Who's on First?
Daniel Wodak (Virginia Tech)

July 26, 2018, 4:15pm - 5:15pm
School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne, The University of Melbourne

Jim Potter Room, Old Physics
University of Melbourne
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Topic areas


According to 'X-Firsters', there's some essential feature that all normative properties and relations have in common in virtue of which they're normative. Much has been said about the debate between X-Firsters: proponents of Reasons-First, Value-First, and Fittingness-First disagree about what the best candidate for that essential feature is. But surprisingly little has been said about whether or why one should be an X-Firster about normativity. My goals are two-fold. First, I argue that one shouldn't be an X-Firster about normativity because X-First views are implausible for plenty of domains that are analogous to normativity (e.g., descriptive properties and relations need not have any essential feature in common). Second, I develop a natural alternative view that illustrates how rejecting X-First views makes available a range of interesting, plausible options in metaethics. 

Supporting material

Add supporting material (slides, programs, etc.)




Who is attending?

No one has said they will attend yet.

Will you attend this event?

Let us know so we can notify you of any change of plan.