BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Grails iCalendar plugin//NONSGML Grails iCalendar plugin//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vilnius:20261002T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vilnius:20261003T170000
SUMMARY:Inheriting Ordinary Language Philosophy
UID:20260927T163844Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/Vilnius
LOCATION:Universiteto g. 9\, Vilnius\, Lithuania
DESCRIPTION:<p>Recent years have witnessed a renewed interest in so-called ordinary language philosophy &ndash\; one of the main traditions in 20th century analytic philosophy. The conference will contribute to this renewed engagement by examining the legacy and contemporary significance of the tradition and its leading representatives. At the same time\, the conference aims at critically examining the idea of an ordinary language philosophy tradition itself. The thinkers typically grouped under this label differ substantially in philosophical outlook and method. Assessing the depth and significance of these differences raises broader questions about how unified the tradition really is. Is the current resurgence best understood as the continuation of a shared philosophical approach\, or does it instead consist of diverse and sometimes competing attempts to draw on different elements of this legacy? By addressing these questions\, the conference will both clarify the historical significance of ordinary language philosophy and assess the prospects for its contemporary revival.</p>\n<p><strong>Keynote speakers</strong></p>\n<p>Avner Baz (Tufts University)</p>\n<p>Benjamin De Mesel (KU Leuven)</p>\n<p>Hans-Johann Glock (University of Zurich)</p>\n<p>Martin Gustafsson (&Aring\;bo Akademi University)</p>\n<p>Nicole Rathgeb (University of Bern)</p>\n<p><strong>Important dates</strong></p>\n<p>Abstract submission: July 31\, 2026</p>\n<p>Author notification: August 10\, 2026</p>\n<p>Conference: October 2-3\, 2026</p>\n<p><strong>Registration fees</strong></p>\n<p>Students 50 &euro\;</p>\n<p>Non-students 100 &euro\;</p>\n<p>(Registration fee covers the conference dinner\; waivers might be considered)</p>\n<p><strong>Conference Venue</strong></p>\n<p>Faculty of Philosophy\, Vilnius University\, Universiteto street 9\, Vilnius\, Lithuania.</p>\n<p><strong>Submitting an abstract for a presentation (30 minutes including discussion)</strong></p>\n<p>Abstracts at a maximum length of 400 words should be submitted as Word or PDF to mindaugas.gilaitis@fsf.vu.lt. Make sure to state your name and affiliation clearly in the abstract. The deadline for submission is <strong>July 31\, 2026</strong>. The date of notification is <strong>August 10\, 2026</strong>.</p>\n<p><strong>Organizers</strong></p>\n<p>Mindaugas Gilaitis (Vilnius University)\, Martin Gustafsson (&Aring\;bo Akademi University)</p>\n<p>Please direct all inquiries by email to mindaugas.gilaitis@fsf.vu.lt or martin.gustafsson@abo.fi.</p>\n<p>The event is free to attend. If you intend to come to the conference as a non-speaker\, please register by sending an email to mindaugas.gilaitis@fsf.vu.lt. The deadline for registration is <strong>September 25\, 2026</strong>.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261014T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261014T170000
SUMMARY:Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition
UID:20260927T163845Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by July 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261014T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261014T180000
SUMMARY:What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain
UID:20260927T163846Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by July 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Athens:20261105T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Athens:20261107T170000
SUMMARY:Hegel on Historicity
UID:20260927T163847Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/Athens
LOCATION:Athens\, Greece
DESCRIPTION:<p>10th Conference of the International Network Hegel&rsquo\;s Relevance</p>\n<p><strong>Hegel on Historicity</strong></p>\n<p>Athens\, Greece</p>\n<p>5-7 November 2026</p>\n<p>Despite important precedents in Augustine\, Bossuet\, Voltaire\, Kant\, and Herder\, Hegel is widely regarded as the first philosopher of history&mdash\;not only because he subjected history to philosophical inquiry\, but above all because he thematized the historicity of philosophy itself. Alongside his much-debated philosophy of world history\, Hegel repeatedly stressed\, throughout his oeuvre and especially in numerous programmatic and introductory remarks\, that philosophy\, including all metaphysical categories\, and even rationality itself is substantially conditioned by history&mdash\;by world history as well as by the histories of empirical sciences\, art\, religion\, and philosophy. For Hegel\, history articulates the very possibility of the actual spirit (<em>Geist</em>) in all its forms: there is no subjective\, objective\, or absolute spirit without history. This emphasis famously inspired Marx to describe the &ldquo\;science of history&rdquo\; as the &ldquo\;sole science.&rdquo\;</p>\n<p>This conference aims to discuss central aspects of history and historicity in Hegel&rsquo\;s philosophy from a systematic perspective. Possible guiding questions include\, but are not limited to:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is history\, and why does it matter philosophically?</li>\n<li>What is the difference between historicity and mere contingency?</li>\n<li>What is Hegel&rsquo\;s notion of &ldquo\;philosophical history\,&rdquo\; if it is neither historicism nor the projection of an external teleology onto historical facts?</li>\n<li>Does Hegel&rsquo\;s emphasis on historicity exclude any genuine possibility of predicting future developments\, thereby restricting philosophy to the role symbolized by the &ldquo\;owl of Minerva&rdquo\;?</li>\n<li>To what extent is the historical development of concepts relevant to the immanent conceptual development within Hegel&rsquo\;s <em>Philosophy of Nature</em>\, <em>Philosophy of Spirit</em>\, and&mdash\;most provocatively&mdash\;the <em>Science of Logic</em>?</li>\n<li>How does historicity apply to seemingly ahistorical notions inherited from the rationalist or Kantian tradition\, such as &ldquo\;truth\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;science\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;idea\,&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;reason&rdquo\;?</li>\n<li>Is Hegel&rsquo\;s emphasis on historicity a form of pragmatism <em>avant la lettre</em>?</li>\n<li>Do art\, religion\, philosophy (and their various historical forms)\, or even human life and social institutions (and their own various forms)\, possess a specific intrinsic value beyond what is historically ascribed to them?</li>\n</ul>\n<p>We invite postdoctoral researchers working in the field to submit an abstract (maximum 500 words) addressing one or more of these topics. The conference will include four postdoctoral slots. Coverage of accommodation costs is subject to available funding.</p>\n<p>A collected volume based on the conference papers is planned for publication in the series <em>Critical Studies in German Idealism</em> (BRILL). The publication language will be English.</p>\n<p>Length of papers: 30 minutes presentation\, followed by 15 minutes of discussion</p>\n<p>Deadline for submissions: 15 June 2026</p>\n<p>Email address for abstract submissions: <a href="mailto:HegelOnHistoricity@gmail.com">HegelOnHistoricity@gmail.com</a></p>\n<p>Notification of acceptance: 30 June 2026</p>\n<p>Conference languages: English\, German</p>\n<p>Confirmed speakers: Christophe Bouton\, Paul Cobben\, Maria Daskalaki\, Allegra De Laurentiis\, Georges Faraklas\, Diogo Ferrer\, Guido Frilli\, Antonios Kalatzis\, Jean-Fran&ccedil\;ois Kerv&eacute\;gan\, Jannis Kozatsas\, Christian Krijnen\, Thomas Noutsopoulos\, Tim Rojek\, Panagiotis Thanassas\, Klaus Vieweg</p>\n<p>Organizers: Georges Faraklas (Department of Political Science and History\, Panteion University)\, Jannis Kozatsas (Department of Primary Education\, University of Thessaly)\, Ermylos Plevrakis (Department of History and Philosophy of Science\, University of Athens)</p>\n<p><a href="http://www.hegelsrelevance.org/">www.hegelsrelevance.org</a></p>
ORGANIZER;CN=Ermylos Plevrakis;CN=Georges Faraklas;CN=Jannis Kozatsas:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261111T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261111T170000
SUMMARY:Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation
UID:20260927T163848Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by July 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261111T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261111T180000
SUMMARY:The Side-Effect Effect and “Intentionally”
UID:20260927T163849Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T170000
SUMMARY:Mischaracterization Objection 2.0
UID:20260927T163850Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261209T180000
SUMMARY:From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy
UID:20260927T163851Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270210T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270210T170000
SUMMARY:Do subjects have revelation intuitions?
UID:20260927T163852Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270210T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270210T180000
SUMMARY:Correct\, incorrect\, or neither? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk normative objectivism
UID:20260927T163853Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:Europe/London
DESCRIPTION:<p>We are delighted to announce the next series of UK XPHI Online. This is a monthly online workshop devoted to discussion of work in progress in experimental philosophy (broadly construed). We feature work from all areas of experimental philosophy\, by researchers at all career stages\, from the UK and all over the world. The workshop meets once a month on Teams\, typically the second Wednesday of each month (16:00-18:00 UK time)\, for a two-hour session that typically features two talks (each 40 minutes plus 15 minutes Q&amp\;A).&nbsp\;</p>\n<p>&nbsp\;Talk 1</p>\n<p>Talk 2</p>\n<p>Oct 14\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Redesigning Ethical Thought Experiments: Reassessing the Experimental Challenge to Moral Intuition\, <strong>Pietro Tunesi</strong> (Trinity College Dublin)</p>\n<p>What people (don't) want to know in the moral domain\, <strong>Jordan Wylie</strong> (Cornell University)\, <strong>Nathan Liang</strong> (Cornell University)\, and <strong>Charlotte Austin</strong> (Cornell University)</p>\n<p>Nov 11\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Moral Encroachment and Doxastic Wronging: An Experimental Investigation\, <strong>Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen</strong> (Aarhus University)\, <strong>Kevin Reuter</strong> (University of Gothenburg)\, <strong>Somogy Varga</strong> (Aarhus University)\,</p>\n<p>The Side-Effect Effect and &ldquo\;Intentionally&rdquo\;\, <strong>Lilian O&rsquo\;Brien</strong> (Tampere University\, University of Helsinki)\, <strong>Svetlana Vetchinnikova</strong> (University of Helsinki).</p>\n<p>Dec 9\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Mischaracterization Objection 2.0\, <strong>David Bordonaba-Plou</strong> (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)\, <strong>Krzysztof Sękowski</strong> (University of Warsaw)</p>\n<p>From Thought Experiments to Experimental Evidence: Transparency and Quality of Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: <strong>Bartosz Maćkiewicz</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Katarzyna Kuś</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Joanna Gęgotek</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, <strong>Monika Gurak</strong> (University of Warsaw)\, and <strong>Franciszek Kittel</strong> (University of Warsaw).</p>\n<p>Jan 13\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>NARRABODY: Narrative and Body in Post-Stroke Selfhood. A Longitudinal Qualitative Study\, <strong>Camille L&eacute\;pingle</strong> (ENS de Lyon)</p>\n<p>A cross-cultural\, qualitative study on HPV vaccination intention\, <strong>Konrad Henne </strong>(University of Heidelberg)\, <strong>Alejandra Petino Zappala</strong> (Ruhr University Bochum)\, <strong>Nora Heinzelmann</strong> (University of Heidelberg)</p>\n<p>Feb 10\, 16-18 UK</p>\n<p>Do subjects have revelation intuitions?\, <strong>Marcus Ashby</strong> (King&rsquo\;s College London)</p>\n<p>Correct\, incorrect\, or does it depend? Demonstrating and explaining variation in folk metanormative judgment\, <strong>Mikl&oacute\;s K&uuml\;rthy</strong> (University of Graz)\, <strong>Geoffrey Goodwin</strong> (University of Pennsylvania)\, <strong>Paulo Sousa</strong> (Queen's University Belfast).</p>\n<p>To submit for future series\, please <strong>email the organizers an abstract of up to 500 words by Dec 15\, 2026</strong> to james.andow@manchester.ac.uk.</p>\n<p>This series is organised by:</p>\n<p>Eugen Fischer (UEA)</p>\n<p>Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford)</p>\n<p>James Andow (Manchester)</p>
ORGANIZER;CN=James Andow;CN=Joanna Demaree-Cotton;CN=Eugen Fischer:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260926T155057Z
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:29990101T033000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:29990201T120000
SUMMARY:POSTPONED - Creativity and Improvisation in Thought\, Practice\, and Mind:  An Interdisciplinary Conference
UID:20260927T163854Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@fe80:0:0:0:30b9:5bff:fe8c:d64d%3
TZID:America/Chicago
LOCATION:6001 Dodge Street\, Omaha\, United States\, 68182
DESCRIPTION:<p>*Please note that this event has officially been<em><strong> postponed</strong></em>. More information will be made available asap in the near future*</p>\n<p>Many human cognitive capacities and processes may be deployed creatively\, from unique choices made for oneself up through novel cultural shifts. Similarly\, large swaths of our daily lives are taken up with performing spontaneous\, on-the-fly\, and unplanned activities that are\, in a word\, improvised.&nbsp\; Charting out the nature of both creativity and improvisation\, taken individually or together\, remains an open and pressing issue. In this conference\, we will delve into various philosophical\, theoretical\, empirical\, and interdisciplinary issues that are related to creativity and improvisation. A non-exhaustive list of related questions and themes for this topic include:</p>\n<p>- What is the relationship between improvisation and creativity?</p>\n<p>- What is the relationship between creative activity and well-being?</p>\n<p>- What is the best way to model individual and collective creativity?</p>\n<p>- Is creativity in the arts the same thing as in other domains\, such as in science or business?</p>\n<p>- What are the pros and cons of different scientific operationalizations of creativity and improvisation?</p>\n<p>- Provide a conceptual analysis of creativity and/or improvisation.</p>
ORGANIZER:
METHOD:PUBLISH
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR