An Uncommon Attitude Towards Legislative Intentions
David Tan (Deakin University)

Tomorrow, 4:00pm - 5:30pm
PHI research group, Deakin University

C2.05 Burwood Campus. ic2.108 Waurn Ponds. *VMP 522 39354
221 Burwood Highway
Burwood 3125
Australia

Organisers:

Deakin University

Topic areas

Details

Legal philosophers have recently started using collective intentions (specifically of the type List calls common attitudes) to conceptualise the notion of legislative intentions. This is a crucial part of debates in statutory and constitutional interpretation. In the 90s, social choice theory (i.e. aggregative methods) was used to justify the existence of legislative intentions. However, this approach has fallen out of favour and Richard Ekins has influentially argued that we must rely on collective intentionality and not mere aggregation. 

This paper argues against Ekins’ position. Firstly, Ekins posits that aggregative methods are unsustainable due to mathematical problems. However, I argue that collective intentionality requires aggregation as well. Secondly, collective legislative intentions do a bad job at explaining how legislatures communicate through statutes. The kind of activities that collective intentions are traditionally used to explain are not present in the legislative context. Thirdly, I address Ekins’ claim that legislative intentions based on mere aggregation would have no legislative authority.

David Tan is a Lecturer in Deakin Law School and specialises in analytic legal philosophy. His main research areas are in linguistic approaches to legal interpretation and constitutional theory

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)

Reminders

Registration

No

Who is attending?

No one has said they will attend yet.

Will you attend this event?


Let us know so we can notify you of any change of plan.