BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260821T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260821T090000
SUMMARY:8th CNY Moral Psychology Workshop
UID:20260821T071351Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:1331 Salt Springs Rd\, Syracuse\, United States\, 13214
DESCRIPTION:<p>The 8th CNY Moral Psychology workshop will be held on <strong>Nov. 13\, 2026.</strong> Any topic in moral psychology is welcome. For suggested topics\, see the program from previous years or 'About the Workshop' (https://sites.google.com/lemoyne.edu/cnymoralpsychology/about). We will hold the Workshop this year in-person at Le Moyne College in Syracuse\, NY. There will not be an option to attend remotely.</p>\n<p>Please use the following link for more information.</p>\n<p>https://sites.google.com/lemoyne.edu/cnymoralpsychology/2026</p>\n<p>Sessions are read-ahead. After a brief summary of the paper's main claims and arguments\, the session will be spent in discussion. Applicants will be asked to submit rough drafts of their work (max 25 pages) in late October.</p>\n<p>This year's Workshop will feature a keynote by Dr. Ben Bradley (Syracuse University). Title TBA.</p>\n<p>To have a presentation considered\, please submit a 500-600 word abstract to the following form (https://forms.gle/8Zdu3JtpoRBLPkUL8). Abstracts are due by <u><strong><em>Aug. 21</em></strong></u></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Joseph Spino;CN=Randall R. Curren;CN=John M. Monteleone;CN=Irene Liu:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260831T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260831T120000
SUMMARY:Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical
UID:20260821T071352Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Zurich
LOCATION:Rämistr. 71\, Zürich\, Switzerland\, 8006
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Abstracts on <em>Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical</em> (University of Zurich\, 18th-20th February 2027)</strong></p>\n<p>We invite the submission of <strong>extended abstracts</strong> (but no longer than <strong>1000 words</strong>) for presentations at the international conference on <strong>&ldquo\;Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical&rdquo\; </strong>that takes place at the <strong>University of Zurich</strong> from <strong>18th to 20th February 2027</strong>. The abstracts should be sent to <a href="mailto:sebastian.schmidt@uzh.ch"><strong>sebastian.schmidt@uzh.ch</strong></a> until <strong>August 31st 2026.</strong></p>\n<p>The conference will host a series of renowned experts from ethics and epistemology to discuss the role of relational normativity across philosophical disciplines. If your talk gets accepted\, travel expenses\, including up to three nights at a central hotel in Zurich\, flight and train tickets\, as well as lunch and dinner\, will be covered. We also plan a follow-up project such as an edited volume with a major publisher or a special issue for an academic journal. Accepted talks will be invited as contributions to this follow-up project.</p>\n<p>A recent trend in epistemology is to borrow ethical concepts to think about epistemic normativity. Maybe most notably\, the concept of epistemic injustice is meant to track the wrong that is done to someone in their capacity as a knower (Fricker 2007). More recently\, the idea that there is something we epistemically owe to each other (cf. Basu 2019) is taking hold. Epistemologists defend the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of accountability and blame (Kauppinen 2018\; Brown 2020\; Boult 2020\; 2024)\, that we expect each other to meet our epistemic obligations to believe or know (Goldberg 2018)\, and that we owe epistemic redress (Hull 2019)\, atonement (Woodard 2023)\, or reparations (Altanian 2022\; Lackey 2022) to those we epistemically wronged\, who might then decide to epistemically forgive us (Green 2024). This has led some epistemologists to propose more fundamentally social meta-epistemologies (Dyke 2022\; Fleisher 2024\; Hannon &amp\; Woodard 2025)\, even proposing that epistemic normativity has relational foundations (Boult 2024).</p>\n<p>While epistemologists take inspiration from the work of ethicists to develop their ideas on epistemic relationality\, the above literature develops largely in isolation from broader engagement with the recent ethical discussions on the relational structure of morality. Relational ethics has focused mostly on the explanation of our moral obligations to one another\, where obligations are typically understood as the correlates of rights or similar claims. To be under a moral obligation\, on this view\, is to be under a directed or second-personal duty to another person which is constitutively connected to the claim-right that this person has on you (e.g. Darwall 2006\, Wallace 2019\, Zylberman 2021). The relational understanding of morality illuminates the social significance of morality and the commonly held assumption that morality is grounded in relations of accountability and that moral wrongness warrants blame.</p>\n<p>The pioneering work and ongoing research by ethicists should be studied closely for the transposition of ethical concepts into epistemology to be intelligible and bear philosophical fruit. The aim of this conference is to bring together these two perspectives with a focus on discussing foundational issues surrounding relational normativity. Questions that will be discussed may include the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What grounds the authority of relational normativity? Do we have obligations towards one another simply in virtue of our nature as social creatures\, or is there something else that explains the authority of relational obligations?</li>\n<li>To what extent should relational normativity play a role in epistemology? Should it play a role only insofar as epistemologists are interested in moral questions pertaining to our beliefs\, or is there a distinctly epistemic kind of relational normativity?</li>\n<li>Can epistemic norms in general or in part be understood as relational duties? Maybe we owe it to others to comply with certain epistemic norms when others testify or when it comes to not wronging others with what we believe about them. Or maybe we have epistemic relational obligations in virtue of certain social roles\, such as being a scientific expert. Even so\, is there any hope in understanding epistemic normativity more broadly as relational? We do not seem to owe it to any concrete party to generally fit our beliefs to our evidence. Or do we?</li>\n<li>How can a relational perspective on epistemic normativity gain inspiration from and ground projects in social\, feminist\, and decolonial philosophy? For decades\, feminist epistemologists and ethicists have attended to how we relate to one another under conditions of oppression. While meta-normative discussions tend to pass over this more applied literature\, feminist philosophers tend to focus on the concrete contexts rather than meta-normative theory building. Can we get them into conversation?</li>\n<li>What are the relevant relations between a) practical agents and b) epistemic agents? Are these the same relations and if so on what grounds are these relations built? Or do these relations differ? What can we learn from legal relations on the one hand and personal relationships like friendship on the other hand when thinking about how to best conceive of the relevant relations?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Speakers who accepted our invitation to present at the conference include:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Rima Basu (Claremont McKenna College\, California\, USA)</li>\n<li>Monika Betzler (LMU Munich\, Germany)</li>\n<li>Cameron Boult (Brandon University\, Canada)</li>\n<li>Stephen Darwall (Yale University\, Connecticut\, USA)</li>\n<li>Sanford Goldberg (Northwestern University\, Illinois\, USA)</li>\n<li>Antti Kauppinen (University of Helsinki\, Finland)</li>\n<li>Fabienne Peter (University of Warwick\, England\, UK)</li>\n<li>R. Jay Wallace (University of Berkeley\, California\, USA)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>We are very much looking forward to receiving your abstracts\,</p>\n<p>Jonas Vandieken (LMU Munich) &amp\; Sebastian Schmidt (University of Zurich)</p>\n<p>This conference is part of the Swiss National Science Foundation project on Relational Epistemology (<a  href="https://data.snf.ch/grants/grant/223891"  target="_blank">https://data.snf.ch/grants/grant/223891</a>).</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;<a href="https://zegra.ch/events/event/relational-normativity-epistemic-and-practical/">Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical &ndash\; ZEGRa</a></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sebastian Schmidt;CN=Jonas Vandieken:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260831T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260831T170000
SUMMARY:Trust & Extremism
UID:20260821T071353Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>It might seem obvious that there is a relationship between lower levels of social and political trust and higher levels of extremism. However\, there exists a surprising gap at the intersection of these two areas of research. <em>Trust and Extremism </em>is an inter- and multi-disciplinary edited collection\, under advance contract with UBC Press\, that seeks to fill this gap. It brings scholars from multiple disciplines\, including anthropology\, philosophy\, political science\, religion\, criminology\, and far-right and terrorism studies\, into conversation about the empirical and theoretical connections between trust and extremism.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>The co-editors are seeking up to 3 additional chapters that explicitly address both trust and extremism. Chapters may address any of the following sorts of questions:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is dis/trust and how does it inform extremist movements?</li>\n<li>How do extremist movements leverage or weaponize dis/trust?</li>\n<li>How do social identities inform dis/trust of political and legal institutions?</li>\n<li>What is the (inter)relationship between dis/trust and the rise of extremism\, radicalism\, populism\, fundamentalism\, and violence?</li>\n<li>How do political and social actors respond to issues of dis/trust within or beyond democratic institutions?</li>\n</ul>\n<p><u>Submission Instructions<br></u>Please submit an extended abstract of approximately 1000 words as an attachment (DOC or PDF) to both co-editors at <u>ac.mack@uleth.ca</u> and <u>susan.dieleman@uleth.ca</u>. Use &ldquo\;Submission &ndash\; Trust &amp\; Extremism&rdquo\; as your subject line. Deadline for abstracts: August 31\, 2026. Decisions announced: September 14\, 2026. Deadline for complete first drafts (approx. 7000 words): December 31\, 2026.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260831T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260831T234500
SUMMARY:Res Practica Special Issue - “The Faces of Responsibility”
UID:20260821T071354Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>CFP - <em>Res Practica</em>\, New CR&Eacute\; Journal &ndash\; Special Issue: &ldquo\;The Faces of Responsibility&rdquo\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Edited by Christine Tappolet and Christian Nadeau</strong></p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p>The Centre de recherche en &eacute\;thique (CR&Eacute\;) invites you to submit a manuscript for publication in the first special issue of its new journal <strong><em>Res Practica</em></strong>\, to be launched formally in the Fall of 2026 and which will replace <em>Les Ateliers de l'&eacute\;thique / The Ethics Forum</em>. This special issue aims to explore the plurality of forms that responsibility takes in our individual\, social\, and institutional practices. Drawing on multidisciplinary perspectives by bringing together expertise in moral and political philosophy\, political science\, and legal theory\, our objective is to examine the concepts of moral responsibility\, political responsibility\, and legal responsibility.</p>\n<p>We especially welcome contributions that interrogate the points of convergence and divergence between these different kinds of responsibility: their foundations\, their attribution criteria\, their functions within our normative practices\, and the tensions they may generate in contemporary contexts.</p>\n<p>As the journal is fully bilingual\, submissions may be in either French or English. The articles will be accompanied by a short abstract in the other language.</p>\n<p>We invite the submission of research articles (8\,000 to 12\,000 words) addressing questions related to moral\, political\, and legal responsibility\, as well as issues at the intersection of these fields\, including but not limited to the themes listed below:</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Moral agency\, psychological capacities\, and responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Responsibility attributions\, reactive attitudes\, and emotions</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Responsibility\, blame\, and punishment</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Defenses and apologies</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Responsibility for non-voluntary attitudes (beliefs\, emotions\, etc.)</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Moral constructivism and moral responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Disagreements in responsibility attributions and the question of relativism</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Legal responsibility: criminal vs. civil</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Moral guilt and legal guilt</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Punishment and liability</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Legal doctrines of control\, fault\, and risk</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Corporate responsibility and institutional responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The responsibility gap and artificial intelligence</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Punishment and responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Collective and individual responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Collective agency and excuses</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Political responsibility vs. social responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Tensions between moral and legal responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Reducing one kind of responsibility to another</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Collective and individual responsibility</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Group agency and intentionality</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Responsibility toward future generations</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The political responsibility of states and social responsibility</p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Submission Guidelines</strong></p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp\;</strong>Submitted manuscripts may be in French or English. They should be between 8\,000 and 12\,000 words\, including references and footnotes. Manuscripts must be accompanied by an abstract of no more than 200 words and must be anonymized in preparation for double-blind peer review.</p>\n<p>Manuscripts must be submitted by email to <a href="mailto:aeef@umontreal.ca">aeef@umontreal.ca</a> <strong>no later than August 31\, 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>About <em>Res Practica</em></strong></p>\n<p>The aim of <em>Res Practica</em> is to create a space for fruitful exchange between experts from a variety of disciplines whose work focuses on\, or has implications for\, ethical\, political\, and more broadly normative questions. One important goal is to further our understanding of practical problems that confront both individuals and societies by uncovering philosophical assumptions often left implicit. Another goal is to encourage exploration of innovative solutions to normative dilemmas that confront individuals and societies\, in order to provide original and informed ethical guidelines and public policies. <em>Res Practica</em> will invite authors to reach across traditional disciplinary divides\, and to explore the multiple ways in which experts from a variety of academic disciplines\, including but not restricted to moral and political philosophy\, applied ethics\, political sciences\, and law\, can cast mutually enriching light upon pressing practical questions. <em>Res Practica</em> is also committed to promoting exchanges between experts writing in different languages. While we will begin with English and French\, we hope\, over time\, to broaden the range of linguistic traditions that can find a home in our pages.</p>\n<p><em>Res Practica</em>&rsquo\;s editors in chief are Christine Tappolet (Universit&eacute\; de Montr&eacute\;al)\, Daniel Weinstock (McGill University) and Samuel Dishaw (UCLouvain).</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260901T234500
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260901T234500
SUMMARY:Biophilia: The Ethics\, Politics\, and Aesthetics of Love for the Living World
UID:20260821T071355Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:Starkville\, United States\, 39762
