Heidegger vs. Kuhn: Does Science Think?
Aaron James Wendland (Oxford University)

October 3, 2018, 10:30am - 12:00pm
University of Western Ontario

P&AB 117
Philosophy Dept, University of Western Ontario
London
Canada

Organisers:

University of Western Ontario

Topic areas

Details

In What is Called Thinking?, Heidegger provocatively says that: “Science does not think”. Unfortunately, Heidegger does very little to explain this bold claim, or explicitly articulate what he sees as the unthinking aspects of science. With that said, I elucidate Heidegger’s controversial assertion by aligning Heidegger’s distinction between Gestell and Gelassenheit with Kuhn’s distinction between normal and revolutionary science. Briefly, the idea is that the puzzle-solving of normal science, much like the calculative activity that orders modern technology (Gestell), fails to ask what it means for scientific entities to be. However, the paradigm-testing of revolutionary science represents a releasement (Gelassenheit) from the practices and presuppositions of normal science such that it is able to ask about the being of scientific entities. In short, revolutionary science thinks about the being of entities in a way that normal science does not.

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)

Reminders

Registration

No

Who is attending?

1 person is attending:

(unaffiliated)

See all

Will you attend this event?


Let us know so we can notify you of any change of plan.

Custom tags:

#westernphilosophy