Alston
\n12.45-13.30 Roman Murawski &ndash\; The Conception of Logic in the Cracow Circle: Salamucha\, Drewnowski\, Bocheński
\n13.30-15.00 Lunch break
\n15.00-15.45 Zuzana Rybarikova &ndash\; Łuszczewska-Romahnowa's Contribution to Logic
\n15.45-16.30 Janusz Kaczmarek &ndash\; Formalisation in Ontology. Examples &ndash\; the Ontologies of Wittgenstein\, Wolff and Ingarden
\n16.30-17.00 Coffee break
\n17.00-17.45 Marek Porwolik &ndash\; Some Remarks on the shortest axiom of the implicational calculus of propositions. Based on an archival document written by Jan Łukasiewicz (Nachlass Heinrich Scholz)
\n17.45-18.15 Krzysztof Nowicki &ndash\; On the assessment of the formalization of philosophical concepts: a methodological contribution
\n18.15-18.45 Aleksandra Gomułczak &ndash\; The Evolution of Twardowski&rsquo\;s Concept of Logic
\nSaturday (September 19) - Polish Day
\n10.00-10.45 Marek Lechniak &ndash\; Blaski i cienie stosowania idei wielowartościowości w analizie filozoficznej (Łukasiewicz\, Prior\, Belnap)
\n10.45-11.30 Marek Porwolik &ndash\; Koło Krakowskie\, czyli o polskich korzeniach teologii analitycznej
\n11.30-12.00 Coffee break
\n12.00-12.45 Marek Rembierz &ndash\; Logika nie tylko w filozofii w Szkole Lwowsko-Warszawskiej i innych filozoficznych tradycjach
\n12.45-13.30 Rafał Palczewski &ndash\; Kilka uwag o reprezentacji formalnej epistemicznej normy asercji
\n13.30-15.00 Lunch break
\n15.00-15.45 Wiesław Wó\;jcik &ndash\; Badania Zbigniewa Jordana (1911-1977) nad matematycznymi podstawami systemu Platona
\n15.45.16.30 Maciej Chlewicki &ndash\; Logika i bilokacja. Na marginesie rozważań J. Łukasiewicza o zasadzie sprzeczności
\n16.30-17.00 Ró\;ża Wojtczak &ndash\; Leonard Sławomir Rogowski i Logika Kierunkowa &ndash\; czyli o zapomnianym uczniu Tadeusza Czeżowskiego i jego systemie logicznym
\n17.00 Closing of the conference
\nOrganizers:
\nFaculty of Philosophy\, Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz
\nThe Lvov-Warsaw School Research Center\, University of Warsaw
\nComittee for Philosophical Disciplines\, Polish Academy of Sciences
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260917T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:The Inaugural International Society for Moral Psychology Conference UID:20260918T174042Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:616 Thurston Avenue\, Ithaca\, United States\, 14853 DESCRIPTION:We welcome submissions from various disciplines including but not limited to philosophy\, psychology\, linguistics\, neuroscience\, cognitive science\, medicine\, religion\, and law. Submissions will be refereed for quality and relevance to ISMP\, which aims to promote broader impacts of and participation in moral psychology around the world. We are especially interested in submissions of research on cross-cultural moral psychology and reports on cross-cultural moral psychology research collaborations.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260917T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Epistemische und argumentative Kompetenzen im Zeitalter multipler Wissenskrisen UID:20260918T174043Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Vienna LOCATION:Franziskanergasse 1\, Salzburg\, Austria\, 5020 DESCRIPTION:In einer Zeit der Desinformation\, Polarisierung und Unsicherheit werden die Fä\;higkeiten zu kritischem Denken\, der Bewertung von Argumenten und der Reflexion von Wissen immer wichtiger. Die Tagung widmet sich den Fragen\, wie epistemische und argumentative Kompetenzen zu verstehen sind\, welche normativen Grundlagen ihnen zugrunde liegen und wie ihre Vermittlung in Schule und in Ö\;ffentlichkeit gelingen kann. Sie richtet sich an Philosoph:innen und Philosophiedidaktiker:innen\, an Vertreter:innen angrenzender Bereiche sowie an Lehrkrä\;fte und Bildungsverantwortliche. Sie ist kostenlos und offen fü\;r Interessierte. Die Vorträ\;ge dauern jeweils 30 Minuten und werden von einer 20-minü\;tigen Diskussion gefolgt.
Call for Abstracts
\n\;
\nSymposium 2026
\nPhilosophy at Trial
\nPresented by: \;Iowa Law Review
\n\nSeptember 17 &\; 18\, 2026
\n\;
\nLaw and Philosophy at Iowa and the \;Iowa Law Review \;invite abstract proposals for &ldquo\;Philosophy at Trial\,&rdquo\; a symposium that focuses on philosophical issues in recent Supreme Court jurisprudence. Essays will be published in Volume 112 of the \;Iowa Law Review. \;
\nWe welcome submissions from researchers from a range of disciplines. Abstracts should identify a Supreme Court opinion from approximately the past five years and articulate the philosophical issues it raises. Preference will be given to submissions that engage with more recent Court opinions. \;
\nEvent Details: \;The symposium will take place September 17&ndash\;18\, 2026\, in Iowa City\, Iowa. Authors of accepted proposals will prepare essays (maximum 8\,000 words) for presentation and discussion at the in-person event. The hosts will provide accommodations and reimburse the cost of travel to Iowa City.
\nInvited Speakers:
\nEmad Atiq (Cornell)
\nBrian Bix (Minnesota)
\nHeidi Hurd (Illinois)
\nMichael Moore (Illinois)
\nKevin Tobia (Georgetown)
\nBrandon Waldon (South Carolina) \;
\n\nSubmission Guidelines: \;Abstracts should be 300&ndash\;600 words and must be submitted by \;January \;15\, 2026\, \;to ilr@uiowa.edu. Please direct questions to Emma Diers\, the \;Iowa Law Review&rsquo\;s Symposium Articles Editor\, at \;emma-diers@uiowa.edu\, \;with a copy to \;law-philosophy@uiowa.edu.
ORGANIZER;CN=Mihailis E. Diamantis;CN=Andrew Jordan;CN=Stephanie Patridge: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260917T193000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Little Conference on Big Bioethics UID:20260918T174045Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:South Dakota State University\, Brookings\, United States\, 57006 DESCRIPTION:South Dakota State University will be hosting the Little Conference on Big Bioethics\, September 17-19\, 2026. The conference welcomes scholars interested in ethical issues as they emerge in or are related to theoretical and applied biological science\, including work in medical ethics\, genetic ethics\, environmental ethics\, ethics of biology and biotechnology\, neuroethics\, ethics of psychology\, bioethics and law\, experimental bioethics\, and ethics-related work in philosophy of biology\, philosophy of medicine\, and philosophy of health. \;
\nThe conference includes the Annual Bioethics Lecture\, featuring Leslie Francis (University of Utah) on Friday\, September 18. \;
\nThe conference is located in beautiful Brookings\, South Dakota\, a small community 45 minutes north of Sioux Falls. Questions regarding the conference may be sent to Tony Smith at anthony.smith@sdstate.edu
\nCall for Papers
\nBoth paper and panel proposals are welcome. For full consideration\, proposals for individual papers will consist of an anonymized abstract (500-1000 words) and a separate title page which includes the title of the proposed paper\, author name(s)\, institution\, and contact information for the lead author. Each paper presentation should be 20 minutes in length. \;
\nPanel proposals will include an anonymized abstract (500-1000 words) and a separate title page including the names and institutions of panelists and contact information for the panel organizer. Panels may consist of 3-5 members. Panel sessions will be 1.5 hours in length. \; \;
\nUndergraduate students are invited to submit abstracts for an undergraduate paper session. Undergraduate paper proposals should follow the same guidelines as those outlined for individual papers above. \;
\nFurther information about the conference\, including the portal to submit a proposal and information regarding registration may be found at the conference website.
ORGANIZER;CN=Gregory Peterson;CN=Anthony P Smith: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260917T193000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Big Bioethics Workshop (Updated Call and Extended Deadline) UID:20260918T174046Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:South Dakota State University\, Brookings\, United States\, 57007 DESCRIPTION:South Dakota State University will be hosting a workshop on &ldquo\;Big Bioethics&rdquo\;\, September 17-19\, 2026. The workshop aims to host 10-12 scholars to present works in progress in any area of ethics related to theoretical and applied biological science including work in medical ethics\, genetic ethics\, environmental ethics\, ethics of biology and biotechnology\, \;neuroethics\, ethics of psychology\, bioethics and law\, experimental bioethics\, and ethics-related work in philosophy of biology\, philosophy of medicine\, and philosophy of health. \; \; \;
\nThe workshop will be part of a larger Bioethics Day\, which will include other events\, including the Annual Bioethics Lecture\, featuring Leslie Francis (University of Utah) on Friday\, September 18. \; \; \;
\nStipend\, Transportation\, and Lodging
\nSelected participants will receive a $500 stipend provided through the SDSU Ethics Lab. Participating scholars will be encouraged to share and read each other&rsquo\;s papers prior to the workshop.
\nThe conference \;is located in \;Brookings\, South Dakota\, 45 minutes north of Sioux Falls\, South Dakota. The conference will provide a shuttle service for individuals flying into Sioux Falls\, but participants may use Lyft\, Uber\, or public transport as well. \;Brookings provides several hotel options in addition to the many options in Sioux Falls.
\nQuestions \;regarding \;the conference may be sent to Dr. Gregory Peterson (Philosophy\, School of American and Global Studies) at \;greg.peterson@sdstate.edu \;
\nCall for Papers \;
\nFor full consideration\, proposals for individual papers will consist of an anonymized abstract (4000 characters or approximately 550-600 words) submitted through the application portal. Participants should plan for approximately 20 minutes to present their paper and 20 minutes for discussion and feedback.
\nProposals are due Tuesday\, June 30\, \;2026 \;and may be \;submitted \;here. \; \; \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Gregory Peterson: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Budapest:20260918T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Budapest:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Integrating Human Nature: Toward a Synoptic View of David Hume's Philosophy and Historiography UID:20260918T174047Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Budapest LOCATION:Fővám tér 8.\, Budapest\, Hungary\, 1093 DESCRIPTION:INTEGRATING HUMAN NATURE: TOWARD A SYNOPTIC VIEW OF DAVID HUME&rsquo\;S PHILOSOPHY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY
\nCorvinus University of Budapest
\n18-19/9/2026
\nHume scholarship has long operated with a tacit division of labour: philosophers focus on the Treatise and the Enquiries\; historians focus on the History of England. Our project proceeds from the conviction that this division is unfortunate: it prevents us from exploring productive interconnections between the philosophical and historiographic achievements in Hume&rsquo\;s oeuvre. A synoptic reading can not only help approach Hume&rsquo\;s project of understanding human nature in ways integrating his philosophical and historical insights\, but it can also yield new insights for our understanding of each strand of his scholarship. Several angles for integrative reading can be proposed\, including but not exclusively:
\nMethodology. Hume&rsquo\;s philosophical and historiographic programme can be seen as standing in a dialectic relation. Hume sees in history a chief source of experimental material for the science of man\, and philosophy as the route to explanatory principles of historically significant actions and processes. These principles provide an explanatory framework to be deployed in the History &ndash\; a framework that is itself distilled from history. Hume&rsquo\;s historiographical exercises can thus be read as integrated with experimental reasoning: they explain particular actions and processes drawing on principles analysed from the records of human action across times and circumstances.
\nCharacter. In Hume&rsquo\;s moral philosophy\, character is the locus of virtue and the basis of moral evaluation\; in the essays\, it organises Hume's portraits of political actors and national types\; in the History\, it structures both individual biography and the longer-run formation of institutions. Character\, in short\, functions across all three registers as a mediating concept between psychology and politics.
\nKnowledge. Hume&rsquo\;s accounts in the Treatise of how opinion\, belief\, and normative consensus form\, stabilise\, and transform within societies pertain to questions that are at once psychological\, epistemological\, sociological\, and deeply historical. &ldquo\;Of Refinement in the Arts&rdquo\; and the economic essays on commerce and luxury connect directly to the History&rsquo\;s narrative of how constitutional and cultural development in England tracks its commercial development. &ldquo\;Of the Standard of Taste&rdquo\; belongs in this constellation too: taste\, politeness\, and the softening of manners are both moral- philosophical and historical-sociological concepts in Hume.
\nSympathy as a historical mechanism. Sympathy in the Treatise is not merely an ethical concept but an explanatory device for the social transmission of sentiments in general &ndash\; including that of belief. In the History\, this does real work: it accounts for how religious enthusiasm spreads\, how faction generates self-reinforcing affective communities\, how a nation gradually comes to share a political culture\, and an age comes to have a spirit. The sociology of opinion rests on the psychology of sympathy.
\nThe politics of opinion. The dictum that all government rests on opinion bridges the Treatise&rsquo\;s account of belief-formation and the History&rsquo\;s narrative of how legitimacy is constructed\, contested\, and stabilised. This suggests the possibility of interpretation connecting epistemology\, political theory\, and historiography.
\nReligion as a case study. The Natural History of Religion\, the Dialogues\, and the History's treatment of Reformation and enthusiasm outline a unified sociology of religious belief &mdash\; tracing its psychological origins\, its institutional expressions\, and its political consequences.
\nCustom and habit across registers. Custom and habit are foundational to Humean psychology (as a belief-forming mechanism)\, epistemology (as surrogate for rational justification)\, to his ethics (for artificial virtues as acquired stable disposition)\, and to his political theory and constitutional history (English liberties as the sedimented product of customary practice\, not rational design). Hume&rsquo\;s account of the common law tradition in the History can be read in this sense as a political application of his epistemology.
\nThe meanings of liberty. Arguably\, Hume&rsquo\;s account of liberty in the Treatise and the first Enquiry runs in a complex relation to his account of political liberty in the History and essays. Whether these two concepts are continuous\, analogous\, or deliberately insulated from one another is an open and underexplored question. The essays on commerce\, money\, and the balance of trade are not separable from Hume&rsquo\;s account of constitutional and commercial development of England in the History. Hume&rsquo\;s stadial sensibility and his analysis of the material conditions of liberty run continuously across both.
\nHistoriography from the common point of view. Hume&rsquo\;s judicious spectator in aesthetics and moral philosophy can be seen as a model for the historian&rsquo\;s self-presentation. The historian who explains and evaluates from above faction and party might be seen as enacting &ldquo\;the common point of view&rdquo\; articulated in Hume&rsquo\;s moral philosophy.
\nProject participants include:
\nDonald Ainslie (University of Toronto)\, Pamela Ahern (University of Delaware)\, Christopher Berry (University of Glasgow)\, Donald Gibson (University of Queensland)\, Marc Hanvelt (Carleton University)\, Katharina Paxman (Bingham Young University)\, Dan O&rsquo\;Brian (Oxford Brookes University)\, Dario Perinetti (University of Qué\;bec\, Montré\;al)\, David Raynor (University of Ottawa)\, Andrew Sabl (University of Toronto)\, Margaret Schabas (University of British Columbia) Eric Schliesser (University of Amsterdam)\, Andrew Sabl (University of Toronto)\, Margaret Schabas (University of British Columbia)\, Max Skjö\;nsberg (University of Florida)\, Mark Spencer (Brock University)\, Felix Waldman (University of Cambridge)\, Aaron Zubia (University of Florida).
\nOur workshop aims to explore these and related questions of Hume&rsquo\;s philosophy an \; historiography. We invite abstracts of about 500 words to be sent \;both to Pamela Ahern (pahern@udel.edu) and Tamas Demeter (tsd2333@gmail.com) by the 1 st of June\, 2026.
ORGANIZER;CN=Tamas Demeter;CN=Pamela Ahern: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T133000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T163000 SUMMARY:Book Symposium: The New Modern Medicine UID:20260918T174048Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/New_York LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260 DESCRIPTION:Book Symposium: The New Modern Medicine
\nSeptember 18 @ 1:30 pm - 4:00 pm EDT \;
\nIn The New Modern Medicine: Disease\, Evidence\, and Epidemiological Medicine (OUP\, 2025)\, Jonathan Fuller examines contemporary scientific medicine and its distinctive philosophical problems\, particularly problems brought about by the integration of modern epidemiology into medicine. In this book symposium\, Christopher Phillips and Benjamin Chin-Yee will respond to the book from philosophical\, historical\, and clinical perspectives. The audience will then be invited into the conversation.
\nThe New Modern Medicine is available to download open access:
\nhttps://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-new-modern-medicine-9780190066147?cc=us&\;lang=en&\;#
\nJonathan Fuller MD PhD
\nAssociate Professor\, Department of History and Philosophy of Science
\nUniversity of Pittsburgh
\n\nProfessor and Department Head\, Department of History
\nCarnegie Mellon University
\nBenjamin Chin-Yee MD PhD
\nAssistant Professor\, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
\nAssistant Professor\, Department of Philosophy
\nWestern University
\nSchedule:
\n1:30-1:35: Introduction by Center Director
\n1:35-1:55: Introduction to the book by Jonathan Fuller
\n1:55-2:20: Response by Christopher Phillips
\n2:20-2:45: Response by Benjamin Chin-Yee
\n2:45-3:00 Break
\n3:00-3:10: Reply by Jonathan Fuller
\n3:10-4:00: Q&\;A and Discussion
\nLocated in-person:
\nCenter for Philosophy of Science\, 1117 Cathedral of Learning
\nLive Streamed:
\nZoom Link: https://pitt.zoom.us/j/92326008828
\nYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260918T180000 SUMMARY:What Would You Do Alone in a Cage with Nothing but Cocaine? A Philosophy of Addiction UID:20260918T174049Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:Gore Hall\, Newark\, United States\, 19716 ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260919T000000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Conference celebrating Cezary Cieśliński’s 60th birthday UID:20260918T174050Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Warsaw\, Poland DESCRIPTION:We will be meeting at the University of Warsaw to celebrate Cezary Cieśliński&rsquo\;s 60th birthday\, exchanging ideas on topics Prof. Cieśliński has contributed to.
ORGANIZER;CN="Mateusz Łełyk";CN=Luca Castaldo;CN="Maciej Głowacki";CN=Matteo Zicchetti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 SUMMARY:Memory\, Trauma and Recovery - 7th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260918T174051Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:CFP:
\nConference online
\nTo remember \; sometimes means to experience again. That is the case of trauma. However\, recovery from trauma is also based on memory. The question\, then\, is not how to forget painful memories\, but how to remember without suffering.
During this conference we would like to concentrate on the phenomena of trauma and recovery\, to look at how memory is involved in the traumatic experience and the recovery process and explore\, among other questions\, what we remember and forget\, what causes suffering and how to deal with it.
We are interested in all aspects of traumatic experiences\, in their individual and collective dimensions\, in the past and in the present-day world. We would like to examine the role of memory in both falling into trauma and overcoming it. Thus\, we want to describe the phenomena of trauma and recovery in their multifarious manifestations: psychological\, social\, historical\, cultural\, philosophical\, religious\, economic\, political\, and many others. As usual\, we also want to devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear in artistic practices: literature\, film\, theatre or visual arts. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology\, history\, psychiatry\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, sociology\, politics\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, cognitive sciences\, and urban studies and others.
Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inqueries\, problem-oriented arguments or comparative analyses.
We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the start of their careers\, as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
The topics for the conference include but are not limited to the following suggestions:
I. Individual experiences
- Trauma and childhood memories
- Trauma and child abuse
- Trauma and violence against women
- Trauma and domestic violence
- Trauma and old age
- Trauma and love
- Trauma and death
- Trauma and mourning
- Trauma and crime
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Trauma and nightmares
- Trauma and neurosis
- Trauma and psychosis
- Secondary traumatization
- Life after trauma
- Trauma and psychotherapy
- Help for traumatized people
II. Collective experiences
- Trauma and war
- Trauma and genocide
- Trauma and terrorism
- Trauma and natural disasters
- Trauma and post-memory
- Traumatized nations
- Traumatized minorities
- Traumatized generations
- Traumatized social classes
- Trauma of victims
- Trauma of witnesses
- Trauma of bystanders
- Trauma of perpetrators
- Trauma and oblivion
- Trauma and forgiveness
III. Representation of trauma
- Bearing witness to trauma
- Testimonies and memories
- Trauma and narrative
- Trauma and fiction
- Trauma in literature
- Trauma in film
- Trauma in theatre
- Trauma in visual arts
- Traumatized authors
- Traumatized readers/spectators
- Writing as a traumatic experience
- Writing as recovery from trauma
- Trauma and creativeness
IV. Institutionalization
- Trauma and law
- Trauma and politics
- Trauma and religion
- Trauma and medical treatment
- Trauma and management
- Trauma and punishment systems
- Trauma and army
- Trauma and school
- Trauma and memory places
- Trauma and museums
\;Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note\, by 4 September 2026 to: conferencememory@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 SUMMARY:Memory\, Trauma and Recovery - 7th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260918T174052Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:CFP:
\nConference online
\nTo remember \; sometimes means to experience again. That is the case of trauma. However\, recovery from trauma is also based on memory. The question\, then\, is not how to forget painful memories\, but how to remember without suffering.