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Biophilia</strong> refers to humans&rsquo\; love of nature and the living world generally. The Mississippi Philosophical Association invites scholars to explore the ethical\, political\, and aesthetic questions related to this theme in a two-day conference at <strong>Mississippi State University\,</strong> <strong>February 12th and 13th\, 2027</strong>. Two keynote speeches shall be delivered by <strong>Paula Casal&nbsp\;</strong>and <strong>Andrew Williams</strong>.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>E.O. Wilson defines biophilia as an evolutionarily developed tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes\; an innate human desire to affiliate with other forms of life\, including plants and animals. We invite scholars to engage with this definition of biophilia as well as a broader understanding of the concept. Papers need not assume that all humans are biophilic. In fact\, the apparent diversity in biophilic feelings across society (the presence or absence of such values\, varying levels of biophilia\, and love for different natural entities) is of interest in political philosophy. Should the government tolerate a reasonable amount of pluralism in citizens&rsquo\; appreciation of nature (or lack thereof)? How might fair terms of social cooperation be drawn up between biophilic and non-biophilic citizens?</p>\n<p>Ideas for presentations include but are not limited to:</p>\n<p><strong>Ethics:</strong> Is life the source of moral value? What is the moral status of the abiotic components of nature? How should &ldquo\;relational values&rdquo\; feature in Environmental Ethics? What is the proper unit of moral concern for nature: individual animals\, ecosystems\, or life itself? Should the natural (red in tooth in claw) be supplanted by the just?</p>\n<p><strong>Politics:</strong> Should the state attempt to inculcate an appreciation of nature in its citizenry? Could biophilia be considered a civic virtue? What are the implications of love for nature and specific natural entities for distributive justice? Should states recognize eco-sovereignty claims? Attachment-based claims?</p>\n<p><strong>Aesthetics:</strong> Is there a connection between aesthetic value and life? Is the current fascination with robots and A.I. an expression of <em>necro</em>philia or perhaps a perverted form of biophilia? What did Kant mean when he said that the &lsquo\;feeling of life&rsquo\; is fundamental to our perception of beauty? Could there be beauty in a dead world?</p>\n<p>Please email an <strong>anonymized abstract of around 500 words</strong> to Susan Erck (serck [at] philrel [dot] msstate [dot] edu) no later than <strong>September 1st\, 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>The MPA Student Presentation Prize:</strong>The winner will receive a cash prize of $250. If you are a student and wish to be considered for this prize\, please indicate so in your application email.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Susan Erck:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260902T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T170000
SUMMARY:MANCEPT Workshop on Ethics of Academia
UID:20260821T071356Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:University of Manchester\, Manchester\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong><u>We are inviting submissions for this workshop to be held as part of this year&rsquo\;s MANCEPT workshops.&nbsp\;The Workshops will take place at the University of Manchester\, from 2nd to 4th September 2026.</u></strong></p>\n<p>Recent resurgence of interest in the ethics of academia has sparked debates about the ideals and ongoing practices within academic institutions. These debates often highlight the tension between the aspirational goals of academia &ndash\; such as promoting systemic equity\, inclusion\, and access &ndash\; and the constraints imposed by socio-political realities\, including discrimination\, bias and lack of diversity\, institutional backlash against specific disciplines\, and budgetary and financial pressures. Our panel contributes to these debates by focusing on challenges that academics face specifically in their role as academics.&nbsp\;These include\, but are not limited to\, the following areas:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Special Relationships</u></em>:&nbsp\;Academics find themselves embedded in special relationships\, most notably with students.&nbsp\;For example\, increasing attention to student well-being and duties of care must be balanced against the pressures of overwork and the ongoing financialization of higher education.&nbsp\;Beyond students\, professional and personal relationships among academics with fellow colleagues\, elite institutions\, politicians\, and wealthy donors play a significant role in shaping norms\, influencing research agendas and funding priorities\, and reinforcing power imbalances and structural inequalities. These dynamics raise a variety of questions: What forms of transparency and accountability are ethically required when research is shaped by powerful institutional or financial interests? Who bears responsibility for protecting academic integrity when such relationships distort disciplinary priorities or public debate? What are the responsibilities of academics towards the public?&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Power and Accountability</u></em>: Academics play crucial roles in peer review and hiring processes. Yet both formal and informal power imbalances can disadvantage junior or marginalized scholars\, raising serious ethical concerns about fairness\, transparency\, and accountability in academic gatekeeping.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Academic Freedom and Public Responsibility:</u></em>&nbsp\;Academic research is expected to inform public debate. This raises questions about the responsibilities academics have toward the public\, as well as the boundaries and obligations of academic freedom.&nbsp\;These questions have taken on renewed urgency in a global context of rising authoritarianism and democratic backsliding\, in which academic freedom is increasingly&nbsp\;being&nbsp\;curtailed by state power.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Invisible Labour and Exploitation</u></em>: Much of academic work&mdash\;such as refereeing journal articles\, reviewing grant applications\, and committee service&mdash\;is unpaid\, unrecognized\, and often performed beyond contractual obligations. Meanwhile\, private corporations frequently profit from these contributions. This prompts critical questions about the ethics of academic labour and whether certain aspects of academic work should be considered exploitative.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Diversity and Justice</u></em>: Academia remains disproportionately white\, male\, and middle-class. This lack of diversity raises not only questions of justice and access\, but also epistemic concerns about how it impacts the core functions of academia&mdash\;such as teaching\, research\, and institutional credibility.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Academic Institutions and Campus Protest</u></em>: Recent student protests have renewed urgent questions about the role of academics and academic institutions in moments of political unrest. What responsibilities do faculty have toward protesting students? How should institutions balance commitments to academic freedom\, free speech\, and political neutrality&mdash\;especially when student activism challenges institutional interests or state-aligned narratives? The growing crackdown on student expression and faculty solidarity has highlighted the ethical stakes of institutional responses and the precarity of dissent within the academy.</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li><em><u>Global Academic Solidarity</u></em>:&nbsp\;The deliberate targeting and destruction of universities and educational infrastructure&mdash\;most visibly in occupied Palestine\, where institutions of higher learning have been systematically demolished &mdash\; raises profound ethical questions for the global academic community. What obligations of solidarity do academics and institutions bear toward colleagues and students whose universities have been destroyed by military force or imperial power? How should these obligations shape decisions about institutional partnerships\, research collaborations\, and academic exchange with states responsible for such destruction?</li>\n<li><em><u>Academia and AI use</u></em>: The rise of AI is particularly challenging for higher education. It raises questions of whether and if so how students should be trained to engage with AI. It also necessitates universities to formulate policies concerning AI use in teaching and exams. Are there general guidelines for such policies that ensure fair procedures\, and how should universities and academics handle cases of AI cheating by their students?&nbsp\; &nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p>We are interested in these or any other topic related to the ethics of academia. By engaging with these issues\, the panel aims to deepen ongoing discussions about what academia is\, what it ought to be\, and how we might reimagine academic life in more just and sustainable ways.<br><br><strong><u>Submissions should&nbsp\;be suitable for 30 minutes of presentation + 30 minutes of Q&amp\;A.</u></strong><br><br><strong><u>Please submit your anonymized abstract (300-500 words) by&nbsp\;20th April 2026&nbsp\;using&nbsp\;</u></strong><strong><u>this form</u></strong><strong><u>: &nbsp\;https://forms.gle/UVP6ctu9uAVmko7W6<br><br></u></strong><strong><u>Participants must pay fees for registration and dinner\; further information about costs will be provided soon.</u></strong></p>\n<p><strong>For any questions\, please contact Kritika Maheshwari (k.maheshwari</strong><strong>@tudelft.nl)<br></strong></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Kritika Maheshwari;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Martin Sticker:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260902T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T170000
SUMMARY:MANCEPT Workshop - Speciesism\, Power and Human Prejudice
UID:20260821T071357Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Manchester Center for Political Theory\, University of Manchester\, Oxford Road\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>Speciesism has become a central concept in moral\, social and political scholarship and movements concerning animals. Broadly understood\, speciesism refers to discrimination based on species-membership and is often compared to racism and sexism. Nonetheless\, unlike racism and sexism\, speciesism is still generally regarded as an acceptable bias by the public and\, also amongst philosophers\, opinions diverge.</p>\n<p>Nowadays\, most philosophers reject forms of speciesism which rely merely on membership in the human species. However\, anthropocentric approaches which are justified in more indirect terms are widespread. Indeed\, these have received renewed defences recently &ndash\; including accounts which rely on rationality or social categories\, among others.</p>\n<p>This raises pressing metaphysical\, normative and epistemic concerns about what it means to be a human\, whether anthropocentric approaches to moral and political theory can be successfully defended\, and a wider question about why philosophers might be compelled to defend them at all. At the same time\, there are a variety of related concerns that are more overtly political in character\, which theorists of race and gender attend to\, but which are under-addressed in the literature on animals. These include issues regarding systems of power\, structural injustice\, social hierarchy\, domination and oppression.</p>\n<p>This panel is therefore broadly concerned with the following question: if speciesism is similar to racism and sexism\, what lies behind the former&rsquo\;s largely unchecked dominance in our thinking\, conduct and social structures? And how might we better understand its continued socio-political power\, within and beyond analytic political and moral philosophy? The panel will consider a range of related sub-questions including\, but not limited to\, the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>How should we define and understand speciesism? What similarities with and differences to racism and sexism does it have?</li>\n<li>Must speciesism be morally wrong? Furthermore\, must it constitute an injustice?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>What are the psychological-philosophical roots of speciesism? And why has speciesism not experienced a similar widespread condemnation to racism and sexism?</li>\n<li>In what ways does speciesism continue to impact political and moral philosophy\, contemporary politics and beyond?</li>\n<li>How might speciesism be related to forms of social hierarchy and oppression seen in racism and sexism?</li>\n<li>How do social\, institutional and political structures impact speciesism? And how might these need to be reformed?</li>\n</ul>\n<p><u>Confirmed speakers</u>: Hannah Battersby (KU Leuven)\, Catia Faria (Complutense University of Madrid)\, Fran&ccedil\;ois Jacquet (Universit&eacute\; de Strasbourg)\, Matthew Wray Perry (University of Sheffield) and Val&eacute\;rie G. Topf (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem).</p>\n<p>For remaining speaker slots\,<strong> we invite submissions of abstracts of 250&ndash\;300</strong> words from scholars within philosophy\, political science\, law\, animal studies\, and related disciplines. Abstracts should be suitable for a presentation of roughly 20-30 minutes. Please email your anonymised abstract to valerie.topf@unipv.it by 11th May 2026. Responses to submitted abstracts will be provided by 22nd May 2026.</p>\n<p>Please note that registration\, travel and accommodation fees must be covered by speakers themselves. Information on current registration fees &ndash\; and bursaries for accepted abstracts &ndash\; will be available on the MANCEPT website. This year&rsquo\;s edition of the workshops will take place in-person only.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Hannah Battersby;CN=Matthew W. Perry;CN="Valérie G. Topf":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260909T170000
SUMMARY:Social Ties in Animal Politics: Mutuality Beyond Humanity
UID:20260821T071358Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:The Wave\, Sheffield\, United Kingdom
DESCRIPTION:<p>Social and political relationships constitute the foundation of our shared communities. Yet\, scholars working in the field of animal politics have not had these social ties as their primary focus. They have predominately highlighted the systematic injustice and exploitation that blight many of our relationships with nonhuman animals. This body of work has argued extensively for the rights of animals to fair treatment and political representation.</p>\n<p>Although crucial\, a focus on injustice leaves out the question of whether the numerous relational concepts traditionally reserved for human society &mdash\; such as civic friendship\, trust\, and solidarity &mdash\; can be meaningfully extended to nonhuman animals. The project of identifying and theorising injustice continues to be important\, but a positive vision of what a just interspecies community would look like necessitates engagement with social ties. To reimagine and build a multispecies political community that works for us all\, we must begin exploring the actual\, lived quality of the social and political relationships that bind humans and animals together\, or set us apart.</p>\n<p>To that end\, <strong>this conference seeks to investigate the everyday reality of coexistence with animals by exploring the diverse range of social\, political\, and institutional relationships between us.</strong> By thinking about the limits and potential of existing interspecies encounters\, we hope to unearth the conceptual and critical resources needed to rethink our shared social and political life with animals.</p>\n<p>Doing so requires us to engage with the idea that we are co-participants who share in social ties with nonhuman others. But there are profound challenges to any possible vision of mutuality beyond humanity. For example\, can the inescapable asymmetries in power\, or the significant communicative and epistemic barriers between species\, be overcome to realise a genuine interspecies politics?</p>\n<p>We will bring together scholars of animal ethics\, animal politics\, and cognate disciplines to explore these and related questions\, including but not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>In what ways do human-animal social relationships contribute to a flourishing political community? How do these relationships serve individual and collective interests in health\, happiness\, and community?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Can positive relational concepts like civic friendship or co-citizenship be meaningfully extended to non-human animals? Are interspecies relations of trust\, civility\, and tolerance possible?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>How\, if at all\, should negative relational concepts like aggression\, incivility\, or contempt be applied to animals? If animals can be our companions and our friends\, can they also be our enemies?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Is interspecies solidarity possible? Can humans and animals have mutual goodwill towards one another?&nbsp\; Can we have alliances with animals?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Why might mutuality with domesticated animals differ from with wild animals? Should we pursue relationships with wild animals\, or is mutuality undesirable? On what terms might it be acceptable?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Can humans and animals engage in mutually creative and cultural relationships? Can humans and animals play\, learn and co-create?