Killing and Rescuing: The Case for Revising NecessityKieran Oberman (University of Edinburgh)
Jim Potter Room, Old Physics
The University of Melbourne
Defensive killing is subject to a necessity condition. One cannot justify killing on defence grounds if killing is unnecessary. But when is killing unnecessary? The standard view is that killing someone to save others from a threat can only be rendered unnecessary by an alternative that rescues the same people from the same threat. This article defends a revisionary view of necessity according to which killing can sometimes be rendered unnecessary by an alternative that rescues the same people from a different threat or different people from a different threat. The revisionary view has radical implications for the real world. In a world with so much poverty and disease, there are many opportunities for peaceful rescue. If the revisionary view is correct, defensive killing is much harder to justify than previously assumed.
Who is attending?
No one has said they will attend yet.
Will you attend this event?