This one week seminar will explore 17th and 18th-century texts about slavery from Europe and America. Prof. Jorati will direct an intensive week of summer classes for the benefit of a small group of recent PhDs whose main research and teaching are in the relevant area. Up to six individuals from among those who apply will be selected to participate in five days of intense classes on the announced subject. Travel\, housing and food for the duration of the classes will be paid by the \;JHP \;up to $2\,000. Applications due by Feb. 1\, 2026. To apply visit \;https://jhp.wisc.edu/summerseminar.html.
\n\n\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Eileen C. Sweeney: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260618T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260619T170000 SUMMARY:Objectivity and Subjectivity in Medicine UID:20260615T125734Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities\, Oxford\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:This interdisciplinary workshop will bring together DPhil students and early career researchers in the medical humanities to share their ongoing research in a supportive environment. Discussion will focus on the problems of objectivity and subjectivity in medical research and practice: is there such a thing as an &ldquo\;objective&rdquo\; approach to medicine\, and if not\, should there be? \;
\nMedical knowledge is always situated and inevitably shaped by forms of uncertainty. We invite contributions that explore the ways in which clinical and scientific practices may reproduce structural biases\, as well as how they engage with key aspects of human experience that resist quantification &ndash\; such as pain\, fatigue\, or emotional distress. In this context\, the increasing use of artificial intelligence raises further questions: does it enhance objectivity\, or simply reinforce pre-existing biases? \;
\nThe subjectivity of patients also generates important tensions: lived experiences do not always align with standardized scientific frameworks. We welcome contributions that examine\, for instance\, how such experiences may be oversimplified when translated into medical categories and terminology\, or marginalized when they fail to fit pre-existing classificatory systems. We are also interested in initiatives that seek to incorporate patients&rsquo\; experiences and emotions into medical practice. \;
\nIn a context of increasing scepticism toward institutional medical discourse and a turn toward alternative medical practices\, it is worth asking how the ideal of objectivity can be reconciled with the acknowledgment of subjective experience. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Charlotte Dewarumez: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260619T150000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Vienna:20260620T170000 SUMMARY:Who gave you permission? Norms\, Agency and Other Awkward Questions UID:20260615T125735Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Vienna LOCATION:Universitätsstraße 7\, Vienna\, Austria\, 1010 DESCRIPTION:The conference examines the power structures embedded in gendered\, romantic\, and sexual relations. Bringing together perspectives form ethics\, social philosophy\, political philosophy\, feminist \;and gender theory - the conference investigates questions surrounding \;consent\, agency\, objectification\, and interpersonal recognition. Particular attention is given to how social norms shape desire\, autonomy\, vulnerability\, and the negotiation of boundaries. By confronting the "awkward questions" surrounding power\, sexuality\, and social expectation\, the conference seeks to open critical discussion on the conditions\, under which relationships become respectful\, exploitative\, liberating\, or harmful. \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Kristina Bogdan;CN=Mirela Koleva: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20260620T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20260620T234500 SUMMARY:The Nature of Social Identities: Metaphysics\, Epistemology\, and Politics UID:20260615T125736Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Prague LOCATION:Arna Nováka 1\, Brno \, Czech Republic\, 60200 DESCRIPTION:The Department of Philosophy\, Faculty of Arts\, Masaryk University in Brno\, Czech Republic\, invites submissions for a conference on the metaphysical and epistemological foundations of social identities\, organised within the research project Identity Politics: Metaphysics and Epistemology.
\nConference Theme
\nIn recent decades\, political and social debates have increasingly focused on identity-based groups defined by characteristics such as race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, disability\, class\, religion\, or age. These developments have generated extensive discussion in political philosophy and social theory. However\, many of the metaphysical and epistemological assumptions underlying identity politics remain insufficiently examined.
\nThis conference aims to investigate the nature\, constitution\, and epistemic role of social identities. In particular\, we seek to explore the mechanisms through which identities emerge as robust social and political entities\, and the ways in which identity-related features&mdash\;such as lived experience\, self-identification\, social recognition\, and shared narratives&mdash\;contribute to their formation and persistence. \;
\nAnother central aim is to examine whether different identities (for example\, race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, or class) are constituted through similar or distinct metaphysical and epistemic mechanisms. Comparative approaches that analyse similarities and differences across identities are especially welcome. \;
\nThe conference will also address the epistemological aspects of social identities\, including questions concerning situated knowledge\, epistemic authority\, intersectionality\, and conflicts among different socially situated perspectives.
\nTopics
\nPossible topics include\, but are not limited to:
\nMetaphysics of Social and Political Identities
\nEpistemology of Social Identity
\nSubmissions from metaphysics\, epistemology\, social philosophy\, feminist philosophy\, philosophy of race\, and related areas are welcome.
\nKeynote speaker: Kristina Rolin (Tampere University)
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nPlease submit an anonymous abstract of 400&ndash\;500 words.
\nThe submission should be attached to the email in .pdf format and prepared for blind review. Please include the following information separately in the body of the email: your name(s)\, affiliation(s)\, contact information\, the title of your talk.
\nImportant Dates
\nConference Details
\nSubmission
\nPlease send submissions to: belohrad@phil.muni.cz
\nContact
\nFor inquiries\, please contact: Radim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. (belohrad@phil.muni.cz)
\nOrganizing committee
\nRadim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. \;
\nZdeňka Jastrzembská\;\, Ph.D. \;
\nMarek Picha\, Ph.D.
\nDagmar Pichová\;\, Ph.D.
ORGANIZER;CN=Radim Belohrad: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260625T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260626T170000 SUMMARY:QUEER: PRESENT! VISIBILITY THROUGH THE BODY UID:20260615T125737Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Wieniawskiego 1\, Poznań\, Poland\, 61-712 DESCRIPTION:QUEER: PRESENT! VISIBILITY THROUGH THE BODY
\nInternational Conference
\n25-26 June 2026
\nAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań\, Poland
\nFaculty of Philosophy
\nThe international conference Queer: Present! Visibility Through the Body aims to examine queer visibility in contemporary culture\, exploring it across a range of contexts. The title of the conference alone may serve as a catalyst for reflection on various aspects of queer visibility\, demonstrating that queer culture is present today in many forms. However\, queer people are constantly fighting to remain visible and gain access to more divergent visibility. This visibility often encounters strong resistance\; opponents view the queer body as imposing its presence\, disrupting social order and manifesting as unnecessary excess or exaggeration.
\nDuring the conference\, we will highlight the physical presence of queer genders\, sexualities and romantic relations and intimacies. This is why the title of our conference is provocative: queer is present and embodied\; it is expressed in the body.
\nDo queer bodies experience encounters with others and strangers differently when moving within cultural boundaries?
\nWhen writing about corporeality\, we draw inspiration from Sara Ahmed&rsquo\;s queer phenomenology. Ahmed reminds us that\, culturally\, the divergence of sexual orientation is equated with being outside the boundaries of heteronormativity\, as if initiating a discussion about it implied queerness. From a phenomenological stance\, sexual desire and gender identity shape not only the boundaries of our world and our experience of the body: our physicality is a lens through which the outside world could perceive our intimate visibility.
\nSilence\, secrecy\, hypocrisy and concealing one's sexuality\, desire and gender identity due to shame or fear or a culturally rooted habit are pertinent characteristics associated with the lack of queer visibility. A wider and more satisfactory presence can be achieved by creating one's own culture and by establishing better social attitudes and legal frameworks\, more accurate terms and rooting novel expectations or &lsquo\;novel tradition&rsquo\;\, although this could outrage apologists for the politics of silence. It is not easy to achieve visibility in the present moment! However\, new traditions are created and emerge before our very eyes: films\, literary works\, memorials to victims of persecution\, queer rituals and\, finally\, the concept and presence of Pride &mdash\; a joyful rejection of the humiliating concept of shame. The present allows us to document all cases of queer resistance against the politics of hatred. The goal of the narrative of hatred is to hide queer people once again and deprive them of visibility. It is an attitude that is contrary to science and is fed by invented harmful myths\, prejudices and superstitions.
\nQueer visibility is not only an emancipatory strategy based on the idea of equality. It is also the daily struggle of every queer person for dignity and visibility. Any attempt to hide queerness is deceptive\, as it creates the false impression that it does not exist or is not needed by anyone.
\nWe invite submissions from scholars\, PhD candidates\, and independent researchers.
\nTopics for suggested panels and papers may include (but are not limited to):
\n1. Cultural transformations that have shaped the contemporary narrative of queer visibility.
\n2. Changes in rooted attitudes\, social\, legislative and political moods often result in significant progress and emancipation\, but can also lead to regression and increased aggression towards queer individuals.
\n3. Tactics\, risks\, politics\, dramatics\, performance\, experimentations\, exploration of visibility in different areas of art and cultural products.
\n4. Queer visibility in performance\; Queer in Cinema\, Dance and Theatre.
\n5. The contribution of queer people to art\, from poetry to mass media.
\n6. Prospects for future visibility based on the present.
\nThe organisers are open to proposals for both individual presentations and panels. Keynote speeches are planned. Detailed information will be updated on the conference website https://queer.web.amu.edu.pl
\nConference language: English.
\nPresentation length: 15-25 minutes\, depending on the final number of accepted contributions. Format: on-site.
\nVenue: Collegium Minus\, ul. Wieniawskiego 1\, Poznań.
\nRegistration
\nDeadline for submission of abstracts is: for panels 20 February 2026 and for individuals presentations 28 February 2026. They should be sent by email to queer@amu.edu.pl (or marjed7@amu.edu.pl)
\nSubmissions should include a max. 200-word abstract with a 100 word author bio and the contact information gathered in a single PDF-FILE.
\nNotification of Acceptance: 10 March 2026.
\nRegistration fee: 150 EUR or 150 USD.
\nThe fee included a coffee breaks\, a two-course lunch to all participants (25 and 26 June) and a banquet (25 June).
\nImportant additional information:
\n- we plan to publish articles in 2027 (an edited collection).
\n- during the conference\, we will be hosting the management team from the Queer Museum in Warsaw\, the first queer museum in Poland and the third in Europe.
