BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260916T005959Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261013T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261013T130000
SUMMARY:Shimin Zhao - From probability raising to actual causation
UID:20260916T005959Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:cc4b:43ff:fe63:b1f2%3
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION: University of Pittsburgh\, 4200 Fifth Avenue\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15260
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh invites you to join us for our Lunch Time Talk. Attend in person at 1117 Cathedral of Learning or visit our live stream on YouTube at <a rel="noopenerdata-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a>.</p>\n\n<p><strong>LTT:&nbsp\;&nbsp\;<a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.centerphilsci.pitt.edu/fellows/zhao-shimin/">Shimin Zhao</a></strong></p>\n\n<p>Tuesday\, October 13th @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST</p>\n\n<p><strong>Title: From probability raising to actual causation</strong></p>\n\n<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p>\n<p>In this talk\, I address an epistemic gap between statistical causal models and actual causal inquiries. First\, I illustrate the gap with two cases: radiation cancer and coin bending. In both cases\, the actual causes are empirically undecidable\, leading to a deadlock of intuitions. Then\, I propose a methodological shift. Rather than relying on unverifiable assumptions\, I analyze the functions of causal concepts: why are we interested in causes even when actual causal inquiries cannot be answered? I argue that the answer is: guiding future actions and assigning responsibility. Crucially\, for both purposes\, a probability-raiser (under interventions) is sufficient. Thus\, for practical purposes\, a probability-raiser functions exactly as a cause. This crosses the gap from probability raising to actual causation\, without dissolving the difference. A metaphysics-free interpretation of the legal &ldquo\;probability of causation&rdquo\; metric is also provided\, as an application of my account.</p>\n<p>This talk will also be available live streamed on:</p>\n<p>Zoom at&nbsp\; TBA</p>\n<p>YouTube at <a data-cke-saved-href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg</a>.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Edouard Machery:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
