Stephen Yablo (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

August 11, 2016, 4:15pm - 6:15pm
Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne

G16 (Jim Potter Room)
Old Physics Building
Melbourne 3010



Proportionality does a lot of work in philosophy. Causes should be proportional to their effects. Reasons should be proportional to what they rationalize. An  argument's premises should ideally be proportional (wholly relevant) to its conclusion. Truthmakers are ideally 'discerning' (Armstrong).

But what is it for X to be proportional to Y? The usual story is that to be proportional is to be minimally sufficient; nothing less would have done. This can't be right. Minimally sufficient conditions often do not exist, and we do not always insist on them when they do exist. What then is proportionality?

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)




Who is attending?

No one has said they will attend yet.

Will you attend this event?

Let us know so we can notify you of any change of plan.