During this conference we would like to concentrate on the phenomena of trauma and recovery\, to look at how memory is involved in the traumatic experience and the recovery process and explore\, among other questions\, what we remember and forget\, what causes suffering and how to deal with it.
We are interested in all aspects of traumatic experiences\, in their individual and collective dimensions\, in the past and in the present-day world. We would like to examine the role of memory in both falling into trauma and overcoming it. Thus\, we want to describe the phenomena of trauma and recovery in their multifarious manifestations: psychological\, social\, historical\, cultural\, philosophical\, religious\, economic\, political\, and many others. As usual\, we also want to devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear in artistic practices: literature\, film\, theatre or visual arts. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology\, history\, psychiatry\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, sociology\, politics\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, cognitive sciences\, and urban studies and others.
Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inqueries\, problem-oriented arguments or comparative analyses.
We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the start of their careers\, as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
The topics for the conference include but are not limited to the following suggestions:
I. Individual experiences
- Trauma and childhood memories
- Trauma and child abuse
- Trauma and violence against women
- Trauma and domestic violence
- Trauma and old age
- Trauma and love
- Trauma and death
- Trauma and mourning
- Trauma and crime
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Trauma and nightmares
- Trauma and neurosis
- Trauma and psychosis
- Secondary traumatization
- Life after trauma
- Trauma and psychotherapy
- Help for traumatized people
II. Collective experiences
- Trauma and war
- Trauma and genocide
- Trauma and terrorism
- Trauma and natural disasters
- Trauma and post-memory
- Traumatized nations
- Traumatized minorities
- Traumatized generations
- Traumatized social classes
- Trauma of victims
- Trauma of witnesses
- Trauma of bystanders
- Trauma of perpetrators
- Trauma and oblivion
- Trauma and forgiveness
III. Representation of trauma
- Bearing witness to trauma
- Testimonies and memories
- Trauma and narrative
- Trauma and fiction
- Trauma in literature
- Trauma in film
- Trauma in theatre
- Trauma in visual arts
- Traumatized authors
- Traumatized readers/spectators
- Writing as a traumatic experience
- Writing as recovery from trauma
- Trauma and creativeness
IV. Institutionalization
- Trauma and law
- Trauma and politics
- Trauma and religion
- Trauma and medical treatment
- Trauma and management
- Trauma and punishment systems
- Trauma and army
- Trauma and school
- Trauma and memory places
- Trauma and museums
\;Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note\, by 4 September 2026 to: conferencememory@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260918T234500 SUMMARY:Memory\, Trauma and Recovery - 7th International Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260918T174053Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:CFP:
\nConference online
\nTo remember \; sometimes means to experience again. That is the case of trauma. However\, recovery from trauma is also based on memory. The question\, then\, is not how to forget painful memories\, but how to remember without suffering.
During this conference we would like to concentrate on the phenomena of trauma and recovery\, to look at how memory is involved in the traumatic experience and the recovery process and explore\, among other questions\, what we remember and forget\, what causes suffering and how to deal with it.
We are interested in all aspects of traumatic experiences\, in their individual and collective dimensions\, in the past and in the present-day world. We would like to examine the role of memory in both falling into trauma and overcoming it. Thus\, we want to describe the phenomena of trauma and recovery in their multifarious manifestations: psychological\, social\, historical\, cultural\, philosophical\, religious\, economic\, political\, and many others. As usual\, we also want to devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear in artistic practices: literature\, film\, theatre or visual arts. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology\, history\, psychiatry\, psychology\, psychoanalysis\, sociology\, politics\, philosophy\, economics\, law\, literary studies\, theatre studies\, film studies\, memory studies\, migration studies\, consciousness studies\, dream studies\, gender studies\, postcolonial studies\, medical sciences\, cognitive sciences\, and urban studies and others.
Different forms of presentations are encouraged\, including case studies\, theoretical inqueries\, problem-oriented arguments or comparative analyses.
We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the start of their careers\, as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners\, without giving a presentation.
The topics for the conference include but are not limited to the following suggestions:
I. Individual experiences
- Trauma and childhood memories
- Trauma and child abuse
- Trauma and violence against women
- Trauma and domestic violence
- Trauma and old age
- Trauma and love
- Trauma and death
- Trauma and mourning
- Trauma and crime
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Trauma and nightmares
- Trauma and neurosis
- Trauma and psychosis
- Secondary traumatization
- Life after trauma
- Trauma and psychotherapy
- Help for traumatized people
II. Collective experiences
- Trauma and war
- Trauma and genocide
- Trauma and terrorism
- Trauma and natural disasters
- Trauma and post-memory
- Traumatized nations
- Traumatized minorities
- Traumatized generations
- Traumatized social classes
- Trauma of victims
- Trauma of witnesses
- Trauma of bystanders
- Trauma of perpetrators
- Trauma and oblivion
- Trauma and forgiveness
III. Representation of trauma
- Bearing witness to trauma
- Testimonies and memories
- Trauma and narrative
- Trauma and fiction
- Trauma in literature
- Trauma in film
- Trauma in theatre
- Trauma in visual arts
- Traumatized authors
- Traumatized readers/spectators
- Writing as a traumatic experience
- Writing as recovery from trauma
- Trauma and creativeness
IV. Institutionalization
- Trauma and law
- Trauma and politics
- Trauma and religion
- Trauma and medical treatment
- Trauma and management
- Trauma and punishment systems
- Trauma and army
- Trauma and school
- Trauma and memory places
- Trauma and museums
\;Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations\, together with a short biographical note\, by 4 September 2026 to: conferencememory@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Taipei:20260919T090000 DTEND;TZID=Asia/Taipei:20260920T170000 SUMMARY:LMPST Taiwan 2026 Annual Meeting UID:20260918T174054Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Asia/Taipei LOCATION:Humanities Building\, National Taiwan University\, Taipei\, Taiwan DESCRIPTION:LMPST Taiwan 2026 Annual Meeting
\n\;
\nI. Overview
\nLMPST Taiwan is the primary academic association in Taiwan devoted to analytic philosophy. In recent years\, we have organized and hosted a number of international events\, including the Taiwan Philosophical Logic Colloquium series \;(https://sites.google.com/view/tplc-2025/home)\, the Taiwan Metaphysics Colloquium series (https://appsa2025taiwan.mystrikingly.com/)\, and a joint annual conferencewith Asia-Pacific Philosophy of Science Association (https://appsa2025taiwan.mystrikingly.com/) last year. We are pleased to announce that our annual meeting this year will be held on September 19&ndash\;20. We cordially invite submissions in all areas of analytic philosophy and science\, technology\, and society (STS) studies. In addition to Featured Talks and Contributed Talks\, our annual meeting this year will include a Panel Discussion on artificial intelligence and mental content\, as well as the General Members' Meeting. To encourage international engagement\, all sessions will be conducted entirely in English.
\nII. Date and Venue
\nVenue: Humanities Building\, National Taiwan University\, Taiwan
\nConference Dates: September 19&ndash\;20\, 2026 (Sat&ndash\;Sun)
\nSubmission Deadline: July 6\, 2026 (Mon)
\n\;
\nIII. Featured Speakers
\nJames Fanciullo (Lingnan University\, Hong Kong)
\nChristopher McCarroll (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University\, Taiwan) &ndash\; 2026 Tony Cheng Lecturer
\nIsaac Wilhelm (National University of Singapore\, Singapore)
\nIV. Panel Discussants
\nAdam Bradley (Lingnan University\, Hong Kong)
\nI-Sen Chen (Soochow University\, Taiwan) \;
\nSimon Goldstein (The University of Hong Kong\, Hong Kong)
\nChristian Helmut Wenzel (National Taiwan University\, Taiwan) \;
\n\; \; \; \;(Additional invited panelists will be announced in due course)
\nV. Submission Guidelines and Eligibility
\nVI. Organizing Institutions
\nHost: Taiwan Association for Logic\, Methodology\, and Philosophy of Science and Technology (LMPST Taiwan)
\nCo-hosts:
\nCenter for Traditional and Scientific Metaphysics (TSM)\, Department of Philosophy\, National Taiwan University
\nCenter for Asian Philosophy and Analytic Philosophy\, Department of Philosophy\, National Taiwan University
\nVII. Sponsoring Organization
\nThe Frontward Foundation
\nContact:
\nLMPST Taiwan: \;talmpst@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Knowledge and Society UID:20260918T174055Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:1304 Campus Drive \, Durham\, United States\, 27701 DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to announce that the 4th annual Duke-UNC Philosophy Graduate Conference will be held on September 19\, 2026 at Duke University in Durham\, North Carolina. The theme for the conference is &ldquo\;Knowledge and Society&rdquo\; which we take to be broadly inclusive of many areas of philosophy\, including submissions from the history of philosophy.
\nPlease submit \;abstracts of a maximum of 300 words by \;June 15th \;to \;dukeuncgradconference@gmail.com. Please \;anonymize \;all submissions. Unfortunately\, we do not have funding to assist with travel or accommodations. We also are unable to accomodate remote presentations. \;
\nAcceptances will be communicated by July 15th
ORGANIZER;CN=Dylan Brown;CN=Michael Bergdolt;CN=Kyle Cessna;CN=Ava Geenen: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260919T170000 SUMMARY:Student Philosophy in the South UID:20260918T174056Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/New_York LOCATION:290 S Jackson Street\, Athens\, United States DESCRIPTION:The UGA Philosophy Graduate Student Association is pleased to announce the second Student Philosophy in the South conference. Paper submissions from current graduate students working on topics in any area or tradition within the discipline are welcome. We especially encourage submissions from members of traditionally underrepresented groups in philosophy.
\nThis conference will be held in person at the University of Georgia campus in Athens on September 19\, 2026\, with a paper submission deadline of August 10. Please see the CFP (linked above) for additional information about submitting. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Kobina Korankye;CN=Danielle Kotrla;CN=Shagun Sharma;CN=Alexander H. Asay: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260920T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260920T163000 SUMMARY:Practices\, Concepts and Norms of Knowledge in Ancient Mesopotamia UID:20260918T174057Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London ORGANIZER;CN=Himanshu .: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260920T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260920T230000 SUMMARY:"Ricœur\, Dead or Alive?" Fonds Ricœur Monthly Seminar (ENS\, Paris) UID:20260918T174058Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:École Normale Supérieure\, 45 rue d'Ulm\, Paris\, France\, 75005 DESCRIPTION:Presentation of the Seminar
\nThe seminar "Actualité\;s de Ric&oelig\;ur" ("Ric&oelig\;ur Studies Today") aims to offer a space for discussion and development for early-career research on Ric&oelig\;ur. Hosted at the É\;cole Normale Supé\;rieure for the 2026&ndash\;2027 academic year\, it welcomes proposals from doctoral students\, postdoctoral researchers\, and early-career scholars who wish to explore\, extend\, or put to the test the resources of Paul Ric&oelig\;ur's philosophy.
\nThe first edition of this seminar is entitled "Ric&oelig\;ur\, Dead or Alive?" &mdash\; a deliberately ambiguous formulation\, one that invites us to question both the internal vitality of his &oelig\;uvre and its capacity to nourish the philosophical\, ethical\, and political debates of today.
\nIs Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutic phenomenology not defined\, in essence\, by its defense of &mdash\; and\, as it were\, its "vow" (v&oelig\;u) in favor of &mdash\; life\, the living\, and the lively? But is he still a living interlocutor\, or has his thought sedimented into heritage?
\nThe seminar will follow this format: two speakers per two-hour session\, with 30 minutes of presentation and 30 minutes of discussion for each speaker.
\nFor paper proposals\, we welcome submissions engaging with three thematic axes.
\nAxis I. Life as Resistance &ndash\; Language\, Time\, and Action
\nHow does life affirm\, narrate\, and configure itself in the face of what negates it? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutic phenomenology is traversed by a fundamental tension between the power to act and the multiple forms of its hindrance. Confronted with evil\, forgetting\, or indeed death\, Ric&oelig\;ur explores the diverse forms of resistance at work within life &mdash\; metaphors\, narratives\, memories\, history. These resistances\, as actions\, possess an intrinsic logic and continue to create the meaning of life.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n1. Language as resistance: How does the "living metaphor" (The Rule of Metaphor\, 1975) constitute a form of resistance to the "entropy of language\," which freezes meaning? In what sense is semantic innovation a vital act\, a "revival"?
\n2. Narrative as resistance: In Time and Narrative (1983&ndash\;1985)\, emplotment is presented as a provisional victory over temporal discordance. How are we to think this victory in the face of the radicality of Heideggerian "being-towards-death"?
\n3. Memory as resistance: Memory\, History\, Forgetting (2000) distinguishes between forgetting kept in reserve and forgetting through effacement. In what way does this distinction commit us to an ethics of memory as a form of fidelity to life?
\nAxis II. A Life of One's Own &ndash\; Selfhood\, Vulnerability\, Ethicity
\nHow might vulnerability\, far from being a limit of subjectivity\, be its very condition of ethical possibility? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutics of the self is built upon the recognition of a constitutive fragility: narrative identity is always exposed to rupture\, to suffering\, to undergoing the action of the other &mdash\; the other inscribing at the very heart of the self. This axis proposes to deepen reflection on the relation between the self and the other\, and to explore the modes by which a "good life" may be accomplished\, starting from the concrete ordeals of vulnerability: trauma\, the quest for mutual recognition\, and the precariousness of existence.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n4. The ordeal of narrative identity: Oneself as Another (1990) articulates idem-identity and ipse-identity around the self-constancy under trial. What becomes of this articulation when the trial is that of identity's collapse &mdash\; serious illness\, exile\, trauma? Ric&oelig\;ur's hermeneutics of narrative identity also resonates with debates on the performativity of identity and with gender studies (Butler).
\n5. The reciprocity of recognition: In The Course of Recognition (2004)\, Ric&oelig\;ur moves from self-recognition to mutual recognition. How might this course enter into dialogue with contemporary theories of vulnerability (Weil\, Levinas) or of care?
\n6. The ethical life: The "ethical aim" defined in the "ethical studies" (Oneself as Another\, Studies 5-7) seeks to realize a "good life." Does this notion remain operative in the face of situations of thwarted life\, precarity\, or desubjectivation?
\nAxis III. Ric&oelig\;ur&rsquo\;s Survival &ndash\; Present Legacies
\nRic&oelig\;ur maintained a singular relationship with his own era\, marked as much by fruitful resonances as by sharp conflicts. This axis seeks to interrogate the philosophical actuality of these past debates: what extensions\, what corrections\, and what ruptures does Ric&oelig\;urian thought call for today? Proposals will place Ric&oelig\;ur's texts in critical dialogue with contemporary problematics\, without confining themselves to historical reconstruction.
\nSuggested Lines of Approach
\n7. Radical alterity in phenomenology: Ric&oelig\;ur engaged in a twofold critical dialogue with Derridean deconstruction and Levinasian ethics &mdash\; two distinct contestations of the autonomy of the self\, the one through the play of language\, the other through the ethical injunction of the face. How do these confrontations\, taken together\, illuminate the limits and the resources of the hermeneutics of the self in the face of the contemporary challenges of hospitality\, communication\, and responsibility?
\n8. Philosophical anthropology: Is the human being\, understood as the "capable human being" (From Text to Action\, 1986)\, in a position to accommodate new forms of agency &mdash\; collective\, distributed\, digital &mdash\; or do its anthropological presuppositions constrain it? In this regard\, Ric&oelig\;urian philosophy could enter into fruitful dialogue with the theories of Stiegler (tertiary retention) and Arendt (collective action).
\n9. Justice today: How might Ric&oelig\;ur's reflections on justice\, collective memory\, and forgiveness (Memory\, History\, Forgetting\, Epilogue) be articulated with the contemporary stakes of memory conflicts\, politics of reconciliation\, or postcolonial reparations? Ric&oelig\;ur's philosophy is bound up with figures such as Halbwachs\, Derrida\, and Honneth. His reflection on memory and forgiveness continues to shed lasting light on the practices of transitional justice.
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nTo submit a proposal or for any inquiries\, please write to us at the following address: seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com. Proposals are welcome from doctoral students\, postdoctoral researchers\, and early-career scholars of any discipline (philosophy\, literary studies\, theology\, social sciences\, law)\, provided that they are grounded in Ric&oelig\;ur's texts and in contemporary debates for which Ric&oelig\;urian theory could be fruitfully mobilized. Comparative and transdisciplinary proposals are welcome. We will accept proposals in French and in English.
\nOrganizing Committee
\nTristan Barberousse (ENS)
\nKexin Hu (ENS)
\nMartina Lodi (Lumsa-ICP)
\nQiyu Chen (Montpellier III)
\n\nPractical Information
\nSubmissions: seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com
\nSubmission deadline: 20 September 2026
\nVenue: É\;cole Normale Supé\;rieure\, 45 rue d'Ulm\, Paris (75005)
\nFrequency: monthly (2026&ndash\;2027 academic year)\, normally on the last Tuesday of each month\, beginning however on Tuesday 6 October.
\nSchedule: 6 October\; 27 October\; 24 November\; 15 December (due to the holiday break)\; 26 January\; 23 February\; 30 March\; 27 April.
\nPaper proposals must follow these guidelines:
\nAn anonymized abstract of 400 to 600 words in Word format\, specifying the title of the paper\, the chosen axis\, and the thesis defended\, accompanied by an indicative bibliography.
\nA brief bio-bibliographical note (name\, affiliation\, current position\, thesis supervisor where applicable) should be included in the body of the email. To facilitate the archiving and processing of your submission\, we kindly ask you to format the subject line of your email as follows: [Seminar Application] Surname &ndash\; Title of the Paper. Formatting guidelines for the (anonymous) abstract: Times New Roman or Arial\, 12-point font\, 1.5 line spacing.
\nWe wish for the papers to be delivered in person\, in order to facilitate the discussions that lie at the heart of the seminar spirit of this initiative. A link will nevertheless be available for those who wish to follow the event remotely\, where applicable.
\nThe seminar has no dedicated budget for the reimbursement of travel and accommodation expenses\, and in-person participation is at the speakers' own expense. We therefore encourage them to explore\, as a first step\, the funding available from their research unit\, doctoral school\, or home institution.
\nSelected speakers will be invited to submit a preparatory text (25\,000 characters maximum)\, to be circulated to participants one week before the session\, and sent to the contact address (seminaire.actualites.ricoeur@gmail.com).
ORGANIZER;CN=Barberousse Tristan;CN=Hu Kexin;CN=Lodi Martina;CN=Chen Qiyu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260920T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20260920T234500 SUMMARY:Paradigms\, Progress\, and Conceptual Change UID:20260918T174059Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Belgrade LOCATION:Koroška cesta 160\, Maribor\, Slovenia\, 2000 DESCRIPTION:Call for Abstracts We welcome abstracts of approximately 500 words. Presentations will be 45 minutes long\, followed by 15 minutes of discussion.
\nSubmissions link: https://forms.gle/gtpb5yY254Fqpcx29
\nDeadline: September 20th\, 2026.
\n***
\nThe Department of Philosophy at the University of Maribor is pleased to announce an international symposium reflecting on the enduring legacy of Thomas Kuhn&rsquo\;s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Marking approximately 65 years since its publication\, this event seeks to move beyond a purely historical retrospective\, exploring "Kuhn after Kuhn"&mdash\;the continued evolution of his concepts within contemporary philosophical practice.
\nKuhn&rsquo\;s notions of paradigms and scientific revolutions have long transcended the history of science. Today\, they serve as vital frameworks for understanding the structure of research practices\, the shifts in epistemic standards\, and the normative boundaries within which conceptual change occurs.
\nWe invite contributions that engage with Kuhnian themes across the breadth of analytic philosophy. We particularly encourage submissions that demonstrate how paradigms\, incommensurability\, and progress are currently being redefined in fields such as:
\nThe symposium aims to foster a dialogue on the broader questions of how progress is achieved and how conceptual frameworks evolve across diverse human practices
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Martin Justin;CN=Borut Trpin;CN=Bojan Borstner: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260920T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260920T234500 SUMMARY:University of Chicago Philosophy Review (Justice) UID:20260918T174100Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The University of Chicago Philosophy Review is accepting undergraduate longform paper submissions on justice (&le\;6000 words).
\nCFP: Philosophy and Justice
\nPapers interrogating justice (or injustice) and related concepts: epistemic injustice\, punishment\, political society\, etc. through the lens of any philosopher\, field\, and/or tradition are welcome. Submissions are due by September 27th to be published in our upcoming print journal edition. \;
\nWe welcome papers addressing questions including but not limited to:
\nCan we justify the relationship between punishment and justice? \;
\nHow does justice influence ethics? Vice versa?
\nWhat role does epistemology play in upholding justice or remedying injustice? \;
\nIs there a relationship between God and justice? \;
\nWho holds the authority to administer justice? \;
\nIs justice only relevant in law\, or is it something that exists beyond the courtroom? \;
\nWhat does it mean for justice to exist at all? \;
\nPapers should be between 2\,500 and 6\,000 words\, contain rigorous philosophical analysis pertaining to the theme\, and be formatted in Chicago Style. A 200 word abstract is also required for consideration.
\nSubmissions must be anonymized\, and will be subject to a blind peer review process. The Review will notify authors of its decisions by October 25th. \;
\nThe Philosophy and Justice submission form can be found here: https://forms.gle/8W7AwfMBXXyPPDuQ8 \;
\nQuestions? Contact us via email (ucprboard@gmail.com)
\nPast issues can be found on our website.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Lima:20260920T234500 DTEND;TZID=America/Lima:20260920T234500 SUMMARY:CAELO 1: First Andean Congress for Epistemology and Logic UID:20260918T174101Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Lima LOCATION:Lima\, Peru DESCRIPTION:The Society for Epistemology and Logic of Peru (SEPLO) is pleased to announce CAELO 1: First Andean Congress for Epistemology and Logic*\, to be held in Lima\, Peru\, from 22 to 28 February 2027.
\nThis inaugural congress marks the beginning of a planned series of meetings dedicated to the study of epistemology and logic\, bringing together scholars\, researchers\, and students from diverse backgrounds. The event offers a space for rigorous discussion and exchange on topics including logic\, epistemology\, philosophy of science\, analytic philosophy\, metaphysics\, social philosophy\, empirically informed approaches\, and both philosophically and scientifically oriented studies.
\nTopics and Suggested Sessions
\nSubmissions are welcome on all topics in epistemology\, logic\, and related areas. Proposed thematic sessions include\, but are not limited to:
\nSubmission Categories:
\nWe invite submissions for talks and thematic sessions (including round tables and workshops). \;
\nIndividual Paper Abstracts:
\nAuthors are invited to submit abstracts for individual papers.
\nThematic Sessions (Including Round Tables and Workshops)
\nWe invite proposals for thematic sessions of various formats\, including standard paper sessions\, round tables\, and workshops.
\nAll thematic session proposals should include:
\nSession proposals should not be anonymised.
\nSubmission Instructions
\nAll submissions should be sent in English or Spanish to: \;epilog@seplo.org
\nPlease indicate the submission category (talk or thematic session) in the subject line of your email. If you propose a talk\, you may suggest a session for it.
\n*This event was formerly called Epilog 1: 1st Congress of Epistemology and Logic.
ORGANIZER;CN=Luis F. Bartolo Alegre: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Lima:20260920T234500 DTEND;TZID=America/Lima:20260920T234500 SUMMARY:SYLLOS2: Second Symposium on the Languages and Logics of Syllogistics UID:20260918T174102Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Lima LOCATION:Lima\, Peru DESCRIPTION:Keynote speakers:
\nCall for abstracts:
\nSYLLOS2 invites submissions of abstracts for presentations on syllogistics in a broad sense. We welcome formal\, philosophical\, and historical contributions addressing\, for example\, Aristotle&rsquo\;s original syllogistic\, Hellenic and medieval developments\, and contemporary approaches to syllogistic reasoning\, including both work in favour of and against syllogistics. Possible topics include\, but are not limited to:
\nAristotle&rsquo\;s syllogistic and its interpretation
\nThe languages and formal systems of syllogistic
\nHellenistic and late-antique developments
\nMedieval syllogistic and its transformations
\nSyllogistic and the history of logical theory
\nFormal reconstructions and extensions of syllogistic
\nSyllogistic reasoning and natural language
\nPhilosophical foundations and interpretations of syllogistic
\nThe relation between syllogistic and other logical systems
\nContemporary approaches to\, and criticisms of\, syllogistic
\nSyllogistic\, semantics\, and consequence
\nApplications of formal and computational methods to historical syllogistic
\nComparative studies of different syllogistic traditions
\nNew perspectives on the scope\, limits\, and relevance of syllogistic reasoning
\nWe particularly welcome contributions that combine formal\, philosophical\, and historical perspectives and that bring new approaches to longstanding questions concerning the languages\, structures\, and logical foundations of syllogistic reasoning.
\nSubmission deadline: 20 September 2026
\nNotifications: \;by 30 October \;2026.
\nPlease submit an abstract of 500 words to \;logica.mexa@gmail.com and caelo@seplo.org indicating the name of the session.
\nTo learn more about CAELO 1 and discover its other special sessions\, please visit the main event website: \;https://caelo.seplo.org
ORGANIZER;CN="Luis Estrada-González";CN=Daniel A. Diaz Carrion: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260921T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260923T170000 SUMMARY:PTK26: 15th Meeting of the Polish Association for Cognitive Science UID:20260918T174103Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Pl. Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 5\, Lublin\, Poland\, 20-031 DESCRIPTION:We are delighted to announce the first call for abstracts for the \;15th Biennial Meeting of the Polish Association for Cognitive Science \;(PTK26)\, hosted by the Institute of Philosophy\, Maria \;Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin\, from \;September 21 \;to \;23\, 2026.
\nSpecial conference topic: Making Sense of Meaning-Making
ORGANIZER;CN=Piotr Konderak: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260921T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260921T170000 SUMMARY:PTK26 Conference: Young Researchers Workshop UID:20260918T174104Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Pl. Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 4\, Lublin\, Poland\, 20-801 DESCRIPTION:In an attempt to engage a new generation of cognitive scientists\, we invite proposals for oral presentations as part of the Young Researchers Workshop\, a special event to be held on \;September 21st. We therefore invite undergraduate and graduate (BA and MA) students to submit abstracts that either address the special topic of the conference or present the results of their inquiries more broadly. We would also like to encourage academic teachers and supervisors to motivate and support their students in the process of preparing submissions. YRW abstracts will be reviewed separately. Specialists&rsquo\; comments on each accepted contribution makes the workshop a unique opportunity to receive expert feedback.
\nSubmission info: \;https://ptk26.umcs.lublin.pl/index.php/young-researchers-workshop/
ORGANIZER;CN=Piotr Konderak;CN=Alexandra Mouratidou: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260921T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260922T170000 SUMMARY:Foundations in Science and Religion: Boundaries of Theory & Practice UID:20260918T174105Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The "Foundations" Conference is The Forum's dedicated space for early‑career researchers exploring the rich\, complex intersections between scientific inquiry and religious thought. This event provides an intellectually supportive environment where emerging scholars can develop foundational skills\, exchange ideas\, and engage critically with the theoretical and practical dimensions of the field. This conference explores the dynamic and sometimes contested borders between scientific understanding and religious interpretation\, asking how these two influential domains shape&mdash\; and are shaped by&mdash\; one another in contemporary thought and practice.
\n\n\n\nKeynote Lectures:
\nThe ongoing Fourth Industrial Revolution is transforming the core of our lives with digital media\, artificial intelligence\, automation\, and ubiquitous connectivity. These technologies do not simply respond to our desires\, but rather cultivate and exploit them\, drawing us ever deeper into opaque control systems. They take hold of our very subjectivity.
How can we make sense of our changing self as the boundaries between the physical and the social\, the public and the private blur\, and virtually everything is fodder for commodification? Interpreting these transformations requires more than a traditional analysis of economics and technology alone.
Psychoanalysis is a philosophy of subjectivity\, a tool that can elucidate the structure of our consciousness and the vicissitudes of its entanglement with our economic and technological reality. This four-part course examines the subjective\, political\, economic\, and technological transformations as inseparable from one another. It interrogates the evolving nature of institutions\, corporations\, desire\, authority\, repression\, and the social bond.
Through a psychoanalytic approach\, these seminars and discussions offer a distinctive way of thinking about these changes\, attending not only to conscious beliefs\, but also to unconscious fantasy\, conflict\, religious thinking\, and enjoyment.
In four sessions\, exploring psychoanalytic understandings of art and film\, artificial intelligence\, capital\, and faith and belief\, participants will explore these themes beyond familiar partisan certainties or cultural campism. The course is designed for both those new to the ideas of psychoanalysis and to readers already familiar with thinkers such as Freud\, Lacan\, Hegel\, Marx\, and contemporary psychoanalytic and continental thought.
Call for Abstracts (deadline extended): Workshop on Functions and Representations in AI Systems
16th&ndash\;17th November 2026
Copenhagen\, Denmark (Carlsberg Academy)
CFA Deadline September 21st \;28th (extended)
We invite abstract submissions for a workshop on Functions and Representations in AI Systems\, to be held in Copenhagen\, Denmark November 16th&ndash\;17th.
Abstracts of 300-500 words will be due 28th September.
The concepts of function and representation are widely invoked in the cognitive and life sciences. An influential philosophical tradition\, teleosemantics\, proposes to ground representation partly in biological functions and ground functions in historical selection processes. While this remains a leading approach\, the account has faced challenges\, ranging from the notorious "swampman" objection\, to more recent disputes about the nature of functional and representational explanation in scientific practice.
Independently\, the recent wave of developments in artificial intelligence has sparked questions about the representational capacities of AI models\, e.g. what\, if anything\, can large language models represent? The emerging field of mechanistic interpretability is replete with function- and representation-talk. But is this talk justified? Are AI models subject to selection processes\, in the proper sense? And are the concepts of representation and function deployed here the same as those invoked in the life sciences? Are standard philosophical frameworks adequate for the case of AI? Or should we look elsewhere\, e.g. to theorising about artefacts? And what role\, if any\, do human norms and intentionality play in grounding AI functions and content?
A workshop on these issues\, co-funded by the Pioneer Center for Artificial Intelligence (https://www.aicentre.dk/p1-programs/functions-and-representations-in-ai-systems) and the Center for Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (University of Copenhagen) (https://cpai.ku.dk/)\, will be held in Copenhagen\, November 16th&ndash\;17th\, in the beautiful Carlsberg Academy building (https://www.carlsbergfondet.dk/en/about-the-foundation/our-buildings/the-carlsberg-academy/).
Confirmed speakers include
\nWe invite abstracts on these issues for presentation at the workshop. Questions for consideration include (but are not limited to):
Abstracts of 300-500 words should be sent via email to Iwan Williams (iwi@hum.ku.dk) no later than Monday 28th September. Please include your name\, institutional affiliation and a short bio (max 150 words) in the body of your email. We look forward receiving your submissions.
Please feel free to forward this information to anyone who you think might be interested in presenting a paper or attending the workshop. A further message will be circulated closer to the time with information about registration.