\nKeynote Speakers:
\nProf. Dan Healey\, University of Oxford
\nProf. Joanna Mizielińska\, University of Warsaw
\nDr. Kush Patel\, Manipal Academy of Higher Education
\nConference Organizers:
\nProf. Marek Jedliński (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)
\nDocent Antu Sorainen (University of Helsinki)
\nDr. Krzysztof Witczak (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)
\nScientific Committee:
\nProf. Dan Healey\, University of Oxford
\nDr. Kush Patel\, Manipal Academy of Higher Education
\nDr. Efstratia Oktapoda\, Sorbonne University
\nDr. Tamas Nagypal\, Mount Royal University
\nDr. Jana Kantorikova\, Sorbonne University
\nDr. Iga Mergler\, Wilfrid Laurier University
\nDr. Agata Mergler\, York University
\n ORGANIZER;CN=Krzysztof Witczak;CN="Marek Jedliński";CN=Antu Sorainen: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Istanbul:20260628T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Istanbul:20260703T170000 SUMMARY:'Sex between Law and Morality' IVR Special Workshop UID:20260615T125738Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Istanbul LOCATION:İstanbul\, Turkey ORGANIZER;CN=Maciej Juzaszek;CN="Karolina Śliwecka";CN=Klaudyna Horniczak: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260713T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260717T170000 SUMMARY:9th Derrida Today Conference UID:20260615T125739Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:5th Arrondissment Rue d'Ulm\, Paris\, France DESCRIPTION:The Derrida Today Conference will focus on the ongoing value of either Derrida&rsquo\;s work\, or deconstruction\, to the political-ethical\, cultural\, artistic\, public debates and philosophical futures that confront us. The conference is interdisciplinary and invites contributions from a range of academic\, disciplinary and cultural contexts. Papers and panel proposals from academics\, independent scholars\, and graduate students are welcomed. The conference encourages contributions on diverse topics and contemporary issues\, and from any discipline in relation to Derrida&rsquo\;s work and/or deconstruction.
\nInformation about Abstract deadlines\, Registrations\, Speakers\, Keynotes\, etc. can be found on the Derrida Today website at: derridatoday.com
\nAbstract submission closes: 15th Jan 2026
\nAll abstracts and enquiries to: conference@derridatoday.com
\nKeynotes: David Farrell Krell\, Isabelle Alfandary\, Elissa Marder\, Marc Crepon
\nSpecial Speakers and Panels to be announced on website
ORGANIZER;CN=Nicole J. Anderson: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260713T094500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260713T170000 SUMMARY:4th Annual Berlin Workshop on Speech and Harm UID:20260615T125740Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Fraunhoferstraße FH420\, Berlin\, Germany DESCRIPTION:Come join us for the fourth annual Berlin Workshop on Speech and Harm! Attendance is free but registration is requested. There will be a self-paid reception and dinner after the event.
ORGANIZER;CN=Quill R Kukla;CN=Willow Starr;CN=Elin McCready;CN=Axel Gelfert: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260713T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Lisbon:20260717T170000 SUMMARY:Critical Theories of Fascism - Lisbon Praxis Summer School 2026 UID:20260615T125741Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Lisbon LOCATION:Alameda da Universidade\, 1600-214 Lisboa\, Lisbon\, Portugal DESCRIPTION:Until recently\, there was a general assumption that fascism had been decisively defeated\, because the horrors of WWII seemed to have left fascism morally bankrupt and politically untenable. Yet\, in the early twenty-first century\, the spectre of fascism has resurfaced. This re-emergence should not be understood as a simple repetition of the 1930s\, but rather as the mutation of fascist tendencies into contemporary conditions. \; One of its defining features is the appropriation of democracy itself. Across different contexts\, authoritarian movements have risen to power through electoral means\, exploiting popular discontent with mainstream politics and using democratic institutions to advance illiberal agendas. Their rhetoric frequently invokes a narrative of national rebirth\, the restoration of a lost &lsquo\;greatness\,&rsquo\; and the reclamation of sovereignty from &lsquo\;corrupt elites\,&rsquo\; &lsquo\;globalists\,&rsquo\; and &lsquo\;dangerous outsiders.&rsquo\; Furthermore\, contemporary fascism permeates everyday life\, normalizing misogyny\, homophobia\, and racism\, and fostering an atmosphere in which authoritarianism appears desirable or inevitable. Its resurgence is closely tied to the expansion of digital media\, which accelerates the spread of conspiracy theories\, hate speech\, and extremist propaganda. Online platforms serve not only as organizational hubs but also as aesthetic arenas where fascist symbols are repackaged in playful or subcultural styles\, obscuring their violent and destructive implications.
\nWhile the ways through which fascism is currently expressed are becoming increasingly visible\, the causes of its re-emergence are more complex\, and so are the challenges they pose to theory. Max Horkheimer famously said that &lsquo\;Whoever is not willing to talk about capitalism should also keep quiet about fascism&rsquo\;\, implying that fascism is always in the background everywhere where capitalism reigns and it intensifies when capitalist realities become unbearable. In this sense\, globalisation and neoliberalism have produced widening inequalities\, labour precarity\, and a pervasive sense of uncertainty and dislocation &mdash\; fertile ground for fascist narratives that promise security\, belonging\, and stability. Yet the Marxist tradition sustained a robust critique of capitalism during the decades of emergence of neoliberalism and globalisation &mdash\; decades in which fascism was widely considered defeated &mdash\; \; but this alone did not prevent its resurgence. Understanding fascism&rsquo\;s reappearance therefore requires a more expansive analysis of its ideological complexity\, attending not only to its entanglement with capital\, but also to race\, gender\, nation\, and empire. At the same time\, as Theodor W. Adorno observed\, fascism possesses an &lsquo\;intrinsically untheoretical nature.&rsquo\; For this reason\, the premise of this Lisbon Praxis Summer School is that fascism&rsquo\;s conditions of emergence and its ways of operating can &mdash\; and must &mdash\; be grasped through renewed critical resources.
\nWith the aim of mobilising Critical Theory&rsquo\;s analytical and explanatory force to understand the contemporary resurgence of fascism and to explore possibilities for its eradication\, the Lisbon Praxis Summer School 2026 will address the following clusters of questions:
\nThe conference\, organized by the Arendt \;Center \;as part of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Project &ldquo\;Rewriting Rights&rdquo\; &ndash\; \;explores the double sense in which feminist justice is \;&ldquo\;on trial&rdquo\; \;today &mdash\; in courtrooms\, where the performance and performativity of legal proceedings expose the structural limits of institutional justice\, and in culture\, where dominant narratives continue to normalize gendered violence. The conference aims to brings feminist philosophy and critical theory into dialogue with socio-legal perspectives to ask what more transformative forms of justice might look like.
\nKeynote speakers:
\nThe conference will also include a workshop on Women&rsquo\;s Courts and Tribunals on Crimes against Women.
\nWe invite submissions from researchers working in \;feminist philosophy\, critical theory\, political theory\, socio-legal theory\, gender studies\, or related fields.
\nWe particularly welcome contributions from early-career researchers and scholars from diverse geographical contexts. \;
\nFor further details\, including submission guidelines and thematic areas\, please consult the full call for abstracts at the link below. \;
\nSubmission deadline: 15 July 2026
\nE-mail for submission and inquiry: \;ontrial.conference@gmail.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260720T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260731T170000 SUMMARY:Critical Theory Workshop's 18th Annual Summer School UID:20260615T125743Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Paris LOCATION:54 Bd Raspail\, Paris\, France\, 75006 DESCRIPTION:The primary objective of the CTW&rsquo\;s Summer School is to provide an international forum for trans-disciplinary and politically relevant research that contributes to a coherent and systematic elucidation of the contemporary world. Participants are exposed to the work of contemporary thinkers and engage with current debates with leading scholars from around the globe. Special attention is paid to traditions of thought that have been sidelined or suppressed in the academy\, including critical theory from the global South\, Marxism\, the black radical tradition\, anticolonial theory\, socialist feminism\, and radical ecological thought. \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Riga:20260724T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Riga:20260801T170000 SUMMARY:The F-word: autofiction as resistance to patriarchy UID:20260615T125744Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Riga LOCATION:Saulkrasti\, Latvia DESCRIPTION:Feminism gives us a vision\, a framework\, and tools to upend systems. One of those systems is how we think of language and the self. Is it possible to say what is true\, when stories are always already framed by the world in which they take place? What role does autofiction play in our own lives\, in the process of resistance\, in the call for that which remains invisible? The poetic attention inherent in autofiction\, in escrevivê\;ncia\, that is inherent in the work\, is created for and by and to address the necessity of the impossible. Autofiction as an act of God\, of the transcendent that manifests itself in the real\, in lived experience\, and as such is aimed at resisting the patriarchy.
\nIn this symposium we aim to bring together people with whom this theme resonates\, and we ask people to share from their own life\, practise\, profession\, in order to create an ongoing conversation as a way to build resilience. We explicitly invite people to embrace the difference they bring in to contribute towards this shared endeavour. \;
\nAutofiction as Resistance as a method
\nDuring this week we aim to work together on exploring the themes that are central to this circle also in the way we participate. We explicitly invite people to share their insights\, artistic practises and theoretic understanding in a way that invites collaborative thinking. For this reason academic presentations are not accepted\, although a presentation can be a part of a larger workshop. Please indicate in your application how much time you would need for your intervention\, and a brief description on how you aim to use the time allotted to your session. First-time experiments are as welcome as tested concepts. \;
\nParticipants without workshops/sharing of their own personal project/ideas are also most welcome to collaborate during the week in the interactive program. \;
\nAbout Nordic Summer University (NSU):
\nNSU is a space for collaboration between disciplines/peoples/ideas. During the Summer Session several study circles\, each hosting their own program\, will come together &ndash\; participants are welcome to join different circles/programmes during the week. NSU is a horizontal organisation\, being present means you are a member and part of the organisation.
\nCosts
\nNSU offers a limited amount of grants and scholarships. If you are interested in receiving one (which means a reduced participation fee of 100 euro for the whole week)\, please let us know while applying. \;
\n100 euros Scholarship (in shared 4-bed rooms with shared bathroom)
\n1250 euros Institutional price/any room type
\n900 euros Institutional price PhD/any room type
\n950 euros Single room
\n700 euros Bed in double room
\n1000 euros Double room 1 adult 1 child
\n1200 euros Family room 1 adult 2 children
\n1800 euros Family room 2 adults 2 children
\n1500 euros Family room 2 adults 1 child
\n500 euros Camping \;
\nThis includes accommodation and all meals for the full week. The price also includes NSU membership\, so it is not necessary to purchase it separately. Those who have already attended a winter symposium and paid the membership will receive a discount code to deduct the membership fee. No refunds will be given if participants pay membership twice by mistake\, so please mention in your application that you already attended an NSU event this year\, to receive a discount code.
\nDeadlines
\nPlease send us a short text explaining your aim / topic / idea\, how much time you would need to host the experience\, and what materials you would require (paper/paint/bicycles)\, which we will try to accommodate. \;
\nPlease send us your application by April 5th. Especially if you would like to be considered to receive a grant/scholarship\, as decisions on grants/scholarships will be made at the end of April. Deadline to confirm and pay your spot as a grant/scholarship receiver is May 1st. \;
\nOther applicants are accepted on a rolling basis. Final deadline to apply: May 10th. By May 15th you will need to register and pay for the accommodation.
\nApplications and queries can be send to: nicole.nobyeni@nsuweb.org
\nPlease be aware that everyone involved at Nordic Summer University is collaborating on a voluntary basis.
\nAbout the Circle:
\nHow to think/write/be/inter-act without being limited by an already outlined goal/outcome/impact? How to explore what is messy/confused/embodied while accepting that exploration is always also taking place within philosophy/genre/language/life &ndash\; within what is. That is\, our attempt to explore\, to transcend our sites of speech happens in this world and is framed by the situatedness of our lives. Could it be otherwise? This study circle aims to take advantage of the network\, space and openness provided by the Nordic Summer University to raise questions that cannot be answered/grounded/voiced\, for philosophers/writers/feminists and/or/as-well-as those who are other(s/ed/ing). \;
\nThis study circle will explore the liminality of not belonging in a discipline/space/frame/ category/nation. Accepting language as the limit/tool/curse and an unavoidable starting point\, building upon the work of Irigaray/Arendt/Ettinger\, this state of exception of being-with/in/of language is not simple put aside\, but accepted as a reality which is &ldquo\;disturbing\, overwhelming\, and sometimes too close for comfort&rdquo\;. \;
\nThese tensions open up a liminal space &ndash\; how to think/write/be/inter-act within such a space\, while being an/Other\\not-I/(m)\\Other within feminist philosophy? How to write/create/live as a being that is more than the categories available to mark/describe/situate them? How to explore power as a temporary space\, a moment\, political and liminal? How to read and ground ourselves in feminist philosophy while also living/m-othering/PhD-ing? How to even ask/write/question these questions\, without falling prey to the linearity inherent in what/who/why it means to question? \;
\n\nMore information: https://www.nsuweb.org/study-circles/circle-4-an-other-not-i-m-other-in-feminist-philosophy/ \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Nicole Des Bouvrie: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260731T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260731T230000 SUMMARY:Disclosure in Thought and Action Philosophical Perspectives on Political Narration and Democratic Prefiguration UID:20260615T125745Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Berlin LOCATION:Berlin\, Germany DESCRIPTION:Democracy claims to struggle about public affairs through the power of language. Already in Plato&rsquo\;s Republic\, political discourse takes two forms: as dialectical discourse\, it draws on the power of logos\; as narrative discourse\, it draws on the power of mythos. While the former relies on proofs\, deductions\, and discursive necessities\, the latter follows a logic of disclosure. The aim here is to make phenomena visible\, to open up horizons\, and to imagine alternatives. Myth tells stories\, reveals perspectives\, and highlights connections\, thereby bringing things into view in new ways.
\nWhile political philosophy and theory have long focused on the power of discursive speech\, in recent years there has been a growing interest in narrative forms of speech and aesthetic-performative political practices. Of particular significance here is the motif of prefiguration as a practice of enacting political alternatives and future forms of coexistence in the here and now. Political narration and prefiguration are currently being discussed within various traditions\, ranging from political phenomenology to critical theory and post-fundamentalism\, and extending into analytical epistemology.
\nThe workshop focuses on the power of disclosure in thought and action in order to explore their potential for a reimagining of democratic debate and political protest. Especially in times when discursive speech in the public sphere is coming under increasing pressure\, a return to the aesthetic\, narrative\, and performative aspects of the political is crucial.
\nExemplarily\, four traditions can be distinguished in which the power of narrative discourse and the demonstrative aspect of political practice are currently the subject of increased discussion:
\n(1) Political Phenomenology: Hannah Arendt can today be regarded as a founding figure of political phenomenology. Through her reflections on democratic debate under conditions of plurality\, she has brought storytelling into the spotlight as a means of engagement. Storytelling conveys perspectives and attitudes that defy purely theoretical analysis. Central to this is the reference to Kant&rsquo\;s conception of aesthetic judgment\, understood as the ability to identify exemplary points of view for evaluation in the absence of ultimate reasons and to solicit agreement with them. Crucial here is the power of the imagination\, which brings to mind divergent viewpoints and alternatives to the status quo. The potential of such disclosure for democratic debate under conditions of plurality has been systematically explored\, above all\, in recent political phenomenology (Loidolt 2017\, Herrmann 2023\, Bedorf 2025).
\n(2) Critical Theory: The founding text of Critical Theory\, Horkheimer and Adorno&rsquo\;s Dialectic of Enlightenment\, breaks radically with the tradition of the systematic treatise. Its specific narrative style&mdash\;often fragmentary\, aphoristic\, and mimetic&mdash\;is not merely a stylistic device but is regarded as a methodological necessity: In order to break through the context of delusion created by instrumental reason\, thought itself must take on a form that not only states but\, above all\, shows. The aesthetic rationality of argumentation preserves the non-identical from the grasp of analytical identity logic through an aesthetic-critical mode of writing. The representation itself thus becomes a site of resistance that prevents the ossification of thought into mere definitions and gives voice to the unresolved nature of experience. This return to the performative power of philosophical writing has once again come into focus in recent Critical Theory (Wesche 2018\, Freyenhagen 2025\, Saar 2025). Furthermore\, Adorno&mdash\;in contrast to a reading that focuses on the notorious &ldquo\;ban on images&rdquo\;&mdash\;has recently been rediscovered as a pioneer of a prefigurative form of political action (Sö\;rensen 2022).
\n(3) Post-foundationalism: Post-foundational theories emphasize that the political space of justification is permeated by power\, affect\, and desire. Practices of justification are closely linked to the establishment of orders that determine the rules of the game governing what can be said in a democracy (Marchart 2010). Against the backdrop of the classical dispute between philosophy and rhetoric\, post-foundationalism understands itself as a project of radical enlightenment that focuses on the complex intertwining of justifications\, power\, and authority (Kompridis 2006). In this vein\, postf-foundationalism conceives of the rhetorical nature inherent in all speech not as a moment of pretense\, but as a necessary moment for bringing reasons and justifications to light (Gebh/Seitz 2024). In this context\, post-foundationalist thinkers such as Laclau and Mouffe emphasize the importance of the narrative in processes of hegemony formation and point to the rhetorical (metaphorical and metonymic) dynamics involved in the formation of political identities.
\n(4) Analytic Epistemology: The motif of disclosure is also found in contemporary analytic philosophy. \;In her work on perspectives\, Elizabeth Camp (2017) has argued that our thinking is often structured by complex cognitive frames that cannot simply be broken down into isolated sentences and propositions. Perspectives instruct us to perceive certain aspects of a situation as central and others as peripheral. Rachel Fraser (2021) also makes clear that we must understand narratives as more complex units of knowledge. They are the templates through which we first assemble individual facts into a coherent worldview. Thus\, disclosure becomes a central mechanism for how we\, as knowing subjects\, orient ourselves in a complex world.
\nFor many of the thinkers mentioned\, the disclosing moment they focus on theoretically is also reflected in their writing. The traditions gathered here can therefore themselves be examined for their narrative and disclosing dimensions. Accordingly\, one may ask what can be learned from the respective form of representation for political discourse or practice. Can the specific logics of philosophical narration be put to fruitful use in the practices of political protest? Conversely\, what can philosophy learn from those narrative and prefigurative practices that attempt to point out alternatives and new perspectives in the heat of political struggle? What relationships and transitions exist between disclosing thought and disclosing action? Can &ldquo\;disclosing action&rdquo\; create spaces for understanding where &ldquo\;proving&rdquo\; and insisting on facts fail?
\nModalities and Deadlines
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Workshop format: Productive\, constructive discussion and critique of papers (work in progress is expressly encouraged) that are submitted in advance and read by all participants.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Language of discussion: German. Papers may be submitted in German or English.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submission of an abstract (approx. 300 words) by July 31\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Notification of acceptance by August 15\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submission of the workshop paper by December 13\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submissions to: steffen.herrmann@fernuni-hagen.deand sergej.seitz@univie.ac.at
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; We are planning to publish the contributions as part of a special issue in a relevant journal.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; We aim to cover travel and accommodation costs\, but this cannot be guaranteed at this time.
\nConcept and organization:
\nSteffen Herrmann (FernUniversitä\;t Hagen)
\nSergej Seitz (University of Vienna\, ERC Advanced Grant &ldquo\;Prefiguring Democratic Futures&rdquo\;)
ORGANIZER;CN=Sergej Seitz;CN=Steffen K. Herrmann: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260808T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260808T090000 SUMMARY:The Seven Cs UID:20260615T125746Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are proud to announce the very first meeting of the &ldquo\;Sailing the The Seven Cs&rdquo\; Conference!
The Seven Cs:
Chaff: Philosophy of the Body\, Medicine\, and Biology.
\nChuff: Philosophy of Emotions &\; Political Rage.
\nChud: Political Philosophy.
\nChad: Philosophy of Gender &\; Sexuality.
\nChopped: Philosophy of Fashion and Food.
\nChess: Philosophy of Games &\; Mathematics
\nChocolate: Philosophy of Economics &\; Global Exploitation
We are currently accepting abstracts on any of the above topics\, and while not preferred\, we also accept talks relating to Cartography\, broadly construed. Submissions must not exceed 1000 words\, and can be emailed to alec@philosophyforthedemos.com. \;
This is a real and light-hearted but philosophically rich conference. Website is currently under-construction.
Convenors: Kristin Kä\;uper\, Isobel Logan\, Charlotte Curran (University of Leeds)
Contact: \;i.j.logan@leeds.ac.uk
This workshop will explore the relationship between intimacy and justice. We will ask: When and how should considerations of justice extend into our intimate lives and influence our actions? How are intimate relationships shaped by\, reproduce\, and resistant to broader structures of injustice and oppression? Should we worry about the distribution of opportunities for intimacy? How do we balance the responsibilities of the individual\, communities\, and the state in promoting just forms of relating?
We hope to better understand the ways in which hegemonic norms\, institutions\, and intersecting forms of oppression structure intimate life\, governing who is able to form certain relationships\, which relationships are socially valued\, and how power operates within them. We seek to explore the potential of intimate practices and communities of care as sites of resistance\, solidarity\, and social transformation.
We are particularly interested in \;exploring \;non-normative ways of relating (e.g. asexuality/aromanticism\, polyamory\, relationship anarchy) and matters of intersecting identities that are underrepresented in philosophy (e.g. sexuality\, disability\, race\, age\, socio-economic status).
By intimacy\, we mean forms of closeness and connection upon which special relationships are based. This encompasses a wide range of relationships\, including but not limited to sexual\, romantic\, platonic\, collegial\, familial\, and parental relationships\, whether in-person or technologically mediated.
Registration opens in April
\nFurther details about the MANCEPT workshops can be found here: https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/activities/mancept-workshops-2026/ \;
ORGANIZER;CN=Isobel Logan;CN="Kristin Käuper";CN=Charlotte Curran: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260902T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T170000 SUMMARY:MANCEPT Workshop - Epistemic Injustice and Backlash UID:20260615T125748Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:Manchester\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:MANCEPT Workshop - Epistemic Injustice and Backlash: Call for Abstracts \; Recent years have been characterized by significant backlash to progressive social movements and social changes such as the #MeToo movement\, the Black Lives Matter movement\, and the increased visibility of trans people in public life. Dimensions to this backlash include the electoral &ndash\; i.e.\, the rise of far-right political parties\; the legal &ndash\; legislation\, executive orders and judicial decisions e.g. overturning rights to abortion and gender-affirming healthcare\, banning affirmative action and DEI initiatives\, and excluding trans people from participation in sport\; and the necropolitical &ndash\; e.g. the misogynistic murder of René\;e Good and the rising tide of anti-trans violence. A further important dimension to this backlash is the epistemic &ndash\; e.g. the widespread repudiation of the testimonies of Christine Blasey Ford and Amber Heard\, the ridiculing of slogans such as &lsquo\;defund the police&rsquo\;\, and the growing dissemination of myths and disinformation concerning trans people. This dimension to the backlash has recently begun to receive philosophical attention\, with aspects of it being theorized variously as 'hermeneutical backlash' (George &\; Goguen 2021)\, 'hermeneutical sabotage' (Edgoose 2024)\, and 'hermeneutical disarmament' (Morgan 2025) &ndash\; all phenomena thought either to constitute or to result in epistemic injustices. It has also been argued that previously proposed strategies for preventing epistemic injustices are frequently ineffective when confronted by backlash\, prompting a search for other strategies which might be pursued more effectively towards this end (Clanchy forthcoming). Much work on epistemic injustice and backlash remains to be done\, however &ndash\; especially in light of the epistemic injustice literature&rsquo\;s &lsquo\;methodological commitment to the primacy of the nonideal&rsquo\; (Medina 2013: 11). The aim of this workshop is to provide a space for the development of such work.
We invite submissions of abstracts of up to 500 words to a MANCEPT workshop on this topic. Abstracts should be submitted by \;May 1st \;and should be sent to \;han.edgoose@glasgow.ac.uk
Questions that papers may address include\, but are not limited to:
&bull\;How is the epistemic dimension related to other dimensions of backlash?
&bull\;To what kinds of epistemic injustice does backlash give rise? What strategies can be most effectively pursued to prevent epistemic injustices in times of backlash? What kinds of epistemic agency can be exercised by members of targeted groups (Pohlhaus 2020)?
&bull\;Does 'epistemic injustice' (Fricker 2007) in fact provide an adequate framework for thinking about these issues? What about these issues might this framework miss or distort but the frameworks provided by e.g. 'epistemic oppression' (Dotson 2014) or 'epistemologies of ignorance' (Mills 2007) capture?
&bull\;How should previous work on epistemic injustice and e.g. the #MeToo movement (e.g. Jackson 2018) or the Black Lives Matter movement (e.g. Anderson 2017) be developed or rethought in light of the current backlash?
&bull\;What practical lessons can be drawn for the present moment from a study of the epistemic dimension of previous backlashes (e.g. Faludi 1991)?
&bull\;Who bears responsibility\, in both backward- and forward-looking senses (Young 2011)\, for the epistemic dimension of backlash?
&bull\;How can thinking about epistemic injustice and backlash inform methodological debates concerning the relative merits of ideal and nonideal theory? \; The panel will take place in-person at the University of Manchester\, between September 2nd \;and September 4th \;2026. Further details about the MANCEPT workshops can be
found here: \;MANCEPT Workshops 2026 - Research Explorer The University of Manchester \; Han Edgoose and Nick Clanchy (organisers) \;
Liberal and democratic institutions are facing unprecedented challenges. The recent rise of radical right‑wing populist movements and their transnational networks and the access to government in several European countries of radical-right populist parties is testified by restrictive norms on migration\, equality rights\, and welfare.
Scholarly attention has focused on far-right stances concerning anti-migration and EU scepticism. The panel aims to explore and deepen the intersecting role that reproductive rights\, environmental and wider health policies play in shaping the political offer of the European and American far right.
Furthermore\, building on existing studies\, this panel examines the existence of common underlying ideologies of conservative\, libertarian\, and radical right‑wing populist actors enabling them to collaborate across borders to reshape policy agendas at national and EU‑level. It also investigates the transnational role of conservative think tanks in the broader dynamic of far-right discourses and their interplay in domestic policy outcomes.
We invite paper proposals on all aspects of rethinking the relationship between conservative and reactionary thinking\, politics and discursive struggles\, the development of social conservative policies that curb gender equality\, reproductive rights\, universal welfare model\, and environmental justice. Possible topics may be:
-Historical Reconstruction and Philosophical Analysis of Reactionary and Conservative Thoughts on Healthy Society\, Traditional Family\, Health and Social Welfare\, Environmentalism\;
-Discursive Strategies and Ideological Reframing: How do conservative and populist actors appropriate progressive language (e.g.\, &ldquo\;equal rights\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;free speech\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;protecting families&rdquo\;) to advance discriminatory or anti‑rights agendas? How do these movements collaborate or reinforce each other&rsquo\;s narratives and policy goals?
-Policy Content and Ideological Convergence: How do stances on public health\, sexual and reproductive rights\, climate policy\, environmental regulation\, and gender equality interlink or align across conservative and libertarian actors? Is there a common ideology or political agenda that unites various far-right parties in Europe and the United States?
-Can we identify a coherent European radical right agenda\, or do national contexts produce divergent models?
-Think tanks\, metapolitics\, and hegemony in the public discursive sphere\;
-Public Health\, Pandemic Measures\, and Antivax Movements\;
-Reproductive health policy\; broader ideological alignments linking opposition to reproductive rights with other policy domains which impact health and social policies.
This panel aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue across political science\, global health\, gender studies\, environmental policy\, and critical theory. We welcome theoretical and empirical contributions. We invite scholars at all career stages\, especially young scholars\, to submit abstracts that engage with these themes.
To submit a paper\, please send an anonymized abstract of no more than 500 words\, suitable for a 30 minute presentation (followed by 30 minutes of Q&\;A)\, to Corrado Piroddi (corrado.piroddi@tuni.fi) or Valentine Berthet (valentine.berthet@tuni.fi)\, by Monday 18 May.
Successful applicants will be notified shortly afterwards.
Who "knows" what Gender is? Arguments and Debates at the Intersection between Epistemic Injustice and Gender Identity
\nOrganisers: Miriam Ronzoni (University of Manchester)\; Esa Dí\;az Leó\;n \;(University of Barcelona).
\nApplication form:
\n\nIn \;recent years\, the "Gender Wars" have dominated public debates in several Western countries. Whilst in the US the debate is largely one between progressives and conservatives\, the UK debate\, and many other European debates\, are often framed as being internal to feminism and what a feminist public policy should look like. Gender critical feminists argue that gender is an oppressive social construct\; thus\, the feminist thing to do with it is simply to destroy it (while failing to recognize trans identities). Trans-inclusive scholars contend that both gender and gender identity cannot be erased without committing very serious harms to some of the already most marginalised people. Predictably\, very different public policy agendas follow.
\nAt closer look\, however\, trans-inclusive scholars and activists agree that gender is largely a social construct. The idea that trans activists and scholars consider gender identity (whether cis or trans) as immutable and innate is largely a myth. The trans-inclusive claim is\, however\, that something can be a social construct yet be very real and serve important social purposes within a certain social context &ndash\; such that destroying the concept *whilst maintain the broader social context* would produce significant harms. Most trans-inclusive actors also agree that gender has many oppressive elements &ndash\; yet contend that\, all things considered\, trans-inclusion is the most promising way to deconstruct those elements. Gender critical feminists usually counter-argue that this stand is simply confused: if gender and gender identity are not something innate but social constructs\, then what are they if not just the oppressive creation of the patriarchy? What else can they be? Thus\, according to gender critical feminism\, either gender identity is conceived as something immutable and innate &ndash\; and that is an implausible claim\, or it is part of an oppressive ideology which should be dismantled. Everything else is mysterious.
\nThis workshop aims to bring together this debate with developments in feminist epistemology. Recently\, much has been written about how the marginalised can be wronged not just in material terms\, but also in their &ldquo\;capacity as knowers&rdquo\; (Fricker 2007). This can happen because their very plausible accounts of their lived experiences are discredited\; because mainstream language and knowledge lack the terms and concepts for their experiences\; and because\, as a result\, marginalised people have struggled to make sense of their own experiences &ndash\; both to themselves and to others. All of this is compatible with marginalised people being\, in spite of all\, very competent or even uniquely insightful knowers in certain domains (Medina 2013).
\nThe workshop asks whether this can be the case for the concepts of gender and gender identity. Could it be that\, when the opponent says that trans-inclusive accounts of gender identity are &ldquo\;confused\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;mysterious\,&rdquo\; or &ldquo\;don&rsquo\;t make sense\,&rdquo\; epistemic marginalisation is playing a role? It would not\, after all\, be the first time. A standpoint of uncertainty and puzzlement is not necessarily one of ignorance: it can indeed be the starting point of productive epistemic innovations. Indeed\, paradigmatic cases of hermeneutical injustice confirm that: the working women who struggled to make sense of their experience of unwelcome sexual flirtation in the workplace are the very same women who went on and developed a new concept for it &ndash\; workplace sexual harassment.
\nThe aim is to explore whether this can apply to trans-inclusive conceptual innovations about gender and gender identity and\, if so\, how barriers of intelligibility can be overcome. Conceptions of gender identity are undergoing revisions in feminist philosophy (e.g.\, Barnes 2022\, Cosker-Rowland 2023\, Cull 2024\, Hernandez &\; Bell 2025\, Jenkins 2023). Our aim is to further explore the connections between debates about conceptual innovations on gender and gender identity\, on the one hand\, and questions about epistemic injustice\, epistemic marginalization and conceptual interventions\, on the other hand.
\nIf you are unsure about whether your proposal might fit\, please feel free to reach out to the organisers before submitting.
\nTo apply\, please fill in and submit the application form below by 30th April \;(EXTENDED UNTIL 7 MAY):
\n\nReferences
\nBarnes\, Elizabeth (2022). Gender without Gender Identity: The Case of Cognitive Disability. Mind 131 (523):836-862.
\nBriggs\, R &\; B. R. George (2023). What Even Is Gender? Routledge.
\nCosker-Rowland\, Rach (2023). Recent Work on Gender Identity and Gender. Analysis 83 (4):801-820.
\nCull\, Matthew J. (2024). What Gender Should Be. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
\nFricker\, Miranda (2007). Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
\nHernandez\, E. M. &\; Bell\, Rowan (2025). Much Ado About Nothing: Unmotivating "Gender Identity". Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 12 (50):1313-1340.
\nJenkins\, Katharine (2023). Ontology and Oppression: Race\, Gender\, and Social Reality. New York: OUP.
\nMedina\, José\; (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression\, Epistemic Injustice\, and the Social Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
ORGANIZER;CN=Esa Diaz-Leon;CN=Miriam Ronzoni: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260903T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Warsaw:20260904T170000 SUMMARY:CEE Forum of Young Legal\, Political and Social Theorists UID:20260615T125751Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Warsaw LOCATION:Katowice\, Poland DESCRIPTION:We are pleased to invite you to apply and register for the 18th CEE Forum of Young Legal\, Political and Social Theorists\, which will take place on 3&ndash\;4 September 2026 at the University of Silesia in Katowice (Poland).\n\nThis year's theme\, "Reconstructing Justice in a Changing World\," encourages reflection on how law\, politics\, and social theory respond to contemporary crises\, conflicts\, technological transformations\, and shifting normative frameworks. We welcome submissions from early-career scholars working in legal theory\, political philosophy\, social and constitutional theory\, and related disciplines.\n\nThe CEE Forum is a long-standing international initiative that creates a space for rigorous discussion\, constructive feedback\, and academic networking across Central and Eastern Europe and beyond.\n\nSubmission Details\nAbstract length: up to 400 words\nDeadline for abstracts: 30 April 2026\nNotification of acceptance: 15 May 2026\nConference dates: 3-4 September 2026\nVenue: University of Silesia\, Katowice\, Poland\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Maciej Juzaszek: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260903T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260904T170000 SUMMARY:Bentham House Conference: Queering Private Law UID:20260615T125752Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London LOCATION:London\, United Kingdom DESCRIPTION:Registration is now open for the Bentham House: Queering Private Law Conference UCL Faculty of Laws\, September 3-4\, 2026.
\nThe conference will cover a wide range of private law topics\, including contracts\, torts\, property\, IP\, commercial\, trust\, children\, families\, conflict of laws\, and legal pedagogy.
\nKeynote Speakers: Darren Rosenblum (McGill)\, Sonia Katyal (UC Berkeley)\, and Nicholas Allen KC (Deputy High Court Judge\; 29 Bedford Row).
\nPlease register via this link:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/queering-private-law-conference-tickets-1988912899021
\nThe schedule is available here:https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/events/2026/sep/queering-private-law-conference
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260905T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260906T170000 SUMMARY:The Seven Cs UID:20260615T125753Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are proud to announce the very first meeting of the &ldquo\;Sailing the The Seven Cs&rdquo\; Conference!
The Seven Cs:
Chaff: Philosophy of the Body\, Medicine\, and Biology.
\nChuff: Philosophy of Emotions &\; Political Rage.
\nChud: Political Philosophy.
\nChad: Philosophy of Gender &\; Sexuality.
\nChopped: Philosophy of Fashion and Food.
\nChess: Philosophy of Games &\; Mathematics
\nChocolate: Philosophy of Economics &\; Global Exploitation
We are currently accepting abstracts on any of the above topics\, and while not preferred\, we also accept talks relating to Cartography\, broadly construed. Submissions must not exceed 1000 words\, and can be emailed to alec@philosophyforthedemos.com. Deadline of 08/15.
This is a real and light-hearted but philosophically rich conference. Website is currently under-construction.
Healthcare education and research continue to grapple with the limits of inherited epistemologies: frameworks that have long marginalised\, pathologised\, or erased trans\, gender-diverse\, and intersex lives. Scholarship on \;epistemic injustice \;(Hall 2017\; Wesp et al. 2019) and \;situated knowledges \;(Haraway 1988) shows how these exclusions are embedded in the very processes through which knowledge is produced and legitimised. Insights from gender/sex pluralism (Monro 2005\; 2019\; Preciado 2013) further highlight how institutional systems struggle to \;accommodate the complexity of lived identities \;within and beyond binary frameworks. Transformative inclusion within healthcare settings therefore requires more than updated curricula or revised clinical guidelines: it calls for new methodological imagination (see e.g. Pendleton &\; Pezaro 2025).
\nThis year&rsquo\;s TransCare conference invites \;scholars\, practitioners\, educators\, and community researchers \;to explore how \;creative\, interdisciplinary\, and humanities‑driven methodologies \;can reshape the production of knowledge in healthcare. Building on the 2024 edition&rsquo\;s focus on educational tools\, TransCare turns its attention to the research practices that make such tools possible. We ask how \;arts‑based\, participatory\, speculative\, and community‑led approaches \;can open pedagogical and methodological pathways that affirm gender diversity\, challenge normative assumptions\, and cultivate critical and trans‑affirming pedagogies and research.
\nTo do so\, we aim to foreground methodology not as a technical procedure but as a site where \;knowledge\, care\, and power intersect. Approaches that centre \;lived experience\, relationality\, and reflexivity \;can unsettle dominant epistemic frames and generate new possibilities for teaching and practice. Attending to the \;affective and embodied dimensions of research \;and care (Malatino 2020\; 2022) further highlights the need for methodologies that recognise and value ways of knowing and dealing with trans and intersex communities\, particularly in challenging social and political settings.
\nThe 2026 edition continues TransCare&rsquo\;s commitment to interdisciplinary exchange by emphasising methodology as a site of care\, ethics\, and transformation (Puig de la Bellacasa 2017). \;We welcome contributions that rethink how education and research are designed\, conducted\, interpreted\, and taught\, and that imagine new infrastructures for trans\, gender-diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare education.
\n\;
\nScope of Contributions
\nWe welcome contributions from across disciplines\, sectors\, and methodological traditions. Submissions may address\, but are \;not limited \;to\, the following areas:
\nWe particularly encourage submissions that experiment with form\, challenge disciplinary boundaries\, or propose new infrastructures for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education. However\, please do not be intimidated: \;all approaches and levels of experimentation are welcome.
\n\;
\nPublication Opportunity
\nWe are also collecting expressions of interest for a \;collected volume on creative\, interdisciplinary\, and humanities‑driven methodologies for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education.
\nIf you wish to be considered for inclusion in this edited collection\, \;please indicate this when submitting your abstract by ticking the box in the form. \;
List of References
\nHall\, K. Q. (2017). Queer epistemology and epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd\, J. Medina\, &\; G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.)\, \;The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice \;(pp. 158&ndash\;166). Routledge.
\nHaraway\, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. \;Feminist Studies\, 14(3)\, 575&ndash\;599.
\nMalatino\, H. (2020). \;Trans care. University of Minnesota Press.
Malatino\, H. (2022). \;Side affects: On being trans and feeling bad. University of Minnesota Press.
Monro\, S. (2005). \;Gender politics: Activism\, citizenship and sexual diversity. Pluto Press.
\nMonro\, S. (2019). Non-binary and genderqueer: An overview of the field. \;International Journal of Transgenderism\, 20(2&ndash\;3)\, 126&ndash\;131.
\nPendleton\, J.\, &\; Pezaro\, S. (2025). From midwife to lead perinatal practitioner: A utopian vision. \;Birth\, 52(3)\, 511&ndash\;516.
\nPreciado\, B. P. (2013). \;Testo Junkie: Sex\, drugs\, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era. The Feminist Press.
\nPuig de la Bellacasa\, M. (2017). \;Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n ORGANIZER;CN=Valeria Venditti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260911T100000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Dublin:20260912T170000 SUMMARY:TransCare 2nd Edition UID:20260615T125755Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Dublin LOCATION:Cork\, Ireland DESCRIPTION:Creative Practices for Trans\, Gender‑Diverse and Intersex Inclusive Healthcare Research and Education 11&ndash\;12 September 2026 | University College Cork
\nTransCare began in 2024 with funding from Research Ireland&rsquo\;s New Foundations scheme to discuss the needs and concerns of intersex\, trans and gender‑diverse people in health settings and envision gender‑affirmative education for healthcare professionals. \;The first edition was hosted in collaboration with \;Society for Women In Philosophy Ireland \;and marked the launch of PATHI\, the \;Professional Association for Trans Health Ireland\, which works to advance trans‑affirming\, evidence‑based healthcare and support practitioners across the island.