</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Are relations of mutuality possible if there are profound asymmetries in power and cognitive ability between humans and animals? Can farmers\, for example\, be friends with those animals that they exploit? Can humans be friends with mice?</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>How do the concepts of love and care challenge or complicate traditional ways of thinking about justice for animals?&nbsp\;</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>How should ethical theory account for the inherent dangers and exploitation present in many human-animal relationships\, even those defined by intimacy? Can animals be exploited? Do animals have an interest in noninferiority?</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>How might emerging technologies facilitate\, improve or harm relationships with animals? How\, if at all\, should AI be used to transform relationships with animals? How might animals need protection from these developments?</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>This is the latest in a series of longstanding annual &lsquo\;Animal Politics&rsquo\; conferences. Details on past events (since 2010) can be found here: https://josh-milburn.com/animal-politics/&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Organisers: Alasdair Cochrane (University of Sheffield)\; Steve Cooke (University of Leicester)\; Sara van Goozen (University of York)\; Josh Milburn (Loughborough University)\; Angie Pepper (Roehampton University)\; Matt Perry (University of Sheffield).</p>\n<p><strong>Please send anonymised abstracts of no more than 300 words to m.w.perry@sheffield.ac.uk by end of day Friday 12th June.&nbsp\;</strong>Please include the title of your paper\, your name and your affiliation in the body of your email. Abstracts should be suitable for a 30 minute presentation and will be subject to a blind review process. Successful proposals will be notified by 30th June.</p>\n<p>There are no fees to attend\, but please register or submit an abstract by emailing the organisers. Refreshments and a buffet lunch will be provided. This conference is gratefully funded by a Mind Association Conference Grant\, as well as a contribution from a Wellcome Trust grant on Multispecies Mutualisms held at the University of Sheffield.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><em>This has allowed us to cover a small number of ECR/graduate student speaker fees consisting of accommodation and dinner (but excluding travel). The details of how to apply for this will be sent out with successful abstract responses.&nbsp\;</em></p>\n<p>We are committed to making the event welcoming for everyone by adhering to the BPA/SWiP Guidelines for Accessible Conferences and the BPA/SWiP Good Practice Scheme. For more information\, please get in touch with the organisers.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Matthew W. Perry;CN=Alasdair Cochrane;CN=Angie Pepper;CN=Josh Milburn;CN=Sara Van Goozen;CN=Steve Cooke:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260908T170000
SUMMARY:Book Launch: Expressive Action: A Philosophical Exploration by Christopher Bennett's
UID:20260821T071359Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Join us at https://meet.google.com/muk-tofn-ftj</p>\n<p>Bennett's&nbsp\;<em>Expressive Action: A Philosophical Theory</em> is the first volume in the new Oxford University Press book series on positive moral philosophy. Cheshire Calhoun will provide a brief introduction to positive moral philosophy followed by Chris Bennett's precis of his book. We'll then have an open discussion.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jules Holroyd:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Tokyo:20260911T093000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Tokyo:20260912T170000
SUMMARY: 2026 Action\, Politics and Responsibility Conference\, Tokyo 
UID:20260821T071400Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Asia/Tokyo
LOCATION:Tokyo\, Japan
DESCRIPTION:<p>The conference aims to survey ongoing original research on agency\, politics\, responsibility and their connections. Special attention will be given to political agency and the responsibility of groups. A wide variety of related questions will be addressed\, including\, but not limited to\, the existence and nature of group agents\, criteria of group responsibility\, how and whether agents can act jointly\, what distinguishes action from behaviour\, what legitimacy groups in conflict zones have\, group epistemic virtues\, and what interplay of emotion and reason renders relations between persons as genuine. The aim is to discuss\, learn from and enable participants to collaboratively improve their new\, original ongoing research on a number of interconnected topics.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="István Zárdai";CN=Kodai Sato:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260915T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260915T000000
SUMMARY:Call for Papers: Journal of Law\, Society\, and Authority - Special Issue (December 2026)
UID:20260821T071401Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Papers &ndash\; Special Issue (December 2026)</strong></p>\n<p>The Journal of Law\, Society\, and Authority (JLSA)\, a peer-reviewed open-access journal indexed in DOAJ and assigning CrossRef DOIs\, invites submissions for a special issue entitled:</p>\n<p><em><strong>&ldquo\;International Order and the Question of the Use of Force Involving Iran: Geopolitical and Legal Dimensions&rdquo\;</strong></em></p>\n<p>The special issue welcomes original and interdisciplinary contributions in international law\, international relations\, political science\, and security studies. Topics may include the regulation of the use of force under international law\, regional security dynamics involving Iran and the Middle East\, collective security mechanisms\, sanctions and geoeconomic transformations\, emerging multipolarity\, maritime security\, asymmetric conflicts\, and strategic communication.</p>\n<p><strong>Guest Editors:</strong><br><strong>Prof. Nacim Belhoul</strong> (University of Blida 2\, Algeria)<br><strong>Dr. Wang Guangda</strong> (China-Arab Research Center on Reform and Development\, China)<br><strong>Prof. Hassan Abdullah Al-Da'jah</strong> (Al-Hussein Bin Talal University\, Jordan)</p>\n<p><strong>Submission deadline:</strong> 15 September 2026<br>Language: English only</p>\n<p><strong>Article Type and Length:</strong><br>Original research articles and theoretical contributions (15&ndash\;25 pages\, including references and appendices).</p>\n<p><strong>Submission Email:</strong><br><a href="mailto:nassaiki@yahoo.fr">nassaiki@yahoo.fr</a></p>\n<p><strong>Author Guidelines:</strong><br><a href="https://revue.univ-oran2.dz/Revue/DSP/index.php/DSP/Author-guidelines">https://revue.univ-oran2.dz/Revue/DSP/index.php/DSP/Author-guidelines</a></p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260915T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260915T234500
SUMMARY:Security-Relevant Research in Academia - Debates\, Definitions\, and Best-Practices
UID:20260821T071402Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Karlsruhe\, Germany
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Please note: The call has been extended to the 15th of September!</strong></p>\n\n<p>Dear Colleagues\,</p>\n<p>We are pleased to invite submissions for a conference on <strong>"Security-Relevant Research in Academia: Debates\, Definitions\, and Best-Practices\,"</strong> taking place <strong>5&ndash\;6 November 2026</strong> at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)\, Germany:</p>\n<p><strong>Date:</strong> 5-6 November 2026<br> <strong>Location:</strong> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)\, Germany<br> <strong>Submission Deadline:</strong> 15 September 2026<br> <strong>Contact:</strong> <a href="mailto:scott.robbins@kit.edu">scott.robbins@kit.edu</a></p>\n<p>Universities stand at the critical intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility. The ongoing war in Ukraine has illustrated how rapidly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict\, raising the stakes for research touching on national security\, cryptography\, dual-use technologies\, and emerging weapon systems. To address these challenges\, we invite submissions for a conference dedicated to exploring the complex area of Security-Relevant Research (SRR) within higher-education institutions.</p>\n<p>We seek contributions from scholars\, administrators\, ethicists\, defense professionals\, policy makers\, and engineers/technology developers that examine the fundamental questions surrounding SRR. We are particularly interested in papers that address:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Defining the boundaries:</strong> What qualifies as security-relevant research in the modern academic landscape?</li>\n<li><strong>Institutional frameworks:</strong> What processes and structures should universities adopt to enable the responsible conducting of SRR?</li>\n<li><strong>Researcher agency:</strong> What are the specific responsibilities of individual researchers regarding SRR?</li>\n<li><strong>Funding and influence:</strong> How do contemporary funding structures and government contracts impact the visibility\, scrutiny\, and direction of SRR?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>While advocates argue that academic freedom fuels innovation and that university-based research offers transparent\, ethical alternatives to opaque military labs\, critics warn of accelerating arms races\, the exposure of students to dual-use dilemmas\, and conflicts of interest with defense sponsors. This workshop aims to navigate these tensions\, fostering a dialogue that balances innovation with ethical stewardship.</p>\n<p><strong>Submission Guidelines</strong><br> We invite abstracts of <strong>300&ndash\;500 words</strong> (excluding references) that propose a paper for presentation. Submissions must include the author's <strong>name and affiliation</strong>. Please send your abstracts via email to <a href="mailto:scott.robbins@kit.edu">scott.robbins@kit.edu</a> by <strong>15 September 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>Presentation Format</strong><br> Selected authors will be invited to present their work during the workshop. Each presentation will be allocated <strong>20 minutes</strong>\, followed by <strong>10 minutes</strong> for Q&amp\;A and discussion.</p>\n<p><strong>Publication Opportunity</strong><br> A primary goal of this workshop is to synthesize the insights\, case studies\, and draft guidelines generated during the event. Following the conference\, all participants will be invited to submit their full manuscripts for consideration in a <strong>special issue</strong> dedicated to Security-Relevant Research in Academia. We will have more information about this in due time.</p>\n<p>This conference is supported by BMFTR\, as part of the "MilEth" project (Military Defense Technologies and Ethics).</p>\n<p><strong>Keynotes:</strong><br> Michiel Bot (Tilburg University)<br> Lonneke Peperkamp (Radboud University Nijmegen &amp\; Netherlands Defense Academy)</p>\n<p><strong>Conference Organizers:</strong></p>\n<p>Scott Robbins &mdash\; Post-Doctoral Researcher\, KIT\, ARRTI<br> Nathan Wood &mdash\; Junior Research Group Leader\, TUHH<br> Alexander Bagattini &mdash\; Senior Researcher\, KIT\, ARRTI<br> Volker Gollnick &mdash\; Professor\, TUHH<br> Nico Br&auml\;hler &mdash\; Managing Director\, ARRTI\, KIT</p>\n<p>KIT &mdash\; TUHH</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Nico Brähler":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260917T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20260918T170000
SUMMARY:24th Pavia Graduate Conference in Political Philosophy
UID:20260821T071403Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Rome
LOCATION: Corso Strada Nuova\, 65\, Pavia\, Italy
DESCRIPTION:<p>24th&nbsp\;Pavia Graduate Conference in Political Philosophy</p>\n<p>17th&nbsp\;and 18th&nbsp\;September 2026</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;CALL FOR PAPERS</p>\n<p>On the 17th&nbsp\;and 18th&nbsp\;of September 2026\, the Department of Political and Social Sciences\, University of Pavia (Italy) will host the 24th&nbsp\;edition of the Pavia Graduate Conference in Political Philosophy. The conference is held within the framework of the PhD Program in Philosophy of the North-west Italy Philosophy Consortium (FINO).</p>\n<p>This two-day conference is meant to offer graduate students an opportunity to present papers\, get helpful feedback in a friendly atmosphere\, and exchange ideas both with peers and with leading academics in the field of political philosophy. In addition to parallel sessions devoted to students&rsquo\; presentations\, there will also be two plenary sessions for keynote speakers. For details of past editions\, see&nbsp\;here (http://www-4.unipv.it/paviagc/). This year&rsquo\;s keynote speakers are:</p>\n<p>Clare Chambers&nbsp\;(Jesus College\, University of Cambridge)</p>\n<p>Francesco Guala&nbsp\;(University of Milan)</p>\n<p>Graduate students interested in giving papers should send their contributions (max 1000 words &ndash\; in English) and a curriculum vitae\, by Friday 1st&nbsp\;May 2026. Papers may focus on any area within political philosophy\, and presentations should take no longer than twenty minutes to allow at least another twenty minutes of discussion. Papers must be prepared for blind review and files must be anonymized.&nbsp\;Applicants will be notified of the outcome of their submissions around mid-June. The conference will be held on premises.</p>\n<p>COSTS</p>\n<p>The conference package includes lunch and coffee breaks. Participants will be charged a fee of roughly 50&euro\; to contribute to catering expenses. Additionally\, participants can choose to sign up for the social dinner (roughly 35-40&euro\;). A number of accommodation places in university colleges are available to paper givers at relatively cheap rates. Accommodation fees and details will be arranged individually.</p>\n<p>EVALUATION OF SUBMISSIONS</p>\n<p>Submissions will be evaluated by the organizing committee\, composed of FINO PhD students and faculty members. To avoid any conflict of interests\, submissions from FINO PhD students will be evaluated separately and will be allocated a limited quota of places in the conference.</p>\n<p>CONTACT</p>\n<p>All correspondence (including paper submissions and additional inquiries) should be addressed to the conference email address:&nbsp\;pavia.gradconference@gmail.com</p>\n<p>http://www-4.unipv.it/paviagc/</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260917T193000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260919T170000
SUMMARY:Big Bioethics Workshop (Updated Call and Extended Deadline)
UID:20260821T071404Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:South Dakota State University\, Brookings\, United States\, 57007
DESCRIPTION:<p>South Dakota State University will be hosting a workshop on &ldquo\;Big Bioethics&rdquo\;\, September 17-19\, 2026. The workshop aims to host 10-12 scholars to present works in progress in any area of ethics related to theoretical and applied biological science including work in medical ethics\, genetic ethics\, environmental ethics\, ethics of biology and biotechnology\,&nbsp\;neuroethics\, ethics of psychology\, bioethics and law\, experimental bioethics\, and ethics-related work in philosophy of biology\, philosophy of medicine\, and philosophy of health.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>The workshop will be part of a larger Bioethics Day\, which will include other events\, including the Annual Bioethics Lecture\, featuring Leslie Francis (University of Utah) on Friday\, September 18.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Stipend\, Transportation\, and Lodging</strong></p>\n<p>Selected participants will receive a $500 stipend provided through the SDSU Ethics Lab. Participating scholars will be encouraged to share and read each other&rsquo\;s papers prior to the workshop.</p>\n<p>The conference&nbsp\;is located in&nbsp\;Brookings\, South Dakota\, 45 minutes north of Sioux Falls\, South Dakota. The conference will provide a shuttle service for individuals flying into Sioux Falls\, but participants may use Lyft\, Uber\, or public transport as well. &nbsp\;Brookings provides several hotel options in addition to the many options in Sioux Falls.</p>\n<p>Questions&nbsp\;regarding&nbsp\;the conference may be sent to Dr. Gregory Peterson (Philosophy\, School of American and Global Studies) at&nbsp\;<a href="mailto:greg.peterson@sdstate.edu">greg.peterson@sdstate.edu</a>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Call for Papers</strong>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>For full consideration\, proposals for individual papers will consist of an anonymized abstract (4000 characters or approximately 550-600 words) submitted through the application <a href="https://forms.cloud.microsoft/r/xE8nsLN5jV">portal</a>. Participants should plan for approximately 20 minutes to present their paper and 20 minutes for discussion and feedback.</p>\n<p>Proposals are due Tuesday\, June 30\,&nbsp\;2026&nbsp\;and may be&nbsp\;submitted&nbsp\;<a target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Gregory Peterson:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20260922T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20260922T090000
SUMMARY:The 2027 Annual Meeting of the American Comparative Literature Association
UID:20260821T071405Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:4302 University Dr\, Houston\, United States\, 77004
DESCRIPTION:https://www.acla.org/seminar/875d9da0-735b-4676-ab1f-fff5c023f669\nView Seminar\nA Pedagogy Seminar and raw notes\n\nSTATUS: STATUS WILL BE AVAILABLE AFTER DECEMBER 1\, 2026\nAbstract\n\nSynopsis of the trends: For the discipline of literature in East Asian Languages + Cultures there were a growing trend to incorporate active learning and digital humanities as pedagogy tools. This encourages students to write research journals along with the pace of the course and allow more flexibility in terms of developing research interests. The outcome of the course can be more than final assignments. It can also be a collaborative project for publish use —a website/a curatorial project/or a published work with collaborative efforts. Digital humanities are more effective in recent research and the teaching of premodern literature. UCLA launched a mobile app of digital dictionary KuLA that transcribes premodern cursive Japanese handwriting into legible characters. The research tool—geographic information systems—is also adopted by many literary scholars to collaborate with city planners/geographers/cartographers or to adopt an interdisciplinary approach of spatial analysis in literary work. Some co-teaching or co-authorship are done this way. Instructors who are interested in ethics in pedagogy are also learning from scholarship on disability studies.\n\nKeywords\n\npedagogy literary pedagogy comparative pedagogy land-based pedagogy premodern
ORGANIZER;CN=Vivien Jiaqian Zhu:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Athens:20260924T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Athens:20260925T170000
SUMMARY:Contemporary Philosophy meets Philosophy of Science: Trends and Perspectives: IV
UID:20260821T071406Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Athens
LOCATION:48 Akadimias Street\, Athens\, Greece\, 105 62
DESCRIPTION:<p>The&nbsp\;MA Program in Contemporary Philosophy/Philosophy of Science&nbsp\;of the&nbsp\;Department of History and Philosophy of Science&nbsp\;is pleased to announce its 4th Annual Conference on 24th and 25th September 2026 at the&nbsp\;National and Kapodistrian University of Athens</p>\n<p><strong>"Contemporary Philosophy meets Philosophy of Science: Trends and Perspectives: IV"</strong></p>\n<p>Conference Venue:&nbsp\;Kostis Palamas building</p>\n<p>(Attendance is free but places are limited and registration is required)</p>\n<p>Speakers:</p>\n<p><strong>Monika Betzler&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Munich)<strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Anjan Chakravartty&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Miami)</p>\n<p><strong>Gerhard&nbsp\;</strong><strong>Heinzmann&nbsp\;</strong>(Universit&eacute\; de Lorraine\, Nancy)</p>\n<p><strong>Doukas Kapantais&nbsp\;</strong>(Academy of Athens\, Research Centre for Greek Philosophy)<strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Chrysostomos Mantzavinos&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Athens)</p>\n<p><strong>Evgenia Mylonaki&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Athens)</p>\n<p><strong>Yannis Stephanou&nbsp\;</strong>(University of Athens)<strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Stelios Virvidakis</strong>&nbsp\;(University of Athens)</p>\n<p>---</p>\n<p>Programme &nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Thursday 24th September</strong></p>\n<p>10.00&ndash\;11.00&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Gerhard Heinzmann&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>A Dialogical Account of Epistemic Intuition</em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Coffee break until 11.30</em></p>\n<p>11.30&ndash\;12.30&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Yannis Stephanou&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>Against Classical Logic</em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Lunch Break until 14.30</em></p>\n<p>14.30&ndash\;15.30&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Doukas Kapantais&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>The Ontological Basis of the Algorithmic Operations in the&nbsp\;</em>Prior Analytics</p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Coffee break until 16.00</em></p>\n<p>16.00-17.00&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Anjan Chakravartty&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>Universalism and Multiculturalism in Science Education\, Revisited</em></p>\n<p><strong>Friday 25th September</strong></p>\n<p>10.00&ndash\;11.00&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Monika Betzler&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>Identity-Shaping as a Relational Wrong</em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Coffee break until 11.30</em></p>\n<p>11.30&ndash\;12.30&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Stelios Virvidakis &mdash\;&nbsp\;</strong><em>On the Relation between Epistemic and Moral Virtues: The Aristotelian Legacy and Contemporary Virtue Epistemology</em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Lunch Break until 14.30</em></p>\n<p>14.30&ndash\;15.30&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Evgenia Mylonaki&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>Moral Growth</em></p>\n<p><em>&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; Coffee break until 16.00</em></p>\n<p>16.00-17.00&nbsp\; &nbsp\;<strong>Roundtable Discussion: Monika Betzler\, Gerhard Heinzmann\, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos&nbsp\;</strong>&mdash\;<strong>&nbsp\;</strong><em>Dialogue as a Philosophical Genre</em></p>\n<p><em>----</em></p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260925T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270416T170000
SUMMARY:Zicklin Center Workshop in Normative Business Ethics
UID:20260821T071407Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:3730 Walnut Street\, Philadelphia\, United States\, 19104
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Call for Abstracts for The Zicklin Center Normative Business Ethics Workshop Series</strong></p>\n<p>Over the 2026-2027 academic year\, the <a href="https://esg.wharton.upenn.edu/centers-labs/zicklin-center/">Zicklin Center for Governance and Business Ethics </a>at the Wharton School\, University of Pennsylvania\, will convene a regular works-in-progress series for scholars working in normative business ethics (NBE). In particular\, the Series will workshop papers pursuing business ethics issues from a normative perspective\, or papers in moral or political philosophy with implications for the market\, distributive justice\, labor relations\, the role of business in society\, etc.</p>\n<p><strong>Workshop Objectives</strong></p>\n<p>The Series is part of an effort to foster normative business ethics in the academy and the public sphere. This particular initiative has two key objectives: First\, it endeavors to provide a regular forum for scholars working on business ethics from a normative perspective. The community of such scholars is relatively small\, and dispersed across numerous institutions\, and there are few opportunities for these individuals to convene and share work. This Series is an effort to connect these scholars and to enrich their shared intellectual life. Second\, the Series aims to be especially valuable to junior faculty and advanced graduate students\, by providing them with feedback from\, and opportunities to interact with\, more established members of the normative business ethics community. To that end\, we hope to have (at least) one junior author and one senior author at each session.</p>\n<p><strong>Workshop Format</strong></p>\n<p>The workshop will meet six times over the academic year. Any academic or practitioner with an interest in normative business ethics is invited to attend the sessions. Attendees are expected to read the papers in advance\, and to come with feedback for the paper authors. To maximize the opportunity for paper improvement\, authors will not present their papers\; we will instead spend our time together on questions and comments for the author.</p>\n<p>Sessions will be held on Fridays\, beginning at 1:00 pm unless otherwise indicated. We will discuss two to three papers at each session. <strong>Attendees are expected to read the papers in advance\, and to come prepared to offer feedback. </strong></p>\n<p>We plan to hold all sessions in-person\, on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania\, in Philadelphia.</p>\n<p><strong>Session Dates:</strong></p>\n<p>September 25th\, 2026</p>\n<p>October 30th\, 2026</p>\n<p>January 29th\, 2027</p>\n<p>February 26th\, 2027</p>\n<p>March 19th\, 2027</p>\n<p>April 16th\, 2027</p>\n<p><strong>Call for Abstracts</strong></p>\n<p>We invite abstract submissions from&nbsp\;faculty and post-docs\, and from graduate students who have advanced to the ABD stage.&nbsp\;Preferential treatment will be given to those who have not presented work at the Series before\, and we especially welcome submissions from women and under-represented minorities.</p>\n<p>The abstract should propose a paper in normative business ethics\, as described above. We ask that submissions offer a fairly detailed sense of the paper without exceeding 500 words.</p>\n<p>We ask that applicants identify three of the above dates\, in order of preference\, at which they would like to present their work. <strong>Please send your abstract to Brian Berkey &ndash\; </strong><a href="mailto:bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu">bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu</a><strong> -- by July 15th\, 2026.</strong> Individuals will be notified about whether their paper has been selected for presentation by August 3rd\, 2026.</p>\n<p><strong>Information for Selected Authors</strong></p>\n<p><em>The Zicklin Center will cover reasonable travel and accommodation expenses for paper authors for the session at which their paper will be discussed.</em></p>\n<p>Reimbursement for travel expenses is subject to two conditions. By accepting the offer to workshop a paper\, the paper author pledges that:</p>\n<p>1.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The paper they will share is at a stage of development where the author can incorporate feedback gained at the workshop (e.g.\, the paper is not yet in page proofs or in print)\; and</p>\n<p>2.&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; The paper author will send their draft paper to the organizers no fewer than 14 days before their presentation date.</p>\n<p>For co-authored papers\, we can ordinarily only provide travel funding for one of the authors\, though other co-authors are welcome to attend.</p>\n<p>Please address any questions about the CFA or the workshop to one of the organizers: Brian Berkey (<a href="mailto:bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu">bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu</a>)\, Amy Sepinwall (<a href="mailto:sepin@wharton.upenn.edu">sepin@wharton.upenn.edu</a>)\, Julian Jonker (<a href="mailto:jonker@wharton.upenn.edu">jonker@wharton.upenn.edu</a>)\, or Paul Forrester (<a href="mailto:pforr@wharton.upenn.edu">pforr@wharton.upenn.edu</a>).</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Amy J. Sepinwall;CN=Julian Jonker;CN=Paul Forrester:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260928T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260930T170000
SUMMARY:Second Conference of the European Moral Responsibility Consortium (EMRC)
UID:20260821T071408Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Vienna
LOCATION:Salzburg\, Austria
DESCRIPTION:<p>The EMRC (European Moral Responsibility Consortium) is a platform devoted to facilitating coordination and cooperation among philosophers based in Europe who are working in the area of moral responsibility and on related topics (free will\, blame\, collective responsibility\, punishment\, moral responsibility and AI\, etc.). From September 28-30\, 2026\, the second conference of the EMRC will be held in Salzburg\, Austria.</p>\n<p>Contact: emrconsortium@gmail.com</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Leonhard Menges;CN=Leonie Eichhorn:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20261001T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20261002T170000
SUMMARY:Ljubljana Doctoral and Postdoctoral Conference in Political Theory and Philosophy
UID:20260821T071409Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Belgrade
LOCATION:Aškerčeva cesta 2\, Ljubljana\, Slovenia
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Department of Philosophy at the Faculty of Arts\, University of Ljubljana\, invites doctoral candidates and early-career postdoctoral researchers to a two-day conference in political theory and political philosophy.</p>\n<p>The conference is open to work on any topic in the field\, and is unconstrained by school or tradition. Papers in the analytic and continental traditions are equally welcome\, as are Marxist\, critical-theoretical\, psychoanalytic\, (post)structuralist\, comparative\, historical\, and normative approaches.</p>\n<p><strong>Keynote speakers</strong></p>\n<p>&ndash\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; <strong>Richard Bellamy</strong> (University College London) &mdash\; title to be confirmed</p>\n<p>&ndash\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\; <strong>Vincent Harting</strong> (London School of Economics) &mdash\; title to be confirmed</p>\n<p><strong>Format</strong></p>\n<p>Papers will be grouped into thematic panels. Each speaker will have 50 minutes to divide between the presentation and discussion. There is no requirement to send papers in advance\, but there will be an opportunity to do so.</p>\n<p><strong>Practical information</strong></p>\n<p>There is no registration fee. Coffee and lunch will be provided on both days. We regret that we are unable to cover travel or accommodation costs.</p>\n<p>We particularly encourage submissions from researchers belonging to groups underrepresented in political theory.</p>\n<p><strong>Submissions</strong></p>\n<p>Please send an abstract of no more than 300 words\, together with your name\, affiliation\, and current position (doctoral or postdoctoral)\, to <strong>dusan.rebolj@ff.uni-lj.si </strong>&nbsp\;by <strong>6 September 2026</strong>. Applicants will be notified of decisions within days of that date. Enquiries may be directed to the same address.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261005T234500
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261005T234500
SUMMARY:36th Association for Practical and Professional Ethics Annual International Conference
UID:20260821T071410Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown\, 600 Commonwealth Place\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15222
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>The </strong><strong>Association for Practical and Professional Ethics</strong></a><strong> (APPE) </strong>invites individuals from every discipline and profession interested in advancing scholarship\, teaching\, and a general understanding of applied ethics to submit proposals based on their work to our 36th Annual APPE International Conference on <strong>March 4-7\, 2027</strong> in Pittsburgh. There will be an online-only portion of the conference program on <strong>April 2\, 2027</strong> to accommodate our members\, presenters\, and guests who are located across the globe\, or who are unable to attend the in-person conference in Pittsburgh.</p>\n<p>APPE is a multidisciplinary\, international organization advancing scholarship\, education\, and practice in practical and professional ethics. We facilitate and support scholarly and professional collaborations among teachers\, scientists\, business practitioners\, engineers\, government officials\, researchers\, the media\, and all professionals concerned with the practical application and communications of ethics and values.</p>\n<p>This year&rsquo\;s theme\, <strong>Examining Ethics and Power</strong>\, invites critical reflection on the ethical dimensions of power across professional\, institutional\, and global contexts. We encourage proposals that explore how power dynamics shape ethical decision‑making\; how power manifests in professional practices\; how institutions perpetuate or prevent harm\; and how ethical frameworks can clarify what is at stake as well as expose\, challenge\, and transform unjust power relations.</p>\n<p>Power structures social\, political\, organizational\, and interpersonal relations. Violence&mdash\;whether physical\, structural\, symbolic\, epistemic\, or institutional&mdash\;often emerges from\, reinforces\, or obscures the workings of power. Ethical analysis is essential for understanding how power is exercised\, resisted\, justified\, and contested\; how its proper use is often not recognized\, as well as how the misuse of power is often normalized\, hidden\, or confronted in professional and public settings.</p>\n<p>In addition to the special focus\, we welcome submissions from all areas of practical and professional ethics.</p>\n<p>Submissions are due <strong>Monday\, October 5\, 2026 </strong>and will be submitted via Ex Ordo</a>.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Kristen Fuhs Wells;CN=Earl Spurgin;CN=Mark Doorley:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261012T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261014T170000
SUMMARY:Caring for Non-Humans: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Care among Animals\, the Environment\, and AI
UID:20260821T071411Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Prague
LOCATION:Praha\, Czech Republic
ORGANIZER;CN=Friderike Spang;CN=John Dorsch:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261015T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261015T090000
SUMMARY:Public Affairs Quarterly
UID:20260821T071412Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Public Affairs Quarterly will hold a special issue focusing on connections between ethics and political psychology.&nbsp\; Philosophers\, political theorists\, and political psychologists are invited to submit normative papers exploring connections between these fields.&nbsp\; Although contributions should be normative or conceptual\, submissions from practicing social scientists are particularly encouraged.&nbsp\; Submissions may raise new philosophical questions from a social scientific point of view\, foster philosophical focus on concepts from political psychology\, or introduce new ways of approaching normative questions.&nbsp\; Examples of possible topics include: opinion change in political beliefs\, bias and heuristics in political reasoning\, polarization (including its causes\, various dimensions\, and normatively significant consequences)\, rural or urban consciousness\, symmetries and asymmetries between political parties\, connections to democracy and democratic norms\, the psychology of deliberation\, attitudes toward political violence\, contact theory and politically significant relationships\, epistemic deference or resistance to expertise\, trust in media and political institutions\, and the political psychology of race and gender.&nbsp\; This issue aims in particular to initiate conversations about issues of common normative concern between philosophers and political scientists.&nbsp\; As such\, submissions need not be situated in an existing philosophical literature\; interested scholars are encouraged to introduce normatively significant conceptual questions from their own disciplinary point of view.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Manuscripts should be between 7\,000 and 9\,000 words\, prepared for anonymous review\, and submitted through the PAQ submission portal by October 15\, 2026. Please note in the submission that this is intended for the special issue on Ethics and Political Psychology. Review will begin November 1\, 2026. The special issue is planned for Spring/Summer 2027. Questions may be directed to Ryan Davis.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261016T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261017T170000
SUMMARY:15th Annual Florida State University Free Will\, Moral Responsibility\, and Agency Conference
UID:20260821T071413Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Tallahassee\, United States\, 32304
DESCRIPTION:<p>The conference will take place at Florida State University on October 16-17\, 2026. The conference is open to any who is interested in attending.&nbsp\;If you would like to attend and require further information\, please email&nbsp\;Justice Cabantangan (jac24m at fsu.edu). The conference website (https://philosophy.fsu.edu/free-will-conference)&nbsp\;is currently under maintenance.</p>\nhttps://philosophy.fsu.edu/free-will-conference</a>
ORGANIZER;CN=Justice Cabantangan:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261102T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261103T170000
SUMMARY:3rd International Workshop on Formal Ethical Agents and Robots (FEAR 2026)
UID:20260821T071414Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
LOCATION:Manchester\, United Kingdom
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20261104T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20261104T080000
SUMMARY:The 3nd Conference Ethics and AI Towards a New Ethos of AI
UID:20260821T071415Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Warsaw
LOCATION:Pl. Politechniki 1\, Warsaw\, Poland
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Conference ETHICS and AI\, </strong><strong>The 3rd Edition: Towards a New Ethos of AI</strong></p>\n<p>We are entering a historic moment in which artificial intelligence is no longer simply a tool that supports our processes\, but is becoming a personal technology &mdash\; one that co-decides\, recommends\, communicates\, and increasingly acts on our behalf. Personalised AI systems are already reshaping education\, business\, politics\, and the everyday choices we all make\, as the market moves faster than regulation can follow and ethical reflection races to keep pace with innovation. At the same time\, a real and urgent tension defines this transformation: increasingly sycophantic LLMs optimised for user satisfaction and engagement risk enclosing individuals within epistemic bubbles\; powerful AI ideologies promoted by major technology leaders frame rapid deployment as unquestionable progress\; and regulatory frameworks continue to struggle to respond adequately to the speed and scale of change. The Ethics and AI conference grows out of this tension and from the conviction that it deserves serious\, open\, cross-disciplinary conversation bringing together AI engineers\, philosophers\, ethicists\, and argumentation researchers to jointly examine the design\, social\, and political decisions shaping the future of technology. Our interest goes beyond compliance: we ask a deeper question about ethos &mdash\; what values\, what model of responsibility\, and ultimately what worldview we are embedding in the systems we build\, and what this means for our shared digital society. We seek to articulate a new ethos for AI design\, capable of translating responsibility\, justice\, and kindness into technological practice\, and of guiding the development of benevolent AI &mdash\; not merely persuasive or adaptive\, but genuinely benevolent\, trustworthy\, and oriented toward the common good and a resilient digital society.</p>\n<p><strong>Keynote speakers</strong>:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Andrea Laus (SkillGym)&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Łukasz Kobyliński (Polish Academy of Sciences\, Sages)&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Bartosz Sawicki (Warsaw University of Technology)&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Special guest</strong>:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Jakub Jernajczyk (The Eugeniusz Geppert Academy of Art and Design in Wrocław)</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>The exhibition "Trust\, social media and digital society"</strong></p>\n<p>The exhibition "Trust\, social media and digital society" presented at the <em>Ethics and AI</em> conference is delivered by the <strong>Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw</strong>. The conference is organised under the auspices of the <strong>[iTRUST] project</strong> (NCN/CHIST-ERA\, 2022/04/Y/ST6/00001).</p>\n<p><strong>Submissions may address\, but are not limited to\, the following thematic areas</strong>:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>From ethics to ethos: values and character in AI systems</li>\n<li>Virtue ethics and AI design (prudence\, justice\, benevolence\, responsibility)</li>\n<li>Silence in the field of ethics and AI ethics</li>\n<li>Ways of communicating ethical content: text\, code\, action\, training and silence\, etc.</li>\n<li>The transition from general-purpose AI to personalized and agentic systems</li>\n<li>Fairness debt in the AI and software ingeneering design</li>\n<li>Business adoption of AI and corporate moral responsibility</li>\n<li>Ethical risk\, accountability\, and liability in AI-driven enterprises</li>\n<li>Responsible innovation and ethically aligned product development</li>\n<li>Public policy\, regulation\, and adaptive governance of AI</li>\n<li>Cultural\, religious\, and civilizational perspectives on AI ethics</li>\n<li>AI and the common good</li>\n<li>The future of trustworthy and value-oriented AI ecosystems</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Submission&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>We invite submissions of regular abstracts (300&ndash\;500 words) prepared for double-blind peer review. should be submitted via the EasyChair platform:https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=eaai-3. Each accepted contribution will be allocated a 30-minute presentation slot\, including time for discussion. We accept submissions in English and Polish (since part of the conference will be held in Polish).</p>\n<p><strong>Conference Fee</strong></p>\n<p>The registration fee is 600 PLN (140 euro). The registration fee for students is 300 PLN (70 euro).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Submission deadlines</strong>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>From June 10\, 2026: submission open&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>September 15: submission deadline&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>October 5: 2026: notifications of acceptance or rejection&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Krzysztof Sołoducha":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20261104T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20261106T170000
SUMMARY:The 3nd Conference Ethics and AI Towards a New Ethos of AI
UID:20260821T071416Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Warsaw
LOCATION:Pl. Politechniki 1\, Warsaw\, Poland
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Conference ETHICS and AI\, </strong><strong>The 3rd Edition: Towards a New Ethos of AI</strong></p>\n<p>We are entering a historic moment in which artificial intelligence is no longer simply a tool that supports our processes\, but is becoming a personal technology &mdash\; one that co-decides\, recommends\, communicates\, and increasingly acts on our behalf. Personalised AI systems are already reshaping education\, business\, politics\, and the everyday choices we all make\, as the market moves faster than regulation can follow and ethical reflection races to keep pace with innovation. At the same time\, a real and urgent tension defines this transformation: increasingly sycophantic LLMs optimised for user satisfaction and engagement risk enclosing individuals within epistemic bubbles\; powerful AI ideologies promoted by major technology leaders frame rapid deployment as unquestionable progress\; and regulatory frameworks continue to struggle to respond adequately to the speed and scale of change. The Ethics and AI conference grows out of this tension and from the conviction that it deserves serious\, open\, cross-disciplinary conversation bringing together AI engineers\, philosophers\, ethicists\, and argumentation researchers to jointly examine the design\, social\, and political decisions shaping the future of technology. Our interest goes beyond compliance: we ask a deeper question about ethos &mdash\; what values\, what model of responsibility\, and ultimately what worldview we are embedding in the systems we build\, and what this means for our shared digital society. We seek to articulate a new ethos for AI design\, capable of translating responsibility\, justice\, and kindness into technological practice\, and of guiding the development of benevolent AI &mdash\; not merely persuasive or adaptive\, but genuinely benevolent\, trustworthy\, and oriented toward the common good and a resilient digital society.</p>\n<p><strong>Keynote speakers</strong>:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Andrea Laus (SkillGym)&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Łukasz Kobyliński (Polish Academy of Sciences\, Sages)&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Bartosz Sawicki (Warsaw University of Technology)&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Special guest</strong>:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Jakub Jernajczyk (The Eugeniusz Geppert Academy of Art and Design in Wrocław)</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>The exhibition "Trust\, social media and digital society"</strong></p>\n<p>The exhibition "Trust\, social media and digital society" presented at the <em>Ethics and AI</em> conference is delivered by the <strong>Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw</strong>. The conference is organised under the auspices of the <strong>[iTRUST] project</strong> (NCN/CHIST-ERA\, 2022/04/Y/ST6/00001).</p>\n<p><strong>Submissions may address\, but are not limited to\, the following thematic areas</strong>:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>From ethics to ethos: values and character in AI systems</li>\n<li>Virtue ethics and AI design (prudence\, justice\, benevolence\, responsibility)</li>\n<li>Silence in the field of ethics and AI ethics</li>\n<li>Ways of communicating ethical content: text\, code\, action\, training and silence\, etc.</li>\n<li>The transition from general-purpose AI to personalized and agentic systems</li>\n<li>Fairness debt in the AI and software ingeneering design</li>\n<li>Business adoption of AI and corporate moral responsibility</li>\n<li>Ethical risk\, accountability\, and liability in AI-driven enterprises</li>\n<li>Responsible innovation and ethically aligned product development</li>\n<li>Public policy\, regulation\, and adaptive governance of AI</li>\n<li>Cultural\, religious\, and civilizational perspectives on AI ethics</li>\n<li>AI and the common good</li>\n<li>The future of trustworthy and value-oriented AI ecosystems</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Submission&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>We invite submissions of regular abstracts (300&ndash\;500 words) prepared for double-blind peer review. should be submitted via the EasyChair platform:https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=eaai-3. Each accepted contribution will be allocated a 30-minute presentation slot\, including time for discussion. We accept submissions in English and Polish (since part of the conference will be held in Polish).</p>\n<p><strong>Conference Fee</strong></p>\n<p>The registration fee is 600 PLN (140 euro). The registration fee for students is 300 PLN (70 euro).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Submission deadlines</strong>&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>From June 10\, 2026: submission open&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>September 15: submission deadline&nbsp\;</p>\n\n<p>October 5: 2026: notifications of acceptance or rejection&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Krzysztof Sołoducha":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261105T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261106T170000
SUMMARY:Security-Relevant Research in Academia - Debates\, Definitions\, and Best-Practices
UID:20260821T071417Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Karlsruhe\, Germany
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Date:</strong> 5-6 November 2026<br> <strong>Location:</strong> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)\, Germany<br> <strong>Submission Deadline:</strong> 15 August 2026<br> <strong>Contact:</strong> <a href="mailto:scott.robbins@kit.edu">scott.robbins@kit.edu</a></p>\n<p>Universities stand at the critical intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility. The ongoing war in Ukraine has illustrated how rapidly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict\, raising the stakes for research touching on national security\, cryptography\, dual-use technologies\, and emerging weapon systems. To address these challenges\, we invite submissions for a conference dedicated to exploring the complex area of Security-Relevant Research (SRR) within higher-education institutions.</p>\n<p>We seek contributions from scholars\, administrators\, ethicists\, defense professionals\, policy makers\, and engineers/technology developers that examine the fundamental questions surrounding SRR. We are particularly interested in papers that address:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Defining the boundaries:</strong> What qualifies as security-relevant research in the modern academic landscape?</li>\n<li><strong>Institutional frameworks:</strong> What processes and structures should universities adopt to enable the responsible conducting of SRR?</li>\n<li><strong>Researcher agency:</strong> What are the specific responsibilities of individual researchers regarding SRR?</li>\n<li><strong>Funding and influence:</strong> How do contemporary funding structures and government contracts impact the visibility\, scrutiny\, and direction of SRR?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>While advocates argue that academic freedom fuels innovation and that university-based research offers transparent\, ethical alternatives to opaque military labs\, critics warn of accelerating arms races\, the exposure of students to dual-use dilemmas\, and conflicts of interest with defense sponsors. This workshop aims to navigate these tensions\, fostering a dialogue that balances innovation with ethical stewardship.</p>\n<p><strong>Submission Guidelines</strong><br> We invite abstracts of <strong>300&ndash\;500 words</strong> (excluding references) that propose a paper for presentation. Submissions must include the author's <strong>name and affiliation</strong>. Please send your abstracts via email to <a href="mailto:scott.robbins@kit.edu">scott.robbins@kit.edu</a> by <strong>15 August 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>Presentation Format</strong><br> Selected authors will be invited to present their work during the workshop. Each presentation will be allocated <strong>20 minutes</strong>\, followed by <strong>10 minutes</strong> for Q&amp\;A and discussion.</p>\n<p><strong>Publication Opportunity</strong><br> A primary goal of this workshop is to synthesize the insights\, case studies\, and draft guidelines generated during the event. Following the conference\, all participants will be invited to submit their full manuscripts for consideration in a <strong>special issue</strong> dedicated to Security-Relevant Research in Academia. We will have more information about this in due time.</p>\n<p>This conference is supported by BMFTR\, as part of the "MilEth" project (Military Defense Technologies and Ethics).</p>\n<p><strong>Keynotes:</strong><br> Michiel Bot (Tilburg University)<br> Lonneke Peperkamp (Radboud University Nijmegen &amp\; Netherlands Defense Academy)</p>\n<p><strong>Conference Organizers:</strong></p>\n<p>Scott Robbins &mdash\; Post-Doctoral Researcher\, KIT\, ARRTI<br> Nathan Wood &mdash\; Junior Research Group Leader\, TUHH<br> Alexander Bagattini &mdash\; Senior Researcher\, KIT\, ARRTI<br> Volker Gollnick &mdash\; Professor\, TUHH<br> Nico Br&auml\;hler &mdash\; Managing Director\, ARRTI\, KIT</p>\n<p>KIT &mdash\; TUHH</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Nico Brähler":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261112T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261113T170000
SUMMARY:Reappraising nostalgia: The times and places of mindful yearning An international colloquium
UID:20260821T071418Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Rome
LOCATION:Macerata\, Italy
DESCRIPTION:<p>Reappraising nostalgia: The times and places of mindful yearning An international colloquium</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261112T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261114T170000
SUMMARY:Praise and Praiseworthiness Workshop\, CFA
UID:20260821T071419Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Copenhagen\, Denmark
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong><u>Praise and Praiseworthiness Workshop</u></strong></p>\n<p><u><br></u></p>\n<p>Philosophers working on praise and praiseworthiness are invited to submit abstracts for a workshop on these topics\, to be held in Copenhagen in the fall of 2026\, specifically November 12-14. Abstracts on the nature&nbsp\;of praise and the nature of praiseworthiness are especially welcome. (Submissions on other praise-related issues-- e.g. the morality of praise-- will be considered\, however.)</p>\n<p>The intention is to workshop papers for a praise-themed issue of&nbsp\;<em>Oxford Studies in Agency &amp\; Responsibility</em>.&nbsp\;Selected abstracts must be&nbsp\;promised&nbsp\;to this special themed issue of OSAR. They cannot be submitted elsewhere\, and if accepted\, they must be committed to OSAR.</p>\n<p>While workshop dinners will be covered\, funds unfortunately are not available to assist with travel or accommodation.</p>\n<p>The timeline of important dates and deadlines is as follows:</p>\n<p>-Abstract due (500-1000 words): April 30\, 2026</p>\n<p>-Notification concerning acceptance: May 30\, 2026</p>\n<p>-First draft due (to be circulated amongst workshop participants): October 21\, 2026</p>\n<p>-Workshop dates: November 12-14\, 2026</p>\n<p>-Revised draft due: sometime in February 2027</p>\n<p>The papers will then be sent out by OUP for vetting and\, once returned\, contributors may make further changes. The praise-themed edition of Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility is expected to be in print 2028.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>Anonymized abstracts (of 500-1000 words</strong>) should be submitted to&nbsp\;<strong>praiseworkshop2026@gmail.com</strong>&nbsp\;by the end of <strong>April 30</strong> (last time zone on Earth).</p>\n<p><br>Confirmed Presenters:</p>\n<p>Jules Holroyd</p>\n<p>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</p>\n<p>Zo&euml\; Johnson King</p>\n<p>Victoria McGeer</p>\n<p>Coleen Macnamara</p>\n<p>Leo Menges and Leonie Eichhorn</p>\n<p>Dana Nelkin</p>\n<p>David Shoemaker</p>\n<p>Daniel Telech</p>\n<p><br> &nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261112T230000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261112T230000
SUMMARY:Reappraising nostalgia: The times and places of mindful yearning An international colloquium
UID:20260821T071420Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Rome
LOCATION:Macerata\, Italy
DESCRIPTION:Reappraising nostalgia: The times and places of mindful yearning\n&nbsp\;\nAn international colloquium organized by Silvia Pierosara and Guido Giglioni\n&nbsp\;\nUniversit&agrave\; di Macerata\, Italy\n&nbsp\;\n12-13 November 2026\n&nbsp\;\nBy focusing on contextual clusters of meaning and historical interpretations dealing with notions of loss\, identity and impermanence\, this conference intends to explore the philosophical relevance of nostalgia for both contemporary thought and the history of ideas.\nFrom Johann Hofer in the late seventeenth century to Karl Jaspers in the twentieth century\, nostalgia has been described as a particular kind of affliction (Weh\, woe) involving emotional\, cognitive and physical symptoms. The origin of the word\, coined by Hofer by combining two Greek words\, sheds light on its meaning and history: nostos (&lsquo\;homecoming&rsquo\;) and algos (&lsquo\;pain&rsquo\;): a wistful longing for familiar surroundings (in Hofer&rsquo\;s case\, Switzerland). While being coterminous with such states of the mind and the body as yearning\, melancholy\, grief and regret\, and while overlapping such places of human action as dispossession\, exile and utopia\, nostalgia cannot be reduced to any of the states and places above. The observation and recording of the features underpinning the syndrome that took shape between the seventeenth and twentieth centuries testify to the slow accretion of cultural\, geographic and social meanings: the forced displacement from one&rsquo\;s native surroundings\; the distinctive landscape of the Alps\; the air\, the water and the food indispensable for the life of a community\; the emotions associated with the folk music of the area. And yet\, despite its being historically and geographically localized\, the story of nostalgia extends before and after the seventeenth century\, and beyond the confines of western sensibilities. After all\, nostos tells us of archives of immemorial myths\, while algia reminds us of contemporary and global anxieties.\nPossible directions and subjects of research include critical review of current models of identity and autonomy\; history of medical and psychiatric accounts of homesickness\; memories and the many precarious ways in which they can be recovered\; landscapes of longing and geographies of desire\; utopianism and imagined futures\; solastalgia and our disorientation at being confronted by the acceleration of environmental change\; non-western nostalgia. We want the scope of our conference to be bold\, far reaching and open to a diversity of approaches and interpretations\, both thematically and chronologically. The kind of nostalgic yearning on which we would like to focus our attention is associated with mindful reflection\, seen as way of enriching our thinking of human and non-human experiences of time.\nWhile featuring keynote addresses\, the conference invites speakers interested in the event&rsquo\;s themes through a call for papers. Applicants should send a title\, an abstract of about 250-500 words\, either in English or in Italian\, name\, affiliation and contact details to the following email addresses:\ns.pierosara@unimc.it\; guido.giglioni64@gmail.com\nThe deadline for submission is 15 June 2026. Successful applicants will be notified by 15 July 2026.
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070856Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261113T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261113T170000
SUMMARY:8th CNY Moral Psychology Workshop
UID:20260821T071421Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:1331 Salt Springs Rd\, Syracuse\, United States\, 13214
DESCRIPTION:<p>Submit abstracts for the Workshop at the following address.</p>\n<p>https://forms.gle/8foFeWAojyHLuFXr7</p>\n<p>The keynote speaker is Ben Bradley (Syracuse University).</p>\n<p><strong>The deadline for submissions is Friday\, August 21st.</strong></p>\n<p>Please direct any questions or issues to Joseph Spino at spinojm@lemoyne.edu.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Joseph Spino;CN=Randall R. Curren;CN=John M. Monteleone;CN=Irene Liu:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261115T234500
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261115T234500
SUMMARY:5th Annual Penn-Georgetown Digital Ethics Workshop
UID:20260821T071422Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Washington\, D. C.\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>We invite submissions for the 5th Annual Penn-Georgetown Digital Ethics Workshop\, to be held at Georgetown University on April&nbsp\; 9th-10th\, 2027. Submissions in any area of digital ethics\, broadly construed\, are welcome.<br><br>Conference presentations will be 30 minutes\, and each paper will be assigned a commentator. Papers of roughly 4000-4500 words will be due to commentators on February 15th\, 2027.<br><br>Please submit an abstract of no more than 500 words\, formatted for blind review\, to&nbsp\;pgdeworkshop@gmail.com. Abstracts should be submitted in PDF form\, single-spaced\, with no references. Please name the file after the title of the paper\, e.g.\, "A Theory of Justice.pdf". Please include your name and institutional affiliation in the body of your email.<br><br>Abstracts are due November 15th\, 2026. Applicants will be notified of decisions by December 15th\, 2026.</p>\n<p>The workshop is generously sponsored by the Georgetown Center for Digital Ethics and the Wharton Accountable AI Lab.</p>\n<p>Some funding will likely be made available to at least some speakers and commentators to defray accommodation costs. We have limited funds\, and we will decide precisely how to distribute them after the review process.<br><br>Questions can be addressed to either of the conference organizers:<br><br>Brian Berkey:&nbsp\;bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu<br>Will Fleisher:&nbsp\;will.fleisher@georgetown.edu</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Will Fleisher:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261119T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261120T170000
SUMMARY:Normative Reasons and Morality 
UID:20260821T071423Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Berlin
LOCATION:Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1\, Frankfurt am Main\, Germany
DESCRIPTION:<p>While the concept of a normative reason is often taken to provide a common currency across different domains of normativity\, its role and nature within the moral domain continue to raise a number of difficult and intriguing questions. Some philosophers have argued that moral reasons are distinctive in virtue of their stringency or overridingness\; others question whether the notion of a normative reason provides the most illuminating framework for understanding moral demands at all. More generally\, the relationship between morality and normative reasons remains contested\, both with respect to the nature of moral reasons and their place within moral thought and practice. This workshop aims to examine these issues from a variety of perspectives and to explore the significance of reasons-based approaches for contemporary moral philosophy.</p>\n<p>We welcome contributions addressing questions including (but not limited to):</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is the relationship between moral reasons and moral obligations?</li>\n<li>What distinguishes moral reasons from other kinds of reasons\, such as prudential or epistemic reasons?</li>\n<li>How should conflicts between moral reasons and other normative reasons be understood?</li>\n<li>How should cases of supererogation be understood within a reasons-based account of morality?</li>\n<li>Are moral reasons agent-relative or agent-neutral?</li>\n<li>What role do moral advice and moral testimony play in moral thought and practice?</li>\n<li>How should moral uncertainty affect the reasons we have for action?</li>\n<li>How should we understand the relationship between moral reasons and moral reasoning?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>A limited number of slots are available through an open call for abstracts. Please send your abstract\, prepared for anonymous review\, as a PDF file to si [dot] behrens [at] em [dot] uni [hyphen] frankfurt [dot] de (subject line: &ldquo\;Morality and Reasons&rdquo\;). Abstracts should be between 500 and 1\,000 words (including notes but excluding bibliography). Papers should be suitable for a 40-minute presentation. The deadline for submissions is<strong>&nbsp\;July 15\, 2026.&nbsp\;</strong>Applicants will be notified of the outcome by July 31\, 2026.</p>\n<p>We particularly encourage Ph.D. students and individuals from underrepresented groups to submit.</p>\n\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Singa Behrens:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20261120T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20261121T170000
SUMMARY:Philosophy of Animal Welfare
UID:20260821T071424Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Duke Law School\, 210 Science Drive\, Durham\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>This conference will focus on the nature\, measurement\, and moral significance of animal well-being.&nbsp\;&nbsp\; We invite philosophical contributions on the following topics: (1) Which animals are welfare-subjects?&nbsp\; (2) What is the appropriate account of well-being for nonhuman animals (be it a hedonic\, desire- or preference-based\, objective-good\, or hybrid theory)? (3) Does the very same account apply to both human and nonhumans (the question of &ldquo\;invariabilism&rdquo\;)?&nbsp\; (4) How should animal welfare be measured\, on one or another account of well-being?&nbsp\; (5) How does animal welfare matter morally?&nbsp\; (6)&nbsp\; How should uncertainty about any of these topics be managed?</p>\n<p>Those interested in presenting at the conference should email an abstract not to exceed 300 words to <a href="mailto:leanna.doty@law.duke.edu">leanna.doty@law.duke.edu</a>.&nbsp\; Please include a current CV. &nbsp\;<strong>Due date for abstracts:&nbsp\; June 1\, 2026</strong>. &nbsp\;&nbsp\;Presentations should be based on work-in-progress\, rather than already published work.&nbsp\;&nbsp\; (Working papers available at the conference date will be circulated to participants\, but are not required for a presentation.) The conference will be an in-person conference.&nbsp\; Zoom presentations are possible\, but preference will be given to in-person presentations. &nbsp\;&nbsp\;The conference sponsors will cover accommodation (up to 3 nights) for those presenting at the conference\, and vegan food will be served during the conference.&nbsp\;&nbsp\; We have limited budget to cover travel by early career scholars (within five years of their degree).</p>\n<p>Because of space limitations\, participation in the conference will be limited to presenters.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Matthew D. Adler:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Africa/Cairo:20261127T090000
DTEND;TZID=Africa/Cairo:20261203T170000
SUMMARY:Cairo International Workshop
UID:20260821T071425Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Africa/Cairo
LOCATION:British university of Egpyt \, Cairo\, Egypt
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>CALL FOR ABSTRACTS</strong><br><strong>Interdisciplinary Workshop and Thinking Retreat</strong><br><br>This event is organized and supported by the&nbsp\;<strong>British University in Egypt</strong>\, under the coordination of&nbsp\;<strong>Professor Mohamed Almisbkawy</strong>\, in collaboration with the&nbsp\;<strong>RTAIM Project</strong>\, based at the&nbsp\;<strong>Institute of Philosophy of the University of Porto</strong>&nbsp\;and coordinated by&nbsp\;<strong>Professor Steven S. Gouveia</strong>.<br><br>The workshop will bring together participants from different disciplines\, professional sectors\, and cultural backgrounds to discuss the ethical\, philosophical\, scientific\, political\, and social implications of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.<br><br><br><strong>Topics of Interest</strong><br>Submissions may address\, but are not limited to:<br><br></p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence</li>\n<li>Responsible AI and responsible innovation</li>\n<li>Philosophy of mind\, cognition\, and consciousness</li>\n<li>Machine intelligence and artificial agency</li>\n<li>AI safety\, control\, and existential risk</li>\n<li>Algorithmic bias\, discrimination\, and fairness</li>\n<li>AI\, democracy\, political power\, and public policy</li>\n<li>Automation\, employment\, and the future of work</li>\n<li>AI in medicine\, healthcare\, and neuroscience</li>\n<li>Education\, knowledge production\, and scientific research</li>\n<li>Human&ndash\;AI interaction and social robotics</li>\n<li>Digital identity\, autonomy\, dignity\, and privacy</li>\n<li>Artificial intelligence\, creativity\, music\, and the arts</li>\n<li>AI\, law\, regulation\, and human rights</li>\n<li>Environmental and social sustainability</li>\n<li>Emerging technologies and their impact on society</li>\n<li>Interdisciplinary\, comparative\, theoretical\, empirical\, and practice-oriented contributions are particularly welcome.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Who Can Apply?&nbsp\;<br></strong><br>We welcome proposals from participants of all backgrounds and levels of expertise\, including:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Researchers and university lecturers</li>\n<li>Postgraduate and early-career scholars</li>\n<li>Undergraduate and graduate students</li>\n<li>Philosophers and social scientists</li>\n<li>Computer scientists\, engineers\, and AI developers</li>\n<li>Legal scholars and policymakers</li>\n<li>Healthcare and medical professionals</li>\n<li>Artists\, musicians\, writers\, and designers</li>\n<li>Entrepreneurs and industry professionals</li>\n<li>Civil-society representatives\, activists\, and independent researchers</li>\n</ul>\n<p>No specific disciplinary affiliation or level of seniority is required.<br><br><strong>Submission Requirements</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li>Title of the proposed talk</li>\n<li>Abstract (200 words)</li>\n<li>Short biographical note (50 words)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Proposals and questions should be sent to:<br><strong>mohammed.almisbkawy@bue.edu.eg<br></strong><br>Please include the following address in CC:<br><strong>stevensequeira92@hotmail.com<br></strong><br><strong>Important Information</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Submission deadline:</strong>&nbsp\;15 August 2026</li>\n<li><strong>Participation fee:</strong>&nbsp\;None</li>\n<li><strong>Available presentation slots:</strong>&nbsp\;Limited</li>\n<li><strong>Travel and accommodation:</strong>&nbsp\;Accepted speakers are responsible for covering their own flights\, accommodation\, and other expenses associated with participation in the thinking retreat.</li>\n<li>Early submissions are strongly encouraged.</li>\n</ul>