Deakin University's HDR Philosophy Seminar Series invites current Australian graduate students to present their work for feedback\, discussion\, and engagement. We aim to foster a supportive space so that the seminar is thoughtful and constructive for all involved. We look forward to seeing you there!
\nSense-making in the digital age: Context and time collapse in the algorithmic feed \; \;
\nLauren Pedersen-Hor (Deakin University)
\nAbstract: \;Context collapse\, the flattening of multiple audiences into a singular context\, and time collapse\, the muddling of temporalities on social media\, have been the site of much attention in social media literature regarding personal identity and presentation\, and increasingly\, epistemology and post-truth discourse. Despite this\, relatively little attention has been paid to how the algorithmic feed affects these relations\, or how their consequences alter everyday lived experience beyond the platform. This paper addresses this gap by interrogating how algorithmically fed spatio-temporal collapses impact broader user sense-making practices. Ultimately\, I argue that these dynamics affect more than how users present and relate to themselves&mdash\;they actively reshape how users navigate the world around them\, fundamentally altering notions of agency\, being\, and practice.
\nBio: \;Lauren Pedersen-Hor is a PhD candidate at Deakin University. Her doctoral research investigates how human-network feedback loops constrain and make possible different subjectivities\, focusing particularly on the symbiotic\, often unconscious relationships between the user\, platform\, and algorithm. Her broader research interests span the philosophy of technology\, field philosophy\, and media and communications theory. In addition to her doctoral research\, Lauren is a Research Assistant for the Deakin Philosophy and Religious Studies research group and runs the Deakin Minorities in Philosophy reading group.
\nZoom Link:
\nhttps://deakin.zoom.us/j/81487158023?pwd=v0kCLGuEdbcymAcHVjpizdeqqeQwG4.1&\;from=addon
\nMeeting ID: \;814 8715 8023 \;// Passcode: 24510077 \;
\nThis meeting is at 12:30pm Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST) 22 September 2026 [02:30am UTC 22 September 2026]
ORGANIZER;CN=Beau Kent;CN=Jasper Lear: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260922T153000 DTEND;TZID=Australia/Melbourne:20260922T170000 SUMMARY:Constituting Religious Belief in Experiencing Faith. A Husserlian Contribution to Revelation. UID:20260918T174109Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Australia/Melbourne LOCATION:250 Victoria Parade\, East Melbourne\, Australia DESCRIPTION:Revelation is central to the task of phenomenology in its &ldquo\;bringing to light&rdquo\; phenomena as they appear to us (Gschwandtner 2024). In a phenomenology of religious experience\, divine revelation has opened beyond &lsquo\;doctrinal content&rsquo\; toward multiple ways of thinking through experiences of the divine as &lsquo\;self-affective&rsquo\; (Henry)\, &lsquo\;saturated&rsquo\; (Marion)\, &lsquo\;dialogic&rsquo\; and as &lsquo\;event&rsquo\; (Horner 2022). \;
\nConstitution deals with the presentation of ordinary objects in perception. It is a key\, all-pervading conceptual device for Husserl in his seeking clarity to understand the world through phenomenological analyses (Sokolowski 1970). There is a deep methodological divide between revelation and constitution. One reason is because constitution cannot account for divine phenomena since they do not appear to us in ordinary perception.
\nA consequence has been to dismiss &lsquo\;phenomenologies of constitution&rsquo\; in the religious context on two fronts. First\, in its inability to describe divine phenomena\, resulting in a widening and/or redefining of Husserlian concepts and method (Dika and Hackett 2016)\; and secondly\, in prohibiting phenomenological method from analysing religious questions best left to theology (Janicaud 2000).
\nElsewhere\, I have argued that an intentional analysis of faith and doubt is possible if one&rsquo\;s regard is directed toward the noetic-noematic structures of believing: the object of belief is a belief as such\, supervened within a community of believers. Drawing on the eidetic laws within Husserl&rsquo\;s series of belief modalities\, I further analysed these movements of believing as faith formation through an interrelated frame of epistemic\, imagistic and aesthetic-kinetic constitutions (Husserl 1983\; McNeilly 2015).
\nIn this paper\, I propose that phenomenologies of constitution offer a robust and revelatory approach to religious experience. I argue that coming back to the constitution of an object that fully presents\, illuminates rather than excludes an account of these experiences. Furthermore\, I argue that God or divine entities\, while appearing to be limits to phenomenological method\, are no less elusive\, or absent as objects in the mind than how they figure in rational\, cataphatic\, mystical\, and apophatic arguments for existence. I will attempt to show how an intentional analysis of constitution reveals something missing in revelation\, by way of a more stable object: the belief of a belief itself. Rather than seeing constitution as a rival approach to revelation\, I ask: how can the limits of both bring out the richness of experience for the other? \; \; \;
\nOverall\, the paper aims to bring us back to Husserl in a phenomenology of religious experience\, where phenomenologies of constitution have been downplayed if not outright dismissed at the peril of losing something profound in understanding one&rsquo\;s faith
ORGANIZER;CN=Caleb Perl: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260922T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260923T170000 SUMMARY:Between Christian and Post-Christian Worldviews UID:20260918T174110Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Kopernika 26\, Kraków\, Poland DESCRIPTION:Christian Philosophy: Between Christian and Post-Christian Worldviews (2026)
\n4th \;International Conference:
\nChristian \;Philosophy: Between Christian \;and Post-Christian \;Worldviews
\nIgnatianum University in Krakow\, 22-23 September 2026 (Tuesday-Wednesday)
\nThe term &lsquo\;post-Christian&rsquo\; is increasingly appearing in philosophical and cultural discourse\, employed to describe various phenomena that supposedly follow on after Christianity. Most often\, the term is used to describe a contemporary world in which Christianity either is no longer the dominant religion or is not recognised as such in the way that it was until recently. At the same time\, although there is a post-Christian world\, the Christian world has not ended. The problem of the &lsquo\;post-Christian picture of reality&rsquo\; therefore provokes discussion amongst both supporters and opponents of Christianity &ndash\; especially because what is &lsquo\;post-Christian&rsquo\; cannot be understood in isolation from Christianity itself.
\nIn a globalised world\, we are witnessing a clash between Christian and post-Christian images of the world. While some recognise the permanence and validity of the picture of reality founded on the Christian religion\, others are convinced that this has\, for various reasons\, been deformed or destroyed and belongs to an irreversible past\, both in terms of cognition and at the level of social practice.
\nWhile within Western civilisation broadly construed a post-Christian worldview founded on ecological\, gender-based or technological naturalism would seem to be dominating\, in other parts of the globe the Christian worldview is only just gaining ground.
\nThe situation in which Christian and post-Christian worldviews clash within culture and social life poses a serious challenge for philosophy. Christianity-inspired philosophy must define its place in relation to not only worldviews\, but also phenomena\, trends and concepts with anti-Christian overtones. At the same time\, the post-Christian worldview raises many questions that need to be addressed. Proposals We invite proposals that address the problems of Christian and post-Christian worldviews.
\n\nOur interests lie especially in the following topics and questions\, but are not limited to them: \;
\n&bull\; What are the main historical and systematic problems of the Christian worldview?
\n&bull\; Is an evolution of the Christian worldview possible\, or even necessary?
\n&bull\; What is the difference between post-Christian worldviews and non-Christian or postreligious worldviews?
\n&bull\; What are the main aspects and characteristics of the relationship between Christian and post-Christian worldviews?
\n&bull\; Is the transition between Christianity and post-Christianity itself an irreversible phenomenon?
\n&bull\; In what way is post-Christianity influencing debates in ethics and/or politics?
\n&bull\; Does the post-Christian worldview lead to a dissolution of our deep need for religious truths or values?
\n&bull\; Why is the post-Christian worldview mostly dominated by materialistic and relativistic perspectives that reject God as a person and the spiritual values of Christianity?
\n&bull\; What kind of personal identity and individual existence is being presented within the post-Christian worldview?
\n&bull\; Why is it that\, in the post-Christian world\, religion is becoming a tool of political mobilisation and/or manipulation?
\n&bull\; What is the function of religion within the Christian and post-Christian worldviews?
\n&bull\; Is the very meaning of Christianity dissolved in the post-Christian worldview into a set of broad ideals about human behaviour and society?
\n&bull\; What is the position of the Christian and post-Christian worldviews on the truth-falsehood opposition?
\n\nSubmissions:
\nPlease submit a 500-word abstract of your paper (in PDF format) by March 31\, 2026\, via EasyChair\, using the following link:
\nhttps://easychair.org/conferences?conf=chp26
\nLanguage: only proposals in English will be accepted for consideration.
\nWe will be delighted to encounter all participants in person here at Ignatianum University in Cracow. However\, the organisers plan to conduct this conference in hybrid mode\, combining both online and on-site elements. Each conference participant will receive a certificate indicating also the mode of participation.
\n\nWe are pleased to announce that the following individuals have agreed to give a lecture or participate in a panel discussion during the conference:
\nJeffrey Bloechl &ndash\; Boston College\,
\nUSA Chantal Delsol &ndash\; University of Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallé\;e\,
\nFrance Piotr Gutowski &ndash\; John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin\,
\nPoland John Milbank &ndash\; University of Nottingham\, UK
\nLinda Trinkaus Zagzebski &ndash\; University of Oklahoma\, USA
\n\nFees
\nThe conference is open to the public (also via social media). Presenting participants will be charged a fee to help cover costs (materials\, dinner\, coffee breaks\, etc.). For the exact amount of the conference fee\, see below.
\nEarly submission (up to December 31\, 2025) will attract a reduced fee (so-called &lsquo\;Early Bird registration&rsquo\;).
\nRegular participants 60/80/100 EUR (Early Birds/PhD Students/Regular Participants).
\nOnline participants 30/40/50 EUR (Early Birds/PhD Students/Regular Participants)
\n\nWe plan to record all presentations and then publish them on conference YouTube chanel and on the conference Facebook fanpage. After the conference we plan to publish a special issue in a philosophical journal\, containing articles based on the conference presentations. With this in mind\, speakers are encouraged to prepare a paper (up to 10\,000 words) and submit it by December 31\, 2026. Each article will be subject to a process of doubleblind peer review. Forum Philosophicum\, an international journal for philosophy (listed in SCOPUS)\, has already agreed to publish a special issue in 2026 including materials from the conference. However\, we are also open to collaboration with other journals.
\n\nDeadlines
\n&bull\; Submission of Proposals (Early Birds): December 31\, 2025
\n&bull\; Submission of Proposals: March 31\, 2026
\n&bull\; Notification of Acceptance: April 30\, 2026
\n&bull\; Registration Deadline and Payment: June 30\, 2026
\n&bull\; Conference Dates: September 22&ndash\;23\, 2026
\n&bull\; Paper Submission Deadline: December 31\, 2026
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrzej Skupień";CN="Jacek Poznański": METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260922T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260923T170000 SUMMARY:Workshop “Do experiments replicate? Philosophical Reflections on the Use and Misuse of Statistics and Econometrics” UID:20260918T174111Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Grodzka 52\, Kraków\, Poland DESCRIPTION:Workshop &ldquo\;Do experiments replicate? Philosophical Reflections on the Use and Misuse of Statistics and Econometrics&rdquo\;\, 22nd-23rd \;of September 2026
\nInstitute of Philosophy\, Jagiellonian University\, \;
\nGrodzka 52\, Krakó\;w\, Poland
\nThe workshop &ldquo\;Do experiments replicate? Philosophical Reflections on the Use and Misuse of Statistics and Econometrics&rdquo\; aims to provide a forum for exchanging ideas on the replicability of randomized experiments\, such as randomized field experiments in economics\, randomized controlled trials and preclinical studies in medicine\, and psychological experiments. \;
\nThe workshop promotes philosophical and methodological discussions of conceptual and methodological issues in statistical analysis\, econometric modeling\, and the methodology of experimentation.
\nKeynote Speakers:
\nBarbara Osimani \;
\nSamuel Fletcher
\n\nExperimental results are considered reliable because\, under comparable conditions\, they are expected to yield similar outcomes. However\, this assumption has recently been challenged by numerous replication efforts that report results differing from those of the original studies in psychology\, medicine\, biology\, the social sciences\, and economics. A surprisingly large fraction of published findings have been found to be non-replicable. Replicability rates range from 11% for in vitro and in vivo preclinical research to 60-90% for clinical trials. Experimental economists fall within this range and\, like psychological experimenters\, achieve around 60% replicability.
\nThe replication crisis has called into question the credibility of published findings and undermined trust in science. However\, \;the replication crisis\, with few exceptions\, has received only limited attention from philosophy of science. Despite the efforts of several pioneers\, the philosophical and conceptual problems in randomized controlled trials\, randomized field experiments\, laboratory experiments\, econometric modeling\, and the statistical analysis of experimental data remain largely uncharted territory in the philosophy of science. The workshop aims to establish a forum for exchanging ideas among philosophers of medicine and economics\, philosophers of statistics\, and methodologically inclined researchers interested in the conceptual problems of the replication crisis. \;
\nThe Workshop &ldquo\;Do experiments replicate? Philosophical Reflections on the Use and Misuse of Statistics and Econometrics&rdquo\; invites contributions that focus on experimentation and statistical analysis in economics and medicine\, as well as problems that trouble statistical inference from experiments\, broadly construed. \;
\nSome exemplary topics of talks:
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;The design of randomized experiments in medicine and economics.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Statistical hypothesis testing.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Non-frequentist approaches to comparing treatment and control group outcomes.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Comparisons of design-based and model-based inference.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Estimating statistical models.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Measuring replication success and replicability rates.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Assessing the quality of empirical evidence.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Making inferences from the literature review with conflicting results.
\n- \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;Other problems in philosophy of statistics related to the replication crisis.
\nAbstracts no longer than 500 words (including references) should be submitted in an attachment\, \;not \;including author details\, by email with the subject &lsquo\;replication workshop&rsquo\; sent to: \;mariusz.maziarz@uj.edu.pl. \;
\nDeadline for submission: June 1st\, 2026
\nDecisions will be announced by June 15th\, 2026.
\nThis activity was supported by a grant funded by the Strategic Program Excellence Initiative at the Jagiellonian University
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T080000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T083000 SUMMARY:Can Epistemic Norms Be Socially Constructed? UID:20260918T174112Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:In recent years\, the debate on normativity has benefited from work at the intersection of different philosophical disciplines. Most notably\, epistemologists have drawn on moral and legal theory to shed light on the grounds of epistemic normativity (Hannon &\; Woodard 2026)\, the nature of epistemic blame (Brown 2020\, Piovarchy 2021\, Boult 2024)\, epistemic accountability (Kauppinen 2026)\, and to better understand the distinctiveness of epistemic justification and excuse (Greco 2021). Within aesthetics\, several philosophers have recently tapped into similar sources to assess ideas such as aesthetic obligation (Kubala 2020\, Whiting 2021)\, aesthetic blameworthiness (Kubala 2024)\, and aesthetic motivation (King 2018). In political philosophy - where the idea of a distinctively political normativity is still under assessment (Leader Maynard &\; Worsnip 2018\, Gadomski 2025) - epistemic insights have been brought to bear on crucial normative notions such as legitimacy (Peter 2023)\, as well as on more applied issues(Edenberg &\; Hannon 2021).
\nFor this workshop\, we invite papers developing this productive cross-pollination to address foundational issues about specific normative domains and clarify the relationship(s) between them. Submissions should include an anonymized abstract of no more than 800 words (references excluded)\, and a title page with authors&rsquo\; info and affiliation.
\nSpeakers will be invited as contributors to a special issue\, to be proposed to a leading international journal.
\nPlease submit materials to: normativeintersections@gmail.com
\nDeadline: July 31st
\nNotification of acceptance: by August 15th
ORGANIZER;CN=Francesco Testini;CN=Devon Cass;CN=Adriana Placani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T080000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T083000 SUMMARY:An Attempt at a Critique of all Epistemic Instrumentalism UID:20260918T174113Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:In recent years\, the debate on normativity has benefited from work at the intersection of different philosophical disciplines. Most notably\, epistemologists have drawn on moral and legal theory to shed light on the grounds of epistemic normativity (Hannon &\; Woodard 2026)\, the nature of epistemic blame (Brown 2020\, Piovarchy 2021\, Boult 2024)\, epistemic accountability (Kauppinen 2026)\, and to better understand the distinctiveness of epistemic justification and excuse (Greco 2021). Within aesthetics\, several philosophers have recently tapped into similar sources to assess ideas such as aesthetic obligation (Kubala 2020\, Whiting 2021)\, aesthetic blameworthiness (Kubala 2024)\, and aesthetic motivation (King 2018). In political philosophy - where the idea of a distinctively political normativity is still under assessment (Leader Maynard &\; Worsnip 2018\, Gadomski 2025) - epistemic insights have been brought to bear on crucial normative notions such as legitimacy (Peter 2023)\, as well as on more applied issues(Edenberg &\; Hannon 2021).
\nFor this workshop\, we invite papers developing this productive cross-pollination to address foundational issues about specific normative domains and clarify the relationship(s) between them. Submissions should include an anonymized abstract of no more than 800 words (references excluded)\, and a title page with authors&rsquo\; info and affiliation.
\nSpeakers will be invited as contributors to a special issue\, to be proposed to a leading international journal.
\nPlease submit materials to: normativeintersections@gmail.com
\nDeadline: July 31st
\nNotification of acceptance: by August 15th
ORGANIZER;CN=Francesco Testini;CN=Devon Cass;CN=Adriana Placani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T080000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T083000 SUMMARY:Irrational Virtues UID:20260918T174114Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:In recent years\, the debate on normativity has benefited from work at the intersection of different philosophical disciplines. Most notably\, epistemologists have drawn on moral and legal theory to shed light on the grounds of epistemic normativity (Hannon &\; Woodard 2026)\, the nature of epistemic blame (Brown 2020\, Piovarchy 2021\, Boult 2024)\, epistemic accountability (Kauppinen 2026)\, and to better understand the distinctiveness of epistemic justification and excuse (Greco 2021). Within aesthetics\, several philosophers have recently tapped into similar sources to assess ideas such as aesthetic obligation (Kubala 2020\, Whiting 2021)\, aesthetic blameworthiness (Kubala 2024)\, and aesthetic motivation (King 2018). In political philosophy - where the idea of a distinctively political normativity is still under assessment (Leader Maynard &\; Worsnip 2018\, Gadomski 2025) - epistemic insights have been brought to bear on crucial normative notions such as legitimacy (Peter 2023)\, as well as on more applied issues(Edenberg &\; Hannon 2021).
\nFor this workshop\, we invite papers developing this productive cross-pollination to address foundational issues about specific normative domains and clarify the relationship(s) between them. Submissions should include an anonymized abstract of no more than 800 words (references excluded)\, and a title page with authors&rsquo\; info and affiliation.
\nSpeakers will be invited as contributors to a special issue\, to be proposed to a leading international journal.
\nPlease submit materials to: normativeintersections@gmail.com
\nDeadline: July 31st
\nNotification of acceptance: by August 15th
ORGANIZER;CN=Francesco Testini;CN=Devon Cass;CN=Adriana Placani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260922T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260923T170000 SUMMARY:Normative Intersections UID:20260918T174115Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:In recent years\, the debate on normativity has benefited from work at the intersection of different philosophical disciplines. Most notably\, epistemologists have drawn on moral and legal theory to shed light on the grounds of epistemic normativity (Hannon &\; Woodard 2026)\, the nature of epistemic blame (Brown 2020\, Piovarchy 2021\, Boult 2024)\, epistemic accountability (Kauppinen 2026)\, and to better understand the distinctiveness of epistemic justification and excuse (Greco 2021). Within aesthetics\, several philosophers have recently tapped into similar sources to assess ideas such as aesthetic obligation (Kubala 2020\, Whiting 2021)\, aesthetic blameworthiness (Kubala 2024)\, and aesthetic motivation (King 2018). In political philosophy - where the idea of a distinctively political normativity is still under assessment (Leader Maynard &\; Worsnip 2018\, Gadomski 2025) - epistemic insights have been brought to bear on crucial normative notions such as legitimacy (Peter 2023)\, as well as on more applied issues(Edenberg &\; Hannon 2021).
\nFor this workshop\, we invite papers developing this productive cross-pollination to address foundational issues about specific normative domains and clarify the relationship(s) between them. Submissions should include an anonymized abstract of no more than 800 words (references excluded)\, and a title page with authors&rsquo\; info and affiliation.
\nSpeakers will be invited as contributors to a special issue\, to be proposed to a leading international journal.
\nPlease submit materials to: normativeintersections@gmail.com
\nDeadline: July 31st
\nNotification of acceptance: by August 15th
ORGANIZER;CN=Francesco Testini;CN=Devon Cass;CN=Adriana Placani: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260922T120000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260922T133000 SUMMARY:Cailin O’Connor - Closing the Loop on Social Influence in Science UID:20260918T174116Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:The Center for Philosophy of Science invites you to our Featured Former Fellow online lecture presented by: \; \;
\nFeatured Former Fellow: \; \;Cailin O&rsquo\;Connor
\nTuesday\, September 22nd @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST
\nTitle: \; Closing the Loop on Social Influence in Science
\nAbstract: \;
\nThe prevalence of social influence in science is widely documented. \; But this influence is not one-sided. \; Social beliefs and values shape science\, and at the same time are shaped by scientific findings. \; This mutual influence raises the possibility of dynamical interplay between science and society. \; But while this possibility has been mentioned numerous times in the literature\, there is relatively little work attempting to analyze and outline how this mutual influence might work. \; This talk argues that two-way influence between science and society is promiscuous\, occurring via a wide range of mechanisms that start with both values and related cultural background beliefs\, and influence both values and related cultural background beliefs. I&rsquo\;ll discuss three sorts of general patterns at play&mdash\;positive feedback\, polarizing feedback\, and amplification.
\nThis talk will be available online only:
\nZoom: \; \; \;https://pitt.zoom.us/j/91092965122
\n\;YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg.
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260922T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260922T090000 SUMMARY:The 2027 Annual Meeting of the American Comparative Literature Association UID:20260918T174117Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:4302 University Dr\, Houston\, United States\, 77004 DESCRIPTION:https://www.acla.org/seminar/875d9da0-735b-4676-ab1f-fff5c023f669\nView Seminar\nA Pedagogy Seminar and raw notes\n\nSTATUS: STATUS WILL BE AVAILABLE AFTER DECEMBER 1\, 2026\nAbstract\n\nSynopsis of the trends: For the discipline of literature in East Asian Languages + Cultures there were a growing trend to incorporate active learning and digital humanities as pedagogy tools. This encourages students to write research journals along with the pace of the course and allow more flexibility in terms of developing research interests. The outcome of the course can be more than final assignments. It can also be a collaborative project for publish use —a website/a curatorial project/or a published work with collaborative efforts. Digital humanities are more effective in recent research and the teaching of premodern literature. UCLA launched a mobile app of digital dictionary KuLA that transcribes premodern cursive Japanese handwriting into legible characters. The research tool—geographic information systems—is also adopted by many literary scholars to collaborate with city planners/geographers/cartographers or to adopt an interdisciplinary approach of spatial analysis in literary work. Some co-teaching or co-authorship are done this way. Instructors who are interested in ethics in pedagogy are also learning from scholarship on disability studies.\n\nKeywords\n\npedagogy literary pedagogy comparative pedagogy land-based pedagogy premodern ORGANIZER;CN=Vivien Jiaqian Zhu: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260918T173305Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260922T153000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260922T170000 SUMMARY:Attention and education UID:20260918T174118Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:74bb:64ff:feff:71eb%3 TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:In the twentieth century\, sociologists and economists began to speak of our economy as an attention economy (Citton\, 2017: 5ff.). At the heart of this economy lies the scarce resource of our attention\, and this is what sellers are competing for with ever more sophisticated means (Franck\, 2019: 13). In fact\, beyond attracting our attention in order to sell goods\, sellers use attractive goods to capture &ndash\; and sell &ndash\; our attention. We pay for many things we consume through various media with the attention we spend on advertisements that frame and interrupt the show\, programme\, or whatever we were enjoying. Big tech companies have become experts at creating technology that arrests and holds people&rsquo\;s attention. The smartphone and the &lsquo\;social&rsquo\; media it channels is currently the ultimate example\, and (young) people&rsquo\;s addiction to it demonstrates its producers&rsquo\; success in captivating their attention (Coughlan\, 2019\; Giansanti\, 2025).
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;The attention economy &ndash\; or more broadly the attentional \;ecology \;today&rsquo\;s society offers (Citton\, 2017) &ndash\; comes with educational implications. According to our experience educators tend to see the educational problem it poses in terms of competition: students&rsquo\; attention is a battleground\, and teachers&rsquo\; efforts to draw and direct students&rsquo\; attention have to compete with those of big tech. \;The attention needed in and for education is distracted\, even held captive\, by smartphones and social media. But here the importance of attention is still seen as instrumental only. Attention is a scarce resource and a means to accomplish educational ends. The problem of smartphone and social media addiction should also help us to look beyond this\, however\, because what we see here is not just that attention we would rather see devoted to educational activities is spent on something else\, but that students \;lack control \;over their attention. The problem with attention is at the same time a problem with autonomy and agency\, concepts &ndash\; and values &ndash\; generally considered to lie at the heart of education. As Ergas (2016\, 2017) argued\, attention lies at the heart of autonomy and agency. It is therefore not just a means to accomplish educational ends\, but also an end\, a capacity (or suite of capacities) worth cultivating in education for its importance in life rather than for &lsquo\;learning&rsquo\; only &ndash\; a point also argued for in different ways by Jiddu Krishnamurti and Simone Weil\, among others (Krishnamurti\, 2024\; Weil\, 1986\; see Lewin\, 2014).
\n\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \;The purpose of this research lab is to explore the educational importance of attention further. The focus will not lie on the question what teachers should direct students&rsquo\; attention to (i.e. the \;object \;of attention)\, which would lead us to the familiar question as to the contents and justification of the curriculum\, but on questions pertaining to attention as such: what \;kinds \;of attention should we try to cultivate in education\, and for what purpose? How does attention relate to autonomy\, agency\, and ultimately human flourishing? How and why should attention have the transformative potential claimed for it? \;And how should educational practices relate to the attentional ecology offered by today&rsquo\;s mediatized societies\, and what attentional ecology should educators and educational institutions themselves strive to offer?
\nEngaging with questions such as these requires that we reflect on the nature(s) of attention itself before we focus on its educational importance (though it may also prove helpful to approach the phenomenon &ndash\; or phenomena &ndash\; of attention through how they manifest in educational situations). Hence\, the research lab will consist of the following three sessions.
\nOutline of the sessions
\n1. \; \; \; \; \;What is attention?
\nDate: Tuesday\, 22 September 2026
\nTime: 15:30 CET
\nReadings:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Watzl\, S. (2011b). The nature of attention. \;Philosophy Compass \;6(11): 842-853.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;McGilchrist\, I. (2019). Ways of attending: How our divided brain constructs the world. Routledge.
\n2. \; \; \; \; \;Attention as the central &lsquo\;act&rsquo\; in\, or aim of\, education
\nDate: TBD via doodle
\nTime: \;
\nReadings:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Ingold\, T. (2025). For attention. In: \;Old ways\, new people: Anthropology and/as education \;(2nd \;ed.) (pp. 23-45). Routledge.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Weil\, S. \;(1986). Prerequisite to dignity of labour. In: \;Simone Weil: An anthology \;(pp. 265-276) Ed. and intr. S. Miles. Virago Press Limited.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Lewin\, D. (2014). Behold: Silence and attention in education. \;Journal of Philosophy of Education \;48(3): 355-369.
\n3. \; \; \; \; \;Attention as key to the good life
\nDate: TBD via doodle
\nTime:
\nReadings:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Ergas\, O. (2016). Attention please: Positioning attention at the center of curriculum and pedagogy. \;Journal of Curriculum Theorizing \;31(2): 66-81.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;Elvis\, L. (2023). Attentiveness\, qualities of listening and the listener in the community of philosophical inquiry. \;Childhood &\; Philosophy \;19: 1-22.
\nReferences
\nCitton\, Y. (2014). \;The ecology of attention. Polity.
\nCoughlan\, S. (2019). Smartphone &lsquo\;addiction&rsquo\;: Young people &lsquo\;panicky&rsquo\; when denied mobiles. \;https://www.bbc.com/news/education-50593971.
\nErgas\, O. (2016). Attention please: Positioning attention at the center of curriculum and pedagogy. \;Journal of Curriculum Theorizing \;31(2): 66-81.
\nErgas\, O. (2017). \;Reconstructing &lsquo\;education&rsquo\; through mindful attention: Positioning the mind at the center of curriculum and pedagogy. \;Palgrave Macmillan.
\nFranck\, G. (2019) [1998]. \;Ö\;konomie der Aufmerksamkeit: Ein Entwurf. Carl Hanser Verlag.
\nGiansanti\, D. (2025). Smartphone addiction in youth: A narrative review of systematic evidence and emerging strategies. \;Psychiatry International \;2025\, \;6\, 118: \;https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6040118.
\nJames\, W. (1899). \;Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life&rsquo\;s ideals. Henry Holt and Company.
\nKrishnamurti\, J. (2024). \;On education. Krishnamurti Foundation India.
\nLewin\, D. (2014). Behold: Silence and attention in education. \;Journal of Philosophy of Education \;48(3): 355-369.
\nWeil\, S. \;(1986). Prerequisite to dignity of labour. In: \;Simone Weil: An anthology \;(pp. 265-276) Ed. and intr. S. Miles. Virago Press Limited.
\nBackground
\nThe guiding idea of this research lab (i.e. a short series of online seminars)\, which is part of the project \;Expanding Consciousness in Education &ndash\; East\, West\, North and South. Towards a Global Philosophy of Education \;(GlobalPhilEd)\, is to establish a genuinely global practice of philosophy of education aiming at an actual collaborative engagement between the substantive positions developed in different traditions focusing on concrete philosophical problems. In doing so our aim is to practice global philosophy as a collaborative explorative enterprise that deals with concrete philosophical issues and concepts and to better understand the methodological (meta-)philosophical issues this involves. To make adequate philosophical sense of the phenomenon of attention and its relationships to education\, as the topic of our second research lab\, we thus hope to draw on the plurality of philosophical traditions in the world in order to better understand the different varieties of attention and their educational value. \;
\nRequirements for registration
\nThis research lab will be structured as three sessions (each 2\,5 hours long) that will encourage active participation of participants during sessions\, as well as in collaboratively thinking about the self and its different dimensions from the perspective of different traditions of the Philosophy of Education. This collaborative philosophical initiative provides a unique opportunity to engage with international colleagues on a central topic in the Global Philosophy of Education\, that currently enjoys increasing attention. The results of our discussion may &ndash\; if participants are interested &ndash\; be published in different forms and via different outlets\, such as joint \;(i.e. by two or more participants) written journal papers (or paper proposals)\, blog texts\, or an edited volume.
\nAs this is a collaborative effort\, we request that you sign up only if you anticipate attending all three sessions and are able to engage with the project in between sessions. \;
\nIn order to register please briefly indicate the specific research interests related to Philosophy of Education (or related fields) and share some general ideas that you have concerning the topic of the self and education. You will receive the texts as well as the zoom links after registration.
\nFor registration please contact: \;a.schinkel@vu.nl.
ORGANIZER;CN=Johannes Drerup: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR