For some time\, Classical German and Early Analytic Philosophy seemed to represent two fundamentally different schools of thought. However\, a more profound analysis reveals a continuity in their philosophical explorations. Both paradigmatic authors of Classical German Philosophy\, such as Kant and Hegel\, as well as pioneers of Analytic Philosophy\, such as Frege and Wittgenstein\, engaged deeply with questions about the nature of thinking\, the role of language for thought\, the feasibility of a science of logic beyond mathematical boundaries\, and the complex interplay between thought and being.
\nThe graduate conference aims to promote dialogue among early career scholars on the historical and systematic connections between Classical German Philosophy (especially the works of Kant and Hegel) and Early Analytic Philosophy. The conference will focus on the continuing relevance of both traditions of thought for systematic problems in current philosophical discussion. This year\, the conference shall focus on paradigmatic topics such as the nature of logic as a philosophical inquiry of thought\, the relation between logical forms and the sensible aspect of experience\, the philosophical comprehension of the conditions for action and right\, and the integration between the forms of subjective thought and the objective world.
\nThe conference is hosted by the Chair of Philosophy and History of Philosophy at the University of Stuttgart (Christian Martin). Several senior scholars\, including James Conant (Chicago)\, Matthias Haase (Chicago)\, and Marvin Tritschler (Stuttgart)\, will participate in the event as discussants. The program can be accessed on the conference website: tinyurl.com/yevnhuft
\nYoung scholars interested in the conference topic are very welcome to participate as listeners and discussants. To attend\, please register by writing to Thomas Dittler at st197123@stud.uni-stuttgart.de.
\nOrganization: James Conant\, Thomas Dittler\, Christian Martin &\; Ana Vieyra
ORGANIZER;CN=James Conant;CN=Christian Martin;CN=Ana Vieyra;CN=Thomas Dittler: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260731T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260731T090000 SUMMARY:Call for Commentaries - Target Article: Francesco Berto\, "Impossible Worlds Are Here to Stay" UID:20260711T043403Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Call for Commentaries
\nCrí\;tica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofí\;a
\nTarget Article: \;Francesco Berto\, &ldquo\;Impossible Worlds Are Here to Stay&rdquo\;
\nEditor: Santiago Echeverri
\nWe invite submissions of commentaries for an article symposium on Francesco Berto&rsquo\;s &ldquo\;Impossible Worlds Are Here to Stay&rdquo\;. The symposium will feature invited commentaries \;by Katalin Bimbo (University of Alberta)\, Kit Fine (New York University)\, Koji Tanaka (Australian National University)\, Zeynep Soysal (University of Rochester)\, and Stephen Yablo (MIT).
\nCommentaries should not exceed 2\,000 words\, excluding references\, and must be submitted in PDF to the following email address: \;santiago.echeverri@filosoficas.unam.mx. All commentaries should be written in English. The deadline for submission is \;July 31\, 2026. Authors seeking feedback on the suitability of a potential commentary are welcome to contact the Editor prior to submission.
\nPlease submit two versions of your manuscript:
\n1. \; \; \; \; \;A full version that includes the author&rsquo\;s name\, title of the contribution\, email address\, postal address (including phone number)\, and any acknowledgments.
\n2. \; \; \; \; \;An anonymous version prepared for blind review\, with all identifying information removed.
\nBoth files must include:
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;The title of the contribution.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;An abstract of no more than 100 words.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; \;A list of five keywords not mentioned in the title.
\nThe title\, abstract\, and keywords should be provided in both English and Spanish.
\nAbout \;Crí\;tica
\nCrí\;tica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofí\;a \;is a quarterly journal published by the Institute for Philosophical Research at UNAM in Mexico. It publishes articles\, discussion notes\, book symposia\, article symposia\, survey articles\, special issues\, and reviews in all areas of philosophy\, provided they fall within the analytic tradition broadly understood. \;Crí\;tica \;values conceptual clarity\, argumentative rigor\, and originality. Its primary readership consists of academic philosophers and philosophy students\, so authors are expected to clearly articulate how their work contributes to advancing ongoing philosophical debates.
\nFounded in 1967 by Alejandro Rossi\, Fernando Salmeró\;n\, and Luis Villoro\, \;Crí\;tica \;was the first journal in Latin America devoted to analytic philosophy. For decades\, it has maintained its status as a leading philosophical publication in the region and is widely respected in the international academic community\, particularly in the English-speaking world. \;
\nCrí\;tica \;has published work by many influential philosophers\, including:
\nCarlos Alchourró\;n\, G.E.M. Anscombe\, David M. Armstrong\, Eugenio Bulygin\, Hé\;ctor-Neri Castañ\;eda\, Donald Davidson\, Jon Elster\, R.M. Hare\, Gilbert Harman\, John L. Mackie\, Hugo Margá\;in\, John McDowell\, Thomas Nagel\, David F. Pears\, Arthur N. Prior\, Hilary Putnam\, W.V.O. Quine\, Richard Rorty\, Gilbert Ryle\, Sydney Shoemaker\, Thomas M. Simpson\, Ernest Sosa\, Peter F. Strawson\, Barry Stroud\, Bas C. van Fraassen\, and Georg H. von Wright.
\nFor more information\, please visit our website: \;
\nhttp://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260807T093000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260808T170000 SUMMARY:Metaphysics of Logic UID:20260711T043404Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Regina-Pacis-Weg 3\, Bonn\, Germany\, 53113 DESCRIPTION:What is the relationship between logical laws and rational thinking? Are there facts about logic that are independent of us\, and if so\, what is their metaphysical status? Do purely logical statements have meaning? Is there a true logical system\, or can several logical systems be accepted at once? What is the relationship between classical logic and alternative logics?
\nGiven the central role that logic plays in contemporary philosophy\, the importance of these questions cannot be underestimated. In analytical philosophy in particular\, it is often assumed that logical formalization can lend arguments a special power. This power makes it seemingly impossible to accept the premises of an argument and yet reject its conclusion. Arguments that cannot be formalized in this way\, on the other hand\, are often rejected as &lsquo\;unscientific.&rsquo\;
\nBut as central as logic is to analytical philosophy\, philosophers disagree about its nature and foundations. This great diversity of positions in the philosophy of logic has a long tradition: Frege believed that the principles of logic were general laws of truth and that rules for correct judgment could be derived from them. (Der Gedanke\, 58) Carnap's famous postulate &ldquo\;In logic there are no morals&rdquo\; (The Logical Syntax of Language §\;17) expresses the idea that logical systems can only claim validity relative to the specification of a particular language. Jared Warren believes that logical truths are a shadow of syntax or reflections on linguistic rules. (Shadows of Syntax\, p. 325\; Slogan 8)
\nThe aim of the conference is to facilitate the exchange of different positions on the mentioned issues. Both systematic contributions to current debates and discussions of historical positions are welcome.
\nCall for abstracts
\nWe encourage BA\, MA\, and M.Ed. students to submit abstracts on the above topic in English. Submissions should include a brief description of the topic (approximately two to three sentences) and an abstract of no more than 400 words for a blind review. Each presenter will have 45 minutes for their presentation\, 20 minutes for the talk\, and 25 minutes for a Q&\;A. \;
\nThe deadline for submissions is 30.04.26.. Please submit your application as a PDF to logicandmetaphysics@protonmail.com. Documents need to be anonymized for blind review. Please make sure to use &ldquo\;Abstract Metaphysics of Logic Bonn 2026&rdquo\; \;as the subject of the Email.
\nWe particularly encourage students from underrepresented and marginalized groups to submit abstracts in order to support diversity and equality at universities. \;
\nAll submissions will undergo a blind review. All applicants will be notified by email by 18.05.26. regardless of whether their presentation has been selected. We will contact you for further organizational steps if your presentation is selected.
\nWe are working on financing the conference\, however currently we cannot guarantee a full (or even a partial) reimbursement of travel and accommodation costs. Should you be unable to finance your accommodation\, please indicate this in your email. A limited number of participants can be accommodated by the local student body.
\nIf you have any questions\, please contact the organizers logicandmetaphysics@protonmail.com. We look forward to receiving your abstracts!
ORGANIZER;CN=Madara Vaserberga;CN=Leon Isenmann;CN=Timo Selting;CN=Dalon Axhimusa;CN=Marvin Thinschmidt: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20260901T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20260901T234500 SUMMARY:The 25th Amsterdam Colloquium UID:20260711T043405Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Amsterdam LOCATION:Amsterdam\, Netherlands DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to announce the call for papers for the 25th Amsterdam Colloquium\, to be held on 16-18 December 2026\, at the Institute for Logic\, Language and Computation (ILLC)\, University of Amsterdam.
\nSubmissions are now open on the journal website: https://platform.openjournals.nl/PAC/about/submissions
\nCall Deadline: 01-Sep-2026
\nMeeting Description:
\nThe Amsterdam Colloquia aim to bring together linguists\, philosophers\, logicians\, cognitive scientists and computer scientists who share an interest in the formal study of the semantics and pragmatics of natural and formal languages. The Amsterdam Colloquia are organized by the Institute for Logic\, Language and Computation (ILLC) of the University of Amsterdam.
\nWith this year's edition\, the Amsterdam Colloquium turns half a century old! \; To celebrate the 50th anniversary we will host a special session on The Past and Future of Semantics. A history of the Amsterdam Colloquium can be found on the website of its Proceedings (https://platform.openjournals.nl/PAC/history). \;
\nIn addition to the general program and the special session\, the 25th Amsterdam Colloquium will feature a workshop on Semantics and Non-classical Logics. The Colloquium will also include a poster session and an evening lecture by Prof. Nicholas Asher\, jointly organised with the E. W. Beth Foundation.
\nImportant dates:
\nSubmission Deadline: 1 September 2026
\nNotification of Acceptance: 22 October 2026
\nDeadline for Proceeding Papers: 2 December 2026
\nConference: 16-18 December 2026
\nFor further information please consult the AC2026 website: https://events.illc.uva.nl/AC/AC2026
\nWe are looking forward to your contributions.
\nBest regards\,
\nThe Organising Committee
\nFausto Carcassi (ILLC)
\nGiorgio Sbardolini (ILLC)
\nWoxuan Zhou (ILLC)
\nHugh Reilly (ILLC &\; St Andrews)
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260914T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260916T170000 SUMMARY:Truth\, Use-Conditions\, Hyperintensionality: Visegrad Inspirations in Philosophy of Language UID:20260711T043406Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Krakowskie Przedmiście 3\, Warsaw\, Poland DESCRIPTION:As part of the research project \;Analytic Philosophy in Visegrad Countries\, the University of Warsaw is pleased to announce a three-day workshop titled \;&ldquo\;Truth\, Use-Conditions\, Hyperintensionality: Visegrad Inspirations in Philosophy of Language&rdquo\;
\nThe Visegrad (V4) region&mdash\;Czechia\, Hungary\, Poland\, and Slovakia&mdash\;has shaped analytic philosophy of language in foundational yet often underrecognized ways. Some contributions\, such as Tarski&rsquo\;s work on semantics\, are widely known\; others&mdash\;early work on inferentialism\, situation semantics\, and hyperintensionality&mdash\;remain less familiar\, and many are still underexplored. In fact\, across nearly every area of contemporary philosophy of language\, V4 philosophers have developed distinctive ideas\, This includes original works on proper names\, indexicals\, quotation\, context-sensitivity\, attitude reports\, interrogatives\, speech act theory\, conditionals\, pronouns\, propositional content\, and logical form.
\nThis is not only a historical legacy: philosophy of language in the V4 region is a vibrant and increasingly visible research ecosystem today. The workshop aims to further raise the international profile of V4 work and to provide a shared forum where current V4 research can meet international\, V4-inspired research.
\n
Two submission paths:
To make the workshop both a genuine platform for V4 scholars and a bridge to the broader international community\, we invite submissions through two tracks:
\n
1) V4 Track
We welcome submissions on any topic in analytic philosophy of language (broadly construed) from scholars who are currently affiliated with an institution in a V4 country\, have held a significant past affiliation in the V4 region\, or have a substantial research connection to V4 philosophy of language (e.g. doctoral or postdoctoral \; affiliation\, long-term collaboration\, etc.).
2) International Track (Outside the V4)
We welcome submissions from scholars without a V4 affiliation or background on any topic in analytic philosophy of language explicitly inspired by V4 traditions&mdash\;historically (e.g. engaging with classic figures or schools) or inspired by current V4 contributions.
Topics:
We invite submissions on all areas of analytic philosophy of language (broadly conceived\, including philosophical logic)
Abstract submission:
&bull\; Abstract length: 250&ndash\;500 words\, prepared \;for anonymous review
&bull\; Language: English
&bull\; Deadline: 30 April 2026 (23:59 CEST)
&bull\; Decision of acceptance: 15 June 2026
&bull\; Talk: each accepted speaker will have 60 minutes\, including Q&\;A
Please submit:
1. an anonymized abstract (PDF preferred)\, and
2. a separate cover page with your name\, affiliation(s)\, email address\, paper title\, and submission track (V4 Track or International Track).
Practical information:
&bull\; Venue: Faculty of Philosophy\, University of Warsaw\, Warsaw\, Poland
&bull\; Dates: 14&ndash\;16 September 2026
&bull\; Format: in-person workshop
&bull\; Fee: no conference fee
&bull\; Support: we plan to provide accommodation for authors of accepted papers \;
Submissions &\; inquiries:
Please send submissions and inquiries to: zuzana.rybarikova@osu.cz or zuzka.rybarikova@gmail.com
(Subject line suggestion: &ldquo\;V4 Language Workshop 2026 &ndash\; Submission &ndash\; [V4 Track / International Track]&rdquo\;)
We warmly welcome contributions from both early-career researchers and established scholars.
The history of analytic philosophy is essentially told as a history of the development and application of logic on the one hand\, and as a continuous discussion of the question of the possibility of metaphysics on the other hand. While logical empiricism believed that metaphysical questions could be exposed as pseudo-problems using the tools of formal logic\, developments in modal logic and model theory were partly responsible for the renaissance of metaphysics that we can still observe today. In short\, since formal logic is an essential tool and distinguishing feature of analytic philosophy\, logic is also crucial in the historical and contemporary discourse on the possibility of metaphysics. In this context\, the question arises as to what functions logic fulfills in metaphysics and what questions it enables or prevents. \;
\nThe aim of the conference is to shed light on the relationship between analytic metaphysics and its logical toolkit and to trace the historical development of analytic philosophy from a fundamentally anti-metaphysical to a philosophical movement\, which is decidedly open towards metaphysics. An examination of the second area of interest is closely linked to the role that logic plays in the dissolution and reformulation of metaphysical problems. This may take the form of systematic contributions to current debates or reviews of historical positions.
\nCALL FOR ABSTRACTS
\nWe encourage BA\, MA\, and M.Ed. students to submit abstracts on the above topic in English. Submissions should include a brief description of the topic (approximately two to three sentences) and an abstract of no more than 400 words for a blind review. Each presenter will have 45 minutes for their presentation\, 20 minutes for the talk\, and 25 minutes for a Q&\;A. \;
\nThe deadline for submissions is 30.05.26.. Please submit your application as a PDF to logicandmetaphysics@protonmail.com. Documents need to be anonymized for blind review. Please make sure to use &ldquo\;Abstract Logic of Metaphysics Potsdam 2026&rdquo\;as the subject of the Email.
\nWe particularly encourage students from underrepresented and marginalized groups to submit presentations in order to support diversity and equality at universities. \;
\nAll submissions will undergo a blind review. All applicants will be notified by email by 22.06.26.regardless of whether their presentation has been selected. We will contact you for further organizational steps if your presentation is selected.
\nWe are working on financing the conference\, however currently we cannot guarantee a full (or even a partial) reimbursement of travel and accommodation costs. Should you be unable to finance your accommodation\, please indicate this in your email. A limited number of participants can be accommodated by the local student body.
\n
If you have any questions\, please contact the organizers logicandmetaphysics@protonmail.com. We look forward to receiving your abstracts!
Intensionalists claim that necessarily equivalent propositions are identical\; hyperintensionalists deny this. Whereas possible worlds semantics provides a canonical intensionalist framework\, there is no canonical hyperintensionalist framework. Recent years have rather seen a thousand flowers bloom with the \; development of truthmakers semantics\, aboutness theory\, grounding theory\, and logics of essence\, to mention but a few hyperintensionalist theories. \;
\nA lot of recent work has focused on various paradoxes that threaten hyperintensionalism - the so-called Russell-Myhill paradox in particular. We now have reason to think that these paradoxes can be resolved. \;
\nThe mere consistency of hyperintensionalist theories does not\, obviously\, mean that they are worth having. Even staunch adherents of hyperintensionalists approaches would admit that they are more complicated than their intensionalist competitors. So\, what work can be done by hyperintensionalists theories that cannot be done by their intensionalist competitors? Is the work being done worth the price of the greater complexity? The goal of the workshop is to bring together some leading proponents and opponents of hyperintensionalism to discuss these questions.
\nThe workshop will be held at St John's College\, Oxford\, 1-2 OCtober 2026.
\nDue to space constraints\, we ask participants to regsiter in advance\; a registration link will be posted here shortly.
\nUpdates to the timins and schedle will appear on this site.
ORGANIZER;CN="Øystein Linnebo";CN=Jon Litland;CN=Nicholas K. Jones: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261006T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Mexico_City:20261008T170000 SUMMARY:17th Latin American Workshop on New Methods of Reasoning LANMR 2026 UID:20260711T043409Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Mexico_City LOCATION:Mexico City\, Mexico DESCRIPTION:LANMR 2026 is the seventeenth edition of the Latin American Workshop series on Logic/Languages\, Algorithms and New Methods of Reasoning organized by Universidad Nacional Autó\;noma de Mé\;xico through Facultad de Ciencias (DGAPA-PAPIIT IN111126) and Facultad de Ingenierí\;a (DGAPA-PAPIIT IN116726 and IA103026\, and DGAPA-PAPIME PEI110226).
\n\nThe aim of this workshop is to bring together people from different fields such as programming languages foundations\, formal verification\, philosophy or artificial intelligence\, around methods of reasoning and applications involving logic. We call for extended abstracts. In particular you can present work in progress or work that is recently published elsewhere.
\n\n\nSuggested topics include\, but are not limited to the following:
\n\n\n\nCALL FOR PAPERS\, EXTENDED DEADLINE 19th June 2026.
\n17th Latin American Workshop on Logic and New Methods of Reasoning LANMR 2026
\nOctober 6th\, 7th &\; 8th\, 2026.
\nCiudad Universitaria UNAM\, CDMX\, Mé\;xico and Online
\nhttps://www.lanmr.unam.mx/
\nLANMR 2026 is the seventeenth edition of the Latin American Workshop series on Logic/Languages\, Algorithms and New Methods of Reasoning\, organized by Universidad Nacional Autó\;noma de Mé\;xico through Facultad de Ciencias (DGAPA-PAPIIT IN111126) and Facultad de Ingenierí\;a (DGAPA-PAPIIT IN116726 and DGAPA-PAPIIT IA103026).
\nSCOPE
\nLogic is a robust discipline that nowadays influences several fields going from the study of philosophical problems to the development of algorithms and systems for Artificial Intelligence and formal verification. The LANMR workshop series aims to stimulate and promote international research and collaboration on logic and its applications from philosophy to computer science. Our goal is to bring together people from different fields related to logic\, such as proof theory\, philosophy of logic\, model theory and semantics\, computability theory\, programming language foundations\, formal verification\, or artificial intelligence\, around methods of reasoning and applications involving logic.
\nTOPICS OF INTEREST
\nLANMR 2026 solicits original research articles\, not published elsewhere. Topics of interest encompass all areas of logic and its applications broadly understood\, including\, but not limited to\, the following:
\nLogics (classical and non-classical): constructive\, modal\, epistemic\, temporal\, paraconsistent\, description\, substructural\, connexive\, quantum\, algebraic\, multi-valued\, higher-order\, lambda calculi and type theory\, etc.
\nMethods: natural deduction and sequent calculi\, tableaux\, answer set programming\, model checking\, term rewriting and equational reasoning\, automated and interactive theorem proving\, SAT and SMT solving\, etc.
\nApplications: mechanized proofs\, formalized mathematics\, declarative and dependent-type programming\, program synthesis and analysis\, formal methods\, type systems\, formal semantics of languages and systems\, process calculi\, proof-theoretic semantics\, philosophical logic\, philosophy of computing\, AI-related applications\, etc.
\nImportant Dates
\nPaper submission: EXTENDED DEADLINE June 19th\, 2026
\nNotification of acceptance: August 5th\, 2026
\nWorkshop (Hybrid): October 6th\, 7th &\; 8th\, 2026
\nSubmission Guidelines: papers written in English\, limited to 12 pages excluding footnotes\, appendices\, and references. Contributions are to be prepared for anonymous review\; that is\, authors' names and institutions must be omitted\, and references to authors' own related work should be in the third person. Papers must use the Easychair Latex Class and be submitted via EasyChair at https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=lanmr2026
\nThe language of the workshop is English\; at least one of the authors of accepted papers is expected to attend the workshop in order to present their contribution in a 25-minute presentation.
\nPublication
\nA book of abstracts will be distributed previous to the meeting. A post-proceedings volume with full accepted papers will be organized for publication in a new series by College Publications (https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/LLA/)
\nVenue
\nLANMR 2026 will be held as a hybrid workshop. The physical component will take place in Ciudad Universitaria (CU)\, which houses the Central Campus listed as a World Heritage UNESCO site in 2007.
\nProgram Committee
\nPaoli Baldi\, University of Salento\, Italy.
\nVeró\;nica Borja Mací\;as\, Universidad Tecnoló\;gica de la Mixteca\, Mé\;xico.
\nRaú\;l Fervari\, Universidad de Có\;rdoba\, Argentina.
\nDavid Fuenmayor\, University of Bamberg\, Germany.
\nAna Claudia Golzio\, Universidade Estadual de Campinas\, Brasil.
\nAlejandro Herná\;ndez Tello\, Universidad Tecnoló\;gica de la Mixteca\, Mé\;xico.
\nMalena Ivnisky\, Universidad de Buenos Aires y CONICET\, Argentina.
\nJosé\; de Jesú\;s Lavalle\, Benemé\;rita Universidad Autó\;noma de Puebla\, Mé\;xico.
\nSelene Linares Aré\;valo\, University of Melbourne\, Australia.
\nNancy Abigail Nú\;ñ\;ez Herná\;ndez\, FES Acatlá\;n UNAM\, Mé\;xico.
\nCarlos Olarte\, LIPN Université\; Sorbonne Paris Nord\, France.
\nUmberto Rivieccio\, UNED Madrid\, Spain.
\nJuan Slagter\, Universidad Nacional del Sur\, Argentina.
\nAlejandro Solares-Rojas\, Universidad de Buenos Aires\, Argentina.
\nFernando Velá\;zquez Quesada\, Universitetet i Bergen\, Norway.
\nOrganizing Committee
\nEverardo Bá\;rcenas\, Facultad de Ingenierí\;a\, UNAM\, Mé\;xico
\nLourdes Gonzá\;lez Huesca\, Facultad de Ciencias\, UNAM\, Mé\;xico
\nFavio E. Miranda Perea\, Facultad de Ciencias\, UNAM\, Mé\;xico
\nMiguel Pé\;rez Gaspar\, Facultad de Ingenierí\;a\, UNAM\, Mé\;xico
ORGANIZER;CN=Favio E. Miranda-Perea: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20261013T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20261016T170000 SUMMARY:Ontology As Structured by the Interfaces with Semantics 6 (OASIS 6) UID:20260711T043411Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:OASIS 6 (Ontology As Structured by the Interfaces with Semantics 6) will take place at the Centro de Linguí\;stica da Universidade de Lisboa\, 13-16 October\, 2026.
\nThe OASIS conference series aims to promote conversation across different disciplines that interface with semantics\, using ontological questions as shared reference points. The broad questions in the background are these: 1. What basic ontological building blocks do we use to talk and think about the world? 2. How do these building blocks get combined? 3. And how do grammatical and cognitive phenomena motivate the answers to the first two questions? For more information\, see the OASIS credo.
\nWe welcome submissions from semantics and semantics-adjacent domains\, including philosophy and the cognitive sciences. We will host sessions bringing together linguists and philosophers to discuss foundational questions in linguistics and their relation to broader philosophical issues. The sessions will introduce some of the central assumptions and frameworks of contemporary linguistic theory and provide informal opportunities for interdisciplinary exchange. Philosophers and others interested in language\, mind\, or cognition are particularly encouraged to attend.
\nInvited speakers:
\nSatellite session: Creoles as windows on language and cognition This special session will focus on Creoles as full-fledged natural languages that emerged in certain socio-historical environments shaped by European colonial expansion. For any given theory of Creole formation\, those contexts involve language contact and innovation through complex processes of language acquisition\, therefore providing a particular starting point for research on how conceptual categories are mapped into diverse grammatical systems.
\nAbstract submission:
\nAbstracts are due on May 15\, 2026. Submission will be via the conference Open Review page. Authors should be aware of OpenReview's moderation policy for newly created profiles in the Call for Papers:
\nIf you are submitting for the satellite workshop\, please indicate this by including &ldquo\;[for satellite workshop]&rdquo\; under the title of your abstract.
\nAbstracts must be anonymous\, in pdf format\, 2 A4 pages\, in a font size no less than 12pt. You may submit at most two abstracts but can be single author on only one.
\nLinguists and any others submitting very technical research: It is absolutely necessary that you do what you can to make your abstract accessible to an interdisciplinary audience. This doesn't mean eschewing all formalism\, but do pitch your abstract so that a non-technical reader can get something interesting out of it.
\nImportant dates:
\nContact: oasis6lisboa@letras.ulisboa.pt
\nMeeting URL: https://oasis.cnrs.fr/meetings/oasis-6
\nOrganizing Committee:
\nWe invite submissions of abstracts for a one-day symposium exploring the nature and consequences of deep disagreement for argumentation theory. When interlocutors lack shared premises\, standards of evidence\, or even criteria for what counts as a good argument\, what &mdash\; if anything &mdash\; can argumentation still accomplish?
\nKeynote Speaker: Scott F. Aikin (Vanderbilt University) &mdash\; "Deep Disagreement and the Owl of Minerva Problem"
\nTopics of interest include:
\n- The nature and scope of deep disagreement
\n- Epistemic and argumentative responses to fundamental disagreement
\n- The limits of rational persuasion
\n- Deep disagreement in political\, moral\, and religious contexts
\n- The role of argumentation in polarized discourse
\n- Argumentation and epistemic agency under conditions of disagreement
\nSubmission Guidelines: Please submit an abstract of 300&ndash\;500 words to deepdisagreement2026@gmail.com by June 30\, 2026. Include your name\, affiliation\, and contact details in the body of the email.
\nNotification of acceptance: August 1\, 2026.
\nThere is no registration fee.
\nOrganizer: Tomá\;&scaron\; Kollá\;rik (Institute of Philosophy\, Slovak Academy of Sciences)
\nContact: deepdisagreement2026@gmail.com
ORGANIZER;CN=Tomas Kollarik: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Istanbul:20261103T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Istanbul:20261105T170000 SUMMARY:36th Novembertagung on the History and Philosophy of Mathematics UID:20260711T043413Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Istanbul LOCATION:İstanbul\, Turkey DESCRIPTION:36th Novembertagung on the History and Philosophy of Mathematics
\n&lsquo\;(Perceived) Dichotomies in Mathematics: Opposites\, Boundaries\, and Tensions in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics&rsquo\;
\n&mdash\; Call for Abstracts &mdash\;
\nhttps://novembertagung.wordpress.com/novembertagung-2026/ \;
\nThe Novembertagung on the History and Philosophy of Mathematics is an international conference aimed at PhD students and early-career researchers in the history\, philosophy of mathematics and related areas. This event offers an opportunity to share your work in progress in a collegial atmosphere and receive feedback.
\nThe 36th edition of the Novembertagung will take place in Istanbul (Turkey) from November 3rd to 5th\, 2026. It will be hosted by theInstitute for the History of Science at Istanbul Medeniyet University. The keynote speakers will be confirmed in the coming weeks. Please see the website for the most up-to-date information.
\nThe conference is planned as an in-person event. For those who require financial assistance\, please indicate so in your application as we may be able to provide some funding.
\nThis year&rsquo\;s Novembertagung theme centres on Opposites\, Boundaries and Tensions in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics. We will explore the ways in which mathematical belief\, disagreement and conflict are both formed and conducted\, and the ways that these tensions and disagreements shape both the content and perception of mathematical belief. Believing that mathematical disagreement is much more substantial than a question of &lsquo\;right&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;wrong&rsquo\;\, we call for papers that explore how Opposites\, Boundaries and Tensions are formed\, expressed and entrenched throughout mathematical history.
\nAbstracts about the following\, non exhaustive\, list of topics will be welcomed:
\nAbstract dichotomies: objects and concepts\, theory and practice\, informal and formal reasoning\, etc.
\nThe formation of mathematical disciplines
\nThe resolution of mathematical disputes
\nThe roles of institutions in forming mathematical culture
\nHistorical and Philosophical approaches to the treatment of mathematical disputation
\nHow mathematical and &lsquo\;extra-mathematical&rsquo\; thought interact in shaping mathematical and non-mathematical belief
\nHistoriographical work that explores how these concepts are treated in the literature. \;
\nWhile the topic of the submission should ideally be related to the conference&rsquo\;s theme\, most topics that fall under the broader heading of philosophy or history of mathematics\, and that can fruitfully be connected to it will be welcomed as valuable additions to the conference. Early-Career and graduate students working on conflict theory in academia and society more general\, or at the intersection of the History of Mathematics and science more generally for example\, are also welcome to submit their work.
\nPhD students and early-career researchers are invited to submit abstracts.
\nAbstracts should be written in English and not exceed 300 words.
\nAll submissions should be suitable for a 20-minute presentation\, followed by a 10-minute discussion.
\nAbstracts should be sent as a PDF file prepared for blind review (do not put your name nor affiliation in the abstract\, only in your email) to
\nnovembertagung.hpm@gmail.com \;
\nPlease include your full name and affiliation in your email.
\nWe expect to secure funding for accommodation expenses\, or travel in exceptional cases\, as mentioned earlier. Please\, let us know in your application if you would like to be considered for funding.
\nThe deadline for submissions is May 31st\, 2026.
\nIf you have any further questions\, feel free to contact the organisers atnovembertagung.hpm@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261113T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261114T170000 SUMMARY:Universality and Indifference: Is Logic Neutral? UID:20260711T043414Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1\, Munich\, Germany DESCRIPTION:Logic is often regarded as neutral within a theoretical\, conceptual framework.
\nOn a traditional view\, it is topic-neutral and metaphysically neutral: its laws and principles apply irrespective of subject matter\, abstracting from the particular domains to which they are applied. In this sense\, logic would provide a framework for reasoning independent of what we are reasoning about. Moreover\, as a scientific discipline\, logic is commonly expected to be neutral to social and political commitments. Indeed\, because of its high degree of abstraction\, this may be expected of logic more strongly than of most other disciplines.
\nMeanwhile\, the purely theoretical view on logic faces revisions from research practices through logical devices. Within a practical framework\, some philosophers and logicians have nevertheless questioned whether logic is genuinely neutral. For instance\, some have questioned whether topic-neutrality can be sustained considering debates over logical pluralism\, expressive power\, and domain pertinence. Others have discussed whether logic can\, in practice\, be disentangled from the social and institutional contexts in which it is developed\, taught\, and applied.
\nThis workshop will examine the idea of logical neutrality from multiple perspectives.
\nEvent dedicated to the memory of Susan Haack.
ORGANIZER;CN=Luis F. Bartolo Alegre;CN=Zhouwanyue Nata Yang: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261201T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261201T230000 SUMMARY:Philosophy and Technology UID:20260711T043415Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Call for Papers: Philosophy &\; Technology
Our special issue "The Ethics of Medical Artificial Intelligence: Trust and the Adoption of AI in Healthcare" is now open for submissions.
We invite contributions that scrutinize how trust is formed\, sustained\, or eroded in AI-mediated clinical practice\, and how ethical\, epistemic\, organisational\, and socio-technical factors shape adoption.
The Collection is edited in Philosophy &\; Technology (Springer) and welcomes papers from philosophy\, ethics\, STS\, cognitive science\, social sciences\, law\, and AI/medical domains.
If your work engages with medical AI\, trust\, explainability\, governance\, clinical validation\, or responsible innovation\, we would be delighted to consider your submission.
Call for Papers---> The Ethics of Medical Artificial Intelligence: Trust and the Adoption of AI in Healthcare \; We look forward to your contributions and to advancing the debate on one of the most pressing issues in contemporary AI ethics. \; \; \;
Guest editors: \;
\nAnibal M. Astobiza PhD Universidad de Granada\, Granada\, Spain. \;
\;Ramó\;n Ortega-Lozano PhD Comillas Pontifical University\, Madrid\, Spain. \;
The Amsterdam Colloquia aim to bring together linguists\, philosophers\, logicians\, cognitive scientists and computer scientists who share an interest in the formal study of the semantics and pragmatics of natural and formal languages. The Amsterdam Colloquia are organized by the Institute for Logic\, Language and Computation (ILLC) of the University of Amsterdam.
\nWith this year's edition\, the Amsterdam Colloquium turns half a century old! \; To celebrate the 50th anniversary we will host a special session on The Past and Future of Semantics. A history of the Amsterdam Colloquium can be found on the website of its Proceedings (https://platform.openjournals.nl/PAC/history). \;
\nIn addition to the general program and the special session\, the 25th Amsterdam Colloquium will feature a workshop on Semantics and Non-classical Logics. The Colloquium will also include a poster session and an evening lecture by Prof. Nicholas Asher\, jointly organised with the E. W. Beth Foundation.
\n \; ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Lima:20270222T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Lima:20270228T170000 SUMMARY:Ifs\, Thens\, and Otherwises: New Perspectives on the Logic of Conditionals UID:20260711T043417Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Lima LOCATION:Lima\, Peru DESCRIPTION:Conditionals lie at the heart of reasoning in philosophy\, mathematics\, and everyday discourse\, yet the logical rules governing them remain an object of philosophical debate. The workshop \;Ifs\, Thens\, and Otherwises: New Perspectives on the Logic of Conditionals \;will bring together contributions addressing the semantics\, pragmatics\, and logic of conditionals\, including counterfactual conditionals and other related kinds of expressions\, from a wide range of perspectives. These include approaches from philosophical logic\, formal semantics\, epistemology\, and related areas.
\nThis workshop will be part of the \;1st Andean Congress for Epistemology and Logic \;(CAELO 1)\, to take palce from \;22 to 28 February 2027 in Lima. \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260702T070318Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20300531T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20300531T090000 SUMMARY:Phenomenologies of Religious Experience UID:20260711T043418Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:This series invites proposals in classical phenomenology\, French phenomenology\, pre- and post-phenomenologies\, and in methodologies that bridge phenomenology and analytic philosophy. The relation between phenomenology and religious experience can be considered in a variety of modes: epistemic (phenomenology as a "rigorous science" of religious experience in Husserl's sense)\; ontic (phenomenology as a way to access the core motive\, or regulative ideal\, of religion)\; analogical (phenomenological experience as a secular version of religious experience)\; generalizing (religious experience turning into phenomenological experience when stripped from its dogmatic frame)\, etc. Proposals can take critical\, descriptive\, theoretical\, comparative\, historical\, or other approaches\, and they can focus on the interplay between religious or spiritual experience and assorted theoretical approaches\, or proceed from such experience towards building a new theory. In accord with Husserl&rsquo\;s original intent\, the series welcomes attempts to locate spiritual or religious experience within a broader theory of the sciences (Wissenschaftslehre) and to expand phenomenology towards transcendental philosophy and metaphysics.
The series covers five areas:
1) Clarifications of religious and spiritual experience\, its formal phenomenological research\, and its relationships to art\, textuality\, culture\, anthropology\, politics\, and comparative religion\;
2) Metaphysical extensions of the phenomenology of religious and spiritual experience\;
3) Existential and psychological analyses\, in different traditions\, of religious and spiritual experience\;
4) Theologies of religious experience\, with or beyond a specific focus on ritual and liturgy\, including liberation theologies\, feminist theologies\, theologies at the intersection of religious experience and race\, social status\, etc.\;
5) The phenomenology of religious and spiritual experience as applied to and/ or examined within medicine\, nursing\, and the health sciences and the natural and social sciences.
The series is published in cooperation with the Society for the Phenomenology of Religious Experience\, \;www.sophere.org.
Editors: \;Michael Barber (michael.barber@slu.edu)\, Peter Costello (PCOSTELL@providence.edu)\, Olga Louchakova-Schwartz (founding editor\, \;olouch@ucdavis.edu)\, and Martin Nitsche (nitsche@flu.cas.cz)
Advisory Board: \;Jason Alvis (University of Vienna)\, Angela Ales Bello (Pontifical Lateran University)\, Michel Bitbol (The French National Center for Scientific Research)\, Carla Canullo (University of Macerata)\, David Ciavatta (Ryerson University)\, Crina Gschwandtner (Fordham University)\, Neal DeRoo (The King&rsquo\;s University)\, Thomas Fuchs (University of Heidelberg)\, James G. Hart (University of Indiana)\, Richard Kearney (Boston College)\, Jeff McCurry (Duquesne University)\, Felix O&rsquo\;Murchadha (National University of Ireland\, Galway)\, Dermot Moran (Boston College)\, Tom Nenon (The University of Memphis)\, Ryōsuke Ōhashi (Universities of Kyoto and Osaka)\, Vincent Pastro (Jesuit School of Theology of Santa Clara University and Aquinas Institute of Theology\, St Louis)\, Hans Rainer Sepp (Charles University)\, Michel Staudigl (University of Vienna)\, Claudia Welz (Aarhus University)
Staff editorial contact: \;Jana Hodges-Kluck (jhodges-kluck@rowman.com) \;