\nThanks to the \;Health Research Board&rsquo\;s CES Scheme 2025\, TransCare returns in 2026 with a renewed focus on creative and interdisciplinary methodologies for trans\, gender‑diverse\, and intersex&ndash\;inclusive healthcare research and education.
\nThe conference is organised by Dr Valeria Venditti (they/them\; she/her)\, College Lecturer in Healthcare at the School of Nursing and Midwifery\, University College Cork. The 2026 scientific committee includes people with lived experience\, Dr Valeria Venditti (College Lecturer in Healthcare Ethics)\, Mx Ryan \;Biskupović-Goulding \;(College Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing\, SONM\, UCC)\, and Dr Meg Ryan (Assistant Professor in Psychology and Director of the MSc in Global Mental Health\, Trinity College Dublin)
\nThe CFP is open!
ORGANIZER;CN=Valeria Venditti: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261006T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Prague:20261007T170000 SUMMARY:The Nature of Social Identities: Metaphysics\, Epistemology\, and Politics UID:20260615T125756Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Prague LOCATION:Arna Nováka 1\, Brno \, Czech Republic\, 60200 DESCRIPTION:The Department of Philosophy\, Faculty of Arts\, Masaryk University in Brno\, Czech Republic\, invites submissions for a conference on the metaphysical and epistemological foundations of social identities\, organised within the research project Identity Politics: Metaphysics and Epistemology.
\nConference Theme
\nIn recent decades\, political and social debates have increasingly focused on identity-based groups defined by characteristics such as race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, disability\, class\, religion\, or age. These developments have generated extensive discussion in political philosophy and social theory. However\, many of the metaphysical and epistemological assumptions underlying identity politics remain insufficiently examined.
\nThis conference aims to investigate the nature\, constitution\, and epistemic role of social identities. In particular\, we seek to explore the mechanisms through which identities emerge as robust social and political entities\, and the ways in which identity-related features&mdash\;such as lived experience\, self-identification\, social recognition\, and shared narratives&mdash\;contribute to their formation and persistence. \;
\nAnother central aim is to examine whether different identities (for example\, race\, gender\, sexual orientation\, or class) are constituted through similar or distinct metaphysical and epistemic mechanisms. Comparative approaches that analyse similarities and differences across identities are especially welcome. \;
\nThe conference will also address the epistemological aspects of social identities\, including questions concerning situated knowledge\, epistemic authority\, intersectionality\, and conflicts among different socially situated perspectives.
\nTopics
\nPossible topics include\, but are not limited to:
\nMetaphysics of Social and Political Identities
\nEpistemology of Social Identity
\nSubmissions from metaphysics\, epistemology\, social philosophy\, feminist philosophy\, philosophy of race\, and related areas are welcome.
\nKeynote speaker: Kristina Rolin (Tampere University)
\nSubmission Guidelines
\nPlease submit an anonymous abstract of 400&ndash\;500 words.
\nThe submission should be attached to the email in .pdf format and prepared for blind review. Please include the following information separately in the body of the email: your name(s)\, affiliation(s)\, contact information\, the title of your talk.
\nImportant Dates
\nConference Details
\nSubmission
\nPlease send submissions to: belohrad@phil.muni.cz
\nContact
\nFor inquiries\, please contact: Radim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. (belohrad@phil.muni.cz)
\nOrganizing committee
\nRadim Bělohrad\, Ph.D. \;
\nZdeňka Jastrzembská\;\, Ph.D. \;
\nMarek Picha\, Ph.D.
\nDagmar Pichová\;\, Ph.D.
ORGANIZER;CN=Radim Belohrad: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261031T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261031T090000 SUMMARY:Special Issue of Análisis Filosófico: “Oppressive Argumentation: Silencing and Oppressive Speech in Argumentation” UID:20260615T125757Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Call for Papers
\nSpecial Issue of Aná\;lisis Filosó\;fico: &ldquo\;Oppressive Argumentation: Silencing and Oppressive Speech in Argumentation&rdquo\;
\nThis special issue aims to collect original articles in Spanish and English devoted to the analysis of oppressive discourses within our argumentative practices\, with a particular emphasis on those commonly found in Latin American contexts. Informal logic\, epistemology\, and gender studies will serve as the central&mdash\;though not exclusive&mdash\;perspectives guiding this special issue.
\nWe may understand &ldquo\;oppressive discourse&rdquo\; as a speech act that harms a person or group\, whose consequences contribute to the perpetuation of their conditions of subordination. One way in which oppression manifests itself is by depriving such individuals or groups of credibility (and\, consequently\, of epistemic authority)\, thereby reproducing discriminatory forms of subordination. This (epistemic) form of oppression typically accounts for the silencing of certain marginalized groups. This special issue will place particular emphasis on analyzing these forms of oppression\, as well as the discursive and argumentative mechanisms that sustain them.
\nLanguage is a powerful force\, deeply intertwined with social practices and ways of life: harmful stereotypes about individuals or groups are forged and reinforced through discursive activities. Thus\, in order to prevent epistemic injustices\, it is necessary to intervene in the discursive domain of power by critically reflecting on its influence on credibility\, epistemic authority\, and the prejudices associated with epistemic agents\, as well as on the fallacies and argumentative errors committed by those who produce oppressive discourses. Informal logic\, epistemology\, and gender studies have much to contribute to this area\, and this issue seeks to highlight contributions from these philosophical fields by examining recurring forms of discussion and argumentation in cases and examples drawn from everyday life. As a final outcome\, this collection aims to show how philosophical argumentation can both help mitigate situations of epistemic injustice and contribute to identifying and dismantling harmful prejudices that promote discrimination.
\nSubmissions are invited on topics including\, but not limited to:
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Discursive silencing and epistemic exclusion in argumentative contexts
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Epistemic injustice in practices of debate and deliberation
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Epistemic authority in argumentation
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Fallacies and argumentative errors in oppressive discourses
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Relations between social power\, language\, and argumentation
\n● \; \; \; \; \; Philosophical analysis of oppressive speech in Latin American contexts
\nSubmissions must be made through the Aná\;lisis Filosó\;fico website (https://analisisfilosofico.org/index.php/af/about/submissions)\, following the author guidelines (https://analisisfilosofico.org/index.php/af/guia-autores). When submitting the manuscript\, authors should include a note in the &ldquo\;Comments for the Editor&rdquo\; field indicating that the submission is intended for this special issue. All submissions will undergo double-blind peer review by external referees. The deadline for submissions is October 31\, 2026. For inquiries\, please contact:pyrosuarezcaro@gmail.com.
\nThe guest editorial team is composed of Pyro Suarez (lead editor)\, Pamela Lastres (editorial supervisor)\, and Luz Muñ\;oz (editorial assistant)\, all members of the research project &ldquo\;Silencing and Discourses of Oppression in Peru: Intersections between Informal Logic\, Epistemology\, and Gender Studies&rdquo\; at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20261101T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20261101T234500 SUMMARY:The Relevance of Michel Foucault in the Face of Global Surveillance\, Post-Truth and New Forms of Governance UID:20260615T125758Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:Labyrinth: An International Journal of Philosophy\, Value Theory\, and Sociocultural Hermeneutics \;is preparing a special issue in honor of the 100th \;anniversary of Michel Foucault's birth. The publication aims to highlight the continued relevance of Foucault&rsquo\;s conception of power. His analyses of power are particularly pertinent in the present age because he describes power not only as domination of a person/group over other individuals or groups\, but also as extensive networks such as those involved in money laundering\, drug trafficking\, and the Epstein network\, to name but a few examples. Furthermore\, his theories on discipline\, surveillance\, and governmentality are essential for comprehending digital surveillance and the optimization of power and social control in today's world. Foucault also pointed out ways in which the subject can free itself from external influences and begin to "govern" itself. His revelations about the relationships between power and truth\, as well as power and knowledge\, are crucial in this regard.
\nScholars working in the field of Foucault's philosophy are invited to submit a \;brief abstract and bio-bibliographic information \;by \;April 30\, 2026. The bio-bibliographic information should include the following: name\, academic degree\, academic position\, academic affiliation\, and five to seven main publications.
\nAuthors with finished\, unpublished papers are welcome to submit them with an abstract. Final papers should be proofread and formatted according to the journal guidelines (i.e.\, print-ready) and submitted no later than \;November 1\, 2026.
\nAs a multilingual Journal \;Labyrinth \;accepts papers in English\, French\, and German.
\nFor more information about the journal policies and the submission guidelines please visit: \;https://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/AuthorGuidelines
\n\;All abstracts and papers should be sent to labyrinth[at]axiapublishers.com
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261106T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20261107T170000 SUMMARY:Social Categories of the Future UID:20260615T125759Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Los_Angeles LOCATION:1156 High Street\, Santa Cruz\, United States DESCRIPTION:Recent years have seen an explosion of work on social categories\, including gender\, race\, disability\, and sexual orientation. But little attention has been paid to what these and other categories might look like in the future. \;
\nFor example\, trans philosophy is just beginning to broach the topic of futuristic social categories\, while social metaphysics has just begun to investigate gender abolitionism (the view that gender categories should be abolished in a more just future.) Philosophers of AI have just begun thinking about how artificially intelligent entities will fit into human-constructed social structures\, or whether they will develop their own social hierarchies.
\nWe plan to bring together researchers from different approaches and viewpoints working on these and related topics. Topics for abstracts include\, but are not limited to:
\nThe existence and nonexistence of gender categories in the future\, and their level of grain
\nGender abolitionism
\nChanging notions of ability\, disability\, and health given new technologies and scientific breakthroughs
\nChanging notions of biological sex given advances in reproductive technology
\nRacial\, ethnic\, and religious categories of the future
\nAmeliorative construction and destruction of social categories \;
\nSocial categories and hierarchies of artificial intelligent agents
\nThis workshop is generously funded by the International Social Ontology Society and the Department of Philosophy at University of California\, Santa Cruz.
\nOrganizers: Sara Bernstein and Nico Orlandi
\nPlease send extended abstracts of no more than 1500 words to socialcategoriesofthefuture@gmail.com. Deadline: July 15\, 2026 (anywhere in the world).
\nSmall travel bursaries may be available for graduate students and precariously employed attendees. Please email the organizers to find out more.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20261113T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261115T170000 SUMMARY:Another Sense of Earth at the End of Worlds: Environmental Humanities in the Face of Crises UID:20260615T125800Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:1704 W Mulberry St\, Denton\, United States\, 76201 DESCRIPTION:Another Sense of Earth at the End of Worlds: Environmental Humanities in the Face of Crises
The Fourth Philosophy and Religion Graduate Student Conference \;
at the University of North Texas (UNT) \;
In a time of crises overshadowed by impressions of the precarity and contingency of the plurality of worlds we live in\, we invite interdisciplinary\, critical reflection on the meaning and stakes of our senses of world and ending. While totalizing narratives of crises oscillate between techno-optimistic visions of geoengineering and dystopic pessimism\, this conference seeks to contextualize dominant understandings of endings to envision new conceptions of time\, relations\, and finality beyond the hegemonic imaginaries.
For whom and what do the apocalyptic bells of the end of the world sound? What does it even mean to conceive of &ldquo\;our&rdquo\; world as ending? Who&rsquo\;s included and excluded from this sense of world? What does it mean for traditions in which the end of the world is inevitable\, cyclical\, or has already come to pass? What would this so-called &ldquo\;end of the world&rdquo\; even mean for people who&rsquo\;ve already endured innumerable ends to their ways of life?
Taking up the gauntlet thrown by Thomas Nail in Theory of the Earth\, we ask for submissions that problematize static\, dominant conceptions of world and think with him on what it means\, in the context of crises\, to imagine how &ldquo\;this stable ground is becoming increasingly unstable&mdash\;for some of us more than others.&rdquo\; In this spirit\, the conference seeks to engage with forms of thought that emphasize the radically plural character of sense-making\, ways of knowing\, and temporal existence. We welcome submissions that build upon these critical and marginalized perspectives to challenge assumptions of crisis and delimit what worlds are at stake. Within these broad thematic horizons\, we aim to bring together a diverse set of perspectives into dialogue and reconceptualize our relationship to planet Earth. \;
\n\nWe cordially invite graduate students from all fields and disciplines to submit their research and perspectives on the following themes:
\nIndigenous &\; non-Western conceptions of world-making\, cataclysm\, and/or time
\nFeminist/Queer theories on resistant subjectivities and spaces in the face of precarity
\nGeophilosophical approaches from traditions historically excluded from philosophy (ex. Sikhism\, Buddhism\, Hinduism\, etc.) \;
\nPhilosophies of science and normative theories that utilize a planetary approach \;
\nRelational ontologies\, specifically those with nonhuman and more-than-human beings
\nPhenomenological accounts of temporality\, &ldquo\;world collapse\,&rdquo\; and futurity
\nCritical theories on the &ldquo\;Anthropocene&rdquo\; and the role of capitalism in the ongoing environmental crisis
\nEcocritical perspectives on the role of technology and natural science in organizing our sense of the Earth
\nConference Details
\nThe conference will be held in-person at the University of North Texas\, Denton\, TX\, from November 13th-15th. This conference does not require registration fees. \;\nThe conference will feature Thomas Nail\, a Distinguished Scholar and Professor of Philosophy at the University of Denver\, as the keynote speaker\, whose materialist interventions in conceptions of earth and planet\, particularly in Theory of the Earth\, pose deep and transformational reflections on imaginaries of time\, space\, and world for our context of apocalypse and crisis.\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20261119T090000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261121T170000 SUMMARY:Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy Annual Conference UID:20260615T125801Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile\, 633 N St Clair St\, Chicago\, IL\, United States ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261203T090000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20261204T170000 SUMMARY:"On Trial". Claiming Feminist Justice in Dark Times - Between Law\, Testimony\, and Politics UID:20260615T125802Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/Rome LOCATION:Via San Francesco 22\, Verona\, Italy DESCRIPTION:The conference\, organized by the Arendt \;Center \;as part of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Project &ldquo\;Rewriting Rights&rdquo\; &ndash\; \;explores the double sense in which feminist justice is \;&ldquo\;on trial&rdquo\; \;today &mdash\; in courtrooms\, where the performance and performativity of legal proceedings expose the structural limits of institutional justice\, and in culture\, where dominant narratives continue to normalize gendered violence. The conference aims to brings feminist philosophy and critical theory into dialogue with socio-legal perspectives to ask what more transformative forms of justice might look like.
\nKeynote speakers:
\nThe conference will also include a workshop on Women&rsquo\;s Courts and Tribunals on Crimes against Women.
\n\n ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270104T234500 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270104T234500 SUMMARY:Feminist Accountability and Transformative Justice - Special Issue of Feminist Philosophy Quarterly UID:20260615T125803Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:We are irrevocably implicated in the systems of oppression we seek to dismantle\, and the effects of those systems live with us and within us. Accountability&mdash\;understood as taking responsibility for our contributions to and complicity in systemic harms&mdash\;offers a framework for practicing feminist solidarity\, building community\, and supporting both individual and collective healing. This special issue explores feminist accountability as a practice that moves beyond punishment and retribution toward transformative justice as an ethical and political project. We are especially interested in work that engages the tensions\, limits\, and possibilities of accountability: not only as an ethical ideal\, but as a lived\, contested\, and situated practice across interpersonal\, institutional\, and structural contexts. We invite submissions that examine how accountability is practiced today and how it intersects with broader frameworks of transformative justice. What does it mean to take responsibility for harm within feminist communities? How might accountability reshape our understandings of power\, complicity\, and solidarity? What challenges arise when transformative justice frameworks&mdash\;often developed in grassroots and activist contexts&mdash\;are brought into academic spaces? In keeping with Feminist Philosophy Quarterly&rsquo\;s commitment to inclusive\, intersectional\, and community-engaged feminist philosophy\, we especially encourage submissions that engage and build upon the work of scholars from historically marginalized communities and those most affected by the forms of harm under discussion. Submissions may address\, but are not limited to:
\n
-Feminist accountability as a practice: its limits\, tensions\, and conditions of possibility
-Accountability beyond carceral logics: abolitionist and transformative approaches to harm
-Transformative justice as ethical and political praxis
-Responsibility\, complicity\, and refusal in conditions of structural injustice
-Practices of repair\, restitution\, and non-reconciliation
-Community-based responses to harm: care\, conflict\, and collective healing
-Navigating accountability in a context of backlash and reaction
-The misuse of accountability practices and procedures
-Accountability within feminist movements: power\, exclusion\, and internal critique
-Pedagogies of accountability: teaching\, learning\, and institutional responsibility
-The politics of &ldquo\;calling in\,&rdquo\; &ldquo\;calling out\,&rdquo\; and other modes of response
-Citation as accountability: feminist lineage-building and epistemic responsibility
-Coalition-building and solidarity across asymmetries of power
-Mutual aid\, abolition feminism\, disability justice\, and transformative justice
-Intersections of restorative and transformative justice frameworks
-Feminist responses to interpersonal\, gendered\, and sexual violence
-Feminist responses to state violence\, war\, and genocide
-The ethics and politics of care within transformative justice practices
\;
Submission Details:
Deadline: January 4\, 2027
Length: Up to 9\,000 words (including notes\, excluding references)
Review Process: Double-anonymous peer review
\nFile Format: PDF or Word (DOC/DOCX/RTF)
\n
Submissions should be prepared for anonymous review\, with all identifying information removed from the manuscript. Authors should submit two separate files: An anonymized manuscript &\; a title page including the paper title\, author name(s)\, institutional affiliation(s)\, and contact information.
Submissions should be sent to the following email address: femacctj (at) gmail.com
Submissions must follow the Chicago Manual of Style (author&ndash\;date system).
For full author guidelines\, please see: https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/information/authors
The special issue is planned for publication in late 2027/early 2028 in the journal Feminist Philosophy Quarterly.
For any questions on this special issue\, please contact the guest editors: Fulden İbrahimhakkıoğlu (fulden@metu.edu.tr) and Amy Marvin (amarvin@hamilton.edu).
Democracy claims to struggle about public affairs through the power of language. Already in Plato&rsquo\;s Republic\, political discourse takes two forms: as dialectical discourse\, it draws on the power of logos\; as narrative discourse\, it draws on the power of mythos. While the former relies on proofs\, deductions\, and discursive necessities\, the latter follows a logic of disclosure. The aim here is to make phenomena visible\, to open up horizons\, and to imagine alternatives. Myth tells stories\, reveals perspectives\, and highlights connections\, thereby bringing things into view in new ways.
\nWhile political philosophy and theory have long focused on the power of discursive speech\, in recent years there has been a growing interest in narrative forms of speech and aesthetic-performative political practices. Of particular significance here is the motif of prefiguration as a practice of enacting political alternatives and future forms of coexistence in the here and now. Political narration and prefiguration are currently being discussed within various traditions\, ranging from political phenomenology to critical theory and post-fundamentalism\, and extending into analytical epistemology.
\nThe workshop focuses on the power of disclosure in thought and action in order to explore their potential for a reimagining of democratic debate and political protest. Especially in times when discursive speech in the public sphere is coming under increasing pressure\, a return to the aesthetic\, narrative\, and performative aspects of the political is crucial.
\nExemplarily\, four traditions can be distinguished in which the power of narrative discourse and the demonstrative aspect of political practice are currently the subject of increased discussion:
\n(1) Political Phenomenology: Hannah Arendt can today be regarded as a founding figure of political phenomenology. Through her reflections on democratic debate under conditions of plurality\, she has brought storytelling into the spotlight as a means of engagement. Storytelling conveys perspectives and attitudes that defy purely theoretical analysis. Central to this is the reference to Kant&rsquo\;s conception of aesthetic judgment\, understood as the ability to identify exemplary points of view for evaluation in the absence of ultimate reasons and to solicit agreement with them. Crucial here is the power of the imagination\, which brings to mind divergent viewpoints and alternatives to the status quo. The potential of such disclosure for democratic debate under conditions of plurality has been systematically explored\, above all\, in recent political phenomenology (Loidolt 2017\, Herrmann 2023\, Bedorf 2025).
\n(2) Critical Theory: The founding text of Critical Theory\, Horkheimer and Adorno&rsquo\;s Dialectic of Enlightenment\, breaks radically with the tradition of the systematic treatise. Its specific narrative style&mdash\;often fragmentary\, aphoristic\, and mimetic&mdash\;is not merely a stylistic device but is regarded as a methodological necessity: In order to break through the context of delusion created by instrumental reason\, thought itself must take on a form that not only states but\, above all\, shows. The aesthetic rationality of argumentation preserves the non-identical from the grasp of analytical identity logic through an aesthetic-critical mode of writing. The representation itself thus becomes a site of resistance that prevents the ossification of thought into mere definitions and gives voice to the unresolved nature of experience. This return to the performative power of philosophical writing has once again come into focus in recent Critical Theory (Wesche 2018\, Freyenhagen 2025\, Saar 2025). Furthermore\, Adorno&mdash\;in contrast to a reading that focuses on the notorious &ldquo\;ban on images&rdquo\;&mdash\;has recently been rediscovered as a pioneer of a prefigurative form of political action (Sö\;rensen 2022).
\n(3) Post-foundationalism: Post-foundational theories emphasize that the political space of justification is permeated by power\, affect\, and desire. Practices of justification are closely linked to the establishment of orders that determine the rules of the game governing what can be said in a democracy (Marchart 2010). Against the backdrop of the classical dispute between philosophy and rhetoric\, post-foundationalism understands itself as a project of radical enlightenment that focuses on the complex intertwining of justifications\, power\, and authority (Kompridis 2006). In this vein\, postf-foundationalism conceives of the rhetorical nature inherent in all speech not as a moment of pretense\, but as a necessary moment for bringing reasons and justifications to light (Gebh/Seitz 2024). In this context\, post-foundationalist thinkers such as Laclau and Mouffe emphasize the importance of the narrative in processes of hegemony formation and point to the rhetorical (metaphorical and metonymic) dynamics involved in the formation of political identities.
\n(4) Analytic Epistemology: The motif of disclosure is also found in contemporary analytic philosophy. \;In her work on perspectives\, Elizabeth Camp (2017) has argued that our thinking is often structured by complex cognitive frames that cannot simply be broken down into isolated sentences and propositions. Perspectives instruct us to perceive certain aspects of a situation as central and others as peripheral. Rachel Fraser (2021) also makes clear that we must understand narratives as more complex units of knowledge. They are the templates through which we first assemble individual facts into a coherent worldview. Thus\, disclosure becomes a central mechanism for how we\, as knowing subjects\, orient ourselves in a complex world.
\nFor many of the thinkers mentioned\, the disclosing moment they focus on theoretically is also reflected in their writing. The traditions gathered here can therefore themselves be examined for their narrative and disclosing dimensions. Accordingly\, one may ask what can be learned from the respective form of representation for political discourse or practice. Can the specific logics of philosophical narration be put to fruitful use in the practices of political protest? Conversely\, what can philosophy learn from those narrative and prefigurative practices that attempt to point out alternatives and new perspectives in the heat of political struggle? What relationships and transitions exist between disclosing thought and disclosing action? Can &ldquo\;disclosing action&rdquo\; create spaces for understanding where &ldquo\;proving&rdquo\; and insisting on facts fail?
\nModalities and Deadlines
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Workshop format: Productive\, constructive discussion and critique of papers (work in progress is expressly encouraged) that are submitted in advance and read by all participants.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Language of discussion: German. Papers may be submitted in German or English.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submission of an abstract (approx. 300 words) by July 31\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Notification of acceptance by August 15\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submission of the workshop paper by December 13\, 2026.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; Submissions to: steffen.herrmann@fernuni-hagen.deand sergej.seitz@univie.ac.at
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; We are planning to publish the contributions as part of a special issue in a relevant journal.
\n·\; \; \; \; \; \; We aim to cover travel and accommodation costs\, but this cannot be guaranteed at this time.
\nConcept and organization:
\nSteffen Herrmann (FernUniversitä\;t Hagen)
\nSergej Seitz (University of Vienna\, ERC Advanced Grant &ldquo\;Prefiguring Democratic Futures&rdquo\;)
ORGANIZER;CN=Sergej Seitz;CN=Steffen K. Herrmann: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20270409T230000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20270409T230000 SUMMARY:Call for Papers: Hypatia Special Issue ‘Gender and Nation’ UID:20260615T125805Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:Europe/London DESCRIPTION:'Gender and Nation' Special Issue of \;Hypatia \;(43.3)\, Summer 2028
\nAcross the globe\, nationalist projects are being renewed and intensified\, mobilizing &ldquo\;gender&rdquo\; as a central site of social and political struggle. From anti-gender movements and border regimes to racialized citizenship policies and digital surveillance\, contemporary nationalisms draw on gender and related intersectional structures to organize political belonging\, govern populations\, and delineate whose lives are recognized as part of &ldquo\;the nation.&rdquo\; These developments lend a particular urgency to examining the philosophical stakes of the relationship between &ldquo\;gender&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;nation&rdquo\; today.
\nThis special issue of \;Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy \;invites philosophical engagements of the topic of &ldquo\;Gender and Nation.&rdquo\; We seek contributions that interrogate how nations are imagined\, experienced\, constituted\, and governed through gendered logics that shape various forms of exclusion\, political subjectivity\, citizenship\, and national belonging. While broadly soliciting contributions that (re)consider &ldquo\;the nation&rdquo\; alongside &ldquo\;gender\,&rdquo\; we also wish to mark the 30th \;anniversary of Nira Yuval-Davis&rsquo\; influential book\, \;Gender and Nation. \;Yuval-Davis&rsquo\; work has been foundational for studies on gender and nationalisms\, and has inspired countless feminist analyses of the idea and lived experience of &ldquo\;the nation.&rdquo\; In the 30 years since the book&rsquo\;s publication\, the world has changed in unimaginable ways\, with the last decade\, in particular\, witnessing a resurgence in nationalist fervour that forms part of a global shift to the right. An assessment of and reengagement with &ldquo\;gender and nation&rdquo\; is therefore not only apt\, but arguably more pressing than ever\, given that such nationalist resurgence has deployed gendered dynamics that are deeply troubling from a feminist perspective.
\nQuestioning whether the idea and attendant realisation of &ldquo\;the nation&rdquo\; can ever be straightforwardly adopted by feminists\, this special issue also provides an opportunity to highlight past and present feminist resistance to misogyny and sexist policymaking underlying patriarchal nation-building projects. Indeed\, there are numerous examples of feminist activism and scholarship challenging nationalism\, but also reconfiguring and claiming &ldquo\;the nation&rdquo\; and &ldquo\;nationalism&rdquo\; in progressive terms. Building on the by now large and influential feminist literature on nationalisms\, of which \;Gender and Nation \;is a stalwart\, we invite contributors to take stock of work on &ldquo\;the nation&rdquo\;\, and to present new and promising ways of thinking about the theme of \;gender and nation. To this end\, articles might address\, without being limited to\, the following questions:
\nContributors working in and across various relevant disciplines (e.g. philosophy\, gender studies\, sociology\, literature\, politics\, and disability studies) are invited to address these questions philosophically\, and to do so drawing on a range of theoretical frameworks (such as critical race theory\, crip theory\, queer theory\, and postcolonial theory). We welcome contributions from diverse social\, cultural\, and geographical contexts\, including those approaching &ldquo\;gender and nation&rdquo\; through decolonial\, Indigenous\, queer of colour\, trans\, and Black feminist frameworks.
\nSubmissions must be written in English and prepared for anonymous review. We will accept both traditional article submissions (up to 10\,000 words long\, excluding footnotes and references) and musings (4\,000 words including footnotes\, but not references). Musings are not merely short research articles\; they are often more personal and/or more concerned with current issues than full-fledged academic articles\, and they are typically less rooted in particular bodies of literature. However they are approached\, Musings should seek to catalyse philosophical reflection on important issues in feminist philosophy. (For examples\, please see the recently published Musings on our \;FirstView \;pages.) We encourage submissions to be written in a style accessible across relevant disciplines\, and with an eye to understanding concrete social and political phenomena. \;
\nDeadline for submission: \;9th \;April 2027
\nPlease submit your original manuscript electronically through the Cambridge University Press online submission and review system \;ScholarOne. Manuscripts need to be prepared for anonymous review. More information may be found in the \;Manuscript Preparations Guidelines.
\nFor any questions on this special issue\, contact the guest editors: Clara Fischer (C.Fischer@qub.ac.uk) and Fulden İbrahimhakkıoğlu (fulden@metu.edu.tr). \;
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTAMP:20260613T194536Z DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:29990101T033000 DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:29990201T120000 SUMMARY:POSTPONED - Creativity and Improvisation in Thought\, Practice\, and Mind: An Interdisciplinary Conference UID:20260615T125806Z-iCalPlugin-Grails@philevents-web-bd7db559-gt5qm TZID:America/Chicago LOCATION:6001 Dodge Street\, Omaha\, United States\, 68182 DESCRIPTION:*Please note that this event has officially been postponed. More information will be made available asap in the near future*
\nMany human cognitive capacities and processes may be deployed creatively\, from unique choices made for oneself up through novel cultural shifts. Similarly\, large swaths of our daily lives are taken up with performing spontaneous\, on-the-fly\, and unplanned activities that are\, in a word\, improvised. \; Charting out the nature of both creativity and improvisation\, taken individually or together\, remains an open and pressing issue. In this conference\, we will delve into various philosophical\, theoretical\, empirical\, and interdisciplinary issues that are related to creativity and improvisation. A non-exhaustive list of related questions and themes for this topic include:
\n- What is the relationship between improvisation and creativity?
\n- What is the relationship between creative activity and well-being?
\n- What is the best way to model individual and collective creativity?
\n- Is creativity in the arts the same thing as in other domains\, such as in science or business?
\n- What are the pros and cons of different scientific operationalizations of creativity and improvisation?
\n- Provide a conceptual analysis of creativity and/or improvisation.
ORGANIZER: METHOD:PUBLISH END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR