BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20241001T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261026T170000
SUMMARY:In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance
UID:20261016T074819Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>In Conversation: Exploring the Philosophy of Money and Finance &ndash\; Series III</strong></p>\n<p>A series of interviews with contributors to <em><strong>The Philosophy of Money and Finance</strong></em> (Hardcover\, OUP 2024\; Paperback\, fall 2025)</p>\n<p><strong>Schedule</strong></p>\n<p><strong>"Bitcoins Left and Right: A Normative Assessment of a Digital Currency"<br></strong>Authors: Lars Lindblom and Joakim Sandberg<br>Interviewer: Violet Victoria<br>Date and Time: October 6\, 2026\, 12 pm EST (18:00 CET)</p>\n<p>[Thi is the final interview in the series. Recordings of prior interviews can be found on <em>Phinance</em>.]</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Lisa Warenski;CN=Emiliano Ippoliti:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261016T100000
DTEND;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261016T170000
SUMMARY:From Logic to Language: New Takes on Philosophy of AI
UID:20261016T074820Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/Mexico_City
LOCATION:Circuito de los Posgrados\, Coyoacán\, Mexico\, 04510
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>Motivation:&nbsp\;</strong></p>\n<p>Recent advances in artificial intelligence&mdash\;especially large language models&mdash\;have renewed foundational philosophical questions about language\, inference\, and knowledge. These systems produce linguistically well-formed outputs and display patterns of reasoning\, yet their epistemic and semantic status remains unclear. Are we witnessing new forms of linguistic agency\, or merely sophisticated statistical artifacts? And what kinds of logical and formal tools are adequate to capture their behavior?<br><br><strong>This workshop aims to bring together perspectives from logic\, linguistics\, and philosophy to address these questions.</strong>&nbsp\;<strong><br></strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Epistemology of AI outputs: </strong>What is the epistemic status of AI-generated content? Can such outputs constitute knowledge\, understanding\, or evidence? Under what conditions\, if any\, are they reliable or trustworthy?</li>\n<li><strong>Language and meaning in AI: </strong>Do the outputs of large language models qualify as genuine speech acts? Can they be said to have meaning\, reference\, or intention\, or are these merely ascriptions from the user&rsquo\;s perspective?</li>\n<li><strong>Logic and formal modeling: </strong>What logical frameworks are best suited to model AI behavior&mdash\;classical\, non-classical\, probabilistic\, or hybrid approaches? How should we formalize phenomena such as inconsistency\, opacity\, or context-sensitivity in AI systems?</li>\n<li><strong>Understanding and explanation: </strong>Do AI systems exhibit any form of understanding\, or only simulate it? What would count as an explanation of their outputs\, and how does this relate to broader debates on scientific understanding</li>\n<li><strong>Normativity and evaluation: </strong>What norms&mdash\;epistemic\, semantic\, or pragmatic&mdash\;should govern the use and assessment of AI outputs? Can traditional notions of justification and validity be extended to these systems?</li>\n<li><strong>Bias\, gender\, and injustice: </strong>How do AI systems reproduce or amplify existing social biases\, including those related to gender? What forms of epistemic or linguistic injustice arise in their deployment\, and how should they be addressed.&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n\n&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER;CN="María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz";CN="Cristian Alejandro Gutiérrez Ramírez";CN=Fernanda Samaniego;CN="Andrés E. Vázquez-Quijano":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261027T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261029T170000
SUMMARY:Understanding Current Approaches to the Theory and Philosophy of History
UID:20261016T074821Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>&ldquo\;Theory and philosophy of history&rdquo\; is a contested label for a loosely connected set of research agendas about history (in the sense of our more or less systematic ways of studying the human past). It has been said that theorists tend to focus on history as a cultural product &ndash\; one among many other ways in which people in the present relate to the past\, both theirs and of others &ndash\;\, while philosophers tend to focus on the epistemology of what historians (actually or should) do\; or that theorists tend to be closer to &ldquo\;continental&rdquo\; philosophy\, social theory\, and literary theory\, while philosophers tend to be closer mainstream &ldquo\;analytic&rdquo\; philosophy. However\, these distinctions themselves are also quite contested. In fact\, there is little agreement on what &ldquo\;theory of history&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;philosophy of history&rdquo\; individually are\, how they differ\, and how they relate to one another.</p>\n<p>Despite these problems with definitions\, researchers who share an interest in the theoretical problems that our relations to the human past entail have managed to gather around certain journals\, conferences\, and networks\, suggesting that some sort of connection may be found. Thus\, the argument appeared that &ldquo\;theory and philosophy of history&rdquo\; is more like an interdisciplinary space where scholars from different fields can discuss a common set of objects from their respective perspectives. However\, the details of what perspectives are those and what methodological or conceptual commitments they carry remain unknown. It is also not entirely clear what exactly the connecting thread is that makes such interdisciplinary dialogue possible.</p>\n<p>This virtual workshop aims to discuss the methodological challenges and metaphilosophical commitments of different approaches to the theory and philosophy of history as currently (and broadly) envisioned. As such\, we invite proposals for papers that clarify what these approaches consider to be the field&rsquo\;s proper objects\, aims\, and methods\, as well as the basic presuppositions that make such considerations possible. Accordingly\, proposals may deal with questions that include\, among others\, the following:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What exactly is &ldquo\;theoretical&rdquo\; or &ldquo\;philosophical&rdquo\; about the theory and philosophy of history? What do &ldquo\;theory&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;philosophy&rdquo\; mean in this expression? Is &ldquo\;theory of history&rdquo\; different from &ldquo\;philosophy of history&rdquo\;? How so?</li>\n<li>What is the object of the theory and philosophy of history: texts\, arguments\, concepts\, practices?</li>\n<li>What are the aims of the theory and philosophy of history? Are they descriptive\, normative\, or both?</li>\n<li>What is the role of case studies\, conceptual analysis\, and other methods in the theory and philosophy of history?</li>\n<li>How does our descriptive knowledge of historiography (acquired via history\, sociology\, or anthropology of historiography) relate to conceptual or normative problems in the theory and philosophy of history?</li>\n<li>What are the costs and benefits from the current heterogeneity of approaches in the theory and philosophy of history? Should we aim at integration or further dispersion?</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Invited speakers:</strong> Herman Paul (Leiden University)\; Mar&iacute\;a In&eacute\;s La Greca (National University of Tres de Febrero/CONICET)\; Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (University of Oulu).</p>\n<p><strong>Submission guidelines:</strong> Please submit an abstract (maximum 500 words) and a short biographical note by 11 September 2026. Acceptance letters will be sent by 25 September 2026.</p>\n<p>Submissions and inquiries should be sent to Jo&atilde\;o Ohara\, <a href="mailto:ohara@usp.br">ohara@usp.br</a>.</p>\n<p><strong>Workshop format:</strong> 3 days (27-29 October 2026)\, with 2 sessions each (keynotes in the morning\, papers in the afternoon\, in Bras&iacute\;lia Time\, UTC&minus\;03:00)</p>\n<p>Presentations will be 15 minutes long\, followed by more time for discussion/Q&amp\;A.</p>\n<p><em>This workshop is supported by a grant from the S&atilde\;o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) &ndash\; process 25/09351-8.</em></p>
ORGANIZER;CN="João Ohara":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261030T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261030T234500
SUMMARY:MetaScientia: Journal of the History and Philosophy of Science
UID:20261016T074822Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Dear Colleagues\,</p>\n<p>MetaScientia: Journal of the History and Philosophy of Science invites submissions for the thematic issue:</p>\n<p>Philosophy of Biology: Organization\, Agency\, and Organismality in Living Systems</p>\n<p>This thematic issue welcomes contributions addressing contemporary debates in the philosophy of biology\, including organization\, agency\, autonomy\, organismality\, biological individuality\, biosemiotics\, evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-Devo)\, teleology\, biological function\, and related topics.</p>\n<p>We particularly encourage conceptual\, historical\, theoretical\, interdisciplinary\, and empirically informed studies that explore the nature of living systems and the foundations of biological organization.</p>\n<p>Accepted Contribution Types</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Research Articles</li>\n<li>Review Essays</li>\n<li>Book Reviews</li>\n<li>Critical Commentaries</li>\n<li>Short Notes</li>\n<li>Discussion Notes</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Languages</p>\n<p>English and Turkish</p>\n<p>Important Dates</p>\n<p>Initial Submission Deadline: 15 November 2026<br>Final Submission Deadline: 30 November 2026*<br>Expected Publication: December 2026</p>\n<p>* Manuscripts submitted after 15 November 2026 may be considered for publication in a subsequent issue if the peer-review and production process cannot be completed in time for inclusion in the thematic issue.</p>\n<p>Publication Information</p>\n<ul>\n<li>No APCs</li>\n<li>No submission fees</li>\n<li>Double-blind peer review</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Submission Guidelines and Online Submission</p>\n<p>Authors should submit their manuscripts through the journal&rsquo\;s online submission system and prepare them in accordance with the Official Template and Author Guidelines available on the journal website:</p>\n<p>MetaScientia: Journal of the History and Philosophy of Science<br>https://metasciencehps.org/index.php/science</p>\n<p>Contact</p>\n<p>Prof. Mustafa Yavuz<br>Guest Editor<br>mustafa.yavuz@medeniyet.edu.tr</p>\n<p>Assoc. Prof. Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı<br>Editor-in-Chief<br>alperyardimci@pau.edu.tr</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20261105T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20261107T170000
SUMMARY:First International Conference of the Spanish Network for the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
UID:20261016T074823Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/Madrid
LOCATION:Faculty of Philosophy\, Mazarelos Square\, Santiago de Compostela\, Spain\, 12503
DESCRIPTION:<p>Further details about registration will soon be available on the reFIA website:<br> https://refia.es/</p>\n<p>If you are interested in participating please send a message to:&nbsp\;refia@usc.es</p>
ORGANIZER;CN="Xavier de Donato Rodríguez";CN=Spanish Network for the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence reFIA:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20261105T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Belgrade:20261106T170000
SUMMARY:Emerge 2026: Contested Futures
UID:20261016T074824Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/Belgrade
LOCATION:Kraljice Natalije 45\, Belgrade\, Serbia\, 11000
DESCRIPTION:<p>EMERGE: Contested Futures\, raises pressing questions about power and agency in the age of AI. Rather than treating technological change as inevitable or neutral\, the conference invites critical reflection on how emerging technologies are developed\, governed\, narrated\, and contested\, and how they reshape democratic processes\, social relations\, environmental conditions\, education\, media\, and cultural production. Whether you are a researcher\, practitioner\, or policy professional\, EMERGE offers a rare interdisciplinary space to interrogate the futures being built around us\, and to imagine alternatives. More information at&nbsp\;https://emerge.ifdt.bg.ac.rs/</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Jelena Novakovic:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20261107T090000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20261108T170000
SUMMARY:The 1st Workshop on History and Philosophy of Science in the East
UID:20261016T074825Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Asia/Hong_Kong
LOCATION:HKUST\, Hong Kong\, Hong Kong
DESCRIPTION:<p>History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) has been a vibrant movement in the philosophy of science since 1960s. It profoundly influenced the development of 20th century philosophy of science. HPS departments and postgraduate programmes have been established worldwide\, while various HPS conferences have been running regularly. However\, HPS in the East is still underdeveloped. To be fair\, philosophy of science in East Asia is not as well developed as it might seem. For example\, in China\, philosophy of science is even sometimes conflated with analytic philosophy. This workshop series aims to advance and promote the research of HPS in the East. It will bring together philosophers of science and historians of science in the East to promote the dialogue across the boundaries with an aim to reflect on the nature\, methodology\, and development of HPS and explore new HPS approaches.</p>\n<p>Venue</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Center for Philosophy of Science\, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Dates</p>\n<ul>\n<li>7 &ndash\; 8 November 2026</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Organising Committee</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Yafeng Shan (HKUST) &ndash\; Chair</li>\n<li>Qinyi Wang (HKUST)</li>\n<li>Qiyue Zhang (HKUST)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Keynote Speakers</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Jonathon Hricko (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)</li>\n<li>Seungbae Park (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Contact</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Should you have any questions\, please contact Qiyue Zhang (qiyue.zhang@connect.ust.hk).</li>\n</ul>
ORGANIZER;CN=Yafeng Shan;CN=Qiyue Zhang;CN=Qinyi Wang:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261115T234500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261115T234500
SUMMARY:Philosophical and Technological Reflections on Contemporary Cosmology
UID:20261016T074826Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<strong>Online Workshop: "Philosophical and Technological Reflections on Contemporary Cosmology</a>"</strong>\n<br><strong>When:</strong> 27-29 January 2027.<br><strong>Where: </strong>Online (Zoom and streamed on the YouTube channel of the UNAM's Institute for Philosophical Research</a>).&nbsp\;<br><br><br>Submission deadline: 15 November 2026.<br><br><strong>Keynote speakers:<br></strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Daniel Sudarsky</a></strong> (Nuclear Sciences Institute\, UNAM)</li>\n<li><strong>Jamee Elder</a></strong> (Tufts University)</li>\n<li><strong>TBA</strong>&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<br><strong>Motivation and central questions:</strong>\n<strong><br></strong>\n<strong><br></strong>\nCosmology has undoubtedly become an epistemically successful science. Some of its successes include explaining the Cosmic Microwave Background and its features (temperature\, anisotropies\, polarization\, etc.) with high precision\; accounting for the abundances of the light chemical elements in the universe with high accuracy\; discovering the isotropic accelerated expansion of the universe\; establishing a model that synthesizes the results of various observational research projects (SNIFS\, BOSS\, COBE\, etc.) into a relativistic model of an overall flat geometry with predictive power\, and much more.<br><br>On the one hand\, its success makes cosmology a reliable ground on which to test philosophical theses and frameworks motivated by research in other areas of science (Doboszewski &amp\; Elder\, 2026\; Elder\, 2025). On the other hand\, despite its success\, there remain several philosophical concerns regarding the standard model of cosmology and inflation (Jacquart\, 2021\; Smeenk\, 2014)\, the conceptual character and metaphysics of the phenomena it aims to account for (Martens &amp\; Lehmkuhl\, 2020\; Josset\, P&eacute\;rez &amp\; Sudarsky\, 2017)\, the integration of relativistic and quantum theories into a coherent whole (Sudarsky\, Urrutia &amp\; Vucetich\, 2002\; Ok&oacute\;n &amp\; Sudarsky\, 2014)\, the epistemological significance of computational methods (Gueguen\, 2020\; Meskhidze\, 2023)\, and the challenges involved in developing a science of the universe itself (Ellis\, 2001\; Smeenk\, 2017).<br><br><strong>The workshop aims to open a dialogue between physics and philosophy</strong>. We welcome contributions addressing\, but not limited to\, the following questions:<br><br>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The role and status of different kinds of evidence in cosmology.</strong> What counts as evidence in cosmology? How do models\, simulations\, and observations contribute to the production of evidence?<br><br></li>\n<li><strong>The status of cosmological entities.</strong> What is the status of cosmological entities (such as the multiverse\, dark matter\, or dark energy)? Are we rationally authorized to hold metaphysical commitments to entities whose foundations are inherently theoretical?<br><br></li>\n<li><strong>The epistemological issues surrounding computational methods.</strong> Does the heavy use of computational methods hinder theory testing? How do different forms of epistemic opacity impact the production of knowledge about the cosmos? What methodological frameworks can guarantee the acquisition of understanding from simulations?<br><br></li>\n<li><strong>The theoretical difficulties of pursuing a coherent quantum-relativistic theory.</strong> What are the most reliable strategies to pursue a quantum gravity theory? Is there inductive risk when developing effective field theories?<br><br></li>\n<li><strong>Formal approaches to reasoning in cosmology.</strong> Do alternative logics have any use in cosmology? Are cosmological phenomena fully consistent?</li>\n</ul>\n&nbsp\;\n&nbsp\;\n\n<strong>Submission Guidelines:</strong><br>Abstracts should be no longer than 300 words (references not included)\, and they should be prepared for blind review. Abstracts must be sent in PDF format to philcosmology.unam@gmail.com</a>. &nbsp\;<br><br><strong>Submission deadline: 15 November 2026.<br>Notification of acceptance: 30 November 2026.</strong>\n&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrés E. Vázquez-Quijano";CN="María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz";CN="Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Africa/Casablanca:20261203T090000
DTEND;TZID=Africa/Casablanca:20261205T170000
SUMMARY:The 6th International Conference: Green Lab. Solutions for Sustainable Development (JOE6)
UID:20261016T074827Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Africa/Casablanca
LOCATION:CERHSO\, Oujda\, Morocco\, 60000
DESCRIPTION:<p>The <strong>6th</strong><strong>&nbsp\;International Conference: Green Lab. Solutions for Sustainable Development </strong>(<strong>J</strong><strong>O</strong><strong>E</strong><strong>6</strong>)\, scheduled for&nbsp\;<strong>December 3&ndash\;5\, 2026</strong>\, in <strong>Oujda\, Morocco</strong>\, will serve as a platform for addressing pressing environmental\, territorial and technological challenges.</p>\n<p>The conference is structured around six central themes\, ranging from the management of geo-resources and territories to the valorisation of natural resources within a circular economy approach\, renewable energies and advanced materials for sustainable production\, artificial intelligence applied to environmental and health risk management\, and environmental education and eco-citizenship:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Scope 1</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Management of Geo-Resources &amp\; Geo-Hazards for Sustainable Territories\;</em></li>\n<li><strong>Scope 2</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Natural Resources\, Environment &amp\; Circular Economy\;</em></li>\n<li><strong>Scope 3</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Eco-Materials &amp\; Renewable Energies for Sustainable Production</em>\;</li>\n<li><strong>Scope 4</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Science and Engineering of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Technologies\;</em></li>\n<li><strong>Scope 5</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Artificial Intelligence for the Environment &amp\; Health Risk Management\;</em></li>\n<li><strong>Scope 6</strong>:&nbsp\;<em>Environmental Education &amp\; Eco-Citizenship.</em></li>\n</ul>\n<p>As part of this International Conference\, a strategic workshop dedicated to co-action will be held on&nbsp\;<strong>5 December 2026</strong>\, in connection with the&nbsp\;<em>Info-Energy Climate Cell</em>&nbsp\;(<strong>CIEC</strong>)\, under the theme: &ldquo\;<strong>From Strategy to Citizen Action: CIEC for Participatory Territorial Energy Transition</strong>&rdquo\;. The workshop will bring together key institutional\, academic\, socio-economic and civil society stakeholders to share experiences\, discuss operational challenges and co-develop practical recommendations aimed at strengthening participatory territorial action in the fields of energy and climate.</p>\n<p>This sixth edition of the conference is conceived as a call to action. In light of the complex challenges of adapting to climate change and the need to ensure sustainable development\, it brings together diverse perspectives to propose practical and innovative solutions. By uniting scientists\, researchers\, policymakers\, entrepreneurs and citizens\, it aims to build a bridge between science and concrete action\, generating a collective momentum capable of transforming our practices towards a sustainable and equitable future.</p>\n<p>Under the visionary leadership of&nbsp\;<strong>His Majesty King Mohammed VI</strong>\, Morocco is committed to a sustainable and ecologically sound future. This event serves as a collaborative platform for researchers\, experts\, governmental bodies and civil society to converge and devise tangible solutions to the environmental challenges facing our nation. The event will feature enlightening plenary sessions\, engaging panel discussions and insightful presentations from eminent speakers\, highlighting scientific breakthroughs and key strategies for cultivating a sustainable future.</p>\n<p>In keeping with our commitment to recognising exemplary efforts\, the event will honour outstanding solutions within each theme. We extend a warm invitation to scientists\, researchers\, policymakers\, environmental advocates and all concerned stakeholders to join us on&nbsp\;<strong>3&ndash\;5 December 2026</strong>\, as we collectively champion:</p>\n<p><em>"</em><strong><em>Innovative Solutions for Sustainable Environmental Practices</em></strong><em>."</em></p>\n<p>Together\, let us help shape a greener\, more sustainable Morocco\,&nbsp\;<em>fostering harmony between human endeavour and the environment.</em><em>&nbsp\;</em></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Association Yes Green Maroc;CN=Mourad Arabi;CN=Mohamed El Malki;CN=Latifa Mechkirrou:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20261204T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20261204T090000
SUMMARY:Graduate Conference at the University of Toronto in History and Philosophy of Science and Technology 2027
UID:20261016T074828Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/Toronto
LOCATION:91 Charles Street W. \, Toronto\, Canada\, M5S 1K7
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (IHPST) at the University of Toronto is pleased to announce the call for papers for our annual graduate conference. This year our theme is&nbsp\;Janus-Faced Science: Models\, Metaphors\, and (Mis)representations.&nbsp\;Please see below for details.&nbsp\;Submissions are due&nbsp\;December 4\, 2026.</p>\n<p>Janus is a two-faced Roman god often taken to symbolize opposites and contrasts. Models\, metaphors and (mis)representations in science have a similar kind of duality: the search for truth sometimes requires turning a blind eye to the false assumptions made in the process. This conference explores the ways in which such practices can facilitate and distort scientific understanding.&nbsp\; &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>We welcome proposals related to models\, metaphors\, and (mis)representations from graduate and early-career scholars in history\, philosophy\, and broader humanistic studies of science. Below are questions we are interested in:&nbsp\;</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Are idealizations just stepping stones towards the truth\, or are they themselves ever the end goal?</li>\n<li>How does acknowledging false assumptions change the ways in which science is viewed\, used\, or practiced?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>When have scientists explicitly decided to make assumptions in their work and how did they justify their decisions?</li>\n<li>How do measurements or representations of invisible phenomena influence our understanding of processes we cannot directly observe?</li>\n<li>How can we think critically about the relationship between theoretical or idealized constructs\, and reality?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>How are specific communities differentially impacted by the benefits or harms of scientific idealisation?</li>\n<li>How does the use of idealizations in science impact science communication\, funding\, or policy?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>The conference will take place on&nbsp\;<strong>April 2-3\, 2027</strong>&nbsp\;at the University of Toronto. Accepted proposals will be matched with a University of Toronto faculty commentator who will provide feedback on the presentation. Those accepted will also have&nbsp\;the option&nbsp\;to publish their paper in the conference proceedings alongside the faculty commentary in our graduate journal&nbsp\;<em>Spontaneous Generations (</em><a href="https://spontaneousgenerations.com/">https://spontaneousgenerations.com</a><em>)</em></p>\n<p>Application instructions:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Proposals are due by&nbsp\;December 4\, 2026&nbsp\;and can be submitted using&nbsp\;this form:&nbsp\;<a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdF4Ur2MBHgEtgl9AN_2vNYsCeuWFQGziCgzxJBGoqbvJ2l6Q/viewform">https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdF4Ur2MBHgEtgl9AN_2vNYsCeuWFQGziCgzxJBGoqbvJ2l6Q/viewform</a>. &nbsp\;</li>\n<li>We intend to respond to all proposals by January 11\, 2027.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Proposals should be about&nbsp\;500 words&nbsp\;(references excluded).&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Clearly state the main argument of the presentation and how it connects to the conference theme.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Once accepted\, participants&nbsp\;must&nbsp\;provide a full paper (max. 8000 words) by&nbsp\;February 26\, 2027.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>The conference will be a hybrid format. Please specify whether you would like to attend virtually through Zoom or on-site in Toronto (we will prioritize in-person papers).&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>There is no conference fee\, and we are unable to cover travel or accommodation costs.&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If you have any questions\, please reach out to&nbsp\;hapsatconference@gmail.com. &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Hongyu Chen\, Rebecca Muscant\, Kye Palider\, and Luna Wang</p>\n<p>IHPST Graduate Conference Organization Team &nbsp\;</p>\n<p>University of Toronto</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20261231T010000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20261231T010000
SUMMARY:Objectivity across the Sciences
UID:20261016T074829Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Asia/Hong_Kong
LOCATION:HKUST\, Hong Kong\, Hong Kong
DESCRIPTION:<p>Objectivity is an important topic in the philosophy of science with implications for many debates\, including scientific confirmation\, scientific realism\, measurement\, values in science\, and theory choice. However\, defining scientific objectivity is not easy. Its meaning varies radically from different contexts. Objectivity can be a property of a product of science (e.g. scientific claims)\, or of a process of science (e.g. scientific methods). It can also be a virtue or ideal of scientific practice. This conference aims to examine the notion of objectivity across the natural and social sciences. In particular\, it will scrutinise the nature\, role\, and significance of objectivity in scientific practice.</p>\n<p>Questions to be addressed include but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is scientific objectivity?</li>\n<li>Is there a monistic account of objectivity across the sciences?</li>\n<li>Is objectivity a virtue of science?</li>\n<li>Is objectivity in science attainable?</li>\n<li>Does a pursuit of objectivity in science imply a value-free ideal of science?</li>\n<li>Should we stop talking of objectivity in science?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Selected papers will be included in an edited volume to be published by Springer (part of the Asian Studies in the Philosophy of Science).</p>\n<p>Submission Guidelines</p>\n<p>Please submit a 500-word abstract for blind review via Oxford Abstracts (https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/83122/submitter) by 31 December 2026.</p>\n<p>Contact</p>\n<p>If you have any questions\, please contact Qiyue Zhang (qiyue.zhang@connect.ust.hk).</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Yafeng Shan;CN=Qinyi Wang;CN=Qiyue Zhang:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20270105T234500
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270105T234500
SUMMARY:The AI & Society Symposium: Where Technology Meets Human Values
UID:20261016T074830Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Boston\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Boston University Humanities &amp\; AI Lab (HAIL) invites undergraduate and graduate students from any institution and any discipline to submit papers for its first symposium.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p><strong>This symposium inquires into the conceptions of the human built into generative AI.</strong>&nbsp\;<br><br>GenAI systems sound like us: they say &ldquo\;I understand\,&rdquo\; they apologize\, they appear to care. They&rsquo\;re also made for a user\, and so they come with assumptions about who that user is: what they need and what they can already do. And they&rsquo\;re built on assumptions about what intelligence itself is. Some of these pictures of the human reflect choices made by engineers and product teams\; others were assumed without anyone ever deciding. It all demands to be examined. This symposium brings these and related questions into public discussion\, asking what it means to be human at a time when these systems are made like us and for us\, even as this &lsquo\;us&rsquo\; is still being decided.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>We welcome work from any discipline in the humanities\, the social sciences\, and technical fields such as engineering\, computer science\, and data science. Possible topics include\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Should AI systems speak like us? How does this affect the way we relate to them? How do training choices like fine-tuning on human feedback produce an AI&rsquo\;s voice?</li>\n<li>Do we owe anything to a system that speaks as one of us? Does making AI seem human lead us to trust it more than we should?</li>\n<li>How do economic incentives shape the picture of the user\, or the humanlike voice\, built into AI?</li>\n<li>Who is the user GenAI systems are built for? An assistant presupposes someone who knows what they want and can judge what they get. Whose needs\, abilities\, and ends does this take for granted? Who is left out of this picture?</li>\n<li>What picture of intelligence\, reasoning\, and understanding is built into how AI is designed? Is it the right one\, or does it leave something out?</li>\n<li>Can using AI prevent us from learning key skills we need to develop as people\, professionals\, and citizens? Can it lead us to lose skills we already have?</li>\n<li>What would AI look like if it were built for people who are still learning? Can it be designed to support learning rather than replace it\, and how would we know if it works as intended?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Submission details:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Fill in&nbsp\;<a href="https://forms.gle/MTZqLYXoYyjxuF8i7">this Google Form</a>&nbsp\;with your name\, institution\, program and year\, and paper title.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Attach in the form an&nbsp\;<strong>abstract of up to 500 words</strong>\, prepared for anonymous review.</li>\n<li>The deadline is January 5\, 2027.</li>\n<li>Decisions by February 5\, 2027.&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Talks are 20 minutes\, followed by 10 minutes of discussion.&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Limited travel grants may be available for presenters from outside Boston\, with priority for students in New England.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>You can send questions to&nbsp\;<a href="mailto:ppardi1@bu.edu">ppardi1@bu.edu</a>.</p>\n<p>Organized by Pol Pardini Gispert\, Anika Mukherjee\, Daniel Munro\, and Seth Villegas\, with support from the Boston University Center for the Humanities and the APA Berry Fund.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Pol Pardini Gispert;CN=Daniel Munro:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270127T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270129T170000
SUMMARY:Philosophical and Technological Reflections on Contemporary Cosmology
UID:20261016T074831Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>Cosmology has undoubtedly become an epistemically successful science. Some of its successes include explaining the Cosmic Microwave Background and its features (temperature\, anisotropies\, polarization\, etc.) with high precision\; accounting for the abundances of the light chemical elements in the universe with high accuracy\; discovering the isotropic accelerated expansion of the universe\; establishing a model that synthesizes the results of various observational research projects (SNIFS\, BOSS\, COBE\, etc.) into a relativistic model of an overall flat geometry with predictive power\, and much more.</p>\n<p>On the one hand\, its success makes cosmology a reliable ground on which to test philosophical theses and frameworks motivated by research in other areas of science (Doboszewski &amp\; Elder\, 2026\; Elder\, 2025). On the other hand\, despite its success\, there remain several philosophical concerns regarding the standard model of cosmology and inflation (Jacquart\, 2021\; Smeenk\, 2014)\, the conceptual character and metaphysics of the phenomena it aims to account for (Martens &amp\; Lehmkuhl\, 2020\; Josset\, P&eacute\;rez &amp\; Sudarsky\, 2017)\, the integration of relativistic and quantum theories into a coherent whole (Sudarsky\, Urrutia &amp\; Vucetich\, 2002\; Ok&oacute\;n &amp\; Sudarsky\, 2014)\, the epistemological significance of computational methods (Gueguen\, 2020\; Meskhidze\, 2023)\, and the challenges involved in developing a science of the universe itself (Ellis\, 2001\; Smeenk\, 2017).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Our aim is to provide space for these discussions.&nbsp\;</p>\n\n&nbsp\;
ORGANIZER;CN="Andrés E. Vázquez-Quijano";CN="María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz";CN="Ana Rosa Pérez Ransanz":
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20270402T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20270403T170000
SUMMARY:Graduate Conference at the University of Toronto in History and Philosophy of Science and Technology 2027
UID:20261016T074832Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/Toronto
LOCATION:91 Charles Street W. \, Toronto\, Canada\, M5S 1K7
DESCRIPTION:<p>The Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (IHPST) at the University of Toronto is pleased to announce the call for papers for our annual graduate conference. This year our theme is&nbsp\;Janus-Faced Science: Models\, Metaphors\, and (Mis)representations.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>Janus is a two-faced Roman god often taken to symbolize opposites and contrasts. Models\, metaphors and (mis)representations in science have a similar kind of duality: the search for truth sometimes requires turning a blind eye to the false assumptions made in the process. This conference explores the ways in which such practices can facilitate and distort scientific understanding.&nbsp\;</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20270416T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20270417T170000
SUMMARY:The AI & Society Symposium: Where Technology Meets Human Values
UID:20261016T074833Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/New_York
LOCATION:Boston\, United States
DESCRIPTION:<p><strong>This symposium inquires into the conceptions of the human built into generative AI.</strong>&nbsp\;<br><br>GenAI systems sound like us: they say &ldquo\;I understand\,&rdquo\; they apologize\, they appear to care. They&rsquo\;re also made for a user\, and so they come with assumptions about who that user is: what they need and what they can already do. And they&rsquo\;re built on assumptions about what intelligence itself is. Some of these pictures of the human reflect choices made by engineers and product teams\; others were assumed without anyone ever deciding. It all demands to be examined. This symposium brings these and related questions into public discussion\, asking what it means to be human at a time when these systems are made like us and for us\, even as this &lsquo\;us&rsquo\; is still being decided.&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>You can send questions to&nbsp\;ppardi1@bu.edu</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Organized by Pol Pardini Gispert\, Anika Mukherjee\, Daniel Munro\, and Seth Villegas\, with support from the Boston University Center for the Humanities and the APA Berry Fund.</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Pol Pardini Gispert;CN=Daniel Munro:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20270623T090000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Hong_Kong:20270625T170000
SUMMARY:Objectivity across the Sciences
UID:20261016T074834Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:Asia/Hong_Kong
LOCATION:HKUST\, Hong Kong\, Hong Kong
DESCRIPTION:<p>Objectivity is an important topic in the philosophy of science with implications for many debates\, including scientific confirmation\, scientific realism\, measurement\, values in science\, and theory choice. However\, defining scientific objectivity is not easy. Its meaning varies radically from different contexts. Objectivity can be a property of a product of science (e.g. scientific claims)\, or of a process of science (e.g. scientific methods). It can also be a virtue or ideal of scientific practice. This conference aims to examine the notion of objectivity across the natural and social sciences. In particular\, it will scrutinise the nature\, role\, and significance of objectivity in scientific practice.</p>\n<p>Questions to be addressed include but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is scientific objectivity?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Is there a monistic account of objectivity across the sciences?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Is objectivity a virtue of science? Is objectivity in science attainable?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Does a pursuit of objectivity in science imply a value-free ideal of science?&nbsp\;</li>\n<li>Should we stop talking of objectivity in science?&nbsp\;</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Selected papers will be included in an edited volume to be published by Springer (part of the Asian Studies in the Philosophy of Science).</p>\n<p>If you have any questions\, please contact Qiyue Zhang (qiyue.zhang@connect.ust.hk).</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Yafeng Shan;CN=Qinyi Wang;CN=Qiyue Zhang:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261016T074537Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:29990101T033000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:29990201T120000
SUMMARY:POSTPONED - Creativity and Improvisation in Thought\, Practice\, and Mind:  An Interdisciplinary Conference
UID:20261016T074835Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-8d97778f4-zm8pp
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:6001 Dodge Street\, Omaha\, United States\, 68182
DESCRIPTION:<p>*Please note that this event has officially been<em><strong> postponed</strong></em>. More information will be made available asap in the near future*</p>\n<p>Many human cognitive capacities and processes may be deployed creatively\, from unique choices made for oneself up through novel cultural shifts. Similarly\, large swaths of our daily lives are taken up with performing spontaneous\, on-the-fly\, and unplanned activities that are\, in a word\, improvised.&nbsp\; Charting out the nature of both creativity and improvisation\, taken individually or together\, remains an open and pressing issue. In this conference\, we will delve into various philosophical\, theoretical\, empirical\, and interdisciplinary issues that are related to creativity and improvisation. A non-exhaustive list of related questions and themes for this topic include:</p>\n<p>- What is the relationship between improvisation and creativity?</p>\n<p>- What is the relationship between creative activity and well-being?</p>\n<p>- What is the best way to model individual and collective creativity?</p>\n<p>- Is creativity in the arts the same thing as in other domains\, such as in science or business?</p>\n<p>- What are the pros and cons of different scientific operationalizations of creativity and improvisation?</p>\n<p>- Provide a conceptual analysis of creativity and/or improvisation.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
