Laura Gradowski - Datasets and dead assets: The missing archives of science
Laura Gradowski (University of Pittsburgh)

February 6, 2026, 12:00pm - 1:00pm
The Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

1117 Cathedral of Learning - 11th Floor
University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh 15260
United States

This will be an accessible event, including organized related activities

This event is available both online and in-person

Organisers:

University of Pittsburgh

Details

The Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh invites you to join us for our Lunch Time Talk. Attend in person at 1117 Cathedral of Learning or visit our live stream on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg.

Lunch Time Talk:   Laura Gradowski

Friday, February 6 @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST

Title: Datasets and dead assets: The missing archives of science

Abstract:

According to lore, the Library of Alexandria was created to compile every manuscript its librarians could get their hands on. Science is not like that. It is a system of filters that limits what is acceptable and accessible. Science communicators have increasingly understood it to be their responsibility to guide science consumers towards trust in prevailing views by promulgating authoritative datasets that restrict what can be considered reasonable questions and disagreements. Databases, journals, conferences, and institutions keep gates narrow. Science aims for consensus, and pillories anything that isn’t deemed mainstream. But mainstream science includes many well-known biases, and is also prone to flawed or dubious practices. For example, recent work suggests data from clinical trials published in top journals is regularly flawed or faked. While the call for consensus is variously justified—for instance, on the basis of concern for public health—these arguments often underestimate the value of dissenting views and reflect the impact of political polarization. Yet efforts to create consensus archives continue. This talk presents a counterpoint. We have much to gain from an Alexandrian approach that emphasizes inclusion. We could create archives of science that reflect the full spectrum of views, including unpopular views, views of nonprofessionals and outsiders. What would such an archive look like? How would it work? These are the kinds of questions we should be asking. Here I motivate the Alexandrian approach and offer suggestions about its implementation.

This talk will be available online:

Zoom:   https://pitt.zoom.us/j/91084235286


YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrRp47ZMXD7NXO3a9Gyh2sg

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)

Reminders

Registration

No

Who is attending?

No one has said they will attend yet.

Will you attend this event?


Let us know so we can notify you of any change of plan.