Value-Reflecting Reasons and the Reliability of Testimonial Belief

Sanford Goldberg (Northwestern University)

Abstract:

Several recent authors speak of social norms in connection with the production and consumption of testimony. It has been argued that the prevalence of such norms can affect the reliability of testimonial transactions, by enhancing both the reliablity of speakers’ testimony and the reliability of the audience’s discrimination of reliable testimony. In this paper I want to highlight one particular kind of pressure that is generated by the values in play in our testimonial exchanges. While many in the ethics literature have appreciated the presence of these values and their relevance to testimonial exchanges, their accounts are inconsistent with a plausible theory of the epistemology of testimony. I aim to sketch an account that does better.

About this series:

The Zeno Lectures at Utrecht Philosophy provide a welcoming forum for philosophers and anyone interested in philosophy alike to hear high quality talks and to engage in philosophical discussion. Lectures are held at regular Thursday afternoons in Utrecht’s historic city center. Refreshments are provided.

Attendance is free and all are welcome, especially students.