Conversational Maxims as Social Norms

Megan Henricks Stotts (McMaster University)

I argue that although Paul Grice’s (1989) picture of conversational maxims and conversational implicature is an immensely useful theoretical tool, his view about the nature of the maxims is misguided.  Grice portrays conversational maxims as tenets of rationality, but I will contend that they are best seen as social norms.  I develop this proposal in connection to Philip Pettit’s (1990) account of social norms, with the result that conversational maxims are seen as grounded in practices of social approval and disapproval within a given group.  This shift to seeing conversational maxims as social norms has several advantages.  First, it allows us to neatly accommodate possible variation with respect to the maxims across well-functioning linguistic groups.  Second, it facilitates a more psychologically plausible account of flouting.  And third, it generates interesting insights about the nature of social norms themselves.  

Time: Feb 12, 2021 03:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)  

Join Zoom Meeting

https://westernuniversity.zoom.us/j/94281582190?pwd=dEc3eWd6S0pXclRLS21mZDFkek1zUT09  

Meeting ID: 942 8158 2190

Passcode: philosophy

One tap mobile +16475580588,,94281582190#,,,,*5430535159# Canada  

Dial by your location        

+1 647 558 0588 Canada

Meeting ID: 942 8158 2190

Passcode: 5430535159

Find your local number: https://westernuniversity.zoom.us/u/at8naalHd  

Join by SIP [email protected]  

Join by H.323 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 69.174.57.160 (Canada)

Meeting ID: 942 8158 2190

Passcode: 5430535159