Epistemic Injustice and AI

AI systems now play a role in many practices through which people are heard, interpreted, assessed, and trusted. This raises questions that are not just ethical or political, but also epistemic in nature: whose testimony is treated as credible, whose experiences are made intelligible, and who is able to participate in shared practices of knowledge production? The workshop focuses on these questions by bringing work on epistemic injustice into conversation with current debates about AI, including debates about algorithmic bias, transparency, linguistic exclusion, trust, institutional decision-making, and the distribution of epistemic authority. We welcome contributions on the philosophical, ethical, social, and political dimensions of epistemic injustice and AI.