CFP: Function and Dysfunction: Revising, Expanding, and Questioning Two Core Concepts in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Submission deadline: May 25, 2025
Topic areas
Details
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
SPECIAL ISSUE - MEFISTO
Function and Dysfunction: Revising, Expanding, and Questioning Two Core Concepts in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences Special issue to appear in Mefisto – Journal of Medicine, Philosophy, and History. Guest editors:
M. Cristina Amoretti – University of Genova – [email protected] Claudio Davini – University of Bologna – [email protected] Rebecca/Riccardo Cuciniello – University of Pavia – [email protected] Overview: We invite researchers working in the philosophy of the life sciences, broadly construed, to submit abstracts for an upcoming special issue of Mefisto – Journal of Medicine, Philosophy, and History, focusing on the concepts of function and dysfunction. From medicine and psychiatry to evolutionary biology and cognitive science, the notions of function and dysfunction play a crucial role in scientific explanation. However, these concepts remain theoretically contested, methodologically complex, and normatively loaded. Traditional approaches – such as aetiological, causal-role, fitness-based, and goal-contribution accounts – have provided powerful frameworks, yet contemporary scientific and philosophical inquiry raises pressing questions that challenge their adequacy. How should we define function and dysfunction in light of emerging fields such as synthetic biology, systems medicine, and neuroscience? Do contemporary technological and conceptual advances necessitate new functional frameworks (e.g. generalised selected-effects, biological autonomy)? How do different scientific disciplines negotiate the boundary between function and dysfunction, and what are the epistemic, ontological, and normative implications of these negotiations? This special issue aims to rethink and critically assess these foundational concepts, fostering dialogue between philosophy, the life sciences, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Early career scholars are especially encouraged to submit! Theme and Topics of Interest: We welcome submissions that engage with function and dysfunction from philosophical, historical, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to): 1. Conceptual and Theoretical Challenges
SPECIAL ISSUE - MEFISTO
Function and Dysfunction: Revising, Expanding, and Questioning Two Core Concepts in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences Special issue to appear in Mefisto – Journal of Medicine, Philosophy, and History. Guest editors:
M. Cristina Amoretti – University of Genova – [email protected] Claudio Davini – University of Bologna – [email protected] Rebecca/Riccardo Cuciniello – University of Pavia – [email protected] Overview: We invite researchers working in the philosophy of the life sciences, broadly construed, to submit abstracts for an upcoming special issue of Mefisto – Journal of Medicine, Philosophy, and History, focusing on the concepts of function and dysfunction. From medicine and psychiatry to evolutionary biology and cognitive science, the notions of function and dysfunction play a crucial role in scientific explanation. However, these concepts remain theoretically contested, methodologically complex, and normatively loaded. Traditional approaches – such as aetiological, causal-role, fitness-based, and goal-contribution accounts – have provided powerful frameworks, yet contemporary scientific and philosophical inquiry raises pressing questions that challenge their adequacy. How should we define function and dysfunction in light of emerging fields such as synthetic biology, systems medicine, and neuroscience? Do contemporary technological and conceptual advances necessitate new functional frameworks (e.g. generalised selected-effects, biological autonomy)? How do different scientific disciplines negotiate the boundary between function and dysfunction, and what are the epistemic, ontological, and normative implications of these negotiations? This special issue aims to rethink and critically assess these foundational concepts, fostering dialogue between philosophy, the life sciences, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Early career scholars are especially encouraged to submit! Theme and Topics of Interest: We welcome submissions that engage with function and dysfunction from philosophical, historical, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to): 1. Conceptual and Theoretical Challenges
- Are traditional accounts of function and dysfunction sufficient for contemporary scientific and philosophical inquiry?
- What are the epistemic and normative challenges in applying these concepts across different domains (e.g., biology, medicine, psychiatry)?
- Are dysfunctions mere failures to meet functional roles, or do they expose deeper ontological or methodological gaps?
- How do the recent trends in evolutionary biology (e.g. dynamical system theory, niche construction theory, evo-devo, the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis) shape our understanding of biological functions?
- How do selection-based and current utility-based accounts interact in functional explanations?
- What is the role of adaptation and fitness in defining function across different biological contexts?
- How can we define cross-generational and ecological functions?
- To what extent does biological form determine function?
- Are functions constrained by structural properties, or can they shift independently of form?
- How do mechanistic explanations intersect with functional attributions in biology and medicine?
- How do diverse medical fields negotiate the boundary between function and dysfunction?
- Are function and dysfunction value-free concepts? If not, what normative commitments are embedded in their definitions? Should these be revised?
- How do these concepts inform debates on health, disease, and mental disorders?
- How do different models of function and dysfunction shape our understanding of disability and neurodiversity?
- What role do historical, cultural, and social contexts play in defining function and dysfunction?