ORGANIZER;CN=Mohamed Almisbkawy;CN=Steven Gouveia:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20261206T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20261206T120000
SUMMARY:2027 Ethics at Notre Dame symposium: Ethics Beyond Action
UID:20260821T071426Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Indiana/Indianapolis
LOCATION:Notre Dame\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>We invite submissions of abstracts for ENDs 2027\, which will be held at the University of Notre Dame in South Bend\, Indiana\, on <strong>Friday\, April 30\, and Saturday\, May 1\, 2027</strong>. Abstracts should be between <strong>750 and 1\,000 words</strong> (inclusive of everything but the bibliography). Abstracts must be prepared for blind review. The title of the proposed paper should be included at the top of the document\, above the abstract. Save the abstract as a PDF with the paper&rsquo\;s title as its name (e.g.\, &ldquo\;Paper&rsquo\;s Title.pdf&rdquo\;) and attach it to an email sent to <strong>ends@nd.edu</strong> with the subject heading &ldquo\;Abstract for ENDs 2027.&rdquo\; The deadline is <strong>noon (EST) on Sunday\, December 6\, 2026</strong>. The proposed paper must be on normative ethics and relate to the theme &ldquo\;<strong>Ethics Beyond Action</strong>.&rdquo\; We are especially interested in submissions that aim to open up new lines of inquiry relating to this theme.</p>\n<p>Possible topics under this theme include but are not limited to: (1) moral education\; (2) moral perception\; (3) moral virtues and vices\; (4) morally relevant feelings\, attitudes\, and emotions\; (5) moral ideals and individual and cultural moral improvement\; (6) whether things besides actions (such as beliefs\, biases\, feelings\, perceptions\, dispositions\, etc.) can be right or wrong\; (7) whether it&rsquo\;s important that a moral theory not be exclusively act-oriented\; (8) whether the motive or intention with which an act is performed is important to its moral assessment\; (9) the epistemological relevance of the emotions to deontic and evaluative assessment\; (10) whether it matters\, morally speaking\, what sorts of reasons or motives we act upon\; (11) whether we can be morally responsible for things that are not under our voluntary control\; etc.</p>\n<p>Submissions will be evaluated by the organizers\, and decisions will be finalized in mid-January. The plan is for there to be around eight to ten speakers\, all of whom will be chosen on the basis of the abstracts&mdash\;thus\, no keynotes. The authors of accepted abstracts will be expected to provide drafts of their papers for distribution to ENDs attendees at least four weeks in advance of the conference. Authors will have 30-45 minutes to present their papers at the conference\, followed by Q&amp\;A. These papers must not be published\, accepted for publication\, or submitted for publication prior to the conclusion of the conference\, for speakers should be willing to consider including their papers in any anthology or symposium that the organizers possibly arrange. Speakers will not be required to include their papers\, but they should be open to doing so depending on what the organizers are able to arrange. Since abstracts will be reviewed anonymously\, those affiliated with the University of Notre Dame are welcome to submit to ENDs.</p>\n<p>Lastly\, those who are either currently enrolled in a graduate program or within fifteen (15) years of having received their Ph.D should note that we offer a $5\,000 prize for the most outstanding paper by an early-career scholar.</p>\n<p>The Ethics at Notre Dame symposium ("ENDs" for short) is a biennial\, thematic conference in normative ethics held every other spring at the University of Notre Dame beginning in 2027. Free and open to all registrants\, ENDs aims both to advance new work on significant themes in ethical theory and to support scholars&mdash\;especially those early in their careers&mdash\;through feedback\, mentorship\, and potential publication opportunities.</p>\n<p>See <strong>ethics.nd.edu/ends</strong> for more information. Email <strong>ends@nd.edu</strong> with questions.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Douglas W. Portmore;CN=Katie O'Dell;CN=Tom Dougherty;CN=Cheshire Calhoun:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Bogota:20261209T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Bogota:20261211T170000
SUMMARY:2nd Annual PPEL in the Global South Conference
UID:20260821T071427Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Bogota
LOCATION:Bogotá\, Colombia
DESCRIPTION:<p>After a hugely successful pilot conference in Bengaluru\, India in 2025 (see here)\, we are back with a second edition of the PPEL in the Global South. This in-person conference aims to bring together scholars working in Philosophy\, Politics\, Economics\, and/or Law from around the globe\, and in particular to facilitate interaction between scholars based in the Global South and those in the West and elsewhere.</p>\n<p>We invite submissions on any topic that engages at least one of the focus disciplines (Philosophy\, Politics\, Economics\, and Law) and that clearly addresses a normative issue. Submissions at the intersection of more than one of these fields are especially welcome. The conference language is English.</p>\n<p><strong>Please submit an anonymized abstract&nbsp\;of no more than 500 words using this link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc9sgj7EYCK7reriDbaojKPoJz-aWkPAOhTfWgX0EGIT9dHHg/viewform&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Abstracts should be submitted in PDF form\, single spaced\, with no bibliography/references\, the title at the of the page\, and all on a single page. Please name the PDF file with the title of your paper &ndash\; for example\, &ldquo\;A Theory of Justice.PDF&rdquo\;.&nbsp\;Double submissions will not be considered.&nbsp\;Submission of co-authored work is allowed.</strong><strong></strong></p>\n<p><strong><u>The deadline for submissions is April 1st\, 2026 (anywhere on earth). </u></strong><strong><u><br> </u></strong><br> For more info about the PPEL in the Global South initiative\, visit www.ppelintheglobalsouth.com</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Kritika Maheshwari;CN=Santiago Mejia;CN="Manuela Fernández Pinto";CN=Mafe Rangel;CN=Jaime A Fernandez Uribe:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270104T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270104T234500
SUMMARY:Feminist Accountability and Transformative Justice - Special Issue of Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
UID:20260821T071428Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are irrevocably implicated in the systems of oppression we seek to dismantle\, and the effects of those systems live with us and within us. Accountability&mdash\;understood as taking responsibility for our contributions to and complicity in systemic harms&mdash\;offers a framework for practicing feminist solidarity\, building community\, and supporting both individual and collective healing. This special issue explores feminist accountability as a practice that moves beyond punishment and retribution toward transformative justice as an ethical and political project. We are especially interested in work that engages the tensions\, limits\, and possibilities of accountability: not only as an ethical ideal\, but as a lived\, contested\, and situated practice across interpersonal\, institutional\, and structural contexts. We invite submissions that examine how accountability is practiced today and how it intersects with broader frameworks of transformative justice. What does it mean to take responsibility for harm within feminist communities? How might accountability reshape our understandings of power\, complicity\, and solidarity? What challenges arise when transformative justice frameworks&mdash\;often developed in grassroots and activist contexts&mdash\;are brought into academic spaces? In keeping with Feminist Philosophy Quarterly&rsquo\;s commitment to inclusive\, intersectional\, and community-engaged feminist philosophy\, we especially encourage submissions that engage and build upon the work of scholars from historically marginalized communities and those most affected by the forms of harm under discussion. Submissions may address\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<p><br>-Feminist accountability as a practice: its limits\, tensions\, and conditions of possibility<br>-Accountability beyond carceral logics: abolitionist and transformative approaches to harm<br>-Transformative justice as ethical and political praxis<br>-Responsibility\, complicity\, and refusal in conditions of structural injustice<br>-Practices of repair\, restitution\, and non-reconciliation<br>-Community-based responses to harm: care\, conflict\, and collective healing<br>-Navigating accountability in a context of backlash and reaction<br>-The misuse of accountability practices and procedures<br>-Accountability within feminist movements: power\, exclusion\, and internal critique<br>-Pedagogies of accountability: teaching\, learning\, and institutional responsibility<br>-The politics of &ldquo\;calling in\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;calling out\,&rdquo\; and other modes of response<br>-Citation as accountability: feminist lineage-building and epistemic responsibility<br>-Coalition-building and solidarity across asymmetries of power<br>-Mutual aid\, abolition feminism\, disability justice\, and transformative justice<br>-Intersections of restorative and transformative justice frameworks<br>-Feminist responses to interpersonal\, gendered\, and sexual violence<br>-Feminist responses to state violence\, war\, and genocide<br>-The ethics and politics of care within transformative justice practices</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;<br>Submission Details:<br>Deadline: January 4\, 2027<br>Length: Up to 9\,000 words (including notes\, excluding references)</p>\n<p>Review Process: Double-anonymous peer review</p>\n<p>File Format: PDF or Word (DOC/DOCX/RTF)</p>\n<p><br>Submissions should be prepared for anonymous review\, with all identifying information removed from the manuscript. Authors should submit two separate files: An anonymized manuscript &amp\; a title page including the paper title\, author name(s)\, institutional affiliation(s)\, and contact information.</p>\n<p><br>Submissions should be sent to the following email address: femacctj (at) gmail.com</p>\n<p><br>Submissions must follow the Chicago Manual of Style (author&ndash\;date system).</p>\n<p><br>For full author guidelines\, please see: https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/information/authors</p>\n<p><br>The special issue is planned for publication in late 2027/early 2028 in the journal Feminist Philosophy Quarterly.</p>\n<p><br>For any questions on this special issue\, please contact the guest editors: Fulden İbrahimhakkıoğlu (fulden@metu.edu.tr) and Amy Marvin (amarvin@hamilton.edu).</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20270212T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20270213T170000
SUMMARY:Biophilia: The Ethics\, Politics\, and Aesthetics of Love for the Living World
UID:20260821T071429Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:Starkville\, United States\, 39762
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Biophilia</strong> refers to humans&rsquo\; love of nature and the living world generally. The Mississippi Philosophical Association invites scholars to explore the ethical\, political\, and aesthetic questions related to this theme in a two-day conference at <strong>Mississippi State University\,</strong> <strong>February 12th and 13th\, 2027</strong>. Two keynote speeches shall be delivered by&nbsp\;<strong>Paula Casal</strong>&nbsp\;and <strong>Andrew Williams</strong>.</p>\n<p>E.O. Wilson defines biophilia as an evolutionarily developed tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes\; an innate human desire to affiliate with other forms of life\, including plants and animals. We invite scholars to engage with this definition of biophilia as well as a broader understanding of the concept. Papers need not assume that all humans are biophilic. In fact\, the apparent diversity in biophilic feelings across society (the presence or absence of such values\, varying levels of biophilia\, and love for different natural entities) is of interest in political philosophy. Should the government tolerate a reasonable amount of pluralism in citizens&rsquo\; appreciation of nature (or lack thereof)? How might fair terms of social cooperation be drawn up between biophilic and non-biophilic citizens?</p>\n<p>Ideas for presentations include but are not limited to:</p>\n<p><strong>Ethics:</strong> Is life the source of moral value? What is the moral status of the abiotic components of nature? How should &ldquo\;relational values&rdquo\; feature in Environmental Ethics? What is the proper unit of moral concern for nature: individual animals\, ecosystems\, or life itself? Should the natural (red in tooth in claw) be supplanted by the just?</p>\n<p><strong>Politics:</strong> Should the state attempt to inculcate an appreciation of nature in its citizenry? Could biophilia be considered a civic virtue? What are the implications of love for nature and specific natural entities for distributive justice? Should states recognize eco-sovereignty claims? Attachment-based claims?</p>\n<p><strong>Aesthetics:</strong> Is there a connection between aesthetic value and life? Is the current fascination with robots and A.I. an expression of <em>necro</em>philia\, or perhaps a perverted form of biophilia? What did Kant mean when he said that the &lsquo\;feeling of life&rsquo\; is fundamental to our perception of beauty? Could there be beauty in a dead world?</p>\n<p>Please email an <strong>anonymized abstract of around 500 words</strong> to Susan Erck (serck [at] philrel [dot] msstate [dot] edu) no later than <strong>September 1st\, 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>The MPA Student Presentation Prize:</strong>The winner will receive a cash prize of $250. If you are a student and wish to be considered for this prize\, please indicate so in your application email.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Susan Erck:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20270218T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20270220T170000
SUMMARY:Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical
UID:20260821T071430Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Zurich
LOCATION:Rämistr. 71\, Zürich\, Switzerland\, 8006
DESCRIPTION:<p><a href="https://zegra.ch/events/event/relational-normativity-epistemic-and-practical/">Relational Normativity: Epistemic and Practical &ndash\; ZEGRa</a></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Sebastian Schmidt;CN=Jonas Vandieken:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20270304T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270307T170000
SUMMARY:36th Association for Practical and Professional Ethics Annual International Conference
UID:20260821T071431Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown\, 600 Commonwealth Place\, Pittsburgh\, United States\, 15222
DESCRIPTION:<p>The 36th Annual International Conference will be held March 4-7\, 2027 at the Wyndham Grand in Pittsburgh. The conference welcomes APPE members as well as nonmembers from a wide variety of disciplines and professions dedicated to advancing scholarship\, education\, and practice in practical and professional ethics.</p>\n<p>This year&rsquo\;s theme\, <strong>Examining Ethics and Power</strong>\, invites critical reflection on the ethical dimensions of power across professional\, institutional\, and global contexts. We encourage proposals that explore how power dynamics shape ethical decision‑making\; how power manifests in professional practices\; how institutions perpetuate or prevent harm\; and how ethical frameworks can clarify what is at stake as well as expose\, challenge\, and transform unjust power relations.</p>\n<p>The Call for Proposals is now open. Learn more:&nbsp\;https://www.appe-ethics.org/call-for-proposals/</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Kristen Fuhs Wells;CN=Earl Spurgin;CN=Mark Doorley:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Bogota:20270401T234500
DTEND;TZID=America/Bogota:20270401T234500
SUMMARY:2nd Annual PPEL in the Global South Conference
UID:20260821T071432Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Bogota
LOCATION:Bogotá\, Colombia
DESCRIPTION:<p>After a hugely successful pilot conference in Bengaluru\, India in 2025 (see here)\, we are back with a second edition of the PPEL in the Global South. This in-person conference aims to bring together scholars working in Philosophy\, Politics\, Economics\, and/or Law from around the globe\, and in particular to facilitate interaction between scholars based in the Global South and those in the West and elsewhere.</p>\n<p>We invite submissions on any topic that engages at least one of the focus disciplines (Philosophy\, Politics\, Economics\, and Law) and that clearly addresses a normative issue. Submissions at the intersection of more than one of these fields are especially welcome. The conference language is English.</p>\n<p><strong>Please submit an anonymized abstract&nbsp\;of no more than 500 words using this link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc9sgj7EYCK7reriDbaojKPoJz-aWkPAOhTfWgX0EGIT9dHHg/viewform.</strong></p>\n<p><strong>Abstracts should be submitted in PDF form\, single spaced\, with no bibliography/references\, the title at the of the page\, and all on a single page. Please name the PDF file with the title of your paper &ndash\; for example\, &ldquo\;A Theory of Justice.PDF&rdquo\;.&nbsp\;Double submissions will not be considered.&nbsp\;Submission of co-authored work is allowed.</strong><strong></strong></p>\n<p><strong><u>The deadline for submissions is April 1st\, 2026 (anywhere on earth). </u></strong><strong><u><br> </u></strong><br> For more info about the PPEL in the Global South initiative\, visit www.ppelintheglobalsouth.com</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Kritika Maheshwari;CN=Santiago Mejia;CN="Manuela Fernández Pinto";CN=Mafe Rangel;CN=Jaime A Fernandez Uribe:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20270409T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270410T170000
SUMMARY:5th Annual Penn-Georgetown Digital Ethics Workshop
UID:20260821T071433Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Washington\, D. C.\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>We invite submissions for the 5th Annual Penn-Georgetown Digital Ethics Workshop\, to be held at Georgetown University on April&nbsp\; 9th-10th\, 2027. Submissions in any area of digital ethics\, broadly construed\, are welcome.<br><br>Conference presentations will be 30 minutes\, and each paper will be assigned a commentator. Papers of roughly 4000-4500 words will be due to commentators on February 15th\, 2027.<br><br>Please submit an abstract of no more than 500 words\, formatted for blind review\, to&nbsp\;pgdeworkshop@gmail.com. Abstracts should be submitted in PDF form\, single-spaced\, with no references. Please name the file after the title of the paper\, e.g.\, "A Theory of Justice.pdf". Please include your name and institutional affiliation in the body of your email.<br><br>Abstracts are due November 15th\, 2026. Applicants will be notified of decisions by December 15th\, 2026.</p>\n<p>The workshop is generously sponsored by the Georgetown Center for Digital Ethics and the Wharton Accountable AI Lab.</p>\n<p>Some funding will likely be made available to at least some speakers and commentators to defray accommodation costs. We have limited funds\, and we will decide precisely how to distribute them after the review process.<br><br>Questions can be addressed to either of the conference organizers:<br><br>Brian Berkey:&nbsp\;bberkey@wharton.upenn.edu<br>Will Fleisher:&nbsp\;will.fleisher@georgetown.edu</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Brian Berkey;CN=Will Fleisher:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20270430T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Indiana/Indianapolis:20270501T170000
SUMMARY:2027 Ethics at Notre Dame symposium: Ethics Beyond Action
UID:20260821T071434Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Indiana/Indianapolis
LOCATION:Notre Dame\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Ethics at Notre Dame symposium ("ENDs" for short) is a biennial\, thematic conference in normative ethics held every other spring at the University of Notre Dame beginning in 2027. Free and open to all registrants\, ENDs aims both to advance new work on significant themes in ethical theory and to support scholars&mdash\;especially those early in their careers&mdash\;through feedback\, mentorship\, and potential publication opportunities.</p>\n<p>The 2027 ENDs Conference will be held&nbsp\;Friday\, April 30\, and Saturday\, May 1\, 2027. The conference theme for 2027 is&nbsp\;Ethics Beyond Action.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Douglas W. Portmore;CN=Katie O'Dell;CN=Tom Dougherty;CN=Cheshire Calhoun:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20270516T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20270523T170000
SUMMARY:The 2027 Annual Meeting of the American Comparative Literature Association
UID:20260821T071435Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:4302 University Dr\, Houston\, United States\, 77004
DESCRIPTION:https://www.acla.org/annual-meeting\nhttps://www.acla.org/seminar/875d9da0-735b-4676-ab1f-fff5c023f669\nhttps://www.acla.org/cfp/70fe7418-c14a-468d-be1d-809e878f2e00/seminars\n
ORGANIZER;CN=Vivien Jiaqian Zhu:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20270516T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20270523T170000
SUMMARY:The 2027 Annual Meeting of the American Comparative Literature Association
UID:20260821T071436Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:4302 University Dr\, Houston\, United States\, 77004
DESCRIPTION:<p>https://www.acla.org/annual-meeting https://www.acla.org/seminar/875d9da0-735b-4676-ab1f-fff5c023f669 https://www.acla.org/cfp/70fe7418-c14a-468d-be1d-809e878f2e00/seminars</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Vivien Jiaqian Zhu:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20270628T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20270630T170000
SUMMARY:‘The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Conversations with Buddhist Philosophy’
UID:20260821T071437Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Vienna
LOCATION:Dominikanerbastei 16\, Vienna\, Austria\, 1010
DESCRIPTION:<p>As part of a Starting Grant funded by the European Research Council\, I am pleased to invite proposals for participation in a conference on &lsquo\;The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Conversations with Buddhist Philosophy&rsquo\; scheduled to be held at the Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia (IKGA)\, part of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (OEAW)\, in Vienna on 28-30 June 2027.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Paper proposals are invited from philosophers working with Western and/or Buddhist sources on any topic concerned with the ethics of belief\, broadly understood. Thus\, for example\, papers may be proposed regarding topics such as (but not limited to) the nature of belief\, the norms of belief and&nbsp\;normativity in relation to belief\,&nbsp\;evidence and evidentialism\, and the epistemic basing relation.&nbsp\;Discussions concerning the relationship of belief (including in terms of its&nbsp\;formation\, maintenance\, and/or relinquishment)&nbsp\;to notions such as&nbsp\;credence\, view\, judgment\, assent\, conviction\, faith\, trust\, hope\, and knowledge (or their analogues in Buddhist sources)&nbsp\;are welcome\, as are those concerning&nbsp\;the relationship of&nbsp\;belief (and its ethics) to faculties such as consciousness\, cognition\, discernment\, conceptualization\, view-holding\, volition\, sensation\, and emotion (or their analogues in Buddhist sources).</p>\n<p>The research project of which this conference forms part is titled&nbsp\;<em>The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Chinese Buddhist Philosophy in the &lsquo\;Period of Disunity&rsquo\;</em>&nbsp\;(ChinBuddhPhil)\; for more information\, see&nbsp\;https://www.oeaw.ac.at/projects/chinbuddhphil. The project aims to bring Buddhist philosophical sources into conversation with Western ones\, on the understanding that Buddhist philosophers merit consideration not only as historical artifacts but as genuinely interesting and insightful contributors to live philosophical problems. As such\, the conference is intended to be dialogical\, with specialists of relevant Western and Buddhist philosophical materials engaging in debate regarding overlapping topics\, positions\, and arguments.</p>\n<p>Philosophers specializing in Western sources from any of the ancient\, medieval\, modern\, or contemporary philosophical canons are welcome to apply\; they need possess no prior knowledge of relevant Buddhist materials or debates.</p>\n<p>As for philosophers specializing in Buddhist sources\, in line with the overall focus of the ChinBuddhPhil project on the Sanlun&nbsp\;三論&nbsp\;school of Chinese Buddhist philosophy\, those proposing papers on Sanlun are especially welcome to apply. More broadly\, however\, the call is open to philosophers specializing in Chinese Buddhist sources beyond Sanlun\, and more broadly still to those specializing in sources from any other among the Buddhist traditions spanning diverse geographical regions and temporal periods. Philosophers specializing in Buddhist sources need possess no prior knowledge of relevant Western materials or debates.</p>\n<p>Edited volumes based on two prior project conferences have already been submitted to Oxford University Press. An edited book comprised of chapters based on the papers presented at this conference is also planned\, and potential speakers should keep in mind that they will be invited to submit a written chapter (6\,000-9\,000 words) based on their oral presentation. Each participant will also be invited to prepare a short response to another paper (1\,000-2\,000 words)\, thereby allowing philosophers working with Western sources to engage\, from within their own sphere of expertise\, with Buddhist materials\, and vice-versa. Draft papers will thus be pre-circulated to respondents.</p>\n<p>Timeline:</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 June 2026: Deadline for submission of paper proposals.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 July 2026: Announcement of accepted papers.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 April 2027: Deadline for submission of draft papers.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;28-30 June 2027: In-person conference in Vienna.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 September 2027: Deadline for submission of final papers.</p>\n<p>Those interested in taking part are welcome to send 1) a paper abstract of circa 500 words\, and 2) a CV or link to a professional profile\, to&nbsp\;rafal.stepien@oeaw.ac.at&nbsp\;by the&nbsp\;1st&nbsp\;of June 2026. Requests for further information are also welcome. In a dedicated effort to counteract long-standing discrimination\, women and members of other identity-groups still under-represented in academe are especially encouraged to apply. This is an in-person conference\; accommodation in Vienna for participants will be funded by the organizers\, and funds are also foreseen to be available to offset travel costs to and from Vienna for those participants with no alternative sources of funding.</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Rafal K. Stepien</strong></p>\n<p>Principal Researcher\, Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia\, Austrian Academy of Sciences.</p>\n<p>Principal Investigator\, &lsquo\;The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Chinese Buddhist Philosophy in the &ldquo\;Period of Disunity&rdquo\;&rsquo\;\, European Research Council.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Rafal Stepien:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260821T070857Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20270628T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20270630T170000
SUMMARY:The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Conversations with Buddhist Philosophy
UID:20260821T071438Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-757c47d5c7-8plkm
TZID:Europe/Vienna
LOCATION:Dominikanerbastei 16\, Vienna\, Austria\, 1010
DESCRIPTION:<p>As part of a Starting Grant funded by the European Research Council\, I am pleased to invite proposals for participation in a conference on &lsquo\;The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Conversations with Buddhist Philosophy&rsquo\; scheduled to be held at the Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia (IKGA)\, part of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (OEAW)\, in Vienna on 28-30 June 2027.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Paper proposals are invited from philosophers working with Western and/or Buddhist sources on any topic concerned with the ethics of belief\, broadly understood. Thus\, for example\, papers may be proposed regarding topics such as (but not limited to) the nature of belief\, the norms of belief and&nbsp\;normativity in relation to belief\,&nbsp\;evidence and evidentialism\, and the epistemic basing relation.&nbsp\;Discussions concerning the relationship of belief (including in terms of its&nbsp\;formation\, maintenance\, and/or relinquishment)&nbsp\;to notions such as&nbsp\;credence\, view\, judgment\, assent\, conviction\, faith\, trust\, hope\, and knowledge (or their analogues in Buddhist sources)&nbsp\;are welcome\, as are those concerning&nbsp\;the relationship of&nbsp\;belief (and its ethics) to faculties such as consciousness\, cognition\, discernment\, conceptualization\, view-holding\, volition\, sensation\, and emotion (or their analogues in Buddhist sources).</p>\n<p>The research project of which this conference forms part is titled&nbsp\;<em>The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Chinese Buddhist Philosophy in the &lsquo\;Period of Disunity&rsquo\;</em>&nbsp\;(ChinBuddhPhil)\; for more information\, see&nbsp\;https://www.oeaw.ac.at/projects/chinbuddhphil. The project aims to bring Buddhist philosophical sources into conversation with Western ones\, on the understanding that Buddhist philosophers merit consideration not only as historical artifacts but as genuinely interesting and insightful contributors to live philosophical problems. As such\, the conference is intended to be dialogical\, with specialists of relevant Western and Buddhist philosophical materials engaging in debate regarding overlapping topics\, positions\, and arguments.</p>\n<p>Philosophers specializing in Western sources from any of the ancient\, medieval\, modern\, or contemporary philosophical canons are welcome to apply\; they need possess no prior knowledge of relevant Buddhist materials or debates.</p>\n<p>As for philosophers specializing in Buddhist sources\, in line with the overall focus of the ChinBuddhPhil project on the Sanlun&nbsp\;三論&nbsp\;school of Chinese Buddhist philosophy\, those proposing papers on Sanlun are especially welcome to apply. More broadly\, however\, the call is open to philosophers specializing in Chinese Buddhist sources beyond Sanlun\, and more broadly still to those specializing in sources from any other among the Buddhist traditions spanning diverse geographical regions and temporal periods. Philosophers specializing in Buddhist sources need possess no prior knowledge of relevant Western materials or debates.</p>\n<p>Edited volumes based on two prior project conferences have already been submitted to Oxford University Press. An edited book comprised of chapters based on the papers presented at this conference is also planned\, and potential speakers should keep in mind that they will be invited to submit a written chapter (6\,000-9\,000 words) based on their oral presentation. Each participant will also be invited to prepare a short response to another paper (1\,000-2\,000 words)\, thereby allowing philosophers working with Western sources to engage\, from within their own sphere of expertise\, with Buddhist materials\, and vice-versa. Draft papers will thus be pre-circulated to respondents.</p>\n<p>Timeline:</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 June 2026: Deadline for submission of paper proposals.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 July 2026: Announcement of accepted papers.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 April 2027: Deadline for submission of draft papers.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;28-30 June 2027: In-person conference in Vienna.</p>\n<p>&middot\;&nbsp\;&nbsp\;1 September 2027: Deadline for submission of final papers.</p>\n<p>Those interested in taking part are welcome to send 1) a paper abstract of circa 500 words\, and 2) a CV or link to a professional profile\, to&nbsp\;rafal.stepien@oeaw.ac.at&nbsp\;by the&nbsp\;1st&nbsp\;of June 2026. Requests for further information are also welcome. In a dedicated effort to counteract long-standing discrimination\, women and members of other identity-groups still under-represented in academe are especially encouraged to apply. This is an in-person conference\; accommodation in Vienna for participants will be funded by the organizers\, and funds are also foreseen to be available to offset travel costs to and from Vienna for those participants with no alternative sources of funding.</p>\n<p><strong><br></strong></p>\n<p><strong>Rafal K. Stepien</strong></p>\n<p>Principal Researcher\, Institute for the Cultural and Intellectual History of Asia\, Austrian Academy of Sciences.</p>\n<p>Principal Investigator\, &lsquo\;The Ethics of Empty Beliefs: Chinese Buddhist Philosophy in the &ldquo\;Period of Disunity&rdquo\;&rsquo\;\, European Research Council.</p>\n<p>https://www.oeaw.ac.at/projects/chinbuddhphil/conferences&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Rafal Stepien:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
