CFP: MANCEPT Workshops 2023: Courts and Politics

Submission deadline: June 20, 2023

Conference date(s):
September 11, 2023 - September 13, 2023

Go to the conference's page

This event is online

Topic areas

Details

Courts and Politics 

According to the conventional narrative, courts play an essential role in democratic politics. Relied upon to uphold the rule of law, in particular by mediating disputes between individuals, overseeing the separation of powers between the three branches of government, and protecting individuals’ rights and liberties, courts ideally arbitrate social and political conflicts fairly and without bias, ideology, or partisanship.

Over the past decade, however, these ideas have been increasingly called into question by critics pointing to the essentially political – and indeed partial – role of courts in democratic and liberal regimes. Judges, the argument runs, are political actors, themselves standardly appointed by political actors to advance certain political agendas; political actors who have their own political agendas and who are regularly confronted with political questions that they answer pursuant to their own political philosophies. This, many argue, need not be inherently problematic, but constitutes an apt sociopolitical description of fact.

What, then, is the exact role of courts in democratic or liberal regimes? Do courts preempt democracy and democratic change? What should the relationship between judicial action and democratic self-rule be? What legitimizes the rulings of a court? Is judicial impartiality possible (and desirable)? What principles should orient departures from legal precedents? How should judges be appointed? Should the authority of courts be constrained?  What powers should Supreme Courts be able to exercise? Is judicial review democratic? What principles should guide the interpretation of the constitution and infraconstitutional law by judges? Can “judicial activism” be justified? Are various forms of court reform (e.g., “court-packing”, “jurisdiction stripping”, term limits, supermajority consensus, etc.) viable answers to the challenges that both the court system and constitutionalism face today? 

This workshop aims to bring together lawyers, philosophers, and political theorists interested in normative and historical debates on these and related questions.

Please send abstracts of no more than 500 words to [email protected] by June 20th.

Convenors: Ryan D. Doerfler and Eraldo Souza dos Santos